Also fix up some return values and stuff to use bool (or void if
nothing). I just did it whilst I was here.
According to jilles, the return value used to signify whether or not the
client had exited. This was error-prone and was fixed a long, long time
ago, but the return value was left int for historical reasons.
Since the return type is not used (and has no clear use case anyway),
it's safe to just get rid of it.
s_assert requires some higher-level functionality that shouldn't be
present in ircd_defs.h. ircd_defs.h is used by ssld, which has no notion
of logging or sending IRC messages. Additionally, some of the headers
s_assert depends on result in conflicting definitions in ssld.c.
This change also fixes the compile when using --enable-assert=soft.
While what chanroles are trying to accomplish is a good idea, it is
apparently unclear this is the proper way to do it. Until we figure out
the exact way we wish to do this, it should be reverted for now.
The theory behind this is that services sends an ENCAP * GRANT #channel
UID :+flagspec message specifying the chanroles the user has. They are
mapped into flag bits and applied to the membership of the user. They
then are restricted or permitted to what they can do based on the
permissions mask regardless of rank.
For backwards compatibility, the default permission bit (without a GRANT
statement) allows a user to to anything an existing op can do ONLY if
they are an op.
Todo: make CHANROLE_STATUS work (the ability to apply +ov to people),
which is at the moment controlled by CHANROLE_MODE.
This has a separate enabling option channel::channel_target_change.
It applies to PRIVMSG, NOTICE and TOPIC by unvoiced unopped non-opers.
The same slots are used for channels and users.
(resv, cmode +m, cmode +b, cmode +q, etc.).
This is only checked for local users.
For optimal compatibility, a failure for this reason still
returns ERR_CHANOPRIVSNEEDED.
Side effect: normal users cannot change topics of resv'ed
channels, even if they have ops, just like they already
cannot send messages. This only matters if resv_forcepart
is disabled, as the user would have been removed from the
channel otherwise.
