The recent refactor imported from Gitea made the Fork counter/button in
the repo header appear as icon only on mobile, but left the Star & Watch
buttons unchanged, so they appeared with text. That resulted in the
mobile view looking a bit awkward, with half the widgets (rss & fork) as
icon-only, while the other half (star & watch) with both icon and text.
This changes the other two in the same way: to appear without text on
mobile.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
1. Use general "mobile-only" and "not-mobile" CSS styles, remove some`@media (max-width: 767.98px)` tricks
2. Use `CountFmt` for repo list, just like the repo header (and it matches GitHub, to avoid big numbers bloat the page)
(cherry picked from commit bfa160fc98a23923b6ce1cd4d99e8970d937d6ec)
Conflicts:
templates/explore/repo_list.tmpl
templates/repo/header.tmpl
web_src/css/repo/header.css
Resolved the template conflicts by porting the changes to Forgejo (in
case of `header.tmpl`, applying the changes in `header_fork.tmpl). In
case of the CSS change, opted to take Gitea's version and drop the
entire media query.
Migrate `gt-font-*` to `tw-text-*` All tailwind-original class names are
also available and render like they would with 16px root font size.
We currently have root font size at 14px, but I would like to eventually
migrate us to 16px so that the tailwind docs apply to us unchangend and
because 16px is the recommended root font size for web pages in general.
Also the number 16 is much better dividable than 14 so will result in
more integers.
(cherry picked from commit 75e2e5c736687ae1897cf760a432b572feed56f5)
Conflicts:
templates/repo/header.tmpl
trivial context conflict
These should be all simple inline styles that were left in the
templates.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
(cherry picked from commit 0bef9a2775af0e27a0754207fc87537b96c2792e)
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30005. Regression from
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29945.
There was only once instance of `tw-content-center` before that PR, so I
just ran below command and reverted that one instance.
```sh
perl -p -i -e 's#tw-content-center#tw-items-center#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* tests/**/*
```
(cherry picked from commit 04f9ad056882fc3f21b247b16f84437adf0f36d8)
Conflicts:
templates/repo/diff/conversation.tmpl
templates/repo/header.tmpl
templates/repo/issue/filter_list.tmpl
templates/repo/issue/view_content/conversation.tmpl
templates/repo/wiki/view.tmpl
web_src/js/components/DashboardRepoList.vue
re-ran the command after discarding the Gitea changes to
ensure all Forgejo files are also covered
In HTML, `?key=val` already means "use the current link with new query parameters"
(cherry picked from commit 4c476fa41dc29dc24afda0925023ae3d0b9707cd)
Conflicts:
templates/repo/issue/filter_list.tmpl
templates/shared/issuelist.tmpl
trivial context conflict because the lines in Forgejo have rel=nofollow
Used all existing css vars, other migrations are 1:1.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 34290a00c4501ffeba26db267be71ab68e3ec97f)
Conflicts:
templates/repo/issue/filter_list.tmpl
web_src/js/components/DashboardRepoList.vue
trivial context conflicts
1. The borders were doubled on the "empty" page, fix it.
2. Remove unnecessary CSS classes like "clone", "compact", etc
3. Use CSS class "clone-panel" instead of ID "clone-panel"
4. Use `tw-flex-1` instead of `gt-f1`
5. Remove unnecessary ID "more-btn"
(cherry picked from commit 673286d8c8a00bf7240a93187d767fb5a5e32a31)
The previous (cherry picked) commit changed a translation key, from
`repo.pulls.no_results` to `common.no_results_found`. This would break
existing translations, and will have to be handled differently, if at
all.
This changes the affected code to continue using the old key.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
The citiation button shouldn't be controlled by
DisableDownloadSourceArchives (line 134)
So move it out of that "if" block.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Repositories displaying an "Add more..." tab on the header is a neat way
to let people discover they can enable more units. However, displaying
it all the time for repository owners, even when they deliberately do
not want to enable more units gets noisy very fast.
As such, this patch introduces a new setting which lets people disable
this hint under the appearance settings.
Fixes#2378.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
The modal was broken in two ways:
- On small screens, the input box was partially hanging outside the
modal. Fixed with flexbox and increased modal width.
- The clipboard copy was not working because the modal had both
`data-clipboard-text` and `data-clipboard-target`, while we only support
one of those. Made a small tweak in clipboard as well so that it will
still fall back to target if text is empty.
(cherry picked from commit 94512ee0628dc0d2b697441a4355ace54b6515cd)
- Add `form-fetch-action` to indicate that this form POST to an link
that returns JSON and thus should be handled by Javascript code.
- Found by @fnetx
- Regression of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1793
Refactor the webhook logic, to have the type-dependent processing happen
only in one place.
---
1. An event happens
2. It is pre-processed (depending on the webhook type) and its body is
added to a task queue
3. When the task is processed, some more logic (depending on the webhook
type as well) is applied to make an HTTP request
This means that webhook-type dependant logic is needed in step 2 and 3.
This is cumbersome and brittle to maintain.
Updated webhook flow with this PR:
1. An event happens
2. It is stored as-is and added to a task queue
3. When the task is processed, the event is processed (depending on the
webhook type) to make an HTTP request
So the only webhook-type dependent logic happens in one place (step 3)
which should be much more robust.
- the raw event must be stored in the hooktask (until now, the
pre-processed body was stored)
- to ensure that previous hooktasks are correctly sent, a
`payload_version` is added (version 1: the body has already been
pre-process / version 2: the body is the raw event)
So future webhook additions will only have to deal with creating an
http.Request based on the raw event (no need to adjust the code in
multiple places, like currently).
Moreover since this processing happens when fetching from the task
queue, it ensures that the queuing of new events (upon a `git push` for
instance) does not get slowed down by a slow webhook.
As a concrete example, the PR #19307 for custom webhooks, should be
substantially smaller:
- no need to change `services/webhook/deliver.go`
- minimal change in `services/webhook/webhook.go` (add the new webhook
to the map)
- no need to change all the individual webhook files (since with this
refactor the `*webhook_model.Webhook` is provided as argument)
(cherry picked from commit 26653b196bd1d15c532af41f60351596dd4330bd)
Conflicts:
services/webhook/deliver_test.go
trivial context conflict
# Preview Tab
- Removed the jQuery AJAX call and replaced with our fetch wrapper
- Tested the preview tab functionality and it works as before
# Diff Tab
- Removed the jQuery AJAX call and replaced with htmx
- Tested the diff tab functionality and it works as before
## htmx Attributes
- `hx-post="{{.RepoLink}}..."`: make a POST request to the endpoint
- `hx-indicator=".tab[data-tab='diff']"`: attach the loading indicator
to the tab body
- `hx-target=".tab[data-tab='diff']"`: target the tab body for swapping
with the response
- `hx-swap="innerHTML"`: swap the target's inner HTML
- `hx-include="#edit_area"`: include the value of the textarea (content)
in the request body
- `hx-vals='{"context":"{{.BranchLink}}"}'`: include the context in the
request body
- `hx-params="context,content"`: include only these keys in the request
body
# Demo using `fetch` and `htmx` instead of jQuery AJAX
---------
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
(cherry picked from commit c1331d1f7ab60249ed2f080b24f3e32093fa708d)
Tested a few things, all working fine. Not sure if the chinese machine
translation is good.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7e8c1c5ba18e1ac8861f429b825163b8210fd178)
Conflicts:
docs/content/contributing/guidelines-frontend.zh-cn.md
Gitea docs
