- This is actually https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/19978 &
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/19486 but was removed in one of
the UI refactors of v1.20
- This is a very technical fix and is best explained in the CSS
comments. But the short version: When there's an overflow being set, but
you want an element to 'break out' of that overflow with `position:
absolute`, it sometimes doesn't work! You need to set some CSS to let
the browser know that the element needs to use an element outside of
that overflow as 'clip parent'.
- Resolves my internal frustration with the mobile UI constantly getting broken.
(cherry picked from commit 879f842bed)
(cherry picked from commit 6099c9b41b)
(cherry picked from commit 0749d00b16)
(cherry picked from commit ec6a5428a7)
(cherry picked from commit 9d0bee784d)
(cherry picked from commit 61d6ae4882)
(cherry picked from commit 8b3f3639b6)
Currently, checkboxes are positioned as absolute. This positioning
causes the input to overlay an element that has been floated within the
editor. Floated elements are useful if you want your text to wrap around
this element. This PR fixes the overlaying of checkboxes by removing the
absolute positioning, updating the `ul` padding, and
displaying`.task-list-item` `flex` to ensure inputs and the associated
label are on the same line.
Screenshots:
Before:
<img width="762" alt="Screenshot 2023-09-01 at 3 40 59 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/6152817/570247c7-7f5c-4697-bfc9-ad4655e37991">
After:
<img width="762" alt="Screenshot 2023-09-01 at 3 42 20 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/6152817/db53df45-1294-4eee-84c0-b21ac4fdf805">
---------
Co-authored-by: rafh <rafaelheard@gmail.com>
The `.new-menu` was using a pseudo-element based fade-out effect.
Replace this with a more modern mask-based effect which in this case
required a child element to avoid fading out the background as well, so
I applied it to child `new-menu-inner` which was present on all these
menus except explore where I added it.
There is no visual difference except that the items on the explore page
have no `gap` between them any longer, making it consistent with other
menus. Before and after:
<img width="221" alt="Screenshot 2023-09-21 at 21 13 19"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/115237/b4a38ce2-cee1-4c54-84a5-e1d0bfd79e29">
<img width="222" alt="Screenshot 2023-09-21 at 21 32 36"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/115237/bb6b1335-d935-4ad4-bb85-3b0fc3027c2b">
Also, this cleans up the related CSS vars:
- `--color-header-wrapper-transparent` is removed, no longer needed
- `--color-header-wrapper` is defined in base theme as well, was
previously unset and therefor transparent.
[no whitespace
diff](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/27181/files?diff=unified&w=1)
[demo of mask fade](https://jsfiddle.net/silverwind/tsfadb3u/)
- switch from some weird status badge to label
- translate untranslated `Reset registration token` string
- change documentation link from act_runner README to Gitea Docs site
- fix "No runners available" message width
- use `ctx.Locale.Tr` where possible
Before:
* The layout is quite complex
* The UI flickers when switch the stats (https://try.gitea.io/)
After:
* Simplify the code
* The UI doesn't flicker
Align everything with a new layout.
* Use "baseline" for some special elements, the "flex-item-icon" is for
the issue list only at the moment and I think it should be general
enough now (but not using "flex-item-leading" anymore in this case).
* Make the labels stretch themselves.
1. There is already `gt-ac`, so no need to introduce `flex-item-center`
2. The `flex-item-baseline` and `.flex-item-icon svg { margin-top: 1px
}` seem to be a tricky patch, they don't resolve the root problem, and
still cause misalignment in some cases.
* The root problem is: the "icon" needs to align with the sibling
"title"
* So, make the "icon" and the "title" both have the same height
3. `flex-text-inline` could only be used if the element is really
"inline", otherwise its `vertical-align` would make the box size change.
In most cases, `flex-text-block` is good enough.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
1. In many cases, the `flex-list` has previous and next `gt-hidden`
siblings, so relax the CSS selector to remove all ".segument .flex-list"
paddings.
2. Make the "Add key" button can toggle
3. Move help message into the related segment(panel). Otherwise users
would misread the message, eg: the SSH help seemed for GPG because they
are so near
4. Move modal element into the segment element, otherwise it affects the
layout
The changes for "commit-body" in #26877 are not ideal.
The reason is: the "commit-body" is usually a `<pre>`, it has default
margins. In most cases, we do not need that large margin. So, this PR
introduces a general but small margin for all "commit-body" elements.
Then these `gt-m-0` could be removed.
The `:not` selector is not needed, because the `.timeline-item` selector
is already clear enough.
1. Use `gt-invisible` instead of `invisible`.
2. Use `gt-word-break` instead of `dont-break-out` (there is a slight
different "hyphens", but I think it won't affect too much since it is
only used for the "full name").
3. Remove `.small.button:has(svg)` , now our buttons could layout SVG
correctly, and actually I didn't see this CSS class is used in code.
This PR implements a proposal to clean up the admin users table by
moving some information out to a separate user details page (which also
displays some additional information).
Other changes:
- move edit user page from `/admin/users/{id}` to
`/admin/users/{id}/edit` -> `/admin/users/{id}` now shows the user
details page
- show if user is instance administrator as a label instead of a
separate column
- separate explore users template into a page- and a shared one, to make
it possible to use it on the user details page
- fix issue where there was no margin between alert message and
following content on admin pages
<details>
<summary>Screenshots</summary>
</details>
Partially resolves#25939
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Backtick syntax now works in repo description too. Also, I replaced the
CSS for this was a new single class, making it more flexible and not
dependent on a parent. Also, very slightly reduced font size from 16.8px
to 16px.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Each change is tested manually line by line. There are too many changes
so I can't share dozens of screenshots.
In short:
1. `ui right` could be still used in `ui top attached header`, because
there is a special case.
2. A lot of `ui right` are just no-op, so they can be removed safely.
3. Some of the `ui right` should be replaced by `gt-float-right` (to
avoid breaking, leave them to the future).
4. A few of the `ui right` could be rewritten by flex.
Corollary to #26775:
All selectors I found that are actually used and not necessarily present
in the current code have been copied to `web_src/css/base.css`.
Everything else should be a clean removal.
Replace #26761
It's better to keep children elements simple, and let parent containers
layout the necessary padding/margin.
The old `not(:last-child)` and `.flex-item + .flex-item` are not easy to
maintain (for example, what if the developer would like to use a "tiny
height" item?)
The old approach also makes some UI look strange because the first item
doesn't have proper padding-top.
In this PR, we just simply use `.flex-item { padding: ... }`:
* Developers could manually set the item height they want easily
* It's easier to make it work with various containers -- with padding
(`ui segment`) and without padding (`div`)
And added more samples/examples.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
1. Fine tune the CSS styles, and add more examples
2. Add necessary "dimmer" animation for modal dialogs, otherwise the UI
seems flicking (follow #26469)
## Changes
- no more hardcoded `border-radius`es (apart from `0`)
- no more value inconsistencies
- no more guessing what pixel value you should use
- two new variables:
- `--border-radius-medium` (for elements where the normal border radius
does not suffice)
- `--border-radius-circle` (for displaying circles)
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
