## Needs and benefits
[Livebook](https://livebook.dev/) notebooks are used for code
documentation and for deep dives and note-taking in the elixir
ecosystem. Rendering these in these as Markdown on frogejo has many
benefits, since livemd is a subset of markdown. Some of the benefits
are:
- New users of elixir and livebook are scared by unformated .livemd
files, but are shown what they expect
- Sharing a notebook is as easy as sharing a link, no need to install
the software in order to see the results.
[goldmark-meraid ](https://github.com/abhinav/goldmark-mermaid) is a
mermaid-js parser already included in gitea. This makes the .livemd
rendering integration feature complete. With this PR class diagrams, ER
Diagrams, flow charts and much more will be rendered perfectly.
With the additional functionality gitea will be an ideal tool for
sharing resources with fellow software engineers working in the elixir
ecosystem. Allowing the git forge to be used without needing to install
any software.
## Feature Description
This issue requests the .livemd extension to be added as a Markdown
language extension.
- `.livemd` is the extension of Livebook which is an Elixir version of
Jupyter Notebook.
- `.livemd` is` a subset of Markdown.
This would require the .livemd to be recognized as a markdown file. The
Goldmark the markdown parser should handle the parsing and rendering
automatically.
Here is the corresponding commit for GitHub linguist:
https://github.com/github/linguist/pull/5672
Here is a sample page of a livemd file:
https://github.com/github/linguist/blob/master/samples/Markdown/livebook.livemd
## Screenshots
The first screenshot shows how github shows the sample .livemd in the
browser.
The second screenshot shows how mermaid js, renders my development
notebook and its corresponding ER Diagram. The source code can be found
here:
79615f7428/termiNotes.livemd
## Testing
I just changed the file extension from `.livemd`to `.md`and the document
already renders perfectly on codeberg. Check you can it out
[here](https://codeberg.org/lgh/Termi/src/branch/livemd2md/termiNotes.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
The `SHOW_FOOTER_BRANDING` came from year 2015, and it seems nobody ever
uses it. It only shows an GitHub icon which seems unrelated to Gitea, it
doesn't do what document says. So, remove it.
## ⚠️ Breaking
Users can now remove the key `[other].SHOW_FOOTER_BRANDING` from their
app.ini.
The default access log format has been unnecessarily escaped, leading to
spurious backslashes appearing in log lines.
Additionally, the `RemoteAddr` field includes the port, which breaks
most log parsers attempting to process it. I've added a call to
`net.SplitHostPort()` attempting to isolate the address alone, with a
fallback to the original address if it errs.
Signed-off-by: Gary Moon <gary@garymoon.net>
Without this patch, the setting SSH.StartBuiltinServer decides whether
the native (Go) implementation is used rather than calling 'ssh-keygen'.
It's possible for 'using ssh-keygen' and 'using the built-in server' to
be independent.
In fact, the gitea rootless container doesn't ship ssh-keygen and can be
configured to use the host's SSH server - which will cause the public
key parsing mechanism to break.
This commit changes the decision to be based on SSH.KeygenPath instead.
Any existing configurations with a custom KeygenPath set will continue
to function. The new default value of '' selects the native version. The
downside of this approach is that anyone who has relying on plain
'ssh-keygen' to have special properties will now be using the native
version instead.
I assume the exec-variant is only there because /x/crypto/ssh didn't
support ssh-ed25519 until 2016. I don't see any other reason for using
it so it might be an acceptable risk.
Fixes#23363
EDIT: this message was garbled when I tried to get the commit
description back in.. Trying to reconstruct it:
## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️ Users who don't have SSH.KeygenPath
explicitly set and rely on the ssh-keygen binary need to set
SSH.KeygenPath to 'ssh-keygen' in order to be able to continue using it
for public key parsing.
There was something else but I can't remember at the moment.
EDIT2: It was about `make test` and `make lint`. Can't get them to run.
To reproduce the issue, I installed `golang` in `docker.io/node:16` and
got:
```
...
go: mvdan.cc/xurls/v2@v2.4.0: unknown revision mvdan.cc/xurls/v2.4.0
go: gotest.tools/v3@v3.4.0: unknown revision gotest.tools/v3.4.0
...
go: gotest.tools/v3@v3.0.3: unknown revision gotest.tools/v3.0.3
...
go: error loading module requirements
```
Signed-off-by: Leon M. Busch-George <leon@georgemail.eu>
I neglected that the `NameKey` of `Unit` is not only for translation,
but also configuration. So it should be `repo.actions` to maintain
consistency.
## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️
If users already use `actions.actions` in `DISABLED_REPO_UNITS` or
`DEFAULT_REPO_UNITS`, it will be treated as an invalid unit key.
Follow #21962
After I eat my own dogfood, I would say that
ONLY_SHOW_RELEVANT_REPOS=false is necessary for many private/enterprise
instances, because many private repositories do not have
"description/topic", users just want to search by their names.
This PR also adds `PageIsExploreRepositories` check, to make code more
strict, because the `search` template is shared for different purpose.
And during the test, I found a bug that the "Search" button didn't
respect the "relevant" parameter, so this PR fixes the bug by the way
together.
I think this PR needs to be backported.
Closes#20955
This PR adds the possibility to disable blank Issues, when the Repo has
templates. This can be done by creating the file
`.gitea/issue_config.yaml` with the content `blank_issues_enabled` in
the Repo.
- **Installation**: includes how to install Gitea and related other
tools, also includes upgrade Gitea
- **Administration**: includes how to configure Gitea, customize Gitea
and manage Gitea instance out of Gitea admin UI
- **Usage**: includes how to use Gitea's functionalities. A sub
documentation is about packages, in future we could also include CI/CD
and others.
- **Development**: includes how to integrate with Gitea's API, how to
develop new features within Gitea
- **Contributing**: includes how to contribute code to Gitea
repositories.
After this is merged, I think we can have a sub-documentation of `Usage`
part named `Actions` to describe how to use Gitea actions
---------
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Add some review features that are notably missing from Gitlab CE but not
Gitea.
Also add Merge Queues which is not supported by Gitea but is quite an
important feature.
This updates the PR docs and explains how to work with PRs, for those
who may not know.
It was mentioned that this page could explain PRs a bit better, in case
some users are not familiar with GitHub or similar forges.
Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Creating pid file should not belong to setting package and only web
command needs that. So this PR moves pidfile creation from setting
package to web command package to keep setting package more readable.
I marked this as `break` because the PIDFile path moved. For those who
have used the pid build argument, it has to be changed.
---------
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Ran most of the Less files through the Less compiler and Prettier and
then followed up with a round of manual fixes.
The Less compiler had unfortunately stripped all `//` style comments
that I had to restore (It did preserve `/* */` comments). Other fixes
include duplicate selector removal which were revealed after the
transpilation and which weren't caught by stylelint before but now are.
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/15565
Follow-up for #23458
I could have suggested this on the original PR, but I thought there
would be more to add. Hadn't noticed the push options docs already had
nearly the same shell command. 😅
Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
CI is failing with the following:
```
docs/content/doc/features/localization.zh-cn.md:16 MD022/blanks-around-headings/blanks-around-headers Headings should be surrounded by blank lines [Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below] [Context: "# 本地化"]
docs/content/doc/features/localization.zh-cn.md:23 MD022/blanks-around-headings/blanks-around-headers Headings should be surrounded by blank lines [Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below] [Context: "## 支持的语言"]
```
This fixes that error
This PR adds support for reflogs on all repositories. It does this by
adding a global configuration entry.
Implements #14865
---------
Signed-off-by: Philip Peterson <philip.c.peterson@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
* Fix scoped label left and right part breaking across lines.
* Remove slanted divider in scoped label display, make it straight.
After using this for a while, this feels more visually noisy than
helpful.
* Reduce contrast between scope and item to reduce probability of
unreadable text on background.
* Change documentation to remove mention of non-exclusive scoped labels.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
update documentation to include an overview of the yaml label template that is part of PR #22976
Signed-off-by: Jon Roadley-Battin <jon.roadleybattin@gmail.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
### The CustomEvent prefix
There was already `ce-quick-submit`, the `ce-` prefix seems better than
`us-`. Rename the only `us-` prefixed `us-load-context-popup` to `ce-`
prefixed.
### Styles and Attributes in Go HTML Template
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21855#issuecomment-1429643073
Suggest to stick to `class="c1 {{if $var}}c2{{end}}"`
The readability and maintainability should be applied to the code which
is read by developers, but not for the generated outputs.
The template code is the code for developers, while the generated HTML
are only for browsers.
The `class="c1 {{if $var}}c2{{end}}"` style is clearer for developers
and more intuitive, and the generated HTML also makes browsers happy (a
few spaces do not affect anything)
Think about a more complex case:
* `class="{{if $active}}active{{end}} menu item {{if $show}}show{{end}}
{{if $warn}}warn{{end}}"`
* --vs--
* `class="{{if $active}}active {{end}}menu item{{if $show}}
show{{end}}{{if $warn}} warn{{end}}"`
The first style make it clearer to see each CSS class name with its
`{{if}}` block.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
