Currently, if you implement native CSS nesting within a Vue component a
warning will appear in the terminal. It states
`Nested CSS was detected, but CSS nesting has not been configured
correctly.
Please enable a CSS nesting plugin *before* Tailwind in your
configuration.` To fix this error we need to enable the built-in
[tailwinds nesting
config](https://tailwindcss.com/docs/using-with-preprocessors#nesting).
Example code to trigger the warning within a vue component:
```CSS
<style>
.example {
&:hover,
&:focus-visible {
color: var(--color-text);
}
& svg {
margin-right: 0.78rem;
}
}
</style>
```
---------
Co-authored-by: rafh <rafaelheard@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
(cherry picked from commit 03753cbc0ff68cc4eee0a65b556e6d86a8f1c63f)
It is convenient to skip by setting environment, since it's OK
to use root user in job containers.
It's not a bug, but I want to backport it to v1.21 since it doesn't
break anything.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 487ac9bf6c239ce897f1a2f6c4321d6f1769a22f)
This adds new lexers and includes some fixes. See
https://github.com/alecthomas/chroma/releases/tag/v2.13.0 for the full
changelog.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
(cherry picked from commit 3e7ae79f99ef0e5ba3d1201c38f491121ea2a156)
This PR do some loading speed optimization for feeds user interface
pages.
- Load action users batchly but not one by one.
- Load action repositories batchly but not one by one.
- Load action's Repo Owners batchly but not one by one.
- Load action's possible issues batchly but not one by one.
- Load action's possible comments batchly but not one by one.
(cherry picked from commit aed3b53abdd02a3ffbf9e8eb90272ff567333073)
- Replaced a single jQuery AJAX instance with our fetch wrapper
- Tested the issue branch reference selection and it works as before
# Demo using `fetch` instead of jQuery AJAX
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
(cherry picked from commit 75a9f61f89caada64f6398130844281e4f088a73)
Most time, when invoking `git.OpenRepository`, `objectFormat` will not
be used, so it's a waste to invoke commandline to get the object format.
This PR make it a lazy operation, only invoke that when necessary.
(cherry picked from commit e84e5db6de0306d514b1f1a9657931fb7197a188)
It's unnecessary to detect the repository object format from git
repository. Just use the repository's object format name.
(cherry picked from commit 3c6fc25a77c37d50686caa495d27a31dcef7f75f)
Conflicts:
services/pull/pull.go
- Removed all jQuery AJAX calls and replaced with our fetch wrapper
- Tested the comment edit history list, diff, and delete functionality
and it works as before
# Demo using `fetch` instead of jQuery AJAX
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
(cherry picked from commit b5ed42864e306f22305beba50d6ff71df2aea0c6)
- Add `form-fetch-action` to indicate that this form POST to an link
that returns JSON and thus should be handled by Javascript code.
- Found by @fnetx
- Regression of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1793
I'm working on the snap packaging over at https://codeberg.org/forgejo-contrib/snap which makes this snapcraft.yaml outdated, redundant and potentially confusing for other developers.
Signed-off-by: Alan Pope <popey@noreply.codeberg.org>
Add the same auth check and middlewares as the /v1/ API.
It require to export some variable from /v1 API, i am not sure if is the correct way to do
Co-authored-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2582
Reviewed-by: oliverpool <oliverpool@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Ada <ada@gnous.eu>
Co-committed-by: Ada <ada@gnous.eu>
Unlike other async processing in the queue, we should sync branches to
the DB immediately when handling git hook calling. If it fails, users
can see the error message in the output of the git command.
It can avoid potential inconsistency issues, and help #29494.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
