Commit graph

761 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
techknowlogick
2741546bed
Repositories: by default disable all units except code and pulls on forks (#22541)
Most of the time forks are used for contributing code only, so not
having
issues, projects, release and packages is a better default for such
cases.
They can still be enabled in the settings.

A new option `DEFAULT_FORK_REPO_UNITS` is added to configure the default
units on forks.

Also add missing `repo.packages` unit to documentation.

code by: @brechtvl

## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️ 

When forking a repository, the fork will now have issues, projects,
releases, packages and wiki disabled. These can be enabled in the
repository settings afterwards. To change back to the previous default
behavior, configure `DEFAULT_FORK_REPO_UNITS` to be the same value as
`DEFAULT_REPO_UNITS`.

Co-authored-by: Brecht Van Lommel <brecht@blender.org>
2023-02-04 14:48:38 +08:00
wxiaoguang
6bc3079c00
Refactor git command package to improve security and maintainability (#22678)
This PR follows #21535 (and replace #22592)

## Review without space diff

https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22678/files?diff=split&w=1

## Purpose of this PR

1. Make git module command completely safe (risky user inputs won't be
passed as argument option anymore)
2. Avoid low-level mistakes like
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22098#discussion_r1045234918
3. Remove deprecated and dirty `CmdArgCheck` function, hide the `CmdArg`
type
4. Simplify code when using git command

## The main idea of this PR

* Move the `git.CmdArg` to the `internal` package, then no other package
except `git` could use it. Then developers could never do
`AddArguments(git.CmdArg(userInput))` any more.
* Introduce `git.ToTrustedCmdArgs`, it's for user-provided and already
trusted arguments. It's only used in a few cases, for example: use git
arguments from config file, help unit test with some arguments.
* Introduce `AddOptionValues` and `AddOptionFormat`, they make code more
clear and simple:
    * Before: `AddArguments("-m").AddDynamicArguments(message)`
    * After: `AddOptionValues("-m", message)`
    * -
* Before: `AddArguments(git.CmdArg(fmt.Sprintf("--author='%s <%s>'",
sig.Name, sig.Email)))`
* After: `AddOptionFormat("--author='%s <%s>'", sig.Name, sig.Email)`

## FAQ

### Why these changes were not done in #21535 ?

#21535 is mainly a search&replace, it did its best to not change too
much logic.

Making the framework better needs a lot of changes, so this separate PR
is needed as the second step.


### The naming of `AddOptionXxx`

According to git's manual, the `--xxx` part is called `option`.

### How can it guarantee that `internal.CmdArg` won't be not misused?

Go's specification guarantees that. Trying to access other package's
internal package causes compilation error.

And, `golangci-lint` also denies the git/internal package. Only the
`git/command.go` can use it carefully.

### There is still a `ToTrustedCmdArgs`, will it still allow developers
to make mistakes and pass untrusted arguments?

Generally speaking, no. Because when using `ToTrustedCmdArgs`, the code
will be very complex (see the changes for examples). Then developers and
reviewers can know that something might be unreasonable.

### Why there was a `CmdArgCheck` and why it's removed?

At the moment of #21535, to reduce unnecessary changes, `CmdArgCheck`
was introduced as a hacky patch. Now, almost all code could be written
as `cmd := NewCommand(); cmd.AddXxx(...)`, then there is no need for
`CmdArgCheck` anymore.


### Why many codes for `signArg == ""` is deleted?

Because in the old code, `signArg` could never be empty string, it's
either `-S[key-id]` or `--no-gpg-sign`. So the `signArg == ""` is just
dead code.

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-04 10:30:43 +08:00
zeripath
3c5655ce18
Improve trace logging for pulls and processes (#22633)
Our trace logging is far from perfect and is difficult to follow.

This PR:

* Add trace logging for process manager add and remove.
* Fixes an errant read file for git refs in getMergeCommit
* Brings in the pullrequest `String` and `ColorFormat` methods
introduced in #22568
* Adds a lot more logging in to testPR etc.

Ref #22578

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2023-02-03 18:11:48 -05:00
Pavel Ezhov
98770d3db8
Fix group filter for ldap source sync (#22506)
There are 2 separate flows of creating a user: authentication and source
sync.
When a group filter is defined, source sync ignores group filter, while
authentication respects it.
With this PR I've fixed this behavior, so both flows now apply this
filter when searching users in LDAP in a unified way.

- Unified LDAP group membership lookup for authentication and source
sync flows
- Replaced custom group membership lookup (used for authentication flow)
with an existing listLdapGroupMemberships method (used for source sync
flow)
- Modified listLdapGroupMemberships and getUserAttributeListedInGroup in
a way group lookup could be called separately
- Added user filtering based on a group membership for a source sync
- Added tests to cover this logic

Co-authored-by: Pavel Ezhov <paejov@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-02 15:45:00 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
4e946e5a7d
Small refactor for loading PRs (#22652) 2023-02-01 21:49:28 -06:00
KN4CK3R
6ba9ff7b48
Add Conda package registry (#22262)
This PR adds a [Conda](https://conda.io/) package registry.
2023-02-01 12:30:39 -06:00
Lunny Xiao
2871ea0809
Add more events details supports for actions (#22680)
#21937 implemented only basic events based on name because of `act`'s
limitation. So I sent a PR to parse all possible events details in
https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/11 and it merged. The ref
documentation is
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows

This PR depends on that and make more detail responses for `push` events
and `pull_request` events. And it lefts more events there for future
PRs.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
2023-02-01 13:32:46 +08:00
Brecht Van Lommel
faa96553d1
Add repository setting to enable/disable releases unit (#22671)
To go along with similar settings for issues, pulls, projects, packages.
2023-02-01 01:31:19 +00:00
Jason Song
707ecec715
Fix ref to trigger Actions (#22679)
If triggered by PR, the ref should be `pull/<index>/head` instead of
`repo.DefaultBranch`.

And improve UI:

<img width="493" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/215731280-312564f2-2450-45d0-b986-1accb0670976.png">


Related to #21937.
2023-01-31 22:45:25 +00:00
Jason Song
4011821c94
Implement actions (#21937)
Close #13539.

Co-authored by: @lunny @appleboy @fuxiaohei and others.

Related projects:
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-go
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner

### Summary

The target of this PR is to bring a basic implementation of "Actions",
an internal CI/CD system of Gitea. That means even though it has been
merged, the state of the feature is **EXPERIMENTAL**, and please note
that:

- It is disabled by default;
- It shouldn't be used in a production environment currently;
- It shouldn't be used in a public Gitea instance currently;
- Breaking changes may be made before it's stable.

**Please comment on #13539 if you have any different product design
ideas**, all decisions reached there will be adopted here. But in this
PR, we don't talk about **naming, feature-creep or alternatives**.

### ⚠️ Breaking

`gitea-actions` will become a reserved user name. If a user with the
name already exists in the database, it is recommended to rename it.

### Some important reviews

- What is `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` in `app.ini` for?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1055954954
- Why the api for runners is not under the normal `/api/v1` prefix?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061173592
- Why DBFS?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061301178
- Why ignore events triggered by `gitea-actions` bot?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1063254103
- Why there's no permission control for actions?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1090229868

### What it looks like

<details>

#### Manage runners

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205870657-c72f590e-2e08-4cd4-be7f-2e0abb299bbf.png">

#### List runs

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872794-50fde990-2b45-48c1-a178-908e4ec5b627.png">


#### View logs

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872501-9b7b9000-9542-4991-8f55-18ccdada77c3.png">



</details>

### How to try it

<details>

#### 1. Start Gitea

Clone this branch and [install from
source](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/install-from-source).

Add additional configurations in `app.ini` to enable Actions:

```ini
[actions]
ENABLED = true
```

Start it.

If all is well, you'll see the management page of runners:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205877365-8e30a780-9b10-4154-b3e8-ee6c3cb35a59.png">


#### 2. Start runner

Clone the [act_runner](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner), and follow
the
[README](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/src/branch/main/README.md)
to start it.

If all is well, you'll see a new runner has been added:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205878000-216f5937-e696-470d-b66c-8473987d91c3.png">

#### 3. Enable actions for a repo

Create a new repo or open an existing one, check the `Actions` checkbox
in settings and submit.

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879705-53e09208-73c0-4b3e-a123-2dcf9aba4b9c.png">
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879383-23f3d08f-1a85-41dd-a8b3-54e2ee6453e8.png">

If all is well, you'll see a new tab "Actions":

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205881648-a8072d8c-5803-4d76-b8a8-9b2fb49516c1.png">

#### 4. Upload workflow files

Upload some workflow files to `.gitea/workflows/xxx.yaml`, you can
follow the [quickstart](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/quickstart)
of GitHub Actions. Yes, Gitea Actions is compatible with GitHub Actions
in most cases, you can use the same demo:

```yaml
name: GitHub Actions Demo
run-name: ${{ github.actor }} is testing out GitHub Actions 🚀
on: [push]
jobs:
  Explore-GitHub-Actions:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - run: echo "🎉 The job was automatically triggered by a ${{ github.event_name }} event."
      - run: echo "🐧 This job is now running on a ${{ runner.os }} server hosted by GitHub!"
      - run: echo "🔎 The name of your branch is ${{ github.ref }} and your repository is ${{ github.repository }}."
      - name: Check out repository code
        uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - run: echo "💡 The ${{ github.repository }} repository has been cloned to the runner."
      - run: echo "🖥️ The workflow is now ready to test your code on the runner."
      - name: List files in the repository
        run: |
          ls ${{ github.workspace }}
      - run: echo "🍏 This job's status is ${{ job.status }}."
```

If all is well, you'll see a new run in `Actions` tab:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884473-79a874bc-171b-4aaf-acd5-0241a45c3b53.png">

#### 5. Check the logs of jobs

Click a run and you'll see the logs:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884800-994b0374-67f7-48ff-be9a-4c53f3141547.png">

#### 6. Go on

You can try more examples in [the
documents](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions)
of GitHub Actions, then you might find a lot of bugs.

Come on, PRs are welcome.

</details>

See also: [Feature Preview: Gitea
Actions](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/12/feature-preview-gitea-actions/)

---------

Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-01-31 09:45:19 +08:00
KN4CK3R
d283a31f03
Check quota limits for container uploads (#22450)
The test coverage has revealed that container packages were not checked
against the quota limits.
2023-01-29 11:34:29 -06:00
zeripath
78e6b21c1a
Improve checkIfPRContentChanged (#22611)
The code for checking if a commit has caused a change in a PR is
extremely inefficient and affects the head repository instead of using a
temporary repository.

This PR therefore makes several significant improvements:

* A temporary repo like that used in merging.
* The diff code is then significant improved to use a three-way diff
instead of comparing diffs (possibly binary) line-by-line - in memory...

Ref #22578

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2023-01-28 15:54:40 +00:00
a1012112796
48f5d51908
fix permission check for creating comment while mail (#22524)
only creating comment on locked issue request write permission,
for others, read permission is enough.

related to https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22056

/cc @KN4CK3R

---------

Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-01-28 17:28:55 +08:00
Brecht Van Lommel
c8139c0f64
Webhooks: for issue close/reopen action, add commit ID that caused it (#22583)
The `commit_id` property name is the same as equivalent functionality in
GitHub. If the action was not caused by a commit, an empty string is
used.

This can for example be used to automatically add a Resolved label to an
issue fixed by a commit, or clear it when the issue is reopened.
2023-01-24 23:47:53 -05:00
Sybren
25f4b7d7cd
Prevent duplicate labels when importing more than 99 (#22591)
Importing labels (via `gitea restore-repo`) did not split them up into
batches properly. The first "batch" would create all labels, the second
"batch" would create all labels except those in the first "batch", etc.
This meant that when importing more than 99 labels (the batch size)
there would always be duplicate ones.

This is solved by actually passing `labels[:lbBatchSize]` to the
`CreateLabels()` function, instead of the entire list `labels`.
2023-01-24 19:44:55 +00:00
KN4CK3R
21dd4a252a
Prevent multiple To recipients (#22566)
Change the mailer interface to prevent leaking of possible hidden email
addresses when sending to multiple recipients.

Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com>
2023-01-22 08:23:52 -06:00
Lunny Xiao
6fe3c8b398
Support org/user level projects (#22235)
Fix #13405

<img width="1151" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/209442911-7baa3924-c389-47b6-b63b-a740803e640e.png">

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2023-01-20 19:42:33 +08:00
zeripath
4199d28053
When updating by rebase we need to set the environment for head repo (#22535)
The update by rebase code reuses the merge code but shortcircuits and
pushes back up to the head. However, it doesn't set the correct pushing
environment - and just uses the same environment as the base repo. This
leads to the push update failing and thence the PR becomes out-of-sync
with the head.

This PR fixes this and adjusts the trace logging elsewhere to help make
this clearer.

Fix #18802

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-01-19 17:31:44 -05:00
Sybren
b383652e02
Fix assignment to cm.AssigneeID when importing comments (#22528)
This is a fix for https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22510

The code assumed that the `AssigneeID` from the comment YAML was an
`int64`, but it is actually an `int`, causing a panic. It also had no
check on whether the type cast was actually valid, so badly formatted
YAML could also cause a panic.

Both these issues have been fixed.
2023-01-19 13:24:40 -05:00
Sybren
151b1a9508
Support importing comment types (#22510)
This commit adds support for specifying comment types when importing
with `gitea restore-repo`. It makes it possible to import issue changes,
such as "title changed" or "assigned user changed".

An earlier version of this pull request was made by Matti Ranta, in
https://future.projects.blender.org/blender-migration/gitea-bf/pulls/3

There are two changes with regard to Matti's original code:

1. The comment type was an `int64` in Matti's code, and is now using a
string. This makes it possible to use `comment_type: title`, which is
more reliable and future-proof than an index into an internal list in
the Gitea Go code.

2. Matti's code also had support for including labels, but in a way that
would require knowing the database ID of the labels before the import
even starts, which is impossible. This can be solved by using label
names instead of IDs; for simplicity I I left that out of this PR.
2023-01-18 21:14:56 -05:00
Brecht Van Lommel
cdf53fa4a7
Fix issue not auto-closing when it includes a reference to a branch (#22514)
Ensure branch prefix is stripped away for both when comparing the branch
name.
2023-01-18 19:24:38 -05:00
Brecht Van Lommel
aa87b36900
Fix 500 error viewing pull request when fork has pull requests disabled (#22512)
Swallow error just like in #20839, for the case where there is no
protected branch.

Fixes #20826 for me, though I can't tell if this now covers all cases.
2023-01-18 13:54:57 -06:00
Lunny Xiao
f59ce77772
Display unreferenced packages total size in package admin panel (#22498) 2023-01-18 09:52:04 -06:00
Chongyi Zheng
de484e86bc
Support scoped access tokens (#20908)
This PR adds the support for scopes of access tokens, mimicking the
design of GitHub OAuth scopes.

The changes of the core logic are in `models/auth` that `AccessToken`
struct will have a `Scope` field. The normalized (no duplication of
scope), comma-separated scope string will be stored in `access_token`
table in the database.
In `services/auth`, the scope will be stored in context, which will be
used by `reqToken` middleware in API calls. Only OAuth2 tokens will have
granular token scopes, while others like BasicAuth will default to scope
`all`.
A large amount of work happens in `routers/api/v1/api.go` and the
corresponding `tests/integration` tests, that is adding necessary scopes
to each of the API calls as they fit.


- [x] Add `Scope` field to `AccessToken`
- [x] Add access control to all API endpoints
- [x] Update frontend & backend for when creating tokens
- [x] Add a database migration for `scope` column (enable 'all' access
to past tokens)

I'm aiming to complete it before Gitea 1.19 release.

Fixes #4300
2023-01-17 15:46:03 -06:00
Lunny Xiao
db2286bbb6
some refactor about code comments (#20821) 2023-01-17 15:03:44 -06:00
Yarden Shoham
e763fab685
Fix pull request API field closed_at always being null (#22482)
Fix #22480
2023-01-17 11:42:32 +00:00
Haruo Kinoshita
9edf80f472
Fix migration from gitbucket (repost) (#22477)
Reposting pull request for #22465 

> Migration from GitBucket does not work due to a access for "Reviews"
API on GitBucket that makes 404 response. This PR has following changes.
> 1. Made to stop access for Reviews API while migrating from GitBucket.
> 2. Added support for custom URL (e.g.
`http://example.com/gitbucket/owner/repository`)
> 3. Made to accept for git checkout URL
(`http://example.com/git/owner/repository.git`)

Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
2023-01-17 15:22:00 +08:00
KN4CK3R
8117e41dfa
Add reply hint to mail text (#22459)
Addition to #22056

This PR adds a hint to mail text if replies are supported.
I can't tell if the text structure is supported in every language. Maybe
we need to put the whole line in the translation file and use
parameters.
2023-01-16 14:58:01 -06:00
zeripath
2cc3a6381c
Add cron method to gc LFS MetaObjects (#22385)
This PR adds a task to the cron service to allow garbage collection of
LFS meta objects. As repositories may have a large number of
LFSMetaObjects, an updated column is added to this table and it is used
to perform a generational GC to attempt to reduce the amount of work.
(There may need to be a bit more work here but this is probably enough
for the moment.)

Fix #7045

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2023-01-16 13:50:53 -06:00
Felipe Leopoldo Sologuren Gutiérrez
04c97aa364
Change use of Walk to WalkDir to improve disk performance (#22462)
As suggest by Go developers, use `filepath.WalkDir` instead of
`filepath.Walk` because [*Walk is less efficient than WalkDir,
introduced in Go 1.16, which avoids calling `os.Lstat` on every file or
directory visited](https://pkg.go.dev/path/filepath#Walk).

This proposition address that, in a similar way as
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22392 did.


Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-01-16 16:21:44 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
2782c14396
Supports wildcard protected branch (#20825)
This PR introduce glob match for protected branch name. The separator is
`/` and you can use `*` matching non-separator chars and use `**` across
separator.

It also supports input an exist or non-exist branch name as matching
condition and branch name condition has high priority than glob rule.

Should fix #2529 and #15705

screenshots

<img width="1160" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/205651179-ebb5492a-4ade-4bb4-a13c-965e8c927063.png">

Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
2023-01-16 16:00:22 +08:00
KN4CK3R
fc037b4b82
Add support for incoming emails (#22056)
closes #13585
fixes #9067
fixes #2386
ref #6226
ref #6219
fixes #745

This PR adds support to process incoming emails to perform actions.
Currently I added handling of replies and unsubscribing from
issues/pulls. In contrast to #13585 the IMAP IDLE command is used
instead of polling which results (in my opinion 😉) in cleaner code.

Procedure:
- When sending an issue/pull reply email, a token is generated which is
present in the Reply-To and References header.
- IMAP IDLE waits until a new email arrives
- The token tells which action should be performed

A possible signature and/or reply gets stripped from the content.

I added a new service to the drone pipeline to test the receiving of
incoming mails. If we keep this in, we may test our outgoing emails too
in future.

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-01-14 23:57:10 +08:00
zeripath
99cf0d394e
Continue GCing other repos on error in one repo (#22422)
The current code propagates all errors up to the iteration step meaning
that a single malformed repo will prevent GC of other repos.

This PR simply stops that propagation.

Fix #21605

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-01-13 09:48:48 +08:00
John Olheiser
1ee1147baa
fix: don't replace err variable in nested check (#22416)
We can use `:=` to make `err` local to the if-scope instead of
overwriting the `err` in outer scope.

Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-01-12 14:57:12 -06:00
techknowlogick
b36854df37
Update golang deps (#22410)
Note, hashicorp's LRU has been updated to v2 which supports generics but
this was left out as it is a more involved upgrade.
2023-01-12 09:21:16 +01:00
Jason Song
477a1cc40e
Improve utils of slices (#22379)
- Move the file `compare.go` and `slice.go` to `slice.go`.
- Fix `ExistsInSlice`, it's buggy
  - It uses `sort.Search`, so it assumes that the input slice is sorted.
- It passes `func(i int) bool { return slice[i] == target })` to
`sort.Search`, that's incorrect, check the doc of `sort.Search`.
- Conbine `IsInt64InSlice(int64, []int64)` and `ExistsInSlice(string,
[]string)` to `SliceContains[T]([]T, T)`.
- Conbine `IsSliceInt64Eq([]int64, []int64)` and `IsEqualSlice([]string,
[]string)` to `SliceSortedEqual[T]([]T, T)`.
- Add `SliceEqual[T]([]T, T)` as a distinction from
`SliceSortedEqual[T]([]T, T)`.
- Redesign `RemoveIDFromList([]int64, int64) ([]int64, bool)` to
`SliceRemoveAll[T]([]T, T) []T`.
- Add `SliceContainsFunc[T]([]T, func(T) bool)` and
`SliceRemoveAllFunc[T]([]T, func(T) bool)` for general use.
- Add comments to explain why not `golang.org/x/exp/slices`.
- Add unit tests.
2023-01-11 13:31:16 +08:00
John Olheiser
e7f1d45eb5
fix: omit avatar_url in discord payload when empty (#22393)
Fixes #22391

This field is optional for Discord, however when it exists in the
payload it is now validated.
Omitting it entirely just makes Discord use the default for that
webhook, which is set on the Discord side.

Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-01-10 14:01:52 -05:00
Jason Song
7adc2de464
Use context parameter in models/git (#22367)
After #22362, we can feel free to use transactions without
`db.DefaultContext`.

And there are still lots of models using `db.DefaultContext`, I think we
should refactor them carefully and one by one.

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-01-09 11:50:54 +08:00
Jason Song
6135359a04
Always reuse transaction (#22362) 2023-01-08 09:34:58 +08:00
Gusted
96797fed31
Unify hashing for avatar (#22289)
- Unify the hashing code for repository and user avatars into a
function.
- Use a sane hash function instead of MD5.
- Only require hashing once instead of twice(w.r.t. hashing for user
avatar).
- Improve the comment for the hashing code of why it works.

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
2023-01-02 22:46:39 +01:00
delvh
0f4e1b9ac6
Restructure webhook module (#22256)
Previously, there was an `import services/webhooks` inside
`modules/notification/webhook`.
This import was removed (after fighting against many import cycles).
Additionally, `modules/notification/webhook` was moved to
`modules/webhook`,
and a few structs/constants were extracted from `models/webhooks` to
`modules/webhook`.

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-01-01 23:23:15 +08:00
Jason Song
47efba78ec
Support template for merge message description (#22248)
Fix #21435.

Use the first line of the template as the git commit message title, and
the rest as the description.

## Snapshots

<img width="806" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/209644083-5d85179c-cf58-404f-bc98-c662398a2411.png">
<img width="860" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/209644392-22573090-e2c1-458b-ba44-855b79735632.png">
<img width="1154" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/209644457-a1b2711a-6787-45b4-b52c-a88d7fc132d7.png">

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2022-12-29 14:40:20 +02:00
KN4CK3R
a35749893b
Move convert package to services (#22264)
Addition to #22256

The `convert` package relies heavily on different models which is
[disallowed by our definition of
modules](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#design-guideline).
This helps to prevent possible import cycles.

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-12-29 10:57:15 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
ca67c5a8a7
refactor auth interface to return error when verify failure (#22119)
This PR changed the Auth interface signature from 
`Verify(http *http.Request, w http.ResponseWriter, store DataStore, sess
SessionStore) *user_model.User`
to 
`Verify(http *http.Request, w http.ResponseWriter, store DataStore, sess
SessionStore) (*user_model.User, error)`.

There is a new return argument `error` which means the verification
condition matched but verify process failed, we should stop the auth
process.

Before this PR, when return a `nil` user, we don't know the reason why
it returned `nil`. If the match condition is not satisfied or it
verified failure? For these two different results, we should have
different handler. If the match condition is not satisfied, we should
try next auth method and if there is no more auth method, it's an
anonymous user. If the condition matched but verify failed, the auth
process should be stop and return immediately.

This will fix #20563

Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
2022-12-28 13:53:28 +08:00
Xinyu Zhou
7cc7db73b9
Add option to prohibit fork if user reached maximum limit of repositories (#21848)
If user has reached the maximum limit of repositories:

- Before
  - disallow create
  - allow fork without limit
- This patch:
  - disallow create
  - disallow fork
- Add option `ALLOW_FORK_WITHOUT_MAXIMUM_LIMIT` (Default **true**) :
enable this allow user fork repositories without maximum number limit

fixed https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/21847

Signed-off-by: Xinyu Zhou <i@sourcehut.net>
2022-12-27 15:21:14 -06:00
Jason Song
6cf09ccab4
Use complete SHA to create and query commit status (#22244)
Fix #13485.

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-12-27 21:12:49 +08:00
Jason Song
71ca3067bc
Check primary keys for all tables and drop ForeignReference (#21721)
Some dbs require that all tables have primary keys, see
- #16802
- #21086

We can add a test to keep it from being broken again.

Edit:

~Added missing primary key for `ForeignReference`~ Dropped the
`ForeignReference` table to satisfy the check, so it closes #21086.

More context can be found in comments.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
2022-12-23 19:35:43 +08:00
Jason Song
659055138b
Secrets storage with SecretKey encrypted (#22142)
Fork of #14483, but [gave up
MasterKey](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/14483#issuecomment-1350728557),
and fixed some problems.

Close #12065.
Needed by #13539.

Featrues:
- Secrets for repo and org, not user yet.
- Use SecretKey to encrypte/encrypt secrets.
- Trim spaces of secret value.
- Add a new locale ini block, to make it easy to support secrets for
user.

Snapshots:

Repo level secrets:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/207823319-b8a4903f-38ca-4af7-9d05-336a5af906f3.png)

Rrg level secrets

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/207823371-8bd02e93-1928-40d1-8c76-f48b255ace36.png)

Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2022-12-20 17:07:13 +08:00
zeripath
d6b96627c1
Add setting to disable the git apply step in test patch (#22130)
For a long time Gitea has tested PR patches using a git apply --check
method, and in fact prior to the introduction of a read-tree assisted
three-way merge in #18004, this was the only way of checking patches.

Since #18004, the git apply --check method has been a fallback method,
only used when the read-tree three-way merge method has detected a
conflict. The read-tree assisted three-way merge method is much faster
and less resource intensive method of detecting conflicts. #18004 kept
the git apply method around because it was thought possible that this
fallback might be able to rectify conflicts that the read-tree three-way
merge detected. I am not certain if this could ever be the case.

Given the uncertainty here and the now relative stability of the
read-tree method - this PR makes using this fallback optional and
disables it by default. The hope is that users will not notice any
significant difference in conflict detection and we will be able to
remove the git apply fallback in future, and/or improve the read-tree
three-way merge method to catch any conflicts that git apply method
might have been able to fix.

An additional benefit is that patch checking should be significantly
less resource intensive and much quicker.

(See
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22083\#issuecomment-1347961737)

Ref #22083

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2022-12-19 19:37:15 +08:00
Christian Ullrich
84285a1169
Do not list active repositories as unadopted (#22034)
This fixes a bug where, when searching unadopted repositories, active
repositories will be listed as well. This is because the size of the
array of repository names to check is larger by one than the
`IterateBufferSize`.

For an `IterateBufferSize` of 50, the original code will pass 51
repository names but set the query to `LIMIT 50`. If all repositories in
the query are active (i.e. not unadopted) one of them will be omitted
from the result. Due to the `ORDER BY` clause it will be the oldest (or
least recently modified) one.

Bug found in 1.17.3.

Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-12-16 16:58:56 +08:00