Backport #22633
Our trace logging is far from perfect and is difficult to follow.
This PR:
* Add trace logging for process manager add and remove.
* Fixes an errant read file for git refs in getMergeCommit
* Brings in the pullrequest `String` and `ColorFormat` methods
introduced in #22568
* Adds a lot more logging in to testPR etc.
Ref #22578
---------
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
With the upgrade to go 1.20 golangci-lint no longer correctly works. We must therefore upgrade to the latest golangci-lint.
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Backport #22566
Change the mailer interface to prevent the leaking of possible hidden
email addresses when sending to multiple recipients.
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com>
Backport #22457
The API endpoints for "git" can panic if they are called on an empty
repo. We can simply allow empty repos for these endpoints without worry
as they should just work.
Fix#22452
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
- Backport of #22229
- When the GPG key contains an error, such as an invalid signature or an
email address that does not match the user.A page will be shown that
says you must provide a signature for the token.
- This page had two errors: one had the wrong translation key and the
other tried to use an undefined variable
[`.PaddedKeyID`](e81ccc406b/models/asymkey/gpg_key.go (L65-L72)),
which is a function implemented on the `GPGKey` struct, given that we
don't have that, we use
[`KeyID`](e81ccc406b/routers/web/user/setting/keys.go (L102))
which is [the fingerprint of the
publickey](https://pkg.go.dev/golang.org/x/crypto/openpgp/packet#PublicKey.KeyIdString)
and is a valid way for opengpg to refer to a key.
backport #22119
This PR changed the Auth interface signature from `Verify(http
*http.Request, w http.ResponseWriter, store DataStore, sess
SessionStore) *user_model.User`
to
`Verify(http *http.Request, w http.ResponseWriter, store DataStore, sess
SessionStore) (*user_model.User, error)`.
There is a new return argument `error` which means the verification
condition matched but verify process failed, we should stop the auth
process.
Before this PR, when return a `nil` user, we don't know the reason why
it returned `nil`. If the match condition is not satisfied or it
verified failure? For these two different results, we should have
different handler. If the match condition is not satisfied, we should
try next auth method and if there is no more auth method, it's an
anonymous user. If the condition matched but verify failed, the auth
process should be stop and return immediately.
This will fix#20563
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
backport from #22219
Since we changed the /api/v1/ routes to disallow session authentication
we also removed their reliance on CSRF. However, we left the
ReverseProxy authentication here - but this means that POSTs to the API
are no longer protected by CSRF.
Now, ReverseProxy authentication is a kind of session authentication,
and is therefore inconsistent with the removal of session from the API.
This PR proposes that we simply remove the ReverseProxy authentication
from the API and therefore users of the API must explicitly use tokens
or basic authentication.
Replace #22077Close#22221Close#22077
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Backport #22017
As recognised in #21841 the rendering of plain text files is somewhat
incorrect when there are ambiguous characters as the html code is double
escaped. In fact there are several more problems here.
We have a residual isRenderedHTML which is actually simply escaping the
file - not rendering it. This is badly named and gives the wrong
impression.
There is also unusual behaviour whether the file is called a Readme or
not and there is no way to get to the source code if the file is called
README.
In reality what should happen is different depending on whether the file
is being rendered a README at the bottom of the directory view or not.
1. If it is rendered as a README on a directory - it should simply be
escaped and rendered as `<pre>` text.
2. If it is rendered as a file then it should be rendered as source
code.
This PR therefore does:
1. Rename IsRenderedHTML to IsPlainText
2. Readme files rendered at the bottom of the directory are rendered
without line numbers
3. Otherwise plain text files are rendered as source code.
Replace #21841
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Backport of #22095
I changed it to a static condition because it needs a new version of
xorm which is only available in 1.19. This change is valid because
`SearchLatestVersions` is never called to list internal versions and
there will no change to this behaviour in <1.19.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Backport #21990
- Use explicit avatar size so when JS copies the HTML, the size gets
copied with it
- Replace icon font use with SVG
- Improve styling and diff rendering
- Sort lists in `svg.js`
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/21924
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Backport #21940
If a deleted-branch has already been restored, a request to restore it
again will cause a NPE. This PR adds detection for this case, but also
disables buttons when they're clicked in order to help prevent
accidental repeat requests.
Fix#21930
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Backport #21720.
Fix#20921.
The `ctx.Repo.GitRepo` has been used in deleting issues when the issue
is a PR.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Backport #21731.
Fix#21698.
Set the last login time to the current time when activating the user
successfully.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Backport #21767
The purpose of #18982 is to improve the SMTP mailer, but there were some
unrelated changes made to the SMTP auth in
d60c438694
This PR reverts these unrelated changes, fix#21744
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
backport #21621
This is a performance regression from #18058
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Backport (#21708)
This addresses #21707 and adds a second package test case for a
non-semver compatible version (this might be overkill though since you
could also edit the old package version to have an epoch in front and
see the error, this just seemed more flexible for the future).
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Backport #21619 .
A patch to #17335.
Just like AppPath, Gitea writes its own CustomConf into git hook scripts
too. If Gitea's CustomConf changes, then the git push may fail.
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Fixes an 500 error/panic if using the changed PR files API with pages
that should return empty lists because there are no items anymore.
`start-end` is then < 0 which ends in panic.
Backport https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21602
<!--
Please check the following:
1. Make sure you are targeting the `main` branch, pull requests on
release branches are only allowed for bug fixes.
2. Read contributing guidelines:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md
3. Describe what your pull request does and which issue you're targeting
(if any)
-->
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
I noticed an admin is not allowed to upload packages for other users
because `ctx.IsSigned` was not set.
I added a check for `user.IsActive` and `user.ProhibitLogin` too because
both was not checked. Tests enforce this now.
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
The OAuth spec [defines two types of
client](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-2.1),
confidential and public. Previously Gitea assumed all clients to be
confidential.
> OAuth defines two client types, based on their ability to authenticate
securely with the authorization server (i.e., ability to
> maintain the confidentiality of their client credentials):
>
> confidential
> Clients capable of maintaining the confidentiality of their
credentials (e.g., client implemented on a secure server with
> restricted access to the client credentials), or capable of secure
client authentication using other means.
>
> **public
> Clients incapable of maintaining the confidentiality of their
credentials (e.g., clients executing on the device used by the resource
owner, such as an installed native application or a web browser-based
application), and incapable of secure client authentication via any
other means.**
>
> The client type designation is based on the authorization server's
definition of secure authentication and its acceptable exposure levels
of client credentials. The authorization server SHOULD NOT make
assumptions about the client type.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8252#section-8.4
> Authorization servers MUST record the client type in the client
registration details in order to identify and process requests
accordingly.
Require PKCE for public clients:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8252#section-8.1
> Authorization servers SHOULD reject authorization requests from native
apps that don't use PKCE by returning an error message
Fixes#21299
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
This stype name is also used in many repos, example:
[``README_ZH.md``](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/main/README_ZH.md)
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
According to the OAuth spec
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-6 when "Refreshing
an Access Token"
> The authorization server MUST ... require client authentication for
confidential clients
Fixes#21418
Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Previously mentioning a user would link to its profile, regardless of
whether the user existed. This change tests if the user exists and only
if it does - a link to its profile is added.
* Fixes#3444
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
This prevents a 500 response, because null pointer exceptions in
rendering the template.
This happends bc the repoId is not in the repoMap because it is delete
fix#19076
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
