0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea synced 2024-12-21 05:34:07 +01:00
gitea/tests/integration/api_issue_reaction_test.go

173 lines
6 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2019 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
package integration
import (
"fmt"
"net/http"
"testing"
"time"
auth_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/auth"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/db"
issues_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/issues"
repo_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/repo"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unittest"
user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
api "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/structs"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/services/convert"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/tests"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
)
func TestAPIIssuesReactions(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
issue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: 1})
_ = issue.LoadRepo(db.DefaultContext)
owner := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: issue.Repo.OwnerID})
session := loginUser(t, owner.Name)
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteIssue)
user2 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})
urlStr := fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/issues/%d/reactions", owner.Name, issue.Repo.Name, issue.Index)
// Try to add not allowed reaction
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", urlStr, &api.EditReactionOption{
Reaction: "wrong",
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusForbidden)
// Delete not allowed reaction
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, "DELETE", urlStr, &api.EditReactionOption{
Reaction: "zzz",
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
// Add allowed reaction
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", urlStr, &api.EditReactionOption{
Reaction: "rocket",
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
var apiNewReaction api.Reaction
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &apiNewReaction)
// Add existing reaction
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusForbidden)
// Blocked user can't react to comment
user34 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 34})
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", urlStr, &api.EditReactionOption{
Reaction: "rocket",
}).AddTokenAuth(getUserToken(t, user34.Name, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteIssue))
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusForbidden)
// Get end result of reaction list of issue #1
req = NewRequest(t, "GET", urlStr).
AddTokenAuth(token)
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
var apiReactions []*api.Reaction
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &apiReactions)
expectResponse := make(map[int]api.Reaction)
expectResponse[0] = api.Reaction{
Add context cache as a request level cache (#22294) To avoid duplicated load of the same data in an HTTP request, we can set a context cache to do that. i.e. Some pages may load a user from a database with the same id in different areas on the same page. But the code is hidden in two different deep logic. How should we share the user? As a result of this PR, now if both entry functions accept `context.Context` as the first parameter and we just need to refactor `GetUserByID` to reuse the user from the context cache. Then it will not be loaded twice on an HTTP request. But of course, sometimes we would like to reload an object from the database, that's why `RemoveContextData` is also exposed. The core context cache is here. It defines a new context ```go type cacheContext struct { ctx context.Context data map[any]map[any]any lock sync.RWMutex } var cacheContextKey = struct{}{} func WithCacheContext(ctx context.Context) context.Context { return context.WithValue(ctx, cacheContextKey, &cacheContext{ ctx: ctx, data: make(map[any]map[any]any), }) } ``` Then you can use the below 4 methods to read/write/del the data within the same context. ```go func GetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) any func SetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key, value any) func RemoveContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) func GetWithContextCache[T any](ctx context.Context, cacheGroupKey string, cacheTargetID any, f func() (T, error)) (T, error) ``` Then let's take a look at how `system.GetString` implement it. ```go func GetSetting(ctx context.Context, key string) (string, error) { return cache.GetWithContextCache(ctx, contextCacheKey, key, func() (string, error) { return cache.GetString(genSettingCacheKey(key), func() (string, error) { res, err := GetSettingNoCache(ctx, key) if err != nil { return "", err } return res.SettingValue, nil }) }) } ``` First, it will check if context data include the setting object with the key. If not, it will query from the global cache which may be memory or a Redis cache. If not, it will get the object from the database. In the end, if the object gets from the global cache or database, it will be set into the context cache. An object stored in the context cache will only be destroyed after the context disappeared.
2023-02-15 14:37:34 +01:00
User: convert.ToUser(db.DefaultContext, user2, user2),
Reaction: "eyes",
Created: time.Unix(1573248003, 0),
}
expectResponse[1] = apiNewReaction
assert.Len(t, apiReactions, 2)
for i, r := range apiReactions {
assert.Equal(t, expectResponse[i].Reaction, r.Reaction)
assert.Equal(t, expectResponse[i].Created.Unix(), r.Created.Unix())
assert.Equal(t, expectResponse[i].User.ID, r.User.ID)
}
}
func TestAPICommentReactions(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
comment := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Comment{ID: 2})
_ = comment.LoadIssue(db.DefaultContext)
issue := comment.Issue
_ = issue.LoadRepo(db.DefaultContext)
owner := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: issue.Repo.OwnerID})
session := loginUser(t, owner.Name)
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 20:57:16 +02:00
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteIssue)
user1 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 1})
user2 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})
urlStr := fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/issues/comments/%d/reactions", owner.Name, issue.Repo.Name, comment.ID)
// Try to add not allowed reaction
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", urlStr, &api.EditReactionOption{
Reaction: "wrong",
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusForbidden)
// Delete none existing reaction
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, "DELETE", urlStr, &api.EditReactionOption{
Reaction: "eyes",
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
t.Run("UnrelatedCommentID", func(t *testing.T) {
// Using the ID of a comment that does not belong to the repository must fail
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 4})
repoOwner := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo.OwnerID})
token := getUserToken(t, repoOwner.Name, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteIssue)
urlStr := fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/issues/comments/%d/reactions", repoOwner.Name, repo.Name, comment.ID)
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", urlStr, &api.EditReactionOption{
Reaction: "+1",
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNotFound)
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, "DELETE", urlStr, &api.EditReactionOption{
Reaction: "+1",
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNotFound)
req = NewRequest(t, "GET", urlStr).
AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNotFound)
})
// Add allowed reaction
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", urlStr, &api.EditReactionOption{
Reaction: "+1",
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
var apiNewReaction api.Reaction
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &apiNewReaction)
// Add existing reaction
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusForbidden)
// Get end result of reaction list of issue #1
req = NewRequest(t, "GET", urlStr).
AddTokenAuth(token)
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
var apiReactions []*api.Reaction
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &apiReactions)
expectResponse := make(map[int]api.Reaction)
expectResponse[0] = api.Reaction{
Add context cache as a request level cache (#22294) To avoid duplicated load of the same data in an HTTP request, we can set a context cache to do that. i.e. Some pages may load a user from a database with the same id in different areas on the same page. But the code is hidden in two different deep logic. How should we share the user? As a result of this PR, now if both entry functions accept `context.Context` as the first parameter and we just need to refactor `GetUserByID` to reuse the user from the context cache. Then it will not be loaded twice on an HTTP request. But of course, sometimes we would like to reload an object from the database, that's why `RemoveContextData` is also exposed. The core context cache is here. It defines a new context ```go type cacheContext struct { ctx context.Context data map[any]map[any]any lock sync.RWMutex } var cacheContextKey = struct{}{} func WithCacheContext(ctx context.Context) context.Context { return context.WithValue(ctx, cacheContextKey, &cacheContext{ ctx: ctx, data: make(map[any]map[any]any), }) } ``` Then you can use the below 4 methods to read/write/del the data within the same context. ```go func GetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) any func SetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key, value any) func RemoveContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) func GetWithContextCache[T any](ctx context.Context, cacheGroupKey string, cacheTargetID any, f func() (T, error)) (T, error) ``` Then let's take a look at how `system.GetString` implement it. ```go func GetSetting(ctx context.Context, key string) (string, error) { return cache.GetWithContextCache(ctx, contextCacheKey, key, func() (string, error) { return cache.GetString(genSettingCacheKey(key), func() (string, error) { res, err := GetSettingNoCache(ctx, key) if err != nil { return "", err } return res.SettingValue, nil }) }) } ``` First, it will check if context data include the setting object with the key. If not, it will query from the global cache which may be memory or a Redis cache. If not, it will get the object from the database. In the end, if the object gets from the global cache or database, it will be set into the context cache. An object stored in the context cache will only be destroyed after the context disappeared.
2023-02-15 14:37:34 +01:00
User: convert.ToUser(db.DefaultContext, user2, user2),
Reaction: "laugh",
Created: time.Unix(1573248004, 0),
}
expectResponse[1] = api.Reaction{
Add context cache as a request level cache (#22294) To avoid duplicated load of the same data in an HTTP request, we can set a context cache to do that. i.e. Some pages may load a user from a database with the same id in different areas on the same page. But the code is hidden in two different deep logic. How should we share the user? As a result of this PR, now if both entry functions accept `context.Context` as the first parameter and we just need to refactor `GetUserByID` to reuse the user from the context cache. Then it will not be loaded twice on an HTTP request. But of course, sometimes we would like to reload an object from the database, that's why `RemoveContextData` is also exposed. The core context cache is here. It defines a new context ```go type cacheContext struct { ctx context.Context data map[any]map[any]any lock sync.RWMutex } var cacheContextKey = struct{}{} func WithCacheContext(ctx context.Context) context.Context { return context.WithValue(ctx, cacheContextKey, &cacheContext{ ctx: ctx, data: make(map[any]map[any]any), }) } ``` Then you can use the below 4 methods to read/write/del the data within the same context. ```go func GetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) any func SetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key, value any) func RemoveContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) func GetWithContextCache[T any](ctx context.Context, cacheGroupKey string, cacheTargetID any, f func() (T, error)) (T, error) ``` Then let's take a look at how `system.GetString` implement it. ```go func GetSetting(ctx context.Context, key string) (string, error) { return cache.GetWithContextCache(ctx, contextCacheKey, key, func() (string, error) { return cache.GetString(genSettingCacheKey(key), func() (string, error) { res, err := GetSettingNoCache(ctx, key) if err != nil { return "", err } return res.SettingValue, nil }) }) } ``` First, it will check if context data include the setting object with the key. If not, it will query from the global cache which may be memory or a Redis cache. If not, it will get the object from the database. In the end, if the object gets from the global cache or database, it will be set into the context cache. An object stored in the context cache will only be destroyed after the context disappeared.
2023-02-15 14:37:34 +01:00
User: convert.ToUser(db.DefaultContext, user1, user1),
Reaction: "laugh",
Created: time.Unix(1573248005, 0),
}
expectResponse[2] = apiNewReaction
assert.Len(t, apiReactions, 3)
for i, r := range apiReactions {
assert.Equal(t, expectResponse[i].Reaction, r.Reaction)
assert.Equal(t, expectResponse[i].Created.Unix(), r.Created.Unix())
assert.Equal(t, expectResponse[i].User.ID, r.User.ID)
}
}