MirrorHub/gitea
0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea synced 2024-11-18 07:52:03 +01:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

fix code review on mssql (#5502)

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Lunny Xiao 2018-12-11 09:09:46 +08:00 committed by GitHub
parent 8a64e67456
commit 284b0e12cb
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 19 additions and 7 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

14
models/review.go
View file

@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ import (
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/log"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/util"
"github.com/go-xorm/core"
"github.com/go-xorm/xorm"
"github.com/go-xorm/builder"
@ -266,13 +267,24 @@ type PullReviewersWithType struct {
// GetReviewersByPullID gets all reviewers for a pull request with the statuses
func GetReviewersByPullID(pullID int64) (issueReviewers []*PullReviewersWithType, err error) {
irs := []*PullReviewersWithType{}
if x.Dialect().DBType() == core.MSSQL {
err = x.SQL(`SELECT [user].*, review.type, review.review_updated_unix FROM
(SELECT review.id, review.type, review.reviewer_id, max(review.updated_unix) as review_updated_unix
FROM review WHERE review.issue_id=? AND (review.type = ? OR review.type = ?)
GROUP BY review.id, review.type, review.reviewer_id) as review
INNER JOIN [user] ON review.reviewer_id = [user].id ORDER BY review_updated_unix DESC`,
pullID, ReviewTypeApprove, ReviewTypeReject).
Find(&irs)
} else {
err = x.Select("`user`.*, review.type, max(review.updated_unix) as review_updated_unix").
Table("review").
Join("INNER", "`user`", "review.reviewer_id = `user`.id").
Where("review.issue_id = ? AND (review.type = ? OR review.type = ?)", pullID, ReviewTypeApprove, ReviewTypeReject).
Where("review.issue_id = ? AND (review.type = ? OR review.type = ?)",
pullID, ReviewTypeApprove, ReviewTypeReject).
GroupBy("`user`.id, review.type").
OrderBy("review_updated_unix DESC").
Find(&irs)
}
// We need to group our results by user id _and_ review type, otherwise the query fails when using postgresql.
// But becaus we're doing this, we need to manually filter out multiple reviews of different types by the