wxiaoguang
f3999888c0
Refactor some legacy code and remove unused code ( #28622 )
...
1. use slices.Contains, remove Int64sContains
2. use HashEmail, remove base.EncodeMD5
3. remove BasicAuthEncode, IsLetter
2023-12-28 09:38:59 +00:00
delvh
778ad795fd
Refactor deletion ( #28610 )
...
Introduce the new generic deletion methods
- `func DeleteByID[T any](ctx context.Context, id int64) (int64, error)`
- `func DeleteByIDs[T any](ctx context.Context, ids ...int64) error`
- `func Delete[T any](ctx context.Context, opts FindOptions) (int64,
error)`
So, we no longer need any specific deletion method and can just use
the generic ones instead.
Replacement of #28450
Closes #28450
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-12-25 21:25:29 +01:00
6543
2c48733afe
Fix inperformant query on retrifing review from database. ( #28552 )
...
can we please PLEAS PLEASE only use raw SQL statements if it is relay
needed!!!
source is https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/28544 (before
refactoring)
2023-12-20 15:19:58 +00:00
Nanguan Lin
966dcb99e3
Fix 500 when deleting a dismissed review ( #27903 )
...
Fix #27767
Add a test to ensure its behavior
2023-11-05 13:25:40 +00:00
silverwind
ce83609ff6
Upgrade to golangci-lint@v1.55.0 ( #27756 )
...
https://github.com/golangci/golangci-lint/releases/tag/v1.55.0
2023-10-24 02:54:59 +00:00
JakobDev
cf0df023be
More db.DefaultContext refactor ( #27265 )
...
Part of #27065
This PR touches functions used in templates. As templates are not static
typed, errors are harder to find, but I hope I catch it all. I think
some tests from other persons do not hurt.
2023-09-29 12:12:54 +00:00
Nanguan Lin
15a504cb9f
Fix the approval count of PR when there is no protection branch rule ( #27272 )
...
As title
2023-09-28 23:24:36 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
36eb3c433a
Add transaction when creating pull request created dirty data ( #26259 )
...
Fix #26129
Replace #26258
This PR will introduce a transaction on creating pull request so that if
some step failed, it will rollback totally. And there will be no dirty
pull request exist.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-10 02:39:21 +00:00
sebastian-sauer
70647bd04c
Use yellow if an approved review is stale ( #26312 )
...
By using a different color it's clear that the review isn't pointing to
the latest commit.
**Screenshots:**
Not stale review:
Stale review:
fixes #26306
2023-08-04 00:28:21 +03:00
Lunny Xiao
01c04607c7
Fix bug when pushing to a pull request which enabled dismiss approval automatically ( #25882 )
...
Fix #25858
The option `dissmiss stale approvals` was listed on protected branch but
never implemented. This PR fixes that.
<img width="1006" alt="图片"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/81045/60bfa968-4db7-4c24-b8be-2e5978f91bb9 ">
<img width="1021" alt="图片"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/81045/8dabc14d-2dfe-40c2-94ed-24fcbf6e0e8f ">
2023-07-20 15:18:52 +08:00
silverwind
887a683af9
Update tool dependencies, lock govulncheck and actionlint ( #25655 )
...
- Update all tool dependencies
- Lock `govulncheck` and `actionlint` to their latest tags
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <m.huber@kithara.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-07-09 11:58:06 +00:00
silverwind
88f835192d
Replace interface{} with any ( #25686 )
...
Result of running `perl -p -i -e 's#interface\{\}#any#g' **/*` and `make fmt`.
Basically the same [as golang did](2580d0e08d
2023-07-04 18:36:08 +00:00
sebastian-sauer
25455bc670
Show outdated comments in files changed tab ( #24936 )
...
If enabled show a clickable label in the comment. A click on the label
opens the Conversation tab with the comment focussed - there you're able
to view the old diff (or original diff the comment was created on).
**Screenshots**
When resolved and outdated:
Option to enable/disable this (stored in user settings - default is
disabled):
fixes #24913
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-21 16:08:12 +00:00
Cory Todd
179704695c
Fix duplicate Reviewed-by trailers ( #24796 )
...
Enable deduplication of unofficial reviews. When pull requests are
configured to include all approvers, not just official ones, in the
default merge messages it was possible to generate duplicated
Reviewed-by lines for a single person. Add an option to find only
distinct reviews for a given query.
fixes #24795
---------
Signed-off-by: Cory Todd <cory.todd@canonical.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-06-09 16:34:49 +02:00
谈笑风生间
309354c70e
New webhook trigger for receiving Pull Request review requests ( #24481 )
...
close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16321
Provided a webhook trigger for requesting someone to review the Pull
Request.
Some modifications have been made to the returned `PullRequestPayload`
based on the GitHub webhook settings, including:
- add a description of the current reviewer object as
`RequestedReviewer` .
- setting the action to either **review_requested** or
**review_request_removed** based on the operation.
- adding the `RequestedReviewers` field to the issues_model.PullRequest.
This field will be loaded into the PullRequest through
`LoadRequestedReviewers()` when `ToAPIPullRequest` is called.
After the Pull Request is merged, I will supplement the relevant
documentation.
2023-05-24 22:06:27 -04:00
silverwind
ae0fa64ef6
Review fixes and enhancements ( #24526 )
...
- Fix regression with icons wrapping from
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24459
- Fix box misalignment on small screen
- Fix avatar misalignment on review comment
- Fix incorrect underline hover effect on review icons
- Move status icon to left side in review box
- Enhance review icon colors, add helper function for it
- Add missing inline avatars in review comments
- Tweak icon sizes because some octicons have inconsistent sizing
### Before
<img width="655" alt="Screenshot 2023-05-04 at 20 50 28"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/236301230-92325507-6e03-47ac-bfb4-c9ddde310571.png ">
<img width="260" alt="Screenshot 2023-05-04 at 20 50 42"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/236301236-0dfa50e7-b8fc-4179-ae68-d872bc90f1f3.png ">
### After
<img width="498" alt="Screenshot 2023-05-04 at 20 55 08"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/236301810-23862c2c-c0a9-43a4-a3eb-ee611c14a7f4.png ">
<img width="219" alt="Screenshot 2023-05-04 at 20 55 16"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/236301817-d0de02ea-6ab5-43e1-9183-6b3848b72995.png ">
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-10 09:16:44 +00:00
Jason Song
4011821c94
Implement actions ( #21937 )
...
Close #13539 .
Co-authored by: @lunny @appleboy @fuxiaohei and others.
Related projects:
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-go
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner
### Summary
The target of this PR is to bring a basic implementation of "Actions",
an internal CI/CD system of Gitea. That means even though it has been
merged, the state of the feature is **EXPERIMENTAL**, and please note
that:
- It is disabled by default;
- It shouldn't be used in a production environment currently;
- It shouldn't be used in a public Gitea instance currently;
- Breaking changes may be made before it's stable.
**Please comment on #13539 if you have any different product design
ideas**, all decisions reached there will be adopted here. But in this
PR, we don't talk about **naming, feature-creep or alternatives**.
### ⚠️ Breaking
`gitea-actions` will become a reserved user name. If a user with the
name already exists in the database, it is recommended to rename it.
### Some important reviews
- What is `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` in `app.ini` for?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1055954954
- Why the api for runners is not under the normal `/api/v1` prefix?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061173592
- Why DBFS?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061301178
- Why ignore events triggered by `gitea-actions` bot?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1063254103
- Why there's no permission control for actions?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1090229868
### What it looks like
<details>
#### Manage runners
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205870657-c72f590e-2e08-4cd4-be7f-2e0abb299bbf.png ">
#### List runs
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872794-50fde990-2b45-48c1-a178-908e4ec5b627.png ">
#### View logs
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872501-9b7b9000-9542-4991-8f55-18ccdada77c3.png ">
</details>
### How to try it
<details>
#### 1. Start Gitea
Clone this branch and [install from
source](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/install-from-source ).
Add additional configurations in `app.ini` to enable Actions:
```ini
[actions]
ENABLED = true
```
Start it.
If all is well, you'll see the management page of runners:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205877365-8e30a780-9b10-4154-b3e8-ee6c3cb35a59.png ">
#### 2. Start runner
Clone the [act_runner](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner ), and follow
the
[README](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/src/branch/main/README.md )
to start it.
If all is well, you'll see a new runner has been added:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205878000-216f5937-e696-470d-b66c-8473987d91c3.png ">
#### 3. Enable actions for a repo
Create a new repo or open an existing one, check the `Actions` checkbox
in settings and submit.
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879705-53e09208-73c0-4b3e-a123-2dcf9aba4b9c.png ">
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879383-23f3d08f-1a85-41dd-a8b3-54e2ee6453e8.png ">
If all is well, you'll see a new tab "Actions":
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205881648-a8072d8c-5803-4d76-b8a8-9b2fb49516c1.png ">
#### 4. Upload workflow files
Upload some workflow files to `.gitea/workflows/xxx.yaml`, you can
follow the [quickstart](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/quickstart )
of GitHub Actions. Yes, Gitea Actions is compatible with GitHub Actions
in most cases, you can use the same demo:
```yaml
name: GitHub Actions Demo
run-name: ${{ github.actor }} is testing out GitHub Actions 🚀
on: [push]
jobs:
Explore-GitHub-Actions:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- run: echo "🎉 The job was automatically triggered by a ${{ github.event_name }} event."
- run: echo "🐧 This job is now running on a ${{ runner.os }} server hosted by GitHub!"
- run: echo "🔎 The name of your branch is ${{ github.ref }} and your repository is ${{ github.repository }}."
- name: Check out repository code
uses: actions/checkout@v3
- run: echo "💡 The ${{ github.repository }} repository has been cloned to the runner."
- run: echo "🖥️ The workflow is now ready to test your code on the runner."
- name: List files in the repository
run: |
ls ${{ github.workspace }}
- run: echo "🍏 This job's status is ${{ job.status }}."
```
If all is well, you'll see a new run in `Actions` tab:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884473-79a874bc-171b-4aaf-acd5-0241a45c3b53.png ">
#### 5. Check the logs of jobs
Click a run and you'll see the logs:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884800-994b0374-67f7-48ff-be9a-4c53f3141547.png ">
#### 6. Go on
You can try more examples in [the
documents](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions )
of GitHub Actions, then you might find a lot of bugs.
Come on, PRs are welcome.
</details>
See also: [Feature Preview: Gitea
Actions](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/12/feature-preview-gitea-actions/ )
---------
Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-01-31 09:45:19 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
db2286bbb6
some refactor about code comments ( #20821 )
2023-01-17 15:03:44 -06:00
Lunny Xiao
2782c14396
Supports wildcard protected branch ( #20825 )
...
This PR introduce glob match for protected branch name. The separator is
`/` and you can use `*` matching non-separator chars and use `**` across
separator.
It also supports input an exist or non-exist branch name as matching
condition and branch name condition has high priority than glob rule.
Should fix #2529 and #15705
screenshots
<img width="1160" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/205651179-ebb5492a-4ade-4bb4-a13c-965e8c927063.png ">
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
2023-01-16 16:00:22 +08:00
Jimmy Praet
fe519d8633
Restore previous official review when an official review is deleted ( #22449 )
...
Fix #22406
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2023-01-15 07:00:09 +02:00
Lunny Xiao
68704532c2
Rename almost all Ctx functions ( #22071 )
2022-12-10 10:46:31 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
0a7d3ff786
refactor some functions to support ctx as first parameter ( #21878 )
...
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2022-12-03 10:48:26 +08:00
flynnnnnnnnnn
e81ccc406b
Implement FSFE REUSE for golang files ( #21840 )
...
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.
Fix #16132
Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2022-11-27 18:20:29 +00:00
KN4CK3R
044c754ea5
Add context.Context to more methods ( #21546 )
...
This PR adds a context parameter to a bunch of methods. Some helper
`xxxCtx()` methods got replaced with the normal name now.
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-11-19 16:12:33 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
34283a74e8
Allow detect whether it's in a database transaction for a context.Context ( #21756 )
...
Fix #19513
This PR introduce a new db method `InTransaction(context.Context)`,
and also builtin check on `db.TxContext` and `db.WithTx`.
There is also a new method `db.AutoTx` has been introduced but could be used by other PRs.
`WithTx` will always open a new transaction, if a transaction exist in context, return an error.
`AutoTx` will try to open a new transaction if no transaction exist in context.
That means it will always enter a transaction if there is no error.
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2022-11-12 21:18:50 +01:00
delvh
0ebb45cfe7
Replace all instances of fmt.Errorf(%v) with fmt.Errorf(%w) ( #21551 )
...
Found using
`find . -type f -name '*.go' -print -exec vim {} -c
':%s/fmt\.Errorf(\(.*\)%v\(.*\)err/fmt.Errorf(\1%w\2err/g' -c ':wq' \;`
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2022-10-24 20:29:17 +01:00
zeripath
716fcfcf72
Make every not exist error unwrappable to a fs.ErrNotExist ( #20891 )
...
A lot of our code is repeatedly testing if individual errors are
specific types of Not Exist errors. This is repetitative and unnecesary.
`Unwrap() error` provides a common way of labelling an error as a
NotExist error and we can/should use this.
This PR has chosen to use the common `io/fs` errors e.g.
`fs.ErrNotExist` for our errors. This is in some ways not completely
correct as these are not filesystem errors but it seems like a
reasonable thing to do and would allow us to simplify a lot of our code
to `errors.Is(err, fs.ErrNotExist)` instead of
`package.IsErr...NotExist(err)`
I am open to suggestions to use a different base error - perhaps
`models/db.ErrNotExist` if that would be felt to be better.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2022-10-18 07:50:37 +02:00
6543
c0f5111fea
Dismiss prior pull reviews if done via web in review dismiss ( #20197 )
2022-07-19 15:20:28 +02:00
Wim
cb50375e2b
Add more linters to improve code readability ( #19989 )
...
Add nakedret, unconvert, wastedassign, stylecheck and nolintlint linters to improve code readability
- nakedret - https://github.com/alexkohler/nakedret - nakedret is a Go static analysis tool to find naked returns in functions greater than a specified function length.
- unconvert - https://github.com/mdempsky/unconvert - Remove unnecessary type conversions
- wastedassign - https://github.com/sanposhiho/wastedassign - wastedassign finds wasted assignment statements.
- notlintlint - Reports ill-formed or insufficient nolint directives
- stylecheck - https://staticcheck.io/docs/checks/#ST - keep style consistent
- excluded: [ST1003 - Poorly chosen identifier](https://staticcheck.io/docs/checks/#ST1003 ) and [ST1005 - Incorrectly formatted error string](https://staticcheck.io/docs/checks/#ST1005 )
2022-06-20 12:02:49 +02:00
Lunny Xiao
1a9821f57a
Move issues related files into models/issues ( #19931 )
...
* Move access and repo permission to models/perm/access
* fix test
* fix git test
* Move functions sequence
* Some improvements per @KN4CK3R and @delvh
* Move issues related code to models/issues
* Move some issues related sub package
* Merge
* Fix test
* Fix test
* Fix test
* Fix test
* Rename some files
2022-06-13 17:37:59 +08:00
