0
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea synced 2024-11-24 17:43:12 +01:00
Commit graph

186 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Giteabot
97a7c04a8f
Fix bleve fuzziness (#30799) (#30804)
Backport #30799 by wxiaoguang

Fix #30797
Fix #30317

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-05-01 12:59:59 +00:00
Kemal Zebari
9b7af4340c
Perform Newest sort type correctly when sorting issues (#30644)
Should resolve #30642.

Before this commit, we were treating an empty `?sort=` query parameter
as the correct sorting type (which is to sort issues in descending order
by their created UNIX time). But when we perform `sort=latest`, we did
not include this as a type so we would sort by the most recently updated
when reaching the `default` switch statement block.

This commit fixes this by considering the empty string, "latest", and
just any other string that is not mentioned in the switch statement as
sorting by newest.
2024-04-23 15:10:01 +08:00
silverwind
74f0c84fa4
Enable more revive linter rules (#30608)
Noteable additions:

- `redefines-builtin-id` forbid variable names that shadow go builtins
- `empty-lines` remove unnecessary empty lines that `gofumpt` does not
remove for some reason
- `superfluous-else` eliminate more superfluous `else` branches

Rules are also sorted alphabetically and I cleaned up various parts of
`.golangci.yml`.
2024-04-22 11:48:42 +00:00
wxiaoguang
ca5c895efb
Render embedded code preview by permlink in markdown (#30234)
The permlink in markdown will be rendered as a code preview block, like GitHub

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2024-04-02 17:48:27 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
3f26fe2fa2
Use db.ListOptions directly instead of Paginator interface to make it easier to use and fix performance of /pulls and /issues (#29990)
This PR uses `db.ListOptions` instead of `Paginor` to make the code
simpler.
And it also fixed the performance problem when viewing /pulls or
/issues. Before the counting in fact will also do the search.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2024-03-24 18:51:08 +00:00
wxiaoguang
4734d43e14
Support repo code search without setting up an indexer (#29998)
By using git's ability, end users (especially small instance users) do
not need to enable the indexer, they could also benefit from the code
searching feature.

Fix #29996


![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/11b7e458-88a4-480d-b4d7-72ee59406dd1)


![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/0fe777d5-c95c-4288-a818-0427680805b6)

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2024-03-24 17:05:00 +01:00
6543
b9c57fb78e
Determine fuzziness of bleve indexer by keyword length (#29706)
also bleve did match on fuzzy search and the other way around. this also fix that bug.
2024-03-23 16:45:13 +01:00
Lunny Xiao
f8ab9dafb7
Use db.ListOptionsAll instead of db.ListOptions{ListAll: true} (#29995) 2024-03-22 13:53:52 +01:00
6543
c6e5ec51bd
Meilisearch double quote on "match" query (#29740)
make `nonFuzzyWorkaround` unessesary

cc @Kerollmops
2024-03-16 13:19:41 +00:00
6543
1262ff6734
Refactor code_indexer to use an SearchOptions struct for PerformSearch (#29724)
similar to how it's already done for the issue_indexer


---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
2024-03-16 10:32:45 +00:00
6543
7fd0a5b276
Refactor to use optional.Option for issue index search option (#29739)
Signed-off-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2024-03-13 08:25:53 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
3c6fc25a77
Use repo object format name instead of detecting from git repository (#29702)
It's unnecessary to detect the repository object format from git
repository. Just use the repository's object format name.
2024-03-10 22:30:36 +01:00
6543
7fdc048153
Patch in exact search for meilisearch (#29671)
meilisearch does not have an search option to contorl fuzzynes per query
right now:
 - https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/1192
 - https://github.com/orgs/meilisearch/discussions/377
 - https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/discussions/1096

so we have to create a workaround by post-filter the search result in
gitea until this is addressed.

For future works I added an option in backend only atm, to enable
fuzzynes for issue indexer too.
And also refactored the code so the fuzzy option is equal in logic to
code indexer


---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
2024-03-09 01:39:27 +00:00
yp05327
a2b0fb1a64
Fix wrong line number in code search result (#29260)
Fix #29136

Before: The result is a table and all line numbers are all in one row.

After: Use a separate table column for the line numbers.

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-03-06 07:24:43 +00:00
6543
a3f05d0d98
remove util.OptionalBool and related functions (#29513)
and migrate affected code

_last refactoring bits to replace **util.OptionalBool** with
**optional.Option[bool]**_
2024-03-02 16:42:31 +01:00
6543
f6656181e4
migrate some more "OptionalBool" to "Option[bool]" (#29479)
just some refactoring bits towards replacing **util.OptionalBool** with
**optional.Option[bool]**

---------

Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2024-02-29 18:52:49 +00:00
KN4CK3R
ad0a34b492
Add io.Closer guidelines (#29387)
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
2024-02-25 13:05:23 +00:00
Zettat123
c42083a339
Allow non-admin users to delete review requests (#29057)
Fix #14459

The following users can add/remove review requests of a PR
- the poster of the PR
- the owner or collaborators of the repository
- members with read permission on the pull requests unit
2024-02-24 12:38:43 +00:00
dark-angel
5c0fc90872
fix: Elasticsearch: Request Entity Too Large #28117 (#29062)
Fix for gitea putting everything into one request without batching and
sending it to Elasticsearch for indexing as issued in #28117

This issue occured in large repositories while Gitea tries to 
index the code using ElasticSearch.

I've applied necessary changes that takes batch length from below config
(app.ini)
```
[queue.code_indexer]
BATCH_LENGTH=<length_int>
```
and batches all requests to Elasticsearch in chunks as configured in the
above config
2024-02-07 08:57:16 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
5f82ead13c
Simplify how git repositories are opened (#28937)
## Purpose
This is a refactor toward building an abstraction over managing git
repositories.
Afterwards, it does not matter anymore if they are stored on the local
disk or somewhere remote.

## What this PR changes
We used `git.OpenRepository` everywhere previously.
Now, we should split them into two distinct functions:

Firstly, there are temporary repositories which do not change:

```go
git.OpenRepository(ctx, diskPath)
```

Gitea managed repositories having a record in the database in the
`repository` table are moved into the new package `gitrepo`:

```go
gitrepo.OpenRepository(ctx, repo_model.Repo)
```

Why is `repo_model.Repository` the second parameter instead of file
path?
Because then we can easily adapt our repository storage strategy.
The repositories can be stored locally, however, they could just as well
be stored on a remote server.

## Further changes in other PRs
- A Git Command wrapper on package `gitrepo` could be created. i.e.
`NewCommand(ctx, repo_model.Repository, commands...)`. `git.RunOpts{Dir:
repo.RepoPath()}`, the directory should be empty before invoking this
method and it can be filled in the function only. #28940
- Remove the `RepoPath()`/`WikiPath()` functions to reduce the
possibility of mistakes.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2024-01-27 21:09:51 +01:00
silverwind
60e4a98ab0
Preserve BOM in web editor (#28935)
The `ToUTF8*` functions were stripping BOM, while BOM is actually valid
in UTF8, so the stripping must be optional depending on use case. This
does:

- Add a options struct to all `ToUTF8*` functions, that by default will
strip BOM to preserve existing behaviour
- Remove `ToUTF8` function, it was dead code
- Rename `ToUTF8WithErr` to `ToUTF8`
- Preserve BOM in Monaco Editor
- Remove a unnecessary newline in the textarea value. Browsers did
ignore it, it seems but it's better not to rely on this behaviour.

Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/28743
Related: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/6716 which seems to
have once introduced a mechanism that strips and re-adds the BOM, but
from what I can tell, this mechanism was removed at some point after
that PR.
2024-01-27 18:02:51 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
c4cdebacfe
Fix sort bug on repository issues list (#28897)
Fix #28896
2024-01-23 09:17:42 +08:00
wxiaoguang
20929edc99
Add option to disable ambiguous unicode characters detection (#28454)
* Close #24483
* Close #28123
* Close #23682
* Close #23149

(maybe more)
2023-12-17 14:38:54 +00:00
Adam Majer
cbf923e87b
Abstract hash function usage (#28138)
Refactor Hash interfaces and centralize hash function. This will allow
easier introduction of different hash function later on.

This forms the "no-op" part of the SHA256 enablement patch.
2023-12-13 21:02:00 +00:00
Jason Song
beb71f5ef6
Include public repos in doer's dashboard for issue search (#28304)
It will fix #28268 .

<img width="1313" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/cb1e07d5-7a12-4691-a054-8278ba255bfc">

<img width="1318" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/4fd60820-97f1-4c2c-a233-d3671a5039e9">

## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️

But need to give up some features:

<img width="1312" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/281c0d51-0e7d-473f-bbed-216e2f645610">

However, such abandonment may fix #28055 .

## Backgroud

When the user switches the dashboard context to an org, it means they
want to search issues in the repos that belong to the org. However, when
they switch to themselves, it means all repos they can access because
they may have created an issue in a public repo that they don't own.

<img width="286" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/182dcd5b-1c20-4725-93af-96e8dfae5b97">

It's a confusing design. Think about this: What does "In your
repositories" mean when the user switches to an org? Repos belong to the
user or the org?

Whatever, it has been broken by #26012 and its following PRs. After the
PR, it searches for issues in repos that the dashboard context user owns
or has been explicitly granted access to, so it causes #28268.

## How to fix it

It's not really difficult to fix it. Just extend the repo scope to
search issues when the dashboard context user is the doer. Since the
user may create issues or be mentioned in any public repo, we can just
set `AllPublic` to true, which is already supported by indexers. The DB
condition will also support it in this PR.

But the real difficulty is how to count the search results grouped by
repos. It's something like "search issues with this keyword and those
filters, and return the total number and the top results. **Then, group
all of them by repo and return the counts of each group.**"

<img width="314" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/5206eb20-f8f5-49b9-b45a-1be2fcf679f4">

Before #26012, it was being done in the DB, but it caused the results to
be incomplete (see the description of #26012).

And to keep this, #26012 implement it in an inefficient way, just count
the issues by repo one by one, so it cannot work when `AllPublic` is
true because it's almost impossible to do this for all public repos.


1bfcdeef4c/modules/indexer/issues/indexer.go (L318-L338)

## Give up unnecessary features

We may can resovle `TODO: use "group by" of the indexer engines to
implement it`, I'm sure it can be done with Elasticsearch, but IIRC,
Bleve and Meilisearch don't support "group by".

And the real question is, does it worth it? Why should we need to know
the counts grouped by repos?

Let me show you my search dashboard on gitea.com.

<img width="1304" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/2bca2d46-6c71-4de1-94cb-0c9af27c62ff">

I never think the long repo list helps anything.

And if we agree to abandon it, things will be much easier. That is this
PR.

## TODO

I know it's important to filter by repos when searching issues. However,
it shouldn't be the way we have it now. It could be implemented like
this.

<img width="1316" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/99ee5f21-cbb5-4dfe-914d-cb796cb79fbe">

The indexers support it well now, but it requires some frontend work,
which I'm not good at. So, I think someone could help do that in another
PR and merge this one to fix the bug first.

Or please block this PR and help to complete it.

Finally, "Switch dashboard context" is also a design that needs
improvement. In my opinion, it can be accomplished by adding filtering
conditions instead of "switching".
2023-12-07 13:26:18 +08:00
Brecht Van Lommel
a7de14e493
Meilisearch: require all query terms to be matched (#28293)
Previously only the first term had to be matched. That default
Meilisearch behavior makes sense for e.g. some kind of autocomplete to
find and select a single result. But for filtering issues it means you
can't narrow down results by adding more terms.

This is also more consistent with other indexers and GitHub.

---

Reference:
https://www.meilisearch.com/docs/reference/api/search#matching-strategy
2023-11-29 23:00:59 +08:00
Nanguan Lin
1eae2aadae
Fix issue not showing on default board and add test (#27720)
See https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/27718#issuecomment-1773743014
. Add a test to ensure its behavior.
Why this test uses `ProjectBoardID=0`? Because in `SearchOptions`,
`ProjectBoardID=0` means what it is. But in `IssueOptions`,
`ProjectBoardID=0` means there is no condition, and
`ProjectBoardID=db.NoConditionID` means the board ID = 0.
It's really confusing. Probably it's better to separate the db search
engine and the other issue search code. It's really two different
systems. As far as I can see, `IssueOptions` is not necessary for most
of the code, which has very simple issue search conditions.
2023-10-25 11:51:49 +00:00
Nanguan Lin
eb1478791f
Clean some functions about project issue (#27705)
1. remove unused function `MoveIssueAcrossProjectBoards`
2. extract the project board condition into a function
3. use db.NoCondition instead of -1. (BTW, the usage of db.NoCondition
is too confusing. Is there any way to avoid that?)
4. remove the unnecessary comment since the ctx refactor is completed.
5. Change `b.ID != 0` to `b.ID > 0`. It's more intuitive but I think
they're the same since board ID can't be negative.
2023-10-20 14:01:25 +02:00
Jason Song
1be49fdda6
Improve retrying index issues (#27554)
Fix #27540
2023-10-15 18:56:57 +00:00
Nanguan Lin
dc04044716
Replace assert.Fail with assert.FailNow (#27578)
assert.Fail() will continue to execute the code while assert.FailNow()
not. I thought those uses of assert.Fail() should exit immediately.
PS: perhaps it's a good idea to use
[require](https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/stretchr/testify/require)
somewhere because the assert package's default behavior does not exit
when an error occurs, which makes it difficult to find the root error
reason.
2023-10-11 11:02:24 +00:00
JakobDev
ebe803e514
Penultimate round of db.DefaultContext refactor (#27414)
Part of #27065

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-10-11 04:24:07 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
673cf6af76
make writing main test easier (#27270)
This PR removed `unittest.MainTest` the second parameter
`TestOptions.GiteaRoot`. Now it detects the root directory by current
working directory.

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-09-28 01:38:53 +00:00
Nanguan Lin
2f8e1604f8
Fix review request number and add more tests (#27104)
fix #27019 
## testfixture yml
1. add issue20(a pr issue) in repo 23, org 17
2. add user15 to team 9
3. add four reviews about issue20
## test case
add two tests that are described with code comments
the code before pr #26784 failed the first test
<img width="479" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/1d9b5787-11b4-4c4d-931f-6a9869547f35">
current code failed the second test(as mentioned in #27019)
<img width="484" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/05608055-7587-43d1-bae1-92c688270819">
Any advice is appreciated.

---------

Co-authored-by: CaiCandong <50507092+CaiCandong@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-09-21 13:59:50 +02:00
JakobDev
f91dbbba98
Next round of db.DefaultContext refactor (#27089)
Part of #27065
2023-09-16 14:39:12 +00:00
Nanguan Lin
7cdbe65a2c
Add tests for db indexer in indexer_test.go (#27087)
As described in the title.
Some points: 
1. Why need those tests?
Because `buildIssueOverview` is not well tested, there are several
continuous bugs in the issue overview webpage.
2. Why in indexer_test.go?
It's hard to put those tests in `./modules/indexer/issue/db/db_test.go`
because those tests need 'real' data in db mocked by fixtures instead of
random data in `./modules/indexer/issue/internal/tests`. When using
'real' data(`unittest.PrepareTestDatabase`), `InitIssueIndexer` and the
package `init()` function of `indexer` are required to init indexer.
3. Why only db?
The other three indexer engines are well tested by random data and it's
okay to also test them with 'real' data in db mocked by fixtures. Any
follow-up PR is welcome.
4. Those tests are really basic, any more complicated tests are welcome.
5. I think it's also necessary to add tests in `TestAPISearchIssues`
in`api_test_issue.go` and `TestIssues` in `home_test.go`
2023-09-16 11:15:21 +08:00
Nanguan Lin
0de09d3afc
Remove the useless function GetUserIssueStats and move relevant tests to indexer_test.go (#27067)
Since the issue indexer has been refactored, the issue overview webpage
is built by the `buildIssueOverview` function and underlying
`indexer.Search` function and `GetIssueStats` instead of
`GetUserIssueStats`. So the function is no longer used.
I moved the relevant tests to `indexer_test.go` and since the search
option changed from `IssueOptions` to `SearchOptions`, most of the tests
are useless now.
We need more tests about the db indexer because those tests are highly
connected with the issue overview webpage and now this page has several
bugs.
Any advice about those test cases is appreciated.

---------

Co-authored-by: CaiCandong <50507092+CaiCandong@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-09-14 12:35:53 -04:00
Nanguan Lin
cda97a7253
Update status and code index after changing the default branch (#27018)
Fix #26723 
Add `ChangeDefaultBranch` to the `notifier` interface and implement it
in `indexerNotifier`. So when changing the default branch,
`indexerNotifier` sends a message to the `indexer queue` to update the
index.

---------

Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <matti@mdranta.net>
2023-09-13 04:43:31 +00:00
wxiaoguang
4807f7be22
Clarify the git command Stdin hanging problem (#26967) 2023-09-08 13:20:38 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
4f32abaf94
move repository deletion to service layer (#26948)
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-09-08 04:51:15 +00:00
CaiCandong
a78c2eae24
Replace util.SliceXxx with slices.Xxx (#26958) 2023-09-07 09:37:47 +00:00
wxiaoguang
fc039167d2
Use Go 1.21 and update dependencies (#26878)
To make sure Gitea's next release's lifecycle could have active Golang
support.

And min/max are builtin now.
2023-09-03 10:34:57 +00:00
Jason Song
5db21ce7e1
Fix counting and filtering on the dashboard page for issues (#26657)
This PR has multiple parts, and I didn't split them because
it's not easy to test them separately since they are all about the
dashboard page for issues.

1. Support counting issues via indexer to fix #26361
2. Fix repo selection so it also fixes #26653
3. Keep keywords in filter links.

The first two are regressions of #26012.

After:

https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/71dfea7e-d9e2-42b6-851a-cc081435c946

Thanks to @CaiCandong  for helping with some tests.
2023-08-23 02:29:17 +00:00
Jason Song
47fddaadc8
Support rebuilding issue indexer manually (#26546)
Provide a way to rebuild issue indexer manually.

So if the indexer get outdated because of some bugs like #26539, we can
rebuild it.

<img width="1104" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/9418365/ac242e29-6f04-47ca-b3d0-801a796448d3">

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-17 14:05:17 +00:00
Jason Song
3b129aaa80
Explain SearchOptions and fix ToSearchOptions (#26542)
Follow #26012 #26490.

A detailed description has been added to the comment.
2023-08-16 15:40:13 +00:00
CaiCandong
0e74fc4a84
Fix project filter bugs (#26490)
related: #26012

### Bugs
1. missing project filter on the issue page.

1e76a824bc/modules/indexer/issues/dboptions.go (L11-L15)
3. incorrect SQL condition: some issue does not belong to a project but
exists on the project_issue table.

f5dbac9d36/models/issues/issue_search.go (L233)

### Before:

![before](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/50507092/1dcde39e-3e2f-4151-b2c6-4d67bf493c2f)

### After:

![after](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/50507092/badfb81f-056d-4a2f-9838-1cba9c15768d)

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-15 14:50:12 +00:00
Jason Song
1e76a824bc
Refactor and enhance issue indexer to support both searching, filtering and paging (#26012)
Fix #24662.

Replace #24822 and #25708 (although it has been merged)


## Background

In the past, Gitea supported issue searching with a keyword and
conditions in a less efficient way. It worked by searching for issues
with the keyword and obtaining limited IDs (as it is heavy to get all)
on the indexer (bleve/elasticsearch/meilisearch), and then querying with
conditions on the database to find a subset of the found IDs. This is
why the results could be incomplete.

To solve this issue, we need to store all fields that could be used as
conditions in the indexer and support both keyword and additional
conditions when searching with the indexer.

## Major changes

- Redefine `IndexerData` to include all fields that could be used as
filter conditions.
- Refactor `Search(ctx context.Context, kw string, repoIDs []int64,
limit, start int, state string)` to `Search(ctx context.Context, options
*SearchOptions)`, so it supports more conditions now.
- Change the data type stored in `issueIndexerQueue`. Use
`IndexerMetadata` instead of `IndexerData` in case the data has been
updated while it is in the queue. This also reduces the storage size of
the queue.
- Enhance searching with Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch, make them
fully support `SearchOptions`. Also, update the data versions.
- Keep most logic of database indexer, but remove
`issues.SearchIssueIDsByKeyword` in `models` to avoid confusion where is
the entry point to search issues.
- Start a Meilisearch instance to test it in unit tests.
- Add unit tests with almost full coverage to test
Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch indexer.

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-07-31 06:28:53 +00:00
techknowlogick
cb01b8691d
Add open/closed field support for issue index (#25708)
A couple of notes:
* Future changes should refactor arguments into a struct
* This filtering only is supported by meilisearch right now
* Issue index number is bumped which will cause a re-index
2023-07-07 17:10:13 +00:00
silverwind
88f835192d
Replace interface{} with any (#25686)
Result of running `perl -p -i -e 's#interface\{\}#any#g' **/*` and `make fmt`.

Basically the same [as golang did](2580d0e08d).
2023-07-04 18:36:08 +00:00
Jason Song
9958642502
Fix issues indexer document mapping (#25619)
Fix regression of #5363 (so long ago).

The old code definded a document mapping for `issueIndexerDocType`, and
assigned it to `BleveIndexerData` as its type. (`BleveIndexerData` has
been renamed to `IndexerData` in #25174, but nothing more.) But the old
code never used `BleveIndexerData`, it wrote the index with an anonymous
struct type. Nonetheless, bleve would use the default auto-mapping for
struct it didn't know, so the indexer still worked. This means the
custom document mapping was always dead code.

The custom document mapping is not useless, it can reduce index storage,
this PR brings it back and disable default mapping to prevent it from
happening again. Since `IndexerData`(`BleveIndexerData`) has JSON tags,
and bleve uses them first, so we should use `repo_id` as the field name
instead of `RepoID`.

I did a test to compare the storage size before and after this, with
about 3k real comments that were migrated from some public repos.

Before:

```text
[ 160]  .
├── [  42]  index_meta.json
├── [  13]  rupture_meta.json
└── [ 128]  store
    ├── [6.9M]  00000000005d.zap
    └── [256K]  root.bolt
```

After:

```text
[ 160]  .
├── [  42]  index_meta.json
├── [  13]  rupture_meta.json
└── [ 128]  store
    ├── [3.5M]  000000000065.zap
    └── [256K]  root.bolt
```

It saves about half the storage space.

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-07-04 09:05:28 +00:00
Jason Song
3c7f5ed7b5
Fix Init of db indexer (#25470)
Fix regression of #25174.

The `Init` of the db indexer should return true to indicate that the
index was opened/existed, or the indexer will try to populate the index
(not really populate, just fill the queue, `Index` method of the db
indexer is a dummy).
2023-06-23 14:39:52 +00:00