It doesn't change logic, it only does:
1. Rename the variable and function names
2. Use more consistent format when mentioning config section&key
3. Improve some messages
Result of `go get -u golang.org/x/net; make tidy`.
This is related to the following vulncheck warning:
```
There are 2 vulnerabilities in modules that you require that are
neither imported nor called. You may not need to take any action.
See https://pkg.go.dev/golang.org/x/vuln/cmd/govulncheck for details.
Vulnerability #1: GO-2024-2687
HTTP/2 CONTINUATION flood in net/http
More info: https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2024-2687
Module: golang.org/x/net
Found in: golang.org/x/net@v0.22.0
Fixed in: golang.org/x/net@v0.23.0
Vulnerability #2: GO-2022-0470
No access control in github.com/blevesearch/bleve and bleve/v2
More info: https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2022-0470
Module: github.com/blevesearch/bleve/v2
Found in: github.com/blevesearch/bleve/v2@v2.3.10
Fixed in: N/A
```
This allows you to hide the "Powered by" text in footer via
`SHOW_FOOTER_POWERED_BY` flag in configuration.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Major changes:
* Move some functions like "addReader" / "isSubDir" /
"addRecursiveExclude" to a separate package, and add tests
* Clarify the filename&dump type logic and add tests
* Clarify the logger behavior and remove FIXME comments
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
This fixes a minor issue in the documentation for SSH Container
Passthrough for non-rootless installs. The non-rootless Dockerfile and
docker-compose do not set `USER`/`user` instructions so `docker exec`
will run as root by default. While running as root, gitea commands will
refuse to execute, breaking these approaches. For containers built with
the rootless instructions, `docker exec` will run as git by default so
this is not necessary in that case.
This issue was already discussed in #19065, but it does not appear this
part of the issue was ever added to the documentation.
- Inline math blocks couldn't be preceeded or succeeded by
alphanumerical characters due to changes introduced in PR #21171.
Removed the condition that caused this (precedingCharacter condition)
and added a new exit condition of the for-loop that checks if a specific
'$' was escaped using '\' so that the math expression can be rendered as
intended.
- Additionally this PR fixes another bug where math blocks of the type
'$xyz$abc$' where the dollar sign was not escaped by the user, generated
an error (shown in the screenshots below)
- Altered the tests to accomodate for the changes
Former behaviour (from try.gitea.io):
Fixed behaviour (from my local build):
(Edit) Source code for the README.md file:
```
$x$ -$x$ $x$-
a$xa$ $xa$a 1$xb$ $xb$1
$a a$b b$
a$b $a a$b b$
$a a\$b b$
```
---------
Signed-off-by: João Tiago <joao.leal.tintas@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Fixes#30235
If the key id "front" byte has a single digit, `%X` is missing the 0
prefix.
` 38D1A3EADDBEA9C` instead of
`038D1A3EADDBEA9C`
When using the `IssuerFingerprint` slice `%X` is enough but I changed it
to `%016X` too to be consistent.
Create a new `issue-navbar` class specifically for this bar, previous
class used in many places and I thought I had them all removed, but not
this one.
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30226
To make it more flexible and support SSH signature.
The existing tests are not changed, there are also tests covering
`parseTagRef` which also calls `parsePayloadSignature` now. Add some new
tests to `Test_parseTagData`
1. check `IsActive` before calling `IsLastAdminUser`.
2. Fix some comments and error messages.
3. Don't `return err` if "removing file" fails in `DeleteUser`.
4. Remove incorrect `DeleteInactiveEmailAddresses`. Active users could
also have inactive emails, and inactive emails do not support
"olderThan"
5. Add tests
Remove this label, I find it barely useful and we already have more
useful labels like `modifies/js`. Backport so that we can eventually
delete that label.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
When reviewing PRs, some color names might be mentioned, the
`transformCodeSpan` (which calls `css.ColorHandler`) considered it as a
valid color, but actually it shouldn't be rendered as a color codespan.
