Robert Scott
2052033220
check-cherry-picks workflow: don't run for staging-next PRs
2024-06-12 21:07:03 +01:00
dependabot[bot]
9f4ea63603
build(deps): bump actions/checkout from 4.1.4 to 4.1.5
...
Bumps [actions/checkout](https://github.com/actions/checkout ) from 4.1.4 to 4.1.5.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/checkout/releases )
- [Changelog](https://github.com/actions/checkout/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md )
- [Commits](0ad4b8fada...44c2b7a8a4
2024-05-13 11:43:41 +00:00
dependabot[bot]
c3ce4079d7
build(deps): bump actions/checkout from 4.1.3 to 4.1.4
...
Bumps [actions/checkout](https://github.com/actions/checkout ) from 4.1.3 to 4.1.4.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/checkout/releases )
- [Changelog](https://github.com/actions/checkout/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md )
- [Commits](1d96c772d1...0ad4b8fada
2024-04-29 11:45:13 +00:00
dependabot[bot]
6bc4e63f5f
build(deps): bump actions/checkout from 4.1.1 to 4.1.3
...
Bumps [actions/checkout](https://github.com/actions/checkout ) from 4.1.1 to 4.1.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/checkout/releases )
- [Changelog](https://github.com/actions/checkout/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md )
- [Commits](https://github.com/actions/checkout/compare/v4.1.1...1d96c772d19495a3b5c517cd2bc0cb401ea0529f )
---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: actions/checkout
dependency-type: direct:production
update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
2024-04-22 11:31:52 +00:00
Thomas Gerbet
01127f2276
ci: fix the branch patterns of the 'Check cherry-picks' action
...
For reference on the acceptable pattern:
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#filter-pattern-cheat-sheet
2024-04-09 19:27:11 +02:00
Robert Scott
fbad66daa5
add "Check cherry-picks" github action
...
the intention being to catch commits which declare themselves as
cherry-picks, but either:
- don't refer to a commit in the master or staging branches
- are significantly altered from their original commit
determining the latter is not an exact science, but the heuristic of
looking for differences in only the added or removed lines seems to
work quite well. still, this should be considered an assistant
for reviewers rather than a hard failure. unfortunately github
workflows don't have a way of raising a gentle warning instead of a
failure.
the formatting of the output also leaves something to be desired due
to the limitations of github actions' "group" commands.
2024-04-01 16:10:13 +01:00
