nixpkgs/nixos
Alyssa Ross dc439e41db nixos/environment: move XDG_CONFIG_DIRS to sessionVariables
Otherwise, in non-interactive contexts (e.g. systemd units), this
entry (the default) won't be in the list.  Only the profile relative
ones would be, since they were already using session variables.  This
is clearly not the correct behavior.
2023-10-02 18:47:48 +00:00
..
doc/manual nixos/qemu-vm: optionally disable overriding fileSystems 2023-10-02 11:13:26 +02:00
lib Fix broken genJqSecretsReplacementSnippet for jq 1.7 (#257932) 2023-09-30 14:00:13 +02:00
maintainers maintainers/scripts/oci: add missing parameter 2023-09-21 22:57:39 +01:00
modules nixos/environment: move XDG_CONFIG_DIRS to sessionVariables 2023-10-02 18:47:48 +00:00
tests Merge pull request #238847 from nikstur/qemu-vm-external-disk-image 2023-10-02 13:27:03 +02:00
COPYING
default.nix
README.md
release-combined.nix nixos/release-combined.nix: Build pkgs/by-name tester 2023-08-29 16:35:07 +02:00
release-small.nix
release.nix Merge pull request #244093 from adamcstephens/lxd/vm 2023-09-03 22:02:54 -05:00

NixOS

NixOS is a Linux distribution based on the purely functional package management system Nix. More information can be found at https://nixos.org/nixos and in the manual in doc/manual.

Testing changes

You can add new module to your NixOS configuration file (usually its /etc/nixos/configuration.nix). And do sudo nixos-rebuild test -I nixpkgs=<path to your local nixpkgs folder> --fast.

Reviewing contributions

When changing the bootloader installation process, extra care must be taken. Grub installations cannot be rolled back, hence changes may break peoples installations forever. For any non-trivial change to the bootloader please file a PR asking for review, especially from @edolstra.

Module updates

Module updates are submissions changing modules in some ways. These often contains changes to the options or introduce new options.

Reviewing process:

  • Ensure that the module maintainers are notified.
    • CODEOWNERS will make GitHub notify users based on the submitted changes, but it can happen that it misses some of the package maintainers.
  • Ensure that the module tests, if any, are succeeding.
  • Ensure that the introduced options are correct.
    • Type should be appropriate (string related types differs in their merging capabilities, loaOf and string types are deprecated).
    • Description, default and example should be provided.
  • Ensure that option changes are backward compatible.
    • mkRenamedOptionModuleWith provides a way to make option changes backward compatible.
  • Ensure that removed options are declared with mkRemovedOptionModule
  • Ensure that changes that are not backward compatible are mentioned in release notes.
  • Ensure that documentations affected by the change is updated.

Sample template for a module update review is provided below.

##### Reviewed points

- [ ] changes are backward compatible
- [ ] removed options are declared with `mkRemovedOptionModule`
- [ ] changes that are not backward compatible are documented in release notes
- [ ] module tests succeed on ARCHITECTURE
- [ ] options types are appropriate
- [ ] options description is set
- [ ] options example is provided
- [ ] documentation affected by the changes is updated

##### Possible improvements

##### Comments

New modules

New modules submissions introduce a new module to NixOS.

Reviewing process:

  • Ensure that the module tests, if any, are succeeding.
  • Ensure that the introduced options are correct.
    • Type should be appropriate (string related types differs in their merging capabilities, loaOf and string types are deprecated).
    • Description, default and example should be provided.
  • Ensure that module meta field is present
    • Maintainers should be declared in meta.maintainers.
    • Module documentation should be declared with meta.doc.
  • Ensure that the module respect other modules functionality.
    • For example, enabling a module should not open firewall ports by default.

Sample template for a new module review is provided below.

##### Reviewed points

- [ ] module path fits the guidelines
- [ ] module tests succeed on ARCHITECTURE
- [ ] options have appropriate types
- [ ] options have default
- [ ] options have example
- [ ] options have descriptions
- [ ] No unneeded package is added to environment.systemPackages
- [ ] meta.maintainers is set
- [ ] module documentation is declared in meta.doc

##### Possible improvements

##### Comments