mirror of
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs.git
synced 2024-11-15 14:26:33 +01:00
51d3f3475c
So far the architecture for the tests was that we would use a systemd socket unit using the Accept option to start a small shell process where we can pipe commands into by connecting to the socket created by the socket unit. This is unnecessary since we can directly use the code snippets from the individual subtests and systemd will take care of checking the return code in case we get any assertions[^1]. Another advantage of this is that tests now run in parallel, so we can do rather expensive things such as looking in /nix to see whether anything is writable. The new assert_permissions() function is the main driver behind this and allows for a more fine-grained way to check whether we got the right permissions whilst also ignoring irrelevant things such as read-only empty directories. Our previous approach also just did a read-only check, which might be fine in full-apivfs mode where the attack surface already is large, but in chroot-only mode we really want to make sure nothing is every writable. A downside of the new approach is that currently the unit names are numbered via lib.imap1, which makes it annoying to track its definition. [^1]: Speaking of assertions, I wrapped the code to be run with pytest's assertion rewriting, so that we get more useful AssertionErrors. Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@nix.build>
187 lines
6.4 KiB
Python
187 lines
6.4 KiB
Python
import errno
|
|
import os
|
|
|
|
from enum import IntEnum
|
|
from pathlib import Path
|
|
|
|
|
|
class Accessibility(IntEnum):
|
|
"""
|
|
The level of accessibility we have on a file or directory.
|
|
|
|
This is needed to assess the attack surface on the file system namespace we
|
|
have within a confined service. Higher levels mean more permissions for the
|
|
user and thus a bigger attack surface.
|
|
"""
|
|
NONE = 0
|
|
|
|
# Directories can be listed or files can be read.
|
|
READABLE = 1
|
|
|
|
# This is for special file systems such as procfs and for stuff such as
|
|
# FIFOs or character special files. The reason why this has a lower value
|
|
# than WRITABLE is because those files are more restricted on what and how
|
|
# they can be written to.
|
|
SPECIAL = 2
|
|
|
|
# Another special case are sticky directories, which do allow write access
|
|
# but restrict deletion. This does *not* apply to sticky directories that
|
|
# are read-only.
|
|
STICKY = 3
|
|
|
|
# Essentially full permissions, the kind of accessibility we want to avoid
|
|
# in most cases.
|
|
WRITABLE = 4
|
|
|
|
def assert_on(self, path: Path) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Raise an AssertionError if the given 'path' allows for more
|
|
accessibility than 'self'.
|
|
"""
|
|
actual = self.NONE
|
|
|
|
if path.is_symlink():
|
|
actual = self.READABLE
|
|
elif path.is_dir():
|
|
writable = True
|
|
|
|
dummy_file = path / 'can_i_write'
|
|
try:
|
|
dummy_file.touch()
|
|
except OSError as e:
|
|
if e.errno in [errno.EROFS, errno.EACCES]:
|
|
writable = False
|
|
else:
|
|
raise
|
|
else:
|
|
dummy_file.unlink()
|
|
|
|
if writable:
|
|
# The reason why we test this *after* we made sure it's
|
|
# writable is because we could have a sticky directory where
|
|
# the current user doesn't have write access.
|
|
if path.stat().st_mode & 0o1000 == 0o1000:
|
|
actual = self.STICKY
|
|
else:
|
|
actual = self.WRITABLE
|
|
else:
|
|
actual = self.READABLE
|
|
elif path.is_file():
|
|
try:
|
|
with path.open('rb') as fp:
|
|
fp.read(1)
|
|
actual = self.READABLE
|
|
except PermissionError:
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
writable = True
|
|
try:
|
|
with path.open('ab') as fp:
|
|
fp.write('x')
|
|
size = fp.tell()
|
|
fp.truncate(size)
|
|
except PermissionError:
|
|
writable = False
|
|
except OSError as e:
|
|
if e.errno == errno.ETXTBSY:
|
|
writable = os.access(path, os.W_OK)
|
|
elif e.errno == errno.EROFS:
|
|
writable = False
|
|
else:
|
|
raise
|
|
|
|
# Let's always try to fail towards being writable, so if *either*
|
|
# access(2) or a real write is successful it's writable. This is to
|
|
# make sure we don't accidentally introduce no-ops if we have bugs
|
|
# in the more complicated real write code above.
|
|
if writable or os.access(path, os.W_OK):
|
|
actual = self.WRITABLE
|
|
else:
|
|
# We need to be very careful when writing to or reading from
|
|
# special files (eg. FIFOs), since they can possibly block. So if
|
|
# it's not a file, just trust that access(2) won't lie.
|
|
if os.access(path, os.R_OK):
|
|
actual = self.READABLE
|
|
|
|
if os.access(path, os.W_OK):
|
|
actual = self.SPECIAL
|
|
|
|
if actual > self:
|
|
stat = path.stat()
|
|
details = ', '.join([
|
|
f'permissions: {stat.st_mode & 0o7777:o}',
|
|
f'uid: {stat.st_uid}',
|
|
f'group: {stat.st_gid}',
|
|
])
|
|
|
|
raise AssertionError(
|
|
f'Expected at most {self!r} but got {actual!r} for path'
|
|
f' {path} ({details}).'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def is_special_fs(path: Path) -> bool:
|
|
"""
|
|
Check whether the given path truly is a special file system such as procfs
|
|
or sysfs.
|
|
"""
|
|
try:
|
|
if path == Path('/proc'):
|
|
return (path / 'version').read_text().startswith('Linux')
|
|
elif path == Path('/sys'):
|
|
return b'Linux' in (path / 'kernel' / 'notes').read_bytes()
|
|
except FileNotFoundError:
|
|
pass
|
|
return False
|
|
|
|
|
|
def is_empty_dir(path: Path) -> bool:
|
|
try:
|
|
next(path.iterdir())
|
|
return False
|
|
except (StopIteration, PermissionError):
|
|
return True
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _assert_permissions_in_directory(
|
|
directory: Path,
|
|
accessibility: Accessibility,
|
|
subdirs: dict[Path, Accessibility],
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
accessibility.assert_on(directory)
|
|
|
|
for file in directory.iterdir():
|
|
if is_special_fs(file):
|
|
msg = f'Got unexpected special filesystem at {file}.'
|
|
assert subdirs.pop(file) == Accessibility.SPECIAL, msg
|
|
elif not file.is_symlink() and file.is_dir():
|
|
subdir_access = subdirs.pop(file, accessibility)
|
|
if is_empty_dir(file):
|
|
# Whenever we got an empty directory, we check the permission
|
|
# constraints on the current directory (except if specified
|
|
# explicitly in subdirs) because for example if we're non-root
|
|
# (the constraints of the current directory are thus
|
|
# Accessibility.READABLE), we really have to make sure that
|
|
# empty directories are *never* writable.
|
|
subdir_access.assert_on(file)
|
|
else:
|
|
_assert_permissions_in_directory(file, subdir_access, subdirs)
|
|
else:
|
|
subdirs.pop(file, accessibility).assert_on(file)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def assert_permissions(subdirs: dict[str, Accessibility]) -> None:
|
|
"""
|
|
Recursively check whether the file system conforms to the accessibility
|
|
specification we specified via 'subdirs'.
|
|
"""
|
|
root = Path('/')
|
|
absolute_subdirs = {root / p: a for p, a in subdirs.items()}
|
|
_assert_permissions_in_directory(
|
|
root,
|
|
Accessibility.WRITABLE if os.getuid() == 0 else Accessibility.READABLE,
|
|
absolute_subdirs,
|
|
)
|
|
for file in absolute_subdirs.keys():
|
|
msg = f'Expected {file} to exist, but it was nowwhere to be found.'
|
|
raise AssertionError(msg)
|