* Use the newly added 'default' argument to know if the default flags are set
or not.
* Handle that 'status' may either return flags or YES/NO.
* Centralize flag handling logic.
* Set action variable after check if we need to keep going.
Big thanks to @ajacoutot for implementing the rcctl 'default' argument.
* Make the module support enable/disable of special services like pf via rcctl.
Idea and method from @jarmani.
* Make the module handle when the user supplied 'arguments' variable does not
match the current flags in rc.conf.local.
* Update description now that the code tries to use rcctl for everything if it
is available.
Based on input from @jarmani:
* A return value of 2 now means a service does not exist. Instead of
trying to handle the different meanings of rc after running "status",
just look at stderr to know if something failed.
* Skip looking at stdout to make the code cleaner. Any errors should
turn up on stderr.
1. Don't pull when `dest` is already at the desired changeset.
2. Don't change the working copy when cleaning or pulling and a revision
was specified.
3. Change the default for the `revision` param to match the behavior of
hg.
Encouraging users to use this Ansible module to enable SELinux seems
like a better idea. It also warms Dan Walsh's heart.
Signed-off-by: Major Hayden <major@mhtx.net>
Allows user to decide if git submodule should track branches/tags or track commit hashes defined in the superproject.
Add track_branches parameter to the git module.
Defaults to track branches behavior.
The default is not very useful to sort between different
keys and user. Adding the hostname in the comment permit to later
sort them if you start to reuse the key and set them in different
servers. See https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/7420
for the rational.
This can be tested with this command :
ansible -c local -m copy -a 'src=/etc/group dest=foo/' all
This is a corner case of the algorithm used to find how we should
copy recursively a folder, and this commit detect it and avoid it.
Check https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/9092 for the story