ansible/docs/docsite/rst/user_guide/playbooks_tests.rst
Toshio Kuratomi 80e7e1a17c
Due to the takeover of freenode we're moving to a different irc network. (#74775)
* Due to the takeover of freenode we're moving to a different irc network.

* Our channels updated to point at the same channel name on libera.chat
* Some links went to webchat.freenode.net.  At this time, libera.chat
  doesn't point you to an official webchat client so I changed these to
  https://libera.chat. (kiwi irc does work with libera.chat so that
  could be another option).
* In general, I used the name irc.libera.net for link names and
  https://libera.chat for link targets.  This is because the irc service
  is hosted on irc.libera.chat but the project web server is hosted on
  libera.chat.  (This appears to also be true for freenode but we were
  using http://irc.freenode.net which doesn't seem to work.  Oops).
* Removed http://irc.freenode.net from the linkcheck exceptions.
  linkcheck was actually correct to flag that as invalid (should have
  been http://frenode.net instead).

* Looks like hte important people in #yaml are now in libera.chat

* Link to where contributors should get help

Add a link target and then link to where contributors should get support
for developing groups of modules.

* Update docs/docsite/rst/dev_guide/developing_modules_in_groups.rst

Co-authored-by: Felix Fontein <felix@fontein.de>

Co-authored-by: John R Barker <john@johnrbarker.com>
Co-authored-by: Felix Fontein <felix@fontein.de>
2021-06-01 08:48:09 +01:00

403 lines
12 KiB
ReStructuredText

.. _playbooks_tests:
*****
Tests
*****
`Tests <https://jinja.palletsprojects.com/en/latest/templates/#tests>`_ in Jinja are a way of evaluating template expressions and returning True or False. Jinja ships with many of these. See `builtin tests`_ in the official Jinja template documentation.
The main difference between tests and filters are that Jinja tests are used for comparisons, whereas filters are used for data manipulation, and have different applications in jinja. Tests can also be used in list processing filters, like ``map()`` and ``select()`` to choose items in the list.
Like all templating, tests always execute on the Ansible controller, **not** on the target of a task, as they test local data.
In addition to those Jinja2 tests, Ansible supplies a few more and users can easily create their own.
.. contents::
:local:
.. _test_syntax:
Test syntax
===========
`Test syntax <https://jinja.palletsprojects.com/en/latest/templates/#tests>`_ varies from `filter syntax <https://jinja.palletsprojects.com/en/latest/templates/#filters>`_ (``variable | filter``). Historically Ansible has registered tests as both jinja tests and jinja filters, allowing for them to be referenced using filter syntax.
As of Ansible 2.5, using a jinja test as a filter will generate a warning.
The syntax for using a jinja test is as follows::
variable is test_name
Such as::
result is failed
.. _testing_strings:
Testing strings
===============
To match strings against a substring or a regular expression, use the ``match``, ``search`` or ``regex`` tests::
vars:
url: "http://example.com/users/foo/resources/bar"
tasks:
- debug:
msg: "matched pattern 1"
when: url is match("http://example.com/users/.*/resources/")
- debug:
msg: "matched pattern 2"
when: url is search("/users/.*/resources/.*")
- debug:
msg: "matched pattern 3"
when: url is search("/users/")
- debug:
msg: "matched pattern 4"
when: url is regex("example.com/\w+/foo")
``match`` succeeds if it finds the pattern at the beginning of the string, while ``search`` succeeds if it finds the pattern anywhere within string. By default, ``regex`` works like ``search``, but ``regex`` can be configured to perform other tests as well, by passing the ``match_type`` keyword argument. In particular, ``match_type`` determines the ``re`` method that gets used to perform the search. The full list can be found in the relevant Python documentation `here <https://docs.python.org/3/library/re.html#regular-expression-objects>`_.
All of the string tests also take optional ``ignorecase`` and ``multiline`` arguments. These correspond to ``re.I`` and ``re.M`` from Python's ``re`` library, respectively.
.. _testing_vault:
Vault
=====
.. versionadded:: 2.10
You can test whether a variable is an inline single vault encrypted value using the ``vault_encrypted`` test.
.. code-block:: yaml
vars:
variable: !vault |
$ANSIBLE_VAULT;1.2;AES256;dev
61323931353866666336306139373937316366366138656131323863373866376666353364373761
3539633234313836346435323766306164626134376564330a373530313635343535343133316133
36643666306434616266376434363239346433643238336464643566386135356334303736353136
6565633133366366360a326566323363363936613664616364623437336130623133343530333739
3039
tasks:
- debug:
msg: '{{ (variable is vault_encrypted) | ternary("Vault encrypted", "Not vault encrypted") }}'
.. _testing_truthiness:
Testing truthiness
==================
.. versionadded:: 2.10
As of Ansible 2.10, you can now perform Python like truthy and falsy checks.
.. code-block:: yaml
- debug:
msg: "Truthy"
when: value is truthy
vars:
value: "some string"
- debug:
msg: "Falsy"
when: value is falsy
vars:
value: ""
Additionally, the ``truthy`` and ``falsy`` tests accept an optional parameter called ``convert_bool`` that will attempt
to convert boolean indicators to actual booleans.
.. code-block:: yaml
- debug:
msg: "Truthy"
when: value is truthy(convert_bool=True)
vars:
value: "yes"
- debug:
msg: "Falsy"
when: value is falsy(convert_bool=True)
vars:
value: "off"
.. _testing_versions:
Comparing versions
==================
.. versionadded:: 1.6
.. note:: In 2.5 ``version_compare`` was renamed to ``version``
To compare a version number, such as checking if the ``ansible_facts['distribution_version']``
version is greater than or equal to '12.04', you can use the ``version`` test.
The ``version`` test can also be used to evaluate the ``ansible_facts['distribution_version']``::
{{ ansible_facts['distribution_version'] is version('12.04', '>=') }}
If ``ansible_facts['distribution_version']`` is greater than or equal to 12.04, this test returns True, otherwise False.
The ``version`` test accepts the following operators::
<, lt, <=, le, >, gt, >=, ge, ==, =, eq, !=, <>, ne
This test also accepts a 3rd parameter, ``strict`` which defines if strict version parsing as defined by ``distutils.version.StrictVersion`` should be used. The default is ``False`` (using ``distutils.version.LooseVersion``), ``True`` enables strict version parsing::
{{ sample_version_var is version('1.0', operator='lt', strict=True) }}
As of Ansible 2.11 the ``version`` test accepts a ``version_type`` parameter which is mutually exclusive with ``strict``, and accepts the following values::
loose, strict, semver, semantic
Using ``version_type`` to compare a semantic version would be achieved like the following::
{{ sample_semver_var is version('2.0.0-rc.1+build.123', 'lt', version_type='semver') }}
When using ``version`` in a playbook or role, don't use ``{{ }}`` as described in the `FAQ <https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/reference_appendices/faq.html#when-should-i-use-also-how-to-interpolate-variables-or-dynamic-variable-names>`_::
vars:
my_version: 1.2.3
tasks:
- debug:
msg: "my_version is higher than 1.0.0"
when: my_version is version('1.0.0', '>')
.. _math_tests:
Set theory tests
================
.. versionadded:: 2.1
.. note:: In 2.5 ``issubset`` and ``issuperset`` were renamed to ``subset`` and ``superset``
To see if a list includes or is included by another list, you can use 'subset' and 'superset'::
vars:
a: [1,2,3,4,5]
b: [2,3]
tasks:
- debug:
msg: "A includes B"
when: a is superset(b)
- debug:
msg: "B is included in A"
when: b is subset(a)
.. _contains_test:
Testing if a list contains a value
==================================
.. versionadded:: 2.8
Ansible includes a ``contains`` test which operates similarly, but in reverse of the Jinja2 provided ``in`` test.
The ``contains`` test is designed to work with the ``select``, ``reject``, ``selectattr``, and ``rejectattr`` filters::
vars:
lacp_groups:
- master: lacp0
network: 10.65.100.0/24
gateway: 10.65.100.1
dns4:
- 10.65.100.10
- 10.65.100.11
interfaces:
- em1
- em2
- master: lacp1
network: 10.65.120.0/24
gateway: 10.65.120.1
dns4:
- 10.65.100.10
- 10.65.100.11
interfaces:
- em3
- em4
tasks:
- debug:
msg: "{{ (lacp_groups|selectattr('interfaces', 'contains', 'em1')|first).master }}"
.. versionadded:: 2.4
Testing if a list value is True
===============================
You can use `any` and `all` to check if any or all elements in a list are true or not::
vars:
mylist:
- 1
- "{{ 3 == 3 }}"
- True
myotherlist:
- False
- True
tasks:
- debug:
msg: "all are true!"
when: mylist is all
- debug:
msg: "at least one is true"
when: myotherlist is any
.. _path_tests:
Testing paths
=============
.. note:: In 2.5 the following tests were renamed to remove the ``is_`` prefix
The following tests can provide information about a path on the controller::
- debug:
msg: "path is a directory"
when: mypath is directory
- debug:
msg: "path is a file"
when: mypath is file
- debug:
msg: "path is a symlink"
when: mypath is link
- debug:
msg: "path already exists"
when: mypath is exists
- debug:
msg: "path is {{ (mypath is abs)|ternary('absolute','relative')}}"
- debug:
msg: "path is the same file as path2"
when: mypath is same_file(path2)
- debug:
msg: "path is a mount"
when: mypath is mount
Testing size formats
====================
The ``human_readable`` and ``human_to_bytes`` functions let you test your
playbooks to make sure you are using the right size format in your tasks, and that
you provide Byte format to computers and human-readable format to people.
Human readable
--------------
Asserts whether the given string is human readable or not.
For example::
- name: "Human Readable"
assert:
that:
- '"1.00 Bytes" == 1|human_readable'
- '"1.00 bits" == 1|human_readable(isbits=True)'
- '"10.00 KB" == 10240|human_readable'
- '"97.66 MB" == 102400000|human_readable'
- '"0.10 GB" == 102400000|human_readable(unit="G")'
- '"0.10 Gb" == 102400000|human_readable(isbits=True, unit="G")'
This would result in::
{ "changed": false, "msg": "All assertions passed" }
Human to bytes
--------------
Returns the given string in the Bytes format.
For example::
- name: "Human to Bytes"
assert:
that:
- "{{'0'|human_to_bytes}} == 0"
- "{{'0.1'|human_to_bytes}} == 0"
- "{{'0.9'|human_to_bytes}} == 1"
- "{{'1'|human_to_bytes}} == 1"
- "{{'10.00 KB'|human_to_bytes}} == 10240"
- "{{ '11 MB'|human_to_bytes}} == 11534336"
- "{{ '1.1 GB'|human_to_bytes}} == 1181116006"
- "{{'10.00 Kb'|human_to_bytes(isbits=True)}} == 10240"
This would result in::
{ "changed": false, "msg": "All assertions passed" }
.. _test_task_results:
Testing task results
====================
The following tasks are illustrative of the tests meant to check the status of tasks::
tasks:
- shell: /usr/bin/foo
register: result
ignore_errors: True
- debug:
msg: "it failed"
when: result is failed
# in most cases you'll want a handler, but if you want to do something right now, this is nice
- debug:
msg: "it changed"
when: result is changed
- debug:
msg: "it succeeded in Ansible >= 2.1"
when: result is succeeded
- debug:
msg: "it succeeded"
when: result is success
- debug:
msg: "it was skipped"
when: result is skipped
.. note:: From 2.1, you can also use success, failure, change, and skip so that the grammar matches, for those who need to be strict about it.
.. _builtin tests: https://jinja.palletsprojects.com/en/latest/templates/#builtin-tests
.. seealso::
:ref:`playbooks_intro`
An introduction to playbooks
:ref:`playbooks_conditionals`
Conditional statements in playbooks
:ref:`playbooks_variables`
All about variables
:ref:`playbooks_loops`
Looping in playbooks
:ref:`playbooks_reuse_roles`
Playbook organization by roles
:ref:`playbooks_best_practices`
Tips and tricks for playbooks
`User Mailing List <https://groups.google.com/group/ansible-devel>`_
Have a question? Stop by the google group!
`irc.libera.chat <https://libera.chat/>`_
#ansible IRC chat channel