ansible/docs/docsite/rst/user_guide/playbooks_loops.rst
Toshio Kuratomi 46b1a999c6
Collections docs generation backport (#70515)
* Build documentation for Ansible-2.10 (formerly known as ACD).

Builds plugin docs from collections whose source is on galaxy

The new command downloads collections from galaxy, then finds the
plugins inside of them to get the documentation for those plugins.

* Update the python syntax checks
  * docs builds can now require python 3.6+.

* Move plugin formatter code out to an external tool, antsibull-docs.
  Collection owners want to be able to extract docs for their own
  websites as well.
* The jinja2 filters, tests, and other support code have moved to antsibull
* Remove document_plugins as that has now been integrated into antsibull-docs

* Cleanup and bugfix to other build script code:
  * The Commands class needed to have its metaclass set for abstractmethod
    to work correctly
  * Fix lint issues in some command plugins

* Add the docs/docsite/rst/collections to .gitignore as
  everything in that directory will be generated so we don't want any of
  it saved in the git repository
* gitignore the build dir and remove edit docs link on module pages

* Add docs/rst/collections as a directory to remove on make clean
* Split the collections docs from the main docs

* remove version and edit on github
* remove version banner for just collections
* clarify examples need collection keyword defined

* Remove references to plugin documentation locations that no longer exist.
  * Perhaps the pages in plugins/*.rst should be deprecated
    altogether and their content moved?
  * If not, perhaps we want to rephrase and link into the collection
    documentation?
  * Or perhaps we want to link to the plugins which are present in
    collections/ansible/builtin?

* Remove PYTHONPATH from the build-ansible calls
  One of the design goals of the build-ansible.py script was for it to
  automatically set its library path to include the checkout of ansible
  and the library of code to implement itself.  Because it automatically
  includes the checkout of ansible, we don't need to set PYTHONPATH in
  the Makefile any longer.

* Create a command to only build ansible-base plugin docs
  * When building docs for devel, only build the ansible-base docs for
    now.  This is because antsibull needs support for building a "devel
    tree" of docs.  This can be changed once that is implemented
  * When building docs for the sanity tests, only build the ansible-base
    plugin docs for now.  Those are the docs which are in this repo so
    that seems appropriate for now.

* Docs: User guide overhaul, part 5 (#70307)

(cherry picked from commit db354c0300)

* Need to return any error code from running antsibull-docs (#70763)

This way we fail early if there's a problem

(cherry picked from commit 1e3989c9f7)

Co-authored-by: Alicia Cozine <879121+acozine@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-07-20 14:28:35 -07:00

441 lines
15 KiB
ReStructuredText

.. _playbooks_loops:
*****
Loops
*****
Sometimes you want to repeat a task multiple times. In computer programming, this is called a loop. Common Ansible loops include changing ownership on several files and/or directories with the :ref:`file module <file_module>`, creating multiple users with the :ref:`user module <user_module>`, and
repeating a polling step until a certain result is reached. Ansible offers two keywords for creating loops: ``loop`` and ``with_<lookup>``.
.. note::
* We added ``loop`` in Ansible 2.5. It is not yet a full replacement for ``with_<lookup>``, but we recommend it for most use cases.
* We have not deprecated the use of ``with_<lookup>`` - that syntax will still be valid for the foreseeable future.
* We are looking to improve ``loop`` syntax - watch this page and the `changelog <https://github.com/ansible/ansible/tree/devel/changelogs>`_ for updates.
.. contents::
:local:
Comparing ``loop`` and ``with_*``
=================================
* The ``with_<lookup>`` keywords rely on :ref:`lookup_plugins` - even ``items`` is a lookup.
* The ``loop`` keyword is equivalent to ``with_list``, and is the best choice for simple loops.
* The ``loop`` keyword will not accept a string as input, see :ref:`query_vs_lookup`.
* Generally speaking, any use of ``with_*`` covered in :ref:`migrating_to_loop` can be updated to use ``loop``.
* Be careful when changing ``with_items`` to ``loop``, as ``with_items`` performed implicit single-level flattening. You may need to use ``flatten(1)`` with ``loop`` to match the exact outcome. For example, to get the same output as:
.. code-block:: yaml
with_items:
- 1
- [2,3]
- 4
you would need::
loop: "{{ [1, [2,3] ,4] | flatten(1) }}"
* Any ``with_*`` statement that requires using ``lookup`` within a loop should not be converted to use the ``loop`` keyword. For example, instead of doing:
.. code-block:: yaml
loop: "{{ lookup('fileglob', '*.txt', wantlist=True) }}"
it's cleaner to keep::
with_fileglob: '*.txt'
.. _standard_loops:
Standard loops
==============
Iterating over a simple list
----------------------------
Repeated tasks can be written as standard loops over a simple list of strings. You can define the list directly in the task::
- name: add several users
user:
name: "{{ item }}"
state: present
groups: "wheel"
loop:
- testuser1
- testuser2
You can define the list in a variables file, or in the 'vars' section of your play, then refer to the name of the list in the task::
loop: "{{ somelist }}"
Either of these examples would be the equivalent of::
- name: add user testuser1
user:
name: "testuser1"
state: present
groups: "wheel"
- name: add user testuser2
user:
name: "testuser2"
state: present
groups: "wheel"
You can pass a list directly to a parameter for some plugins. Most of the packaging modules, like :ref:`yum <yum_module>` and :ref:`apt <apt_module>`, have this capability. When available, passing the list to a parameter is better than looping over the task. For example::
- name: optimal yum
yum:
name: "{{ list_of_packages }}"
state: present
- name: non-optimal yum, slower and may cause issues with interdependencies
yum:
name: "{{ item }}"
state: present
loop: "{{ list_of_packages }}"
Check the :ref:`module documentation <modules_by_category>` to see if you can pass a list to any particular module's parameter(s).
Iterating over a list of hashes
-------------------------------
If you have a list of hashes, you can reference subkeys in a loop. For example::
- name: add several users
user:
name: "{{ item.name }}"
state: present
groups: "{{ item.groups }}"
loop:
- { name: 'testuser1', groups: 'wheel' }
- { name: 'testuser2', groups: 'root' }
When combining :ref:`conditionals <playbooks_conditionals>` with a loop, the ``when:`` statement is processed separately for each item.
See :ref:`the_when_statement` for examples.
Iterating over a dictionary
---------------------------
To loop over a dict, use the :ref:`dict2items <dict_filter>`:
.. code-block:: yaml
- name: Using dict2items
debug:
msg: "{{ item.key }} - {{ item.value }}"
loop: "{{ tag_data | dict2items }}"
vars:
tag_data:
Environment: dev
Application: payment
Here, we are iterating over `tag_data` and printing the key and the value from it.
Registering variables with a loop
=================================
You can register the output of a loop as a variable. For example::
- shell: "echo {{ item }}"
loop:
- "one"
- "two"
register: echo
When you use ``register`` with a loop, the data structure placed in the variable will contain a ``results`` attribute that is a list of all responses from the module. This differs from the data structure returned when using ``register`` without a loop::
{
"changed": true,
"msg": "All items completed",
"results": [
{
"changed": true,
"cmd": "echo \"one\" ",
"delta": "0:00:00.003110",
"end": "2013-12-19 12:00:05.187153",
"invocation": {
"module_args": "echo \"one\"",
"module_name": "shell"
},
"item": "one",
"rc": 0,
"start": "2013-12-19 12:00:05.184043",
"stderr": "",
"stdout": "one"
},
{
"changed": true,
"cmd": "echo \"two\" ",
"delta": "0:00:00.002920",
"end": "2013-12-19 12:00:05.245502",
"invocation": {
"module_args": "echo \"two\"",
"module_name": "shell"
},
"item": "two",
"rc": 0,
"start": "2013-12-19 12:00:05.242582",
"stderr": "",
"stdout": "two"
}
]
}
Subsequent loops over the registered variable to inspect the results may look like::
- name: Fail if return code is not 0
fail:
msg: "The command ({{ item.cmd }}) did not have a 0 return code"
when: item.rc != 0
loop: "{{ echo.results }}"
During iteration, the result of the current item will be placed in the variable::
- shell: echo "{{ item }}"
loop:
- one
- two
register: echo
changed_when: echo.stdout != "one"
.. _complex_loops:
Complex loops
=============
Iterating over nested lists
---------------------------
You can use Jinja2 expressions to iterate over complex lists. For example, a loop can combine nested lists::
- name: give users access to multiple databases
mysql_user:
name: "{{ item[0] }}"
priv: "{{ item[1] }}.*:ALL"
append_privs: yes
password: "foo"
loop: "{{ ['alice', 'bob'] |product(['clientdb', 'employeedb', 'providerdb'])|list }}"
.. _do_until_loops:
Retrying a task until a condition is met
----------------------------------------
.. versionadded:: 1.4
You can use the ``until`` keyword to retry a task until a certain condition is met. Here's an example::
- shell: /usr/bin/foo
register: result
until: result.stdout.find("all systems go") != -1
retries: 5
delay: 10
This task runs up to 5 times with a delay of 10 seconds between each attempt. If the result of any attempt has "all systems go" in its stdout, the task succeeds. The default value for "retries" is 3 and "delay" is 5.
To see the results of individual retries, run the play with ``-vv``.
When you run a task with ``until`` and register the result as a variable, the registered variable will include a key called "attempts", which records the number of the retries for the task.
.. note:: You must set the ``until`` parameter if you want a task to retry. If ``until`` is not defined, the value for the ``retries`` parameter is forced to 1.
Looping over inventory
----------------------
To loop over your inventory, or just a subset of it, you can use a regular ``loop`` with the ``ansible_play_batch`` or ``groups`` variables::
# show all the hosts in the inventory
- debug:
msg: "{{ item }}"
loop: "{{ groups['all'] }}"
# show all the hosts in the current play
- debug:
msg: "{{ item }}"
loop: "{{ ansible_play_batch }}"
There is also a specific lookup plugin ``inventory_hostnames`` that can be used like this::
# show all the hosts in the inventory
- debug:
msg: "{{ item }}"
loop: "{{ query('inventory_hostnames', 'all') }}"
# show all the hosts matching the pattern, ie all but the group www
- debug:
msg: "{{ item }}"
loop: "{{ query('inventory_hostnames', 'all:!www') }}"
More information on the patterns can be found in :ref:`intro_patterns`.
.. _query_vs_lookup:
Ensuring list input for ``loop``: ``query`` vs. ``lookup``
==========================================================
The ``loop`` keyword requires a list as input, but the ``lookup`` keyword returns a string of comma-separated values by default. Ansible 2.5 introduced a new Jinja2 function named :ref:`query <query>` that always returns a list, offering a simpler interface and more predictable output from lookup plugins when using the ``loop`` keyword.
You can force ``lookup`` to return a list to ``loop`` by using ``wantlist=True``, or you can use ``query`` instead.
These examples do the same thing::
loop: "{{ query('inventory_hostnames', 'all') }}"
loop: "{{ lookup('inventory_hostnames', 'all', wantlist=True) }}"
.. _loop_control:
Adding controls to loops
========================
.. versionadded:: 2.1
The ``loop_control`` keyword lets you manage your loops in useful ways.
Limiting loop output with ``label``
-----------------------------------
.. versionadded:: 2.2
When looping over complex data structures, the console output of your task can be enormous. To limit the displayed output, use the ``label`` directive with ``loop_control``::
- name: create servers
digital_ocean:
name: "{{ item.name }}"
state: present
loop:
- name: server1
disks: 3gb
ram: 15Gb
network:
nic01: 100Gb
nic02: 10Gb
...
loop_control:
label: "{{ item.name }}"
The output of this task will display just the ``name`` field for each ``item`` instead of the entire contents of the multi-line ``{{ item }}`` variable.
.. note:: This is for making console output more readable, not protecting sensitive data. If there is sensitive data in ``loop``, set ``no_log: yes`` on the task to prevent disclosure.
Pausing within a loop
---------------------
.. versionadded:: 2.2
To control the time (in seconds) between the execution of each item in a task loop, use the ``pause`` directive with ``loop_control``::
# main.yml
- name: create servers, pause 3s before creating next
digital_ocean:
name: "{{ item }}"
state: present
loop:
- server1
- server2
loop_control:
pause: 3
Tracking progress through a loop with ``index_var``
---------------------------------------------------
.. versionadded:: 2.5
To keep track of where you are in a loop, use the ``index_var`` directive with ``loop_control``. This directive specifies a variable name to contain the current loop index::
- name: count our fruit
debug:
msg: "{{ item }} with index {{ my_idx }}"
loop:
- apple
- banana
- pear
loop_control:
index_var: my_idx
.. note:: `index_var` is 0 indexed.
Defining inner and outer variable names with ``loop_var``
---------------------------------------------------------
.. versionadded:: 2.1
You can nest two looping tasks using ``include_tasks``. However, by default Ansible sets the loop variable ``item`` for each loop. This means the inner, nested loop will overwrite the value of ``item`` from the outer loop.
You can specify the name of the variable for each loop using ``loop_var`` with ``loop_control``::
# main.yml
- include_tasks: inner.yml
loop:
- 1
- 2
- 3
loop_control:
loop_var: outer_item
# inner.yml
- debug:
msg: "outer item={{ outer_item }} inner item={{ item }}"
loop:
- a
- b
- c
.. note:: If Ansible detects that the current loop is using a variable which has already been defined, it will raise an error to fail the task.
Extended loop variables
-----------------------
.. versionadded:: 2.8
As of Ansible 2.8 you can get extended loop information using the ``extended`` option to loop control. This option will expose the following information.
========================== ===========
Variable Description
-------------------------- -----------
``ansible_loop.allitems`` The list of all items in the loop
``ansible_loop.index`` The current iteration of the loop. (1 indexed)
``ansible_loop.index0`` The current iteration of the loop. (0 indexed)
``ansible_loop.revindex`` The number of iterations from the end of the loop (1 indexed)
``ansible_loop.revindex0`` The number of iterations from the end of the loop (0 indexed)
``ansible_loop.first`` ``True`` if first iteration
``ansible_loop.last`` ``True`` if last iteration
``ansible_loop.length`` The number of items in the loop
``ansible_loop.previtem`` The item from the previous iteration of the loop. Undefined during the first iteration.
``ansible_loop.nextitem`` The item from the following iteration of the loop. Undefined during the last iteration.
========================== ===========
::
loop_control:
extended: yes
Accessing the name of your loop_var
-----------------------------------
.. versionadded:: 2.8
As of Ansible 2.8 you can get the name of the value provided to ``loop_control.loop_var`` using the ``ansible_loop_var`` variable
For role authors, writing roles that allow loops, instead of dictating the required ``loop_var`` value, you can gather the value via::
"{{ lookup('vars', ansible_loop_var) }}"
.. _migrating_to_loop:
Migrating from with_X to loop
=============================
.. include:: shared_snippets/with2loop.txt
.. seealso::
:ref:`about_playbooks`
An introduction to playbooks
:ref:`playbooks_reuse_roles`
Playbook organization by roles
:ref:`playbooks_best_practices`
Tips and tricks for playbooks
:ref:`playbooks_conditionals`
Conditional statements in playbooks
:ref:`playbooks_variables`
All about variables
`User Mailing List <https://groups.google.com/group/ansible-devel>`_
Have a question? Stop by the google group!
`irc.freenode.net <http://irc.freenode.net>`_
#ansible IRC chat channel