Allow private and protected class members to be accessible in nested classes
This commit is contained in:
parent
d92f78d7e2
commit
703dcee952
1 changed files with 14 additions and 8 deletions
|
@ -8950,9 +8950,10 @@ namespace ts {
|
|||
|
||||
const enclosingClass = enclosingClassDeclaration ? <InterfaceType>getDeclaredTypeOfSymbol(getSymbolOfNode(enclosingClassDeclaration)) : undefined;
|
||||
|
||||
// Private property is accessible if declaring and enclosing class are the same
|
||||
// Private property is accessible if the property is within the declaring class
|
||||
if (flags & NodeFlags.Private) {
|
||||
if (declaringClass !== enclosingClass) {
|
||||
const declaringClassDeclaration = <ClassLikeDeclaration>getClassLikeDeclarationOfSymbol(getParentOfSymbol(prop));
|
||||
if (!isNodeWithinClass(node, declaringClassDeclaration)) {
|
||||
error(node, Diagnostics.Property_0_is_private_and_only_accessible_within_class_1, symbolToString(prop), typeToString(declaringClass));
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -8965,10 +8966,13 @@ namespace ts {
|
|||
if (left.kind === SyntaxKind.SuperKeyword) {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// A protected property is accessible in the declaring class and classes derived from it
|
||||
// A protected property is accessible if the property is within the declaring class or classes derived from it
|
||||
const typeClassDeclaration = <ClassLikeDeclaration>getClassLikeDeclarationOfSymbol(type.symbol);
|
||||
if (!enclosingClass || !hasBaseType(enclosingClass, declaringClass)) {
|
||||
error(node, Diagnostics.Property_0_is_protected_and_only_accessible_within_class_1_and_its_subclasses, symbolToString(prop), typeToString(declaringClass));
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
if (!isNodeWithinClass(node, typeClassDeclaration)) {
|
||||
error(node, Diagnostics.Property_0_is_protected_and_only_accessible_within_class_1_and_its_subclasses, symbolToString(prop), typeToString(declaringClass));
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// No further restrictions for static properties
|
||||
if (flags & NodeFlags.Static) {
|
||||
|
@ -8981,9 +8985,11 @@ namespace ts {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: why is the first part of this check here?
|
||||
if (!(getTargetType(type).flags & (TypeFlags.Class | TypeFlags.Interface) && hasBaseType(<InterfaceType>type, enclosingClass))) {
|
||||
error(node, Diagnostics.Property_0_is_protected_and_only_accessible_through_an_instance_of_class_1, symbolToString(prop), typeToString(enclosingClass));
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
if (getTargetType(type).flags & (TypeFlags.Class | TypeFlags.Interface)) {
|
||||
if (!(hasBaseType(<InterfaceType>type, enclosingClass) || isNodeWithinClass(node, typeClassDeclaration))) {
|
||||
error(node, Diagnostics.Property_0_is_protected_and_only_accessible_through_an_instance_of_class_1, symbolToString(prop), typeToString(enclosingClass));
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue