Previously, they were mistakenly treated as private because of a check
that required all super property accesses (like `super.x()`) to be
references to a MethodDeclaration or MethodSignature. This change also
allows PrototypeProperty special assignment kinds.
* Allow special property assignments in TS
But only for functions and constant variable declarations initialised with
functions.
This specifically excludes class declarations and class expressions,
which differs from Javascript. That's because Typescript supports
`static` properties, which are equivalent to property assignments to a
class.
* Improve contextual typing predicate
Don't think it's right yet, but probably closer?
* More fixes.
The code is still fantastically ugly, but everything works the way it
should.
Also update baselines, even where it is ill-advised.
* Cleanup
* Remove extra whitespace
* Some kind of fix to isAnyDeclarationName
It's not done yet.
Specifically, in TS:
Special property assignments are supposed to be declaration sites (but not all
top-level assignments), and I think I
got them to be. (But not sure).
In JS:
Special property assignments are supposed to be declaration sites (but not all
top-level assignments), and I'm pretty sure ALL top-level assignments
have been declaration sites for some time. This is incorrect, and
probably means the predicate needs to be the same for both dialects.
* Add fourslash and improve isAnyDeclarationName
Now JS behaves the same as TS.
* Cleanup from PR comments
* This-property w/empty object init: use type annotation
* JS initializer type doesn't apply to this-property assignments
* Move getJSExpandoType into getWidenedType* functions
Plus some cleanup.
* Improved style from PR comments
* Parameters are not expando
* Narrow literal element accesses
This means that, for example, the tuple `[number, string?]` allows its
second element to be narrowed with element access:
```ts
export function f(pair: [number, string?]): string {
return pair[1] ? pair[1] : 'nope';
}
```
* Update baselines
* Cleanup
* More cleanup
* Test dashes in property names
* More cleanup
* Delete undead code
* Classes can extend JS constructor functions
Now ES6 classes can extend ES5 constructor functions, although only
those written in a JS file.
Note that the static side assignability is checked. I need to write
tests to make sure that instance side assignability is checked too.
I haven't tested generic constructor functions yet either.
* Test static+instance assignability errors+generics
Note that generics do not work.
* Cleanup from PR comments
* Even more cleanup
* Update case of function name
* Fixes#26128 - signature comp for jsdoc @class.
Another issue caused by js functions tagged with jsdoc
`@constructor` not having construct signatures.
A jsdoc function type that constructs a type (`function(new: Ex)`),
has a construct signature and return value inferred as the
constructed type where as a jsdoc `@constructor` has no construct
signatures, and it's call signature has a void return type
(or undefined).
i.e:
```javascript
/** @constructor **/ function E() {};
// typeof E -> call signature: () => void
/** @param {function(new: E)} d */ function c(d) {}
// typeof d -> construct: () => E
```
--
This commit fixes this (in an inelegant way) by considering `@class` function signatures as construct signatures and synthesizing it's return value _only for signature comparison_.
There might be a slight performance hit, since the synthesized return value is not cached; but changing the `@class` function's return type in `getReturnTypeOfSignature` causes other issues.
* Update jsdoc function test to fix mistake.
* Error on accessing private property through destructuring assignment, and mark property used
* Factor out getTypeOfObjectLiteralDestructuringProperty
