TypeScript/tests/baselines/reference/superSymbolIndexedAccess2.types
Wesley Wigham 87d10eb055
Eliminate well known symbols as a concept in the checker and rely on unique symbols (#42543)
* Eliminate well-known symbols in the checker: 2021 edition

* Actually update the lib text to say unique symbol, too (this is unneeded with compat code in place, but this makes goto-def make more sense)

* Add test showing mismatched symbol constructor type interop

* Add more test cases for some other related issues this fixes

* Revert computed name change

* Style comments
2021-02-22 14:43:28 -08:00

35 lines
881 B
Plaintext

=== tests/cases/conformance/expressions/superPropertyAccess/superSymbolIndexedAccess2.ts ===
class Foo {
>Foo : Foo
[Symbol.isConcatSpreadable]() {
>[Symbol.isConcatSpreadable] : () => number
>Symbol.isConcatSpreadable : unique symbol
>Symbol : SymbolConstructor
>isConcatSpreadable : unique symbol
return 0;
>0 : 0
}
}
class Bar extends Foo {
>Bar : Bar
>Foo : Foo
[Symbol.isConcatSpreadable]() {
>[Symbol.isConcatSpreadable] : () => number
>Symbol.isConcatSpreadable : unique symbol
>Symbol : SymbolConstructor
>isConcatSpreadable : unique symbol
return super[Symbol.isConcatSpreadable]();
>super[Symbol.isConcatSpreadable]() : number
>super[Symbol.isConcatSpreadable] : () => number
>super : Foo
>Symbol.isConcatSpreadable : unique symbol
>Symbol : SymbolConstructor
>isConcatSpreadable : unique symbol
}
}