Formatting fixes for records meeting notes
This commit is contained in:
parent
d28d7c1d26
commit
33fb9ede07
|
@ -2,8 +2,11 @@
|
|||
|
||||
## Agenda
|
||||
|
||||
Discuss two records proposals: 1. [The existing old
|
||||
Discuss two records proposals:
|
||||
|
||||
1. [The existing old
|
||||
one](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/blob/master/proposals/records.md)
|
||||
|
||||
2. [The data classes
|
||||
proposal](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/pull/1667)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -79,9 +82,10 @@ gets unsightly.
|
|||
|
||||
Summary of benefits of nominal over positional records:
|
||||
|
||||
- Object initializer syntax (could possibly be added to positional) - Binary
|
||||
compat from version to version when you move to records (positional can't) -
|
||||
Source compat
|
||||
- Object initializer syntax (could possibly be added to positional)
|
||||
- Binary
|
||||
compat from version to version when you move to records (positional can't)
|
||||
- Source compat
|
||||
|
||||
**Conclusion**
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue