Add missing note about static local functions
`extern` is accepted for static local functions.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5ec2b2c8e3
commit
372e7f5eb5
|
@ -35,7 +35,8 @@ emitted to the lowered methods, on the exact same parameters they were applied t
|
|||
|
||||
**Conclusion**
|
||||
|
||||
Proposal accepted, attributes will be allowed on local functions.
|
||||
Proposal accepted, attributes will be allowed on local functions. `extern` will also be allowed on
|
||||
static local functions, and will be a valid P/Invoke target.
|
||||
|
||||
### Target-typed new
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -94,4 +95,4 @@ In addition, we would like to know the effect of changing switch expressions to
|
|||
type, if one exists. We hope that any difference would be uncommon in practice, but it would be
|
||||
useful to know if there are common instances where this would break. This would be used to decide
|
||||
if we would adjust the behavior of the switch expression to match the proposed behavior for the
|
||||
conditional expression.
|
||||
conditional expression.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue