maxmustermann/csharplang
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

We should Inform people about appropriate use of analyzers (#3934)

Browse source 
* We should Inform people about appropriate use of analyzers

as per #3925

* Update README.md

Co-authored-by: Fred Silberberg <fred@silberberg.xyz>
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Hill 2020-09-28 04:14:17 +10:00 committed by GitHub
parent 8bcdc05af8
commit 3f6a61b29b
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 2 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
README.md
View file

@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ Discussions that are short and stay on topic are much more likely to be read. If
- Stick to the topic of the discussion. If a comment is tangential, or goes into detail on a subtopic, start a new discussion and link back.
- Is your comment useful for others to read, or can it be adequately expressed with an emoji reaction to an existing comment?
Language proposals which prevent specific syntax from occurring can be achieved with [a Roslyn analyzer](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/extensibility/getting-started-with-roslyn-analyzers). Proposals that only make existing syntax optionally illegal will be rejected by the language design committee to prevent increased language complexity.
## Proposals
Once you have a fully fleshed out proposal describing a new language feature in syntactic and semantic detail, please [open an issue for it](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/issues/new/choose), and it will be labeled as a [Proposal](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3AProposal). The comment thread on the issue can be used to hash out or briefly discuss details of the proposal, as well as pros and cons of adopting it into C#. If an issue does not meet the bar of being a full proposal, we may move it to a discussion, so that it can be "baked" further. Specific open issues or more expansive discussion with a proposal will often warrant opening a side discussion rather than cluttering the comment section on the issue.