csharplang/proposals
2020-07-21 14:52:22 -07:00
..
csharp-6.0 Add doc for C# 6.0 struct autoprop initialization (#3459) 2020-05-18 16:36:57 -07:00
csharp-7.0 Add placeholder specs for two features from C# 7.0 (#3270) 2020-03-16 18:23:28 -07:00
csharp-7.1 Update target-typed-default.md 2019-07-30 13:23:29 -07:00
csharp-7.2 Add placeholder documents for missing specifications. (#3261) 2020-03-11 11:48:23 -07:00
csharp-7.3 Fix typo in tuple equality proposal (#3614) 2020-06-25 11:42:58 -07:00
csharp-8.0 Update the ranges.md file to correctly represent the actual impl. (#3645) 2020-07-07 10:51:45 -04:00
inactive Add folders and READMEs 2017-01-27 11:02:27 -08:00
rejected Move old records proposals to rejected/ and rename current proposal 2020-05-30 12:24:13 -07:00
caller-argument-expression.md markdown fixes 2019-03-06 22:28:47 -08:00
constant_interpolated_strings.md Add constant interpolated strings (#3581) 2020-06-18 09:43:38 -07:00
covariant-returns.md Move specification from #2844 to proposals. (#3394) 2020-04-24 16:58:39 -07:00
declaration-expressions.md markdown fixes 2019-03-06 22:28:47 -08:00
discriminated-unions.md Add proposal for discriminated unions 2019-11-14 16:40:28 -08:00
extending-partial-methods.md Update extending-partial-methods.md (#3386) 2020-04-23 13:06:39 -07:00
extension-getenumerator.md Add spec for extension GetEnumerator (#3576) 2020-06-17 16:40:02 -07:00
fixed-sized-buffers.md markdown fixes 2019-03-06 22:28:47 -08:00
format.md Fix typos in format proposal 2019-04-04 14:58:14 +02:00
function-pointers.md Only support public calling convention types. 2020-07-21 14:52:22 -07:00
init.md Local functions and lambdas are outside init phase (#3674) 2020-07-13 22:24:09 -07:00
intptr-operators.md markdown fixes 2019-03-07 10:00:39 -08:00
intrinsics.md Fixed typos (#2167) 2019-02-12 13:45:25 -08:00
lambda-attributes.md markdown fixes 2019-03-07 10:00:39 -08:00
lambda-discard-parameters.md Create speclet for lambda discard parameters (#2901) 2019-12-13 13:43:29 -08:00
local-function-attributes.md Add draft spec for local function attributes (#3198) 2020-03-17 13:58:50 -07:00
module-initializers.md Update module-initializers.md (#3604) 2020-06-23 15:23:17 -07:00
native-integers.md Native-sized integers proposal (#2833) 2020-04-14 12:39:37 -07:00
null-arg-checking.md Fixed typos (#2167) 2019-02-12 13:45:25 -08:00
null-conditional-await.md markdown fixes 2019-03-07 10:00:39 -08:00
nullable-enhanced-common-type.md Add support for common type of int and double?. (#1806) 2018-09-06 16:01:33 -07:00
patterns3.md Add draft spec for C# pattern-matching changes. (#3361) 2020-04-17 16:03:52 -07:00
pointer-null-coalescing.md Added mention ??= rules 2020-07-07 09:48:49 -04:00
primary-constructors.md Create primary-constructors.md 2019-07-23 15:31:23 -07:00
proposal-template.md Remove abbreviations from the text (#68) 2017-02-13 14:59:12 -08:00
README.md Update READMEs for discussion in GitHub issues 2017-02-13 16:20:11 -08:00
readonly-locals.md fix formatting 2019-03-07 10:03:08 -08:00
records.md Clarify expected accessibility of an EqualityContract property in a record directly inheriting from object. (#3700) 2020-07-16 14:49:17 -07:00
repeated-attributes.md Update repeated-attributes.md (#3661) 2020-07-09 13:48:23 -07:00
skip-localsinit.md Fixed typos (#2167) 2019-02-12 13:45:25 -08:00
static-anonymous-functions.md Update and rename static-lambdas.md to static-anonymous-functions.md (#3651) 2020-07-08 17:06:50 -07:00
static-delegates.md Fixed typos (#2167) 2019-02-12 13:45:25 -08:00
target-typed-conditional-expression.md Update target-typed conditional expression spec. (#3503) 2020-05-31 14:29:44 -07:00
target-typed-new.md target-typed new: reflect LDM decisions 2020-03-25 (#3311) 2020-03-25 15:40:49 -07:00
top-level-statements.md Providing access to command line arguments within top-level statements 2020-05-09 09:43:55 -07:00
variance-safety-for-static-interface-members.md Rename Variance-safety-for-static-interface-members.md to variance-safety-for-static-interface-members.md 2020-07-19 09:26:18 -07:00

C# Language Proposals

Language proposals are living documents describing the current thinking about a given language feature.

Proposals can be either active, inactive, rejected or done. Active proposals are stored directly in the proposals folder, inactive and rejected proposals are stored in the inactive and rejected subfolders, and done proposals are archived in a folder corresponding to the language version they are part of.

Lifetime of a proposal

A proposal starts its life when the language design team decides that it might make a good addition to the language some day. Typically it will start out being active, but if we want to capture an idea without wanting to work on it right now, a proposal can also start out in the inactive subfolder. Proposals may even start out directly in the rejected state, if we want to make a record of something we don't intend to do. For instance, if a popular and recurring request is not possible to implement, we can capture that as a rejected proposal.

The proposal may start out as an idea in a discussion issue, or it may come from discussions in the Language Design Meeting, or arrive from many other fronts. The main thing is that the design team feels that it should be done, and that there's someone who is willing to write it up. Typically a member of the Language Design Team will assign themselves as a champion for the feature, tracked by a Champion issue. The champion is responsible for moving the proposal through the design process.

A proposal is active if it is moving forward through design and implementation toward an upcoming release. Once it is completely done, i.e. an implementation has been merged into a release and the feature has been specified, it is moved into a subdirectory corresponding to its release.

If a feature turns out not to be likely to make it into the language at all, e.g. because it proves unfeasible, does not seem to add enough value or just isn't right for the language, it will be rejected. If a feature has reasonable promise but is not currently being prioritized to work on, it may be declared inactive to avoid cluttering the main folder. It is perfectly fine for work to happen on inactive or rejected proposals, and for them to be resurrected later. The categories are there to reflect current design intent.

Nature of a proposal

A proposal should follow the proposal template. A good proposal should:

  • Fit with the general spirit and aesthetic of the language.
  • Not introduce subtly alternate syntax for existing features.
  • Add a lot of value for a clear set of users.
  • Not add significantly to the complexity of the language, especially for new users.

Discussion of proposals

Feedback and discussion happens in discussion issues. When a new proposal is added to the proposals folder, it should be announced in a discussion issue by the champion or proposal author.