Merge #17140: test: Fix bug in blockfilter_index_tests.
f59bbb61af
test: Fix bug in blockfilter_index_tests. (Jim Posen) Pull request description: The test case tests a chain reorganization, however the two chains were generated in the same manner and thus produced the same blocks. This issue was [pointed out](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14121#discussion_r334282663) by MarcoFalke. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: Thanks! ACKf59bbb61af
(looked at the diff on GitHub, didn't compile, nor run tests) Tree-SHA512: a2f063ae9312051ffc2a3fcc1116a6a8ac09beeef261bc40aa3ff7270ff4de22a790eb19fec6b15ba1eb46e78f1f317bfd91472d8581b95bb9441a56b102554e
This commit is contained in:
commit
4f42284fc0
1 changed files with 14 additions and 6 deletions
|
@ -167,17 +167,23 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(blockfilter_index_initial_sync, TestChain100Setup)
|
|||
LOCK(cs_main);
|
||||
tip = ::ChainActive().Tip();
|
||||
}
|
||||
CScript coinbase_script_pub_key = GetScriptForDestination(PKHash(coinbaseKey.GetPubKey()));
|
||||
CKey coinbase_key_A, coinbase_key_B;
|
||||
coinbase_key_A.MakeNewKey(true);
|
||||
coinbase_key_B.MakeNewKey(true);
|
||||
CScript coinbase_script_pub_key_A = GetScriptForDestination(PKHash(coinbase_key_A.GetPubKey()));
|
||||
CScript coinbase_script_pub_key_B = GetScriptForDestination(PKHash(coinbase_key_B.GetPubKey()));
|
||||
std::vector<std::shared_ptr<CBlock>> chainA, chainB;
|
||||
BOOST_REQUIRE(BuildChain(tip, coinbase_script_pub_key, 10, chainA));
|
||||
BOOST_REQUIRE(BuildChain(tip, coinbase_script_pub_key, 10, chainB));
|
||||
BOOST_REQUIRE(BuildChain(tip, coinbase_script_pub_key_A, 10, chainA));
|
||||
BOOST_REQUIRE(BuildChain(tip, coinbase_script_pub_key_B, 10, chainB));
|
||||
|
||||
// Check that new blocks on chain A get indexed.
|
||||
uint256 chainA_last_header = last_header;
|
||||
for (size_t i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
|
||||
const auto& block = chainA[i];
|
||||
BOOST_REQUIRE(ProcessNewBlock(Params(), block, true, nullptr));
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (size_t i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
|
||||
const auto& block = chainA[i];
|
||||
const CBlockIndex* block_index;
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOCK(cs_main);
|
||||
|
@ -193,7 +199,9 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(blockfilter_index_initial_sync, TestChain100Setup)
|
|||
for (size_t i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
|
||||
const auto& block = chainB[i];
|
||||
BOOST_REQUIRE(ProcessNewBlock(Params(), block, true, nullptr));
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (size_t i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
|
||||
const auto& block = chainB[i];
|
||||
const CBlockIndex* block_index;
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOCK(cs_main);
|
||||
|
@ -221,7 +229,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(blockfilter_index_initial_sync, TestChain100Setup)
|
|||
// Reorg back to chain A.
|
||||
for (size_t i = 2; i < 4; i++) {
|
||||
const auto& block = chainA[i];
|
||||
BOOST_REQUIRE(ProcessNewBlock(Params(), block, true, nullptr));
|
||||
BOOST_REQUIRE(ProcessNewBlock(Params(), block, true, nullptr));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check that chain A and B blocks can be retrieved.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue