Merge #18285: test: Check that wait_until returns if time point is in the past
fab7d14ea5
test: Check that wait_until returns if time point is in the past (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Add an explicit regression test for the condvar bug (#18227), so that this doesn't happen again ACKs for top commit: laanwj: ACKfab7d14ea5
Tree-SHA512: 6ec0d0b3945cae87a001e367af34cca1953a8082b4a0d9f8a20d30acd1f36363e98035d4eb173ff786cf6692d352d41f960633415c46394af042eb44e3b5ad71
This commit is contained in:
commit
d20d5dc824
1 changed files with 18 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -98,6 +98,24 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(manythreads)
|
|||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(counterSum, 200);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(wait_until_past)
|
||||
{
|
||||
std::condition_variable condvar;
|
||||
Mutex mtx;
|
||||
WAIT_LOCK(mtx, lock);
|
||||
|
||||
const auto no_wait= [&](const std::chrono::seconds& d) {
|
||||
return condvar.wait_until(lock, std::chrono::system_clock::now() - d);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::cv_status::timeout == no_wait(std::chrono::seconds{1}));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::cv_status::timeout == no_wait(std::chrono::minutes{1}));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::cv_status::timeout == no_wait(std::chrono::hours{1}));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::cv_status::timeout == no_wait(std::chrono::hours{10}));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::cv_status::timeout == no_wait(std::chrono::hours{100}));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(std::cv_status::timeout == no_wait(std::chrono::hours{1000}));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(singlethreadedscheduler_ordered)
|
||||
{
|
||||
CScheduler scheduler;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue