Fix CCoins serialization documentation

The docs talk about bits 2 and 4 instead of 2 and 3, and bits are being
indexed from both 1 (describing nCode) and 0 (in second example).
Changed to use zero-indexing for all.
This commit is contained in:
Peter Josling 2015-11-04 20:15:54 +00:00
parent 193f7b553e
commit e482a7fe6b

View file

@ -29,11 +29,11 @@
* - VARINT(nHeight)
*
* The nCode value consists of:
* - bit 1: IsCoinBase()
* - bit 2: vout[0] is not spent
* - bit 4: vout[1] is not spent
* - bit 0: IsCoinBase()
* - bit 1: vout[0] is not spent
* - bit 2: vout[1] is not spent
* - The higher bits encode N, the number of non-zero bytes in the following bitvector.
* - In case both bit 2 and bit 4 are unset, they encode N-1, as there must be at
* - In case both bit 1 and bit 2 are unset, they encode N-1, as there must be at
* least one non-spent output).
*
* Example: 0104835800816115944e077fe7c803cfa57f29b36bf87c1d358bb85e
@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
*
* - version = 1
* - code = 9 (coinbase, neither vout[0] or vout[1] are unspent,
* 2 (1, +1 because both bit 2 and bit 4 are unset) non-zero bitvector bytes follow)
* 2 (1, +1 because both bit 1 and bit 2 are unset) non-zero bitvector bytes follow)
* - unspentness bitvector: bits 2 (0x04) and 14 (0x4000) are set, so vout[2+2] and vout[14+2] are unspent
* - vout[4]: 86ef97d5790061b01caab50f1b8e9c50a5057eb43c2d9563a4ee
* * 86ef97d579: compact amount representation for 234925952 (2.35 BTC)