702ae1e21a [RPC] [wallet] allow getbalance to use min_conf and watch_only without accounts. (John Newbery)
cf15761f6d [wallet] GetBalance can take a min_depth argument. (John Newbery)
0f3d6e9ab7 [wallet] factor out GetAvailableWatchOnlyBalance() (John Newbery)
7110c830f8 [wallet] deduplicate GetAvailableCredit logic (John Newbery)
ef7bc8893c [wallet] Factor out GetWatchOnlyBalance() (John Newbery)
4279da4785 [wallet] GetBalance can take an isminefilter filter. (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
#12953 inadvertently removed the functionality to call `getbalance "*" <int> <bool>` to get the wallet's balance with either minconfs or include_watchonly.
This restores that functionality (when `-deprecatedrpc=accounts`), and also makes it possible to call ``getbalance minconf=<int> include_watchonly=<bool>` when accounts are not being used.
Tree-SHA512: 67e84de9291ed6d34b23c626f4dc5988ba0ae6c99708d02b87dd3aaad3f4b6baa6202a66cc2dadd30dd993a39de8036ee920fcaa8cbb1c5dfe606e6fac183344
3c292cc19 ScanforWalletTransactions should mark input txns as dirty (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
I'm hitting a corner case in my mainnet wallet where I load a restore a wallet, call `rescanblockchain` from RPC, and it's "double counting" an output I've sent to myself since currently it never marks input transactions as dirty. This is fixed by a restart of the wallet.
Note that this only happens with keys with birthdate *after* the blocks containing the spent funds which gets scanned on startup, so it's hard to test without a set seed function.
Tree-SHA512: ee1fa152bb054b57ab4c734e355df10d241181e0372c81d583be61678fffbabe5ae60b09b05dc1bbbcfb4838df9d8538791d4c1d80a09b84d78ad2f50dcb0a61
I thought we had removed this a long time ago, TBH, its really
confusing feedback to users that we display whether a tx was
broadcast to immediate neighbor nodes, given that has little
indication of whether the tx propagated very far.
faa18ca046 wallet: Erase wtxOrderd wtx pointer on removeprunedfunds (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This prevents segfaults, when reading from the freed memory.
Tree-SHA512: 04f8190dea7901cf1cc298d5db98c83b02858f27114c5ef4da738accd176d6647d6b81f3dc39f3d5912b1a981cf0599370fd391c4154ffbde97afc1fac389123
TransactionWithinChainLimits would take a 'limit' and check it against ascendants and descendants. This is changed to take an explicit
max ancestors and max descendants value, and to test the corresponding value against its corresponding max.
4b62bdf513 Wallet: Refactor ReserveKeyFromKeyPool for safety (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
ReserveKeyFromKeyPool's previous behaviour is to set nIndex to -1 if the keypool is
empty, OR throw an exception for technical failures. Instead, we now return false
if the keypool is empty, true if the operation succeeded.
This is to make failure more easily detectable by calling code.
Tree-SHA512: 753f057ad13bd4c28d121f426bf0967ed72b827d97fb24582f9326ec60072abc5482e3db69ccada7c5fc66de9957fc59098432dd223fc4116991cab44c6d7aef
ReserveKeyFromKeyPool's previous behaviour is to set nIndex to -1 if the keypool is
empty, OR throw an exception for technical failures. Instead, we now return false
if the keypool is empty, true if the operation succeeded.
This is to make failure more easily detectable by calling code.
Pass an error message back from CWallet::Verify(), and call
InitError/InitWarning from WalletInit::Verify().
This means that we can call CWallet::Verify() independently from
WalletInit and not have InitErrors printed to stdout. It also means that
the error can be reported to the user if dynamic wallet load fails.
This allows a single wallet to be verified. Prior to this commit, all
wallets were verified together by the WalletInit::Verify() function at
start-up.
Individual wallet verification will be done when loading wallets
dynamically at runtime.
WalletInit::Start calls postInitProcess() for each wallet. Previously
each call to postInitProcess() would attempt to schedule wallet
background flushing.
Just start wallet background flushing once from WalletInit::Start().
Bump the wallet version to indicate support for the pre split keypool.
Also prevents any wallets from upgrading to versions between HD_SPLIT
and PRE_SPLIT_KEYPOOL.
After upgrading to HD chain split, we want to continue to use keys
from the old keypool. To do this, before we generate any new keys after
upgrading, we mark all of the keypool entries as being pre-chain
split and move them to a separate pre chain split keypool. Keys are
fetched from that keypool until it is emptied. Only then are the new
internal and external keypools used.
Changes the maximum upgradewallet version to the latest wallet version
number, 159900. Non-HD wallets will be upgraded to use HD derivation.
Non HD chain split wallets will be upgraded to HD chain split.
If a non-HD wallet is upgraded to HD, the keypool will be entirely
regenerated.
Since upgradewallet is effectively run during a first run, all of the
first run initial setup stuff is combined with the upgrade to HD
1e46d8a Get rid of ambiguous OutputType::NONE value (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Based on suggestion by @sipa https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12119#issuecomment-357982763
After #12119, the NONE output type was overloaded to refer to either an output type that couldn't be parsed, or to an automatic change output mode. This change drops the NONE enum and uses a simple bool to indicate parse failure, and a new CHANGE_AUTO enum to refer the change output type.
This change is almost a pure refactoring except it makes RPCs reject empty string ("") address types instead of treating them like they were unset. This simplifies the parsing code a little bit and could prevent RPC usage mistakes. It's noted in the release notes.
Follows up #12408 by @MarcoFalke
Followups for future PRs:
- [ ] Add explicit support for specifying "auto" in `ParseOutputType` as suggested by promag and sipa: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12729#issuecomment-374799567 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12729#discussion_r175969481
- [ ] Add wallet `AddressChangeType` method to complement `TransactionChangeType`: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12729#discussion_r175969618.
Tree-SHA512: 8b08b272bcb177a0a9e556dcd965840a7fe601ef83ca97938b879c9b1a33b5b3f96939e1bceef11ba7c644ac21bfd6c1dbc6ca715cd1da4ace50475240e4ee48
This much more accurately captures the meaning of the callback.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/SetBestChain/ChainStateFlushed/g' src/validationinterface.h src/validationinterface.cpp src/wallet/wallet.h src/wallet/wallet.cpp src/validation.cpp src/index/txindex.h src/index/txindex.cpp
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
41ba061 [docs] Add release notes for wallet 'label' API. (John Newbery)
189e0ef [wallet] [rpc] introduce 'label' API for wallet (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Add label API to wallet RPC.
This is one step towards #3816 ("Remove bolt-on account system") although it doesn't
actually remove anything yet.
These initially mirror the account functions, with the following differences:
- These functions aren't DEPRECATED in the help
- Help mentions 'label' instead of accounts. In the language used, labels are
associated with addresses, instead of addresses associated with labels. (unlike
with accounts.)
- Labels have no balance
- No balances in `listlabels`
- `listlabels` has no minconf or watchonly argument
- Like in the GUI, labels can be set on any address, not just receiving addreses
- Unlike accounts, labels can be deleted.
Being unable to delete them is a common annoyance (see #1231).
Currently only by reassigning all addresses using `setlabel`, but an explicit
call `deletelabel` which assigns all address to the default label may make
sense.
Tree-SHA512: 45cc313c68ad529ce3a15c02181d2ab0083a7e14fe824e2cde34972713fecce512e3d4b9aa46db5355f2baa857c44b234d4fe9709225bc23c7ebbc0e03febbf5
Add label API to wallet RPC.
This is one step towards #3816 ("Remove bolt-on account system") although it doesn't
actually remove anything yet.
These initially mirror the account functions, with the following differences:
- These functions aren't DEPRECATED in the help
- Help mentions 'label' instead of accounts. In the language used, labels are
associated with addresses, instead of addresses associated with labels. (unlike
with accounts.)
- Labels have no balance
- No balances in `listlabels`
- `listlabels` has no minconf or watchonly argument
- Like in the GUI, labels can be set on any address, not just receiving addreses
- Unlike accounts, labels can be deleted.
Being unable to delete them is a common annoyance (see #1231).
Currently only by reassigning all addresses using `setlabel`, but an explicit
call `deletelabel` which assigns all address to the default label may make
sense.
Thanks to Pierre Rochard for test fixes.
818dc74 Support serialization as another type without casting (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This adds a `READWRITEAS(type, obj)` macro which serializes `obj` as if it were converted to `const type&` when `const`, and to `type&` when non-`const`. No actual cast is involved, so this only works when this conversion can be done automatically.
This makes it usable in serialization code that uses a single implementation for both serialization and deserializing, which doesn't know the constness of the object involved.
This is a redo of #12712, using a slightly different interface.
Tree-SHA512: 262f0257284ff99b5ffaec9b997c194e221522ba35c3ac8eaa9bb344449d7ea0a314de254dc77449fa7aaa600f8cd9a24da65aade8c1ec6aa80c6e9a7bba5ca7
f63bc5e wallet: Initialize m_last_block_processed to nullptr. Initialize fields where defined. (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Initialize `m_last_block_processed` to `nullptr`.
`m_last_block_processed` was introduced in 5ee3172636.
Tree-SHA512: 6e4a807e5b02115cbd80460761056f2eb22043203212d88dd0cd44c28dc0abce30ab29b078ca2c612232e76af4886f4fdbf2b0ff75e2df19b4d1a801b236cc13
Based on suggestion by Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> at
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12119#issuecomment-357982763
After #12119, the NONE output type was overloaded to refer to either an output
type that couldn't be parsed, or to an automatic change output mode. This
change drops the NONE enum and uses a simple bool indicate parse failure, and a
new CHANGE_AUTO enum to refer the change output type.
This change is almost a pure refactoring except it makes RPCs reject empty
string ("") address types instead of treating them like they were unset. This
simplifies the parsing code a little bit and could prevent RPC usage mistakes.
It's noted in the release notes.
a5bca13 Bugfix: Include <memory> for std::unique_ptr (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Not sure why all these includes were missing, but it's breaking builds for some users:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652142
(Added to all files with a reference to `std::unique_ptr`)
Tree-SHA512: 8a2c67513ca07b9bb52c34e8a20b15e56f8af2530310d9ee9b0a69694dd05e02e7a3683f14101a2685d457672b56addec591a0bb83900a0eb8e2a43d43200509
d2527bd Rename wallet_accounts.py test (Russell Yanofsky)
045eeb8 Rename account to label where appropriate (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Rename account to label where appropriate
This change only updates strings and adds RPC aliases, but should simplify the implementation of address labels in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7729, by getting renaming out of the way and letting that change focus on semantics.
The difference between accounts and labels is that labels apply only to addresses, while accounts apply to both addresses and transactions (transactions have "from" and "to" accounts). The code associating accounts with transactions is clumsy and unreliable so we would like get rid of it.
---
There is a rebased version of #7729 atop this PR at https://github.com/ryanofsky/bitcoin/commits/pr/label, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7729#issuecomment-338417139.
Tree-SHA512: b3f934e612922d6290f50137f8ba71ddfaea4485713c7d97e89400a8b73b09b254f9186dffa462c77f5847721f5af9852b5572ade5443d8ee95dd150b3edb7ff
081bf54 Test that BnB is not used when there are preset inputs (Andrew Chow)
6ef9982 Actually disable BnB when there are preset inputs (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
We don't want to use BnB when there are preset inputs because there
is some weirdness with making that work with using the KnapsackSolver
as the fallback. Currently we say that we haven't used bnb when
there are preset inputs, but we don't actually disable BnB. This fixes
that.
I thought this was done originally. I guess it got lost in a rebase somewhere.
Tree-SHA512: 9792c0cdd0736866bddbed20f10b8050104955dc589fba49a0bd61a582ba491c921af2cdcc2269678b7b69275dad5fcf89c71b75c28733c7bacbe52e55891b9c
