eadd1304c8 tests: Add a test for funding with sufficient preset inputs and subtractFeeFromOutputs (Andrew Chow)
ff330badd4 Default to bnb_used = false as there are many cases where BnB is not used (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
#17290 introduced a bug where, when we had preset inputs that covered the amount being sent and subtractFeeFrromOutputs was being used, transaction funding would result in a `Fee exceeds maximum configured by -maxtxfee` error. This was happening because we weren't setting `bnb_used = false` when the preset inputs were used as it should have been. This resulted in a too high fee because the change would go to fees accidentally.
Apparently this particular case doesn't have a test, so I've added one as well.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK eadd130. I can't get this new test to fail on macOS (without this PR). It passes whether or not I compile with `--enable-debug`. It does fail on Ubuntu. Yay undefined behavior... Anyway, it's a useful test.
fanquake:
ACK eadd1304c8
instagibbs:
utACK eadd1304c8
Tree-SHA512: 7286c321f78666eea558cc591174630d210263594df41cab1065417510591ee514ade0e1d0cec8af09a785757da68de82592b013e8fe8d4966cec3254368706e
b84e776fd1 wallet_importmulti: use addresses of the same type as being imported (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When constructing an import from the solving data of an address, make sure that the original address is the same type as the one that will be imported.
See also: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17374#issuecomment-550036931
Part of #17261
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
Code review ACK b84e776
meshcollider:
Tested re-ACK b84e776fd1
Tree-SHA512: 53c49c63af8cbade0116a62beddc77df1a411d8ed76571c3053f6aff096f41a5325421a188bab3dcacfda69bb28fdff6ba921ddd80f29c4abbadb3b58fda884c
ea3c7e585c test: Remove libssl-dev packages from CI scripts (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
7ea55264b9 test: remove lsan suppression for libcrypto (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
2d7066527a build: remove libcrypto as internal dependency in libbitcoinconsensus.pc (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
278751ea11 doc: Remove ssl as a required dependency from build-unix (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Some doc and build cleanups following #17265.
I intentionally left the libssl-dev install in `gitian-win-signer.yml`, as it's necessary for the ossl signer.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK ea3c7e585c 🗯
jamesob:
ACK ea3c7e585c
practicalswift:
ACK ea3c7e585c - nice!
fanquake:
ACK ea3c7e585c - thanks.
Tree-SHA512: 67ea35bdd6d6e512d69e6734713534c88cae033a2ed695677ea15c3e3d5ff570374e342775c88e60877fa43a19047853e7b2a433e2c9a4349a5c423726a7457e
1c23ea5fe6 test: fix bitcoind already running warnings on macOS (fanquake)
Pull request description:
On macOS, `pidof` installed via brew returns b'' rather than None.
Account for this, to remove spurious warnings from the test_runner.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 1c23ea5fe6
Tree-SHA512: 640f4323d4105eac5c7abb52daf80486d5d3b4a074720490ceeb97c3dd8d73a3de9a988d2550f1e2076c620bb10d452b2959d8b723d2ee64f499878909824e31
fa2ec9f451 fuzz: Bump timeout in test_runner to accomodate for slow arm64 CPUs (MarcoFalke)
fa6e01b2f3 ci: Use clang-8 for fuzzing to run on aarch64 ci systems (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Ubuntu bionic clang is clang version 6, which does not come with libfuzzer. So the ci system breaks down when run on aarch64.
Fix that by using clang-8
For reference, the previous error on my ci system was:
```
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find /usr/lib/llvm-6.0/lib/clang/6.0.0/lib/linux/libclang_rt.fuzzer-aarch64.a: No such file or directory
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fa2ec9f451
Tree-SHA512: 4954dbc36c444d1ae145290115eea6291753c9810c92003ab8d75433c3fe3bfee439d3a99dc394418275527157a8b89f04038c8b16e08c69ec9ded50fb869e70
38516f9078 Fix input size assertion in wallet_bumpfee.py (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
I was investigating a curious error for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17290 and realized that this check should have caught that error earlier in the test.
The loop is intended to ensure that only a single input exists the entire time until the change output disappears, a single additional bump occurs, then it leaves the loop.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 1d2d6ef535ec2c55f516ee5de11352386ceac6bedaabc6842229a486d9f28d35310ad5f57bfcc1f1e654fc397ecff29ec33256f9b3da897500b7e1635004b63a
49997813a4 test: check custom ancestor limit in mempool_packages.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The functional test `mempool_packages.py` starts one node with default ancestor/descendant limit settings and one with a custom, reduced ancestor limit (currently `-limitancestorcount=5`). The effect of the latter had not been tested yet though. This is approached in this PR by checking on the expected mempool contents of node1 after the node0 ancestor tests are done, via the following three conditions:
- the # of txs in the node1 mempool is equal to the the limit
- all txs in node1 mempool are a subset of txs in node0 mempool
- the node1 mempool txs match the start of the constructed tx-chain
Note that this still doesn't *fully* check the expected mempool of node1 (e.g. that it isn't influenced by `prioritisetransaction` RPC on node0), hence I add another TODO. In the future it would make sense to also set a custom descendant limit when the second TODO about checking node1's mempool is approached: 89e93135ae/test/functional/mempool_packages.py (L228)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 49997813a4👲
Tree-SHA512: d3a1d19fb49731238ad08ee7c02e2fa81a227e3b4ef3340d68598de42ddb62be9161134f6b8e08fa76b8c9faa02fecfa01111159642e20e9f358292a757b7608
To test the custom ancestor limit on node1 (passed by the argument
-limitancestorcount), we check for three conditions:
-> the # of txs in the node1 mempool is equal to the the limit
-> all txs in node1 mempool are a subset of txs in node0 mempool
-> the node1 mempool txs match the start of the constructed tx-chain
0e7c90eb37 test: speed up wallet_avoidreuse.py (Jon Atack)
6d50b2606e test: add logging to wallet_avoidreuse.py (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Inspired by PRs #17340 and #15881.
- add logging
- pass -whitelist in `set_test_params` to speed up transaction relay
`wallet_avoidreuse.py` is not intended to test P2P transaction relay/timing, so it should be fine to do this here. This reduces test run time variability and speeds up the test by 2-3 times on average.
Test run times in seconds:
- before: 20, 24, 22, 17, 27, 40, 30
- after: 10, 10, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 0e7c90eb37🐊
fanquake:
ACK 0e7c90eb37
Tree-SHA512: 6d954a0aaf402c9594201626b59d29263479059e68fa5155bb44ed973cd0c3347729dd78b78b4d5a2275e45da365dc1afb4cc7e3293dea33fcc2e3e83a39faf5
Use -whitelist to speed up transaction relay.
The wallet_avoidreuse.py test is not intended to test transaction relay/timing,
so it should be fine to do this here.
This greatly reduces test run time variability and speeds up the test by 2-3
times on average, e.g. on my system from 20-30 seconds down to 8-10 seconds.
af7bae7340 [tests] Don't stop-start unnecessarily in rpc_fundrawtransaction.py (John Newbery)
9a8505299b [tests] Use -whitelist in rpc_fundrawtransaction.py (John Newbery)
646b593bbd [tests] Speed up rpc_fundrawtransaction.py (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Speed up rpc_fundrawtransaction.py
Most of the time in rpc_fundrawtransaction.py is spent waiting for
unconfirmed transactions to propagate. Net processing adds a poisson
random delay to the time it will INV transactions with a mean interval
of 5 seconds. Calls like the following:
```
self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction(signedTx['hex'])
self.sync_all()
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
````
will therefore introduce a delay waiting for the mempools to sync.
Instead just generate the block on the node that sent the transaction:
```
self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction(signedTx['hex'])
self.nodes[2].generate(1)
```
rpc_fundrawtransaction.py is not intended to be a test for transaction
relay, so it's ok to do this.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK af7bae7340🛴
Tree-SHA512: db3407d871bfdc99a02e7304b07239dd3585ac47f27f020f1a70608b7f6386b134343c01f3e4d1c246ce734676755897671999695068d6388602fb042d178780
This was only added in c1dde3a949 to match
behaviour when `encryptwallet` would restart the node. It's not required
for the test (and slows things down).
When constructing an import from the solving data of an address,
make sure that the original address is the same type as the one that
will be imported.
92b2f5306b test: add dumptxoutset RPC test (James O'Beirne)
c1ccbc3dde devtools: add utxo_snapshot.sh (James O'Beirne)
57cf74c991 rpc: add dumptxoutset (James O'Beirne)
92fafb3a7d coinstats: add coins_count (James O'Beirne)
707fde7b9b add unused SnapshotMetadata class (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11):
Parent PR: #15606
Issue: #15605
Specification: https://github.com/jamesob/assumeutxo-docs/tree/master/proposal
---
This changeset defines the serialization format for UTXO snapshots and adds an RPC command for creating them, `dumptxoutset`. It also adds a convenience script for generating and verifying snapshots at a certain height, since that requires doing a hacky rewind of the chain via `invalidateblock`.
All of this is unused at the moment.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 92b2f5306b
Tree-SHA512: 200dff87767f157d627e99506ec543465d9329860a6cd49363081619c437163a640a46d008faa92b1f44fd403bfc7a7c9e851c658b5a4849efa9a34ca976bf31
4671fc3d9e Expand on wallet_balance.py comment from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16766\#issuecomment-527563982 (Jeremy Rubin)
91f3073f08 Update release notes to mention changes to IsTrusted and impact on wallet (Jeremy Rubin)
8f174ef112 Systematize style of IsTrusted single line if (Jeremy Rubin)
b49dcbedf7 update variable naming conventions for IsTrusted (Jeremy Rubin)
5ffe0d1449 Update comment in test/functional/wallet_balance.py (Jeremy Rubin)
a550c58267 Update wallet_balance.py test to reflect new behavior (Jeremy Rubin)
5dd7da4ccd Reuse trustedParents in looped calls to IsTrusted (Jeremy Rubin)
595f09d6de Cache tx Trust per-call to avoid DoS (Jeremy Rubin)
dce032ce29 Make IsTrusted scan parents recursively (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
This slightly modifies the behavior of IsTrusted to recursively check the parents of a transaction. Otherwise, it's possible that a parent is not IsTrusted but a child is. If a parent is not trusted, then a child should not be either.
This recursive scan can be a little expensive, so ~it might be beneficial to have a way of caching IsTrusted state, but this is a little complex because various conditions can change between calls to IsTrusted (e.g., re-org).~ I added a cache which works per call/across calls, but does not store the results semi-permanently. Which reduces DoS risk of this change. There is no risk of untrusted parents causing a resource exploitation, as we immediately return once that is detected.
This is a change that came up as a bug-fix esque change while working on OP_SECURETHEBAG. You can see the branch where this change is important here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/master...JeremyRubin:stb-with-rpc?expand=1. Essentially, without this change, we can be tricked into accepting an OP_SECURETHEBAG output because we don't properly check the parents. As this was a change which, on its own, was not dependent on OP_SECURETHEBAG, I broke it out as I felt the change stands on its own by fixing a long standing wallet bug.
The test wallet_balance.py has been corrected to meet the new behavior. The below comment, reproduced, explains what the issue is and the edge cases that can arise before this change.
# Before `test_balance()`, we have had two nodes with a balance of 50
# each and then we:
#
# 1) Sent 40 from node A to node B with fee 0.01
# 2) Sent 60 from node B to node A with fee 0.01
#
# Then we check the balances:
#
# 1) As is
# 2) With transaction 2 from above with 2x the fee
#
# Prior to #16766, in this situation, the node would immediately report
# a balance of 30 on node B as unconfirmed and trusted.
#
# After #16766, we show that balance as unconfirmed.
#
# The balance is indeed "trusted" and "confirmed" insofar as removing
# the mempool transactions would return at least that much money. But
# the algorithm after #16766 marks it as unconfirmed because the 'taint'
# tracking of transaction trust for summing balances doesn't consider
# which inputs belong to a user. In this case, the change output in
# question could be "destroyed" by replace the 1st transaction above.
#
# The post #16766 behavior is correct; we shouldn't be treating those
# funds as confirmed. If you want to rely on that specific UTXO existing
# which has given you that balance, you cannot, as a third party
# spending the other input would destroy that unconfirmed.
#
# For example, if the test transactions were:
#
# 1) Sent 40 from node A to node B with fee 0.01
# 2) Sent 10 from node B to node A with fee 0.01
#
# Then our node would report a confirmed balance of 40 + 50 - 10 = 80
# BTC, which is more than would be available if transaction 1 were
# replaced.
The release notes have been updated to note the new behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
ariard:
Code Review ACK 4671fc3, maybe extend DoS protection in a follow-up PR.
fjahr:
Code review ACK 4671fc3d9e
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 4671fc3d9e. Changes since last review: 2 new commits adding suggested release note and python test comment, also a clean rebase with no changes to the earlier commits. The PR description is more comprehensive now, too. Looks good!
promag:
Code review ACK 4671fc3d9e.
Tree-SHA512: 6b183ff425304fef49724290053514cb2770f4a2350dcb83660ef24af5c54f7c4c2c345b0f62bba60eb2d2f70625ee61a7fab76a7f491bb5a84be5c4cc86b92f
