We currently flag `setlocale(...)` as locale dependent, but prior to this commit we didn't flag
`std::locale::global(...)` as such.
In addition to setting the global C++ locale `std::locale::global(...)` also does the equivalent
of `std::setlocale(LC_ALL, ...);`.
Thus the functionality of `std::locale::global(...)` is a superset of `setlocale(...)` :)
0306d78cb4 Use getbalances in wallet_address_types tests (Jon Atack)
7eacdc5167 Shift coverage from getunconfirmedbalance to getbalances in wallet_abandonconflict tests (Jon Atack)
3e6f7377f6 Improve getbalances coverage in wallet_balance tests (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
<strike>This PR updates several tests and then removes the `getunconfirmedbalance` RPC which was deprecated in facfb4111d a year ago.
Next steps: remove the deprecated `getwalletinfo` fields and the `getbalance` RPC in follow-ups, if there seems to be consensus on those removals.</strike>
Update:
`getunconfirmedbalance` RPC was deprecated in facfb4111d a year ago, but following the review comments below, this PR now only updates the test coverage to use `getbalances` while still leaving basic coverage for `getunconfirmedbalance` in wallet_balance.py.
That said, I've seen 3 regular contributors confused in the past 10 days by "DEPRECATED" warnings in the code that are not following the deprecation policy in [JSON-RPC-interface.md#versioning](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/JSON-RPC-interface.md#versioning).
ISTM these warnings should either be removed, or the calls deprecated (`-deprecatedrpc`), or the policy updated to describe these warnings as a pre-deprecation practice.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 0306d78cb
Tree-SHA512: 692e43e9bed5afa97d905740666e365f0b64e559e1c75a6a398236d9e943894e3477947fc11324f420a6feaffa0c0c1532aa983c50090ca39d06551399e6ddd1
9cdddae3b4 test: add rpc_signrawtransaction logging (Jon Atack)
4d6cde38ce test: refactor rpc_signrawtransaction witness script tests (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
As a follow-up to #18484, the new tests are good but bury the one non-duplicate line in each test that sets the witness script, and there is no logging in the testfile. This PR makes it easy to see what is unique to each of the new tests and adds logging.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK 9cdddae3b4🥚🐰
Tree-SHA512: 7b1ca303326658afb90b7635abc9fe8bb65f0be004124d4dcf38702bb6f38bc06ce33c0642be4ad5d511453d003cdefeea691e66e3b963a4feb66f6237a3c241
fab9899204 test: Try once more when RPC connection fails on Windows (MarcoFalke)
faa655731e test: Document why connection is re-constructed on windows (MarcoFalke)
fa9f4f663c test: Remove python 3.4 workaround (MarcoFalke)
fae760f2b2 cirrus: Bump freebsd to 12.1 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Fixes: #18548
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fab9899204, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: c4e9ed8d995b63a820ca66984f152ac216c83ba1f318b61b15c6d375c0e936c08f6bc3d38c255dddf3ee8952f848c7ababf684854e07a7c1b1d8504e6b7208ba
555567ace9 test: Extend wallet_dump test to cover comments (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 555567ace9. Nice new checks in this test. I confirmed this catches the missing FormatISO8601DateTime call you discovered in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17954#discussion_r406891999
Tree-SHA512: 71aa23dd039f3bcdee642b01151edd1a0d44f48cedd070f5858148c8cb8abd6f5edfd212daeba38e35c843da5ea6c799e5a952105fdecedac355a5a843c05a84
fa404f1e47 test: Check that the version message does not leak the local address of the node (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Add test for #8740
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK fa404f1e47
Tree-SHA512: 4d1c10d1c02fba4b51bd8b9eb3a0d9a682b6aac8c3f6924e295fdca3faefa5ecc3eaa87d347cfec5d2b2bc49963c10fe0a37c463f36088ed0304a2e3716b963b
The interfaces for the methods wait_for_header() and wait_for_merkleblock() are
changed to take a hex string instead of an integer, improving type safety and
removing the burden from the caller to always do the transformation via
`int(...)`. As suggested by MarcoFalke in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18593#discussion_r407062253
Implements the missing initialization/serialization methods for
msg_merkleblock, based on the already present class CMerkleBlock.
Also changes the method wait_for_merkleblock() to be more precise by waiting
for a merkleblock with a specified blockhash instead of an arbitrary one.
In the BIP37 test p2p_filter.py, this new method is used to make the test of
receiving merkleblock and tx if a filter is set to be more precise, by checking
if they also arrive in the right order.
7524b6479c Add tests for generateblock (Andrew Toth)
dcc8332543 Add generateblock rpc (Andrew Toth)
Pull request description:
The existing block generation rpcs for regtest, `generatetoaddress` and `generatetodescriptor`, mine everything in the mempool up to the block weight limit. This makes it difficult to test a system for several scenarios where a different set of transactions are mined. For example:
- Testing the common scenario where a transaction is replaced in the mempool but the replaced transaction is mined instead.
- Testing for a double-spent transaction where a transaction that conflicts with the mempool is mined.
- Testing for non-standard transactions that are mined.
- Testing the scenario where several blocks are mined without a specific transaction in the mempool being included in a block.
This PR introduces a new rpc, `generateblock`, that takes an array of raw transactions and txids and mines only those and the coinbase. Any txids must be in the mempool, but the raw txs can be anything conforming to consensus rules. The coinbase can be specified as either an address or descriptor.
This reopens#17653 since it was closed by mistake.
Thanks to instagibbs for code suggestions that I used here.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 7524b6479c📁
Tree-SHA512: 857106007465b5b9b8a84b6d07c17cbf8378a33a72d32ff79abea1d5ab4babb4d53a11ddbb14595aa1fac9dfa1391e3a11403d742f69951beea2f683e8a01cd4
5df0877f91 test: update and harden interface_bitcoin_cli tests (Jon Atack)
75019774c9 cli -getinfo: use getbalances instead of deprecated getwalletinfo balance (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Extracted from #18453 to preserve that PR as a discussion on multiwallet RPC/CLI.
This PR updates `bitcoin-cli -getinfo` to fetch the wallet balance from `getbalances` in order to no longer depend on `getwalletinfo.balance` which was deprecated a year ago in facfb41.
I found this when removing the getwalletinfo() `balance`, `unconfirmed_balance`, and `immature_balance` fields to see what broke from depending on them.
I didn't see any perceivable change in `-getinfo` run time from the change.
Test coverage for this change is provided by `test/functional/interface_bitcoin_cli.py`, which the second commit updates to (a) no longer depend on getwalletinfo.balances and (b) test the -getinfo blockcount and balance fields against non-default, non-zero values.
ACKs for top commit:
robot-visions:
ACK 5df0877
MarcoFalke:
ACK 5df0877
vasild:
re-ACK 5df0877f9
promag:
Code review ACK 5df0877f91.
theStack:
ACK 5df0877f91
Tree-SHA512: 0dd8c62f915b1c0112e42b132dcf74a141bdd1f51e7c17d4a698b374ec296f4f9836f7058dbe237cf24f9bfb32ea5000e14f7089e2e86472d9c6a175be26e910
fa1da3d4bf test: Add basic addr relay test (MarcoFalke)
fa1793c1c4 net: Pass connman const when relaying address (MarcoFalke)
fa47a0b003 net: Make addr relay mockable (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
As usual:
* Switch to std::chrono time to be type-safe and mockable
* Add basic test that relies on mocktime to add code coverage
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK fa1da3d
promag:
ACK fa1da3d4bf (fabe56e44b6f683e24e37246a7a8851190947cb3 before https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18454#issuecomment-607866453), fa5bf23d527a450e72c2bf13d013e5393b664ca3 was dropped since last review.
Tree-SHA512: 0552bf8fcbe375baa3cab62acd8c23b2994efa47daff818ad1116d0ffaa0b9e520dc1bca2bbc68369b25584e85e54861fe6fd0968de4f503b95439c099df9bd7
faede1b293 test: Properly raise FailedToStartError when rpc shutdown before warmup finished (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Should fix issues such as https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/671910152#L7034
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: ac659f29c5ec91985c916b734e24911cbf4e2c5c4b1f1891a7e6c2d2511ec285167550fb03848eee4a7a3cbc9f8cdb0c766f4e881d9e44368c7415d007006368
7a2ecf16df Wallet: Change IsMine check in CWallet::DelAddressBook from assert to failure (Luke Dashjr)
2952c46b92 Wallet: Replace CAddressBookData.name with GetLabel() method (Luke Dashjr)
d7092c392e QA: Test that change doesn't turn into non-change when spent in an avoid-reuse wallet (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #18192, not strictly necessary for 0.20
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 7a2ecf16df, only change is adding an assert_equal in the test 🔰
jnewbery:
utACK 7a2ecf16df
Tree-SHA512: e0933ee40f705b751697dc27249e1868ed4874254b174ebdd0a7150125d8c818402e66df2371718c7eeb90e67ee2317215fb260aa9b9d7b9b45ee436de2988ff
fa2251df5e test: Use one node to avoid a race due to missing sync in rpc_signrawtransaction (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Node 0 creates a transaction in a block, and node 1 sends a spending transaction without properly syncing the utxo set.
Fixes intermittent test failure in rpc_signrawtransaction
```
test 2020-04-01T00:14:03.400000Z TestFramework (ERROR): JSONRPC error
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\projects\bitcoin\test\functional\test_framework\test_framework.py", line 112, in main
self.run_test()
File "C:\projects\bitcoin/test/functional/rpc_signrawtransaction.py", line 213, in run_test
self.witness_script_test()
File "C:\projects\bitcoin/test/functional/rpc_signrawtransaction.py", line 208, in witness_script_test
self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(spending_tx_signed['hex'])
File "C:\projects\bitcoin\test\functional\test_framework\coverage.py", line 47, in __call__
return_val = self.auth_service_proxy_instance.__call__(*args, **kwargs)
File "C:\projects\bitcoin\test\functional\test_framework\authproxy.py", line 141, in __call__
raise JSONRPCException(response['error'], status)
test_framework.authproxy.JSONRPCException: bad-txns-inputs-missingorspent (-25)
```
Full log: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/DrahtBot/bitcoin/builds/31864368
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa2251df5e
Tree-SHA512: 9450d216d9989d6c44028ae4b9818790cfb00796e0de22331422f775f74d697bb14ebae0e88dca20c6b641363780da384fe94c708e20fce9cfde929fb343b12f
b224b4e7bd test: wallet_bumpfee assertion fixup (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #18516 to fix up an assertion as per suggested change in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18516#discussion_r404191587.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK b224b4e7bd
Tree-SHA512: 4973bba73a67c1ffaf460921b3d454e9d66a40a67f73b7df742e24a0e389adba3946a3958a729391ee6bfa4ef844be759ebf71d14d788434c248e48a2bbe5bde
cd3b1569d9 Correctly compute redeemScript from witnessScript for signrawtransaction (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`ParsePrevouts` uses `GetScriptForWitness` on the given witnessScript to find the corresponding redeemScript. This is incorrect when the witnessScript is either a P2PK or P2PKH script as it returns the corresponding P2WPK script instead of turning the witnessScript into a P2WSH script. Instead this should make the script a `WitnessV0ScriptHash` destination and get the script for that.
Test cases are also added. These will fail on master with a `redeemScript does not correspond to witnessScript`
Reported on [Bitcointalk](https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5236818.0)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
weak ACK cd3b1569d9, only checked that the test fails without the code change 🚰
instagibbs:
utACK cd3b1569d9
Tree-SHA512: afac671dbb52ce88bfb4a9ca3dd6065427ad52c9778d0549ad40e9286778f308adad24fb3b3c3089545d7f88c57c53d41224fd7a4bb207550eff2fe06600118f
25e03ba1ff test: relax bumpfee dust_to_fee txsize an extra vbyte (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Hopefully closes#18511 by allowing the transaction size to be 140-141 vbytes rather than strictly 141, and bumps with a slightly larger fee to ensure dust in the 140 vbyte case.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 25e03ba1ff
Tree-SHA512: 76a04e1ce090e48befe048ed6d412222d7f8bc951ff822850833061a0606b1bebc5289f7249737d3fb9aa26eb857f99543981037cea6babe3e578e2cfe8afcdb
0ed2d8e07d test: add BIP37 remote crash bug [CVE-2013-5700] test to p2p_filter.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Integrates the missing message type `filteradd` to the test framework and checks that the BIP37 implementation is not vulnerable to the "remote crash bug" [CVE-2013-5700](https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2013-5700) anymore. Prior to v.0.8.4, it was possible to trigger a division-by-zero error on the following line in the function `CBloomFilter::Hash()`:
f0d6487e29/src/bloom.cpp (L45)
By setting a zero-length filter via `filterload`, `vData.size()` is 0, so the modulo operation above, called on any .insert() or .contains() operation then crashed the node. The test uses the approach of just sending an arbitrary `filteradd` message after, which calls `CBloomFilter::insert()` (and in turn `CBloomFilter::Hash()`) on the node. The vulnerability was fixed by commit 37c6389c5a (an intentional covert fix, [according to gmaxwell](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18483#issuecomment-608224095)), which introduced flags `isEmpty`/`isFull` that wouldn't call the `Hash()` member function if `isFull` is true (set to true by default constructor).
To validate that the test fails if the implementation is vulnerable, one can simply set the flags to false in the member function `UpdateEmptyFull()` (that is called after a filter received via `filterload` is constructed), which activates the vulnerable code path calling `Hash` in any case on adding or testing for data in the filter:
```diff
diff --git a/src/bloom.cpp b/src/bloom.cpp
index bd6069b..ef294a3 100644
--- a/src/bloom.cpp
+++ b/src/bloom.cpp
@@ -199,8 +199,8 @@ void CBloomFilter::UpdateEmptyFull()
full &= vData[i] == 0xff;
empty &= vData[i] == 0;
}
- isFull = full;
- isEmpty = empty;
+ isFull = false;
+ isEmpty = false;
}
```
Resulting in:
```
$ ./p2p_filter.py
[...]
2020-04-03T14:38:59.593000Z TestFramework (INFO): Check that division-by-zero remote crash bug [CVE-2013-5700] is fixed
2020-04-03T14:38:59.695000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
[...]
[... some exceptions following ...]
```
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK 0ed2d8e07d
Tree-SHA512: 02d0253d13eab70c4bd007b0750c56a5a92d05d419d53033523eeb3ed80318bc95196ab90f7745ea3ac9ebae7caee3adbf2a055a40a4124e0915226e49018fe8
4670006762 test: remove redundant sync_with_ping after add_p2p_connection (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Now that #18247 is merged, these calls are redundant.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
utACK 4670006
Tree-SHA512: bdbfe8bcf9dbdde0a8115e3a62bfe359910798d7a3010d920ffca07049cb5f97bf8fb9b6f70079b0607105192b61a6d665774e59a2b678597b47ad6237595ad5
3dc8c012f0 test: remaining replacements of (send_message+sync_with_ping) with send_and_ping (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This is a tiny follow-up PR to #18494, substituting the remaining occurences of `send_message(...)`/`sync_with_ping(...)` pairs with `send_and_ping(...)`, as suggested in the comment https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18494#pullrequestreview-386418913. Thanks to jonatack and [MarcoFalke](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18494#issuecomment-608496342) for giving me the hint to do this follow-up.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 3dc8c012f0
Tree-SHA512: 44d64332933c23a7f59c0415e008ce1b2b2e07177f81cb9473b7c71558188f1c698e8973de5cc940280e4697f9553af852d9a42841304f82469673d1c8162852
6112a20982 test: replace (send_message + sync_with_ping) with send_and_ping (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up to faf1d04731 yesterday.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
utACK 6112a20
MarcoFalke:
ACK 6112a20982 🎞
Tree-SHA512: 749644ac9a1ef0e1aa6c3ac5e899eb3fa7fb9c0909352f922a80412df2bc0e539692a7757af550eff4d4914cbe57b0c75ce3948f569acc7a52852e91a55ad457
9eefc6e92f gui: Delete progress dialog instead of hidding it (João Barbosa)
ee9e88ba27 wallet: Handle duplicate fileid exception (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Handle the duplicate fileid exception thrown at `CheckUniqueFileid` in tow cases:
- when duplicate wallets are set on the command line - catch in `LoadWallets`;
- when a duplicate wallet is loaded dynamically - catch in `LoadWallet`.
Fixes#16776.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Re-ACK 9eefc6e92f no change since last review 68e0ff0e1f530c942721aab49cf67ffc07104628
hebasto:
re-ACK 9eefc6e92f
Tree-SHA512: 46e3c1cd6708b54e2d1c4973a74c8d5428822e04cecbc147cf200eb034efa385e867bd749c7c639020e83c9813fae8fed64a851bdd99abf60c33b07e0363f5d5
ParsePrevouts uses GetScriptForWitness on the given witnessScript
to find the corresponding redeemScript. This is incorrect when the
witnessScript is either a P2PK or P2PKH script as it returns the
corresponding P2WPK script instead of turning the witnessScript
into a P2WSH script. Instead this should make the script a
WitnessV0ScriptHash destination and get the script for that.
Test cases are also added.
