1f0adb3dac tests: Add std::to_string to list of locale dependent functions (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add `std::to_string` to list of locale dependent functions:
> `std::to_string` relies on the current locale for formatting purposes […]
Context https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17808#issuecomment-570329665
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 1f0adb3dac, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 4cd6f567f5931dd166cdb9b065a939fb0bc02c93de18a9501655d98caf18b7c4d81f1881ea900dcdf2ec103d3ab1bdc9c68d3257b76dd2468a59e74d278b0d8d
3bd8db80d8 [validation] fix comments in CheckInputScripts() (John Newbery)
6f6465cefc scripted-diff: [validation] Rename CheckInputs to CheckInputScripts (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
CheckInputs() used to check no double spends, scripts & sigs and amounts. Since
832e074, the double spend and amount checks
have been moved to CheckTxInputs(), and CheckInputs() now just validates
input scripts. Rename the function to CheckInputScripts().
Also fix incorrect comments.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 3bd8db80d8, did the rebase myself, checked the scripted diff 👡
promag:
ACK 3bd8db80d8 :trollface:
Tree-SHA512: 7b3f8597d210492798fb784ee8ea47ea6377519111190161c7cc34a967509013f4337304f52e9bedc97b7710de7b0ff8880e08cd7f867754567f82e7b02c794c
7d263571be rpc: require second argument only for scantxoutset start action (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
It was reported on [IRC](http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-12-11.html#l-377) that `scantxoutset`'s API was broken in 0.19.0:
```
<belcher> i think scantxoutset may have been broken in bitcoin core 0.19 ? regardless of what parameters i run it with (e.g. "scantxoutset abort", "scantxoutset status") it just returns the help doc, according to the release notes the only change was https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16285/files but i dont see anything that wouldve broken it, it works fine in 0.18
<belcher> im on regtest, in case its important
<harding> I can confirm `scantxoutset abort` returns the help doc on latest master. Waiting for 0.18.1 to start now to attempt to reproduce there.
<harding> It looks like it's expecting a second parameter (even though that doesn't make sense with "abort").
<jonatack> Same for me as well
<harding> Can also confirm that `scantxoutset abort` returns the expected result on 0.18.1.
```
As noted in the conversation, previously, the second argument of `scanobjects` is only required for the `start` action. `Stop` and `abort` actions did not and could work without them.
It appears that this was broken by #16240 which enforced the size of the arguments to match the listed required arguments.
To fix this issue, this PR makes the `scanobjects` argument an optional argument. Then only in the `start` action do we check whether the `scanobjects` argument is there and throw an informative error about that. Also a test is added for this case.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 7d263571be
promag:
ACK 7d263571be.
Tree-SHA512: 828bdfe47f4fffa5d00a2cf88db6cea4a2714d9c49276841ca5cbdd1603b87bb6862147b86edcf36d7b40314ddb80b1a07fd399faf288572c55cc788c5cf9526
2081442c42 test: Add test for rpc_whitelist (Emil Engler)
7414d3820c Add RPC Whitelist Feature from #12248 (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
Summary
====
This patch adds the RPC whitelisting feature requested in #12248. RPC Whitelists help enforce application policies for services being built on top of Bitcoin Core (e.g., your Lightning Node maybe shouldn't be adding new peers). The aim of this PR is not to make it advisable to connect your Bitcoin node to arbitrary services, but to reduce risk and prevent unintended access.
Using RPC Whitelists
====
The way it works is you specify (in your bitcoin.conf) configurations such as
```
rpcauth=user1:4cc74397d6e9972e5ee7671fd241$11849357f26a5be7809c68a032bc2b16ab5dcf6348ef3ed1cf30dae47b8bcc71
rpcauth=user2:181b4a25317bff60f3749adee7d6bca0$d9c331474f1322975fa170a2ffbcb176ba11644211746b27c1d317f265dd4ada
rpcauth=user3:a6c8a511b53b1edcf69c36984985e$13cfba0e626db19061c9d61fa58e712d0319c11db97ad845fa84517f454f6675
rpcwhitelist=user1:getnetworkinfo
rpcwhitelist=user2:getnetworkinfo,getwalletinfo, getbestblockhash
rpcwhitelistdefault=0
```
Now user1 can only call getnetworkinfo, user2 can only call getnetworkinfo or getwalletinfo, while user3 can still call all RPCs.
If any rpcwhitelist is set, act as if all users are subject to whitelists unless rpcwhitelistdefault is set to 0. If rpcwhitelistdefault is set to 1 and no rpcwhitelist is set, act as if all users are subject to whitelists.
Review Request
=====
In addition to normal review, would love specific review from someone working on LN (e.g., @ roasbeef) and someone working on an infrastructure team at an exchange (e.g., @ jimpo) to check that this works well with their system.
Notes
=====
The rpc list is spelling sensitive -- whitespace is stripped though. Spelling errors fail towards the RPC call being blocked, which is safer.
It was unclear to me if HTTPReq_JSONRPC is the best function to patch this functionality into, or if it would be better to place it in exec or somewhere else.
It was also unclear to me if it would be preferred to cache the whitelists on startup or parse them on every RPC as is done with multiUserAuthorized. I opted for the cached approach as I thought it was a bit cleaner.
Future Work
=====
In a future PR, I would like to add an inheritance scheme. This seemed more controversial so I didn't want to include that here. Inheritance semantics are tricky, but it would also make these whitelists easier to read.
It also might be good to add a `getrpcwhitelist` command to facilitate permission discovery.
Tests
=====
Thanks to @ emilengler for adding tests for this feature. The tests cover all cases except for where `rpcwhitelistdefault=1` is used, given difficulties around testing with the current test framework.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 2081442c42
Tree-SHA512: 0dc1ac6a6f2f4b0be9c9054d495dd17752fe7b3589aeab2c6ac4e1f91cf4e7e355deedcb5d76d707cbb5a949c2f989c871b74d6bf129351f429569a701adbcbf
b6f9e3576a test: re-enable CLI test support by using EncodeDecimal in json.dumps() (fanquake)
Pull request description:
As mentioned in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17675#issuecomment-563188648.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK b6f9e3576a assuming Travis is happy too -- diff looks correct :)
MarcoFalke:
> ACK b6f9e35 assuming Travis is happy too -- diff looks correct :)
Tree-SHA512: 79fa535cc1756c8ee610a3d6a316a1c4f036797d6990a5620e44985393a2e52f78450f8e0021d0a148c08705fd1ba765508464a365f9030ae0d2cacbd7a93e19
5db506ba59 tests: Add option --valgrind to run nodes under valgrind in the functional tests (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
What is better than fixing bugs? Fixing entire bug classes of course! :)
Add option `--valgrind` to run the functional tests under Valgrind.
Regular functional testing under Valgrind would have caught many of the uninitialized reads we've seen historically.
Let's kill this bug class once and for all: let's never use an uninitialized value ever again. Or at least not one that would be triggered by running the functional tests! :)
My hope is that this addition will make it super-easy to run the functional tests under Valgrind and thus increase the probability of people making use of it :)
Hopefully `test/functional/test_runner.py --valgrind` will become a natural part of the pre-release QA process.
**Usage:**
```
$ test/functional/test_runner.py --help
…
--valgrind run nodes under the valgrind memory error detector:
expect at least a ~10x slowdown, valgrind 3.14 or
later required
```
**Live demo:**
First, let's re-introduce a memory bug by reverting the recent P2P uninitialized read bug fix from PR #17624 ("net: Fix an uninitialized read in ProcessMessage(…, "tx", …) when receiving a transaction we already have").
```
$ git diff
diff --git a/src/consensus/validation.h b/src/consensus/validation.h
index 3401eb64c..940adea33 100644
--- a/src/consensus/validation.h
+++ b/src/consensus/validation.h
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ inline ValidationState::~ValidationState() {};
class TxValidationState : public ValidationState {
private:
- TxValidationResult m_result = TxValidationResult::TX_RESULT_UNSET;
+ TxValidationResult m_result;
public:
bool Invalid(TxValidationResult result,
const std::string &reject_reason="",
```
Second, let's test as normal without Valgrind:
```
$ test/functional/p2p_segwit.py -l INFO
2019-11-28T09:30:42.810000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/bitcoin_func_test__fc8q3qo
…
2019-11-28T09:31:57.187000Z TestFramework (INFO): Subtest: test_non_standard_witness_blinding (Segwit active = True)
…
2019-11-28T09:32:08.265000Z TestFramework (INFO): Tests successful
```
Third, let's test with `--valgrind` and see if the test fail (as we expect) when the unitialized value is used:
```
$ test/functional/p2p_segwit.py -l INFO --valgrind
2019-11-28T09:32:33.018000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/bitcoin_func_test_gtjecx2l
…
2019-11-28T09:40:36.702000Z TestFramework (INFO): Subtest: test_non_standard_witness_blinding (Segwit active = True)
2019-11-28T09:40:37.813000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
ConnectionRefusedError: [Errno 111] Connection refused
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 5db506ba59
jonatack:
ACK 5db506ba59
Tree-SHA512: 2eaecacf4da166febad88b2a8ee6d7ac2bcd38d4c1892ca39516b6343e8f8c8814edf5eaf14c90f11a069a0389d24f0713076112ac284de987e72fc5f6cc3795
773d4572a4 Mark PSBTs spending unspendable outputs as invalid in analysis (Andrew Chow)
638e40cb60 Have a PSBTAnalysis state that indicates invalid PSBT (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When analyzing an unspendable PSBT, report that it is unspendable and exit analysis early.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK 773d457
instagibbs:
After some thought ACK 773d4572a4
Tree-SHA512: 99b0cb2fa1ea37593fc65a20effe881639d69ddeeecf5197bc87bc7f2220cbeb40f1d429d517e4d27f2e9fb563a00cd845d2b4b1ce05246a75a6cb56fb9b0ba5
597d10ceb9 tests: Add fuzzing harness for various functions consuming only integrals (practicalswift)
575383b3e1 tests: Add corpora suppression (FUZZERS_MISSING_CORPORA) for fuzzers missing in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets/tree/master/fuzz_seed_corpus (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add fuzzing harness for various functions consuming only integrals.
**Testing this PR**
Run:
```
$ CC=clang CXX=clang++ ./configure --enable-fuzz \
--with-sanitizers=address,fuzzer,undefined
$ make
$ src/test/fuzz/integer
```
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: f0ccbd63671636f8e661385b682e16ad287fef8f92e7f91327ee2093afc36fcd424e1646fe90279388e28a760bcc795766eb80cf6375e0f873efff37fc7e2393
d5766f223f tests: Add corpora suppression (FUZZERS_MISSING_CORPORA) for fuzzers missing in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets/tree/master/fuzz_seed_corpus (practicalswift)
e75ecb91c7 tests: Add fuzzing harness for various CTxOut related functions (practicalswift)
ce935292c0 tests: Add fuzzing harness for various CTxIn related functions (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add fuzzing harness for various `CTx{In,Out}` related functions.
**Testing this PR**
Run:
```
$ CC=clang CXX=clang++ ./configure --enable-fuzz --with-sanitizers=address,fuzzer,undefined
$ make
$ src/test/fuzz/tx_in
…
$ src/test/fuzz/tx_out
…
# And to to quickly verify that the relevant code regions are triggered, that the
# fuzzing throughput seems reasonable, etc.
$ contrib/devtools/test_fuzzing_harnesses.sh '^tx_'
```
`test_fuzzing_harnesses.sh` can be found in PR #17000.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: f1374307a2581ebc3968d012ea2438061bbb84ece068e584fae9750669a6cd003723dde14db88e77c9579281ecd4eaa2a7ff0614f253d8c075e6dd16dd2e68d5
dddd09eb33 test: Wait until mempool is loaded in wallet_abandonconflict (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This might or might not fix intermittent issues such as https://ci.appveyor.com/project/DrahtBot/bitcoin/builds/28724018#L4091
I believe the mempool was not loaded fully after the restart, in which case it was not dumped either on the next restart. Thus, the previous mempool was attempted to be loaded a second time, which succeeded and contained the txs.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK dddd09eb33
Tree-SHA512: ab7061f946b5e5388f825dddceadb125f5197b24af3a7fcf1e700235d106a323419a56bfb4d84a2e27442e0de63e540c623b704343d83a98deaab3c02fcbdcbe
In accordance with #17314, Removing noisy fields from -getinfo. Fields removed: protocolversion, walletversion and keypoololdest. In addition to changing bitcoin-cli -getinfo, there is another change to test/functional/interface_bitcoin_cli.py. This change deletes tests that utilize removed -getinfo calls.
fabd71076c ci: Print free disk space (MarcoFalke)
fad9fdbea5 test: Properly deserialize integers in little-endian (MarcoFalke)
fa94fc10c8 ci: Run functional tests on s390x (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 98ba77eb56f283131fdaeb393fda86cc308f1bf9781e1e0e5736b8d616528dc8ff2e494d55ba107c138083025c66a59e382fcfa9962d4349a5fd6cbbc52484c3
02afb0c550 Fix origfee return for bumpfee with feerate arg (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17642 and adds a simple test that would have caught it
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 02afb0c550
Tree-SHA512: 303e392e05407f204dffe360689b5bb5dc77fd462dd0e489bc0b6c8f94f89ab7fe2bd8cb47e4dc6dc5c23a619826d15f3bf6b02b2c8e96402fbb51953c462e2d
eadd1304c8 tests: Add a test for funding with sufficient preset inputs and subtractFeeFromOutputs (Andrew Chow)
ff330badd4 Default to bnb_used = false as there are many cases where BnB is not used (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
#17290 introduced a bug where, when we had preset inputs that covered the amount being sent and subtractFeeFrromOutputs was being used, transaction funding would result in a `Fee exceeds maximum configured by -maxtxfee` error. This was happening because we weren't setting `bnb_used = false` when the preset inputs were used as it should have been. This resulted in a too high fee because the change would go to fees accidentally.
Apparently this particular case doesn't have a test, so I've added one as well.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK eadd130. I can't get this new test to fail on macOS (without this PR). It passes whether or not I compile with `--enable-debug`. It does fail on Ubuntu. Yay undefined behavior... Anyway, it's a useful test.
fanquake:
ACK eadd1304c8
instagibbs:
utACK eadd1304c8
Tree-SHA512: 7286c321f78666eea558cc591174630d210263594df41cab1065417510591ee514ade0e1d0cec8af09a785757da68de82592b013e8fe8d4966cec3254368706e
b84e776fd1 wallet_importmulti: use addresses of the same type as being imported (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When constructing an import from the solving data of an address, make sure that the original address is the same type as the one that will be imported.
See also: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17374#issuecomment-550036931
Part of #17261
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
Code review ACK b84e776
meshcollider:
Tested re-ACK b84e776fd1
Tree-SHA512: 53c49c63af8cbade0116a62beddc77df1a411d8ed76571c3053f6aff096f41a5325421a188bab3dcacfda69bb28fdff6ba921ddd80f29c4abbadb3b58fda884c
