7d263571be rpc: require second argument only for scantxoutset start action (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
It was reported on [IRC](http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-12-11.html#l-377) that `scantxoutset`'s API was broken in 0.19.0:
```
<belcher> i think scantxoutset may have been broken in bitcoin core 0.19 ? regardless of what parameters i run it with (e.g. "scantxoutset abort", "scantxoutset status") it just returns the help doc, according to the release notes the only change was https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16285/files but i dont see anything that wouldve broken it, it works fine in 0.18
<belcher> im on regtest, in case its important
<harding> I can confirm `scantxoutset abort` returns the help doc on latest master. Waiting for 0.18.1 to start now to attempt to reproduce there.
<harding> It looks like it's expecting a second parameter (even though that doesn't make sense with "abort").
<jonatack> Same for me as well
<harding> Can also confirm that `scantxoutset abort` returns the expected result on 0.18.1.
```
As noted in the conversation, previously, the second argument of `scanobjects` is only required for the `start` action. `Stop` and `abort` actions did not and could work without them.
It appears that this was broken by #16240 which enforced the size of the arguments to match the listed required arguments.
To fix this issue, this PR makes the `scanobjects` argument an optional argument. Then only in the `start` action do we check whether the `scanobjects` argument is there and throw an informative error about that. Also a test is added for this case.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 7d263571be
promag:
ACK 7d263571be.
Tree-SHA512: 828bdfe47f4fffa5d00a2cf88db6cea4a2714d9c49276841ca5cbdd1603b87bb6862147b86edcf36d7b40314ddb80b1a07fd399faf288572c55cc788c5cf9526
2081442c42 test: Add test for rpc_whitelist (Emil Engler)
7414d3820c Add RPC Whitelist Feature from #12248 (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
Summary
====
This patch adds the RPC whitelisting feature requested in #12248. RPC Whitelists help enforce application policies for services being built on top of Bitcoin Core (e.g., your Lightning Node maybe shouldn't be adding new peers). The aim of this PR is not to make it advisable to connect your Bitcoin node to arbitrary services, but to reduce risk and prevent unintended access.
Using RPC Whitelists
====
The way it works is you specify (in your bitcoin.conf) configurations such as
```
rpcauth=user1:4cc74397d6e9972e5ee7671fd241$11849357f26a5be7809c68a032bc2b16ab5dcf6348ef3ed1cf30dae47b8bcc71
rpcauth=user2:181b4a25317bff60f3749adee7d6bca0$d9c331474f1322975fa170a2ffbcb176ba11644211746b27c1d317f265dd4ada
rpcauth=user3:a6c8a511b53b1edcf69c36984985e$13cfba0e626db19061c9d61fa58e712d0319c11db97ad845fa84517f454f6675
rpcwhitelist=user1:getnetworkinfo
rpcwhitelist=user2:getnetworkinfo,getwalletinfo, getbestblockhash
rpcwhitelistdefault=0
```
Now user1 can only call getnetworkinfo, user2 can only call getnetworkinfo or getwalletinfo, while user3 can still call all RPCs.
If any rpcwhitelist is set, act as if all users are subject to whitelists unless rpcwhitelistdefault is set to 0. If rpcwhitelistdefault is set to 1 and no rpcwhitelist is set, act as if all users are subject to whitelists.
Review Request
=====
In addition to normal review, would love specific review from someone working on LN (e.g., @ roasbeef) and someone working on an infrastructure team at an exchange (e.g., @ jimpo) to check that this works well with their system.
Notes
=====
The rpc list is spelling sensitive -- whitespace is stripped though. Spelling errors fail towards the RPC call being blocked, which is safer.
It was unclear to me if HTTPReq_JSONRPC is the best function to patch this functionality into, or if it would be better to place it in exec or somewhere else.
It was also unclear to me if it would be preferred to cache the whitelists on startup or parse them on every RPC as is done with multiUserAuthorized. I opted for the cached approach as I thought it was a bit cleaner.
Future Work
=====
In a future PR, I would like to add an inheritance scheme. This seemed more controversial so I didn't want to include that here. Inheritance semantics are tricky, but it would also make these whitelists easier to read.
It also might be good to add a `getrpcwhitelist` command to facilitate permission discovery.
Tests
=====
Thanks to @ emilengler for adding tests for this feature. The tests cover all cases except for where `rpcwhitelistdefault=1` is used, given difficulties around testing with the current test framework.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 2081442c42
Tree-SHA512: 0dc1ac6a6f2f4b0be9c9054d495dd17752fe7b3589aeab2c6ac4e1f91cf4e7e355deedcb5d76d707cbb5a949c2f989c871b74d6bf129351f429569a701adbcbf
b6f9e3576a test: re-enable CLI test support by using EncodeDecimal in json.dumps() (fanquake)
Pull request description:
As mentioned in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17675#issuecomment-563188648.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK b6f9e3576a assuming Travis is happy too -- diff looks correct :)
MarcoFalke:
> ACK b6f9e35 assuming Travis is happy too -- diff looks correct :)
Tree-SHA512: 79fa535cc1756c8ee610a3d6a316a1c4f036797d6990a5620e44985393a2e52f78450f8e0021d0a148c08705fd1ba765508464a365f9030ae0d2cacbd7a93e19
5db506ba59 tests: Add option --valgrind to run nodes under valgrind in the functional tests (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
What is better than fixing bugs? Fixing entire bug classes of course! :)
Add option `--valgrind` to run the functional tests under Valgrind.
Regular functional testing under Valgrind would have caught many of the uninitialized reads we've seen historically.
Let's kill this bug class once and for all: let's never use an uninitialized value ever again. Or at least not one that would be triggered by running the functional tests! :)
My hope is that this addition will make it super-easy to run the functional tests under Valgrind and thus increase the probability of people making use of it :)
Hopefully `test/functional/test_runner.py --valgrind` will become a natural part of the pre-release QA process.
**Usage:**
```
$ test/functional/test_runner.py --help
…
--valgrind run nodes under the valgrind memory error detector:
expect at least a ~10x slowdown, valgrind 3.14 or
later required
```
**Live demo:**
First, let's re-introduce a memory bug by reverting the recent P2P uninitialized read bug fix from PR #17624 ("net: Fix an uninitialized read in ProcessMessage(…, "tx", …) when receiving a transaction we already have").
```
$ git diff
diff --git a/src/consensus/validation.h b/src/consensus/validation.h
index 3401eb64c..940adea33 100644
--- a/src/consensus/validation.h
+++ b/src/consensus/validation.h
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ inline ValidationState::~ValidationState() {};
class TxValidationState : public ValidationState {
private:
- TxValidationResult m_result = TxValidationResult::TX_RESULT_UNSET;
+ TxValidationResult m_result;
public:
bool Invalid(TxValidationResult result,
const std::string &reject_reason="",
```
Second, let's test as normal without Valgrind:
```
$ test/functional/p2p_segwit.py -l INFO
2019-11-28T09:30:42.810000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/bitcoin_func_test__fc8q3qo
…
2019-11-28T09:31:57.187000Z TestFramework (INFO): Subtest: test_non_standard_witness_blinding (Segwit active = True)
…
2019-11-28T09:32:08.265000Z TestFramework (INFO): Tests successful
```
Third, let's test with `--valgrind` and see if the test fail (as we expect) when the unitialized value is used:
```
$ test/functional/p2p_segwit.py -l INFO --valgrind
2019-11-28T09:32:33.018000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/bitcoin_func_test_gtjecx2l
…
2019-11-28T09:40:36.702000Z TestFramework (INFO): Subtest: test_non_standard_witness_blinding (Segwit active = True)
2019-11-28T09:40:37.813000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
ConnectionRefusedError: [Errno 111] Connection refused
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 5db506ba59
jonatack:
ACK 5db506ba59
Tree-SHA512: 2eaecacf4da166febad88b2a8ee6d7ac2bcd38d4c1892ca39516b6343e8f8c8814edf5eaf14c90f11a069a0389d24f0713076112ac284de987e72fc5f6cc3795
773d4572a4 Mark PSBTs spending unspendable outputs as invalid in analysis (Andrew Chow)
638e40cb60 Have a PSBTAnalysis state that indicates invalid PSBT (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When analyzing an unspendable PSBT, report that it is unspendable and exit analysis early.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK 773d457
instagibbs:
After some thought ACK 773d4572a4
Tree-SHA512: 99b0cb2fa1ea37593fc65a20effe881639d69ddeeecf5197bc87bc7f2220cbeb40f1d429d517e4d27f2e9fb563a00cd845d2b4b1ce05246a75a6cb56fb9b0ba5
dddd09eb33 test: Wait until mempool is loaded in wallet_abandonconflict (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This might or might not fix intermittent issues such as https://ci.appveyor.com/project/DrahtBot/bitcoin/builds/28724018#L4091
I believe the mempool was not loaded fully after the restart, in which case it was not dumped either on the next restart. Thus, the previous mempool was attempted to be loaded a second time, which succeeded and contained the txs.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK dddd09eb33
Tree-SHA512: ab7061f946b5e5388f825dddceadb125f5197b24af3a7fcf1e700235d106a323419a56bfb4d84a2e27442e0de63e540c623b704343d83a98deaab3c02fcbdcbe
In accordance with #17314, Removing noisy fields from -getinfo. Fields removed: protocolversion, walletversion and keypoololdest. In addition to changing bitcoin-cli -getinfo, there is another change to test/functional/interface_bitcoin_cli.py. This change deletes tests that utilize removed -getinfo calls.
fabd71076c ci: Print free disk space (MarcoFalke)
fad9fdbea5 test: Properly deserialize integers in little-endian (MarcoFalke)
fa94fc10c8 ci: Run functional tests on s390x (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 98ba77eb56f283131fdaeb393fda86cc308f1bf9781e1e0e5736b8d616528dc8ff2e494d55ba107c138083025c66a59e382fcfa9962d4349a5fd6cbbc52484c3
02afb0c550 Fix origfee return for bumpfee with feerate arg (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17642 and adds a simple test that would have caught it
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 02afb0c550
Tree-SHA512: 303e392e05407f204dffe360689b5bb5dc77fd462dd0e489bc0b6c8f94f89ab7fe2bd8cb47e4dc6dc5c23a619826d15f3bf6b02b2c8e96402fbb51953c462e2d
eadd1304c8 tests: Add a test for funding with sufficient preset inputs and subtractFeeFromOutputs (Andrew Chow)
ff330badd4 Default to bnb_used = false as there are many cases where BnB is not used (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
#17290 introduced a bug where, when we had preset inputs that covered the amount being sent and subtractFeeFrromOutputs was being used, transaction funding would result in a `Fee exceeds maximum configured by -maxtxfee` error. This was happening because we weren't setting `bnb_used = false` when the preset inputs were used as it should have been. This resulted in a too high fee because the change would go to fees accidentally.
Apparently this particular case doesn't have a test, so I've added one as well.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK eadd130. I can't get this new test to fail on macOS (without this PR). It passes whether or not I compile with `--enable-debug`. It does fail on Ubuntu. Yay undefined behavior... Anyway, it's a useful test.
fanquake:
ACK eadd1304c8
instagibbs:
utACK eadd1304c8
Tree-SHA512: 7286c321f78666eea558cc591174630d210263594df41cab1065417510591ee514ade0e1d0cec8af09a785757da68de82592b013e8fe8d4966cec3254368706e
b84e776fd1 wallet_importmulti: use addresses of the same type as being imported (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When constructing an import from the solving data of an address, make sure that the original address is the same type as the one that will be imported.
See also: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17374#issuecomment-550036931
Part of #17261
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
Code review ACK b84e776
meshcollider:
Tested re-ACK b84e776fd1
Tree-SHA512: 53c49c63af8cbade0116a62beddc77df1a411d8ed76571c3053f6aff096f41a5325421a188bab3dcacfda69bb28fdff6ba921ddd80f29c4abbadb3b58fda884c
38516f9078 Fix input size assertion in wallet_bumpfee.py (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
I was investigating a curious error for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17290 and realized that this check should have caught that error earlier in the test.
The loop is intended to ensure that only a single input exists the entire time until the change output disappears, a single additional bump occurs, then it leaves the loop.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 1d2d6ef535ec2c55f516ee5de11352386ceac6bedaabc6842229a486d9f28d35310ad5f57bfcc1f1e654fc397ecff29ec33256f9b3da897500b7e1635004b63a
49997813a4 test: check custom ancestor limit in mempool_packages.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The functional test `mempool_packages.py` starts one node with default ancestor/descendant limit settings and one with a custom, reduced ancestor limit (currently `-limitancestorcount=5`). The effect of the latter had not been tested yet though. This is approached in this PR by checking on the expected mempool contents of node1 after the node0 ancestor tests are done, via the following three conditions:
- the # of txs in the node1 mempool is equal to the the limit
- all txs in node1 mempool are a subset of txs in node0 mempool
- the node1 mempool txs match the start of the constructed tx-chain
Note that this still doesn't *fully* check the expected mempool of node1 (e.g. that it isn't influenced by `prioritisetransaction` RPC on node0), hence I add another TODO. In the future it would make sense to also set a custom descendant limit when the second TODO about checking node1's mempool is approached: 89e93135ae/test/functional/mempool_packages.py (L228)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 49997813a4👲
Tree-SHA512: d3a1d19fb49731238ad08ee7c02e2fa81a227e3b4ef3340d68598de42ddb62be9161134f6b8e08fa76b8c9faa02fecfa01111159642e20e9f358292a757b7608
To test the custom ancestor limit on node1 (passed by the argument
-limitancestorcount), we check for three conditions:
-> the # of txs in the node1 mempool is equal to the the limit
-> all txs in node1 mempool are a subset of txs in node0 mempool
-> the node1 mempool txs match the start of the constructed tx-chain
0e7c90eb37 test: speed up wallet_avoidreuse.py (Jon Atack)
6d50b2606e test: add logging to wallet_avoidreuse.py (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Inspired by PRs #17340 and #15881.
- add logging
- pass -whitelist in `set_test_params` to speed up transaction relay
`wallet_avoidreuse.py` is not intended to test P2P transaction relay/timing, so it should be fine to do this here. This reduces test run time variability and speeds up the test by 2-3 times on average.
Test run times in seconds:
- before: 20, 24, 22, 17, 27, 40, 30
- after: 10, 10, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 0e7c90eb37🐊
fanquake:
ACK 0e7c90eb37
Tree-SHA512: 6d954a0aaf402c9594201626b59d29263479059e68fa5155bb44ed973cd0c3347729dd78b78b4d5a2275e45da365dc1afb4cc7e3293dea33fcc2e3e83a39faf5
Use -whitelist to speed up transaction relay.
The wallet_avoidreuse.py test is not intended to test transaction relay/timing,
so it should be fine to do this here.
This greatly reduces test run time variability and speeds up the test by 2-3
times on average, e.g. on my system from 20-30 seconds down to 8-10 seconds.
af7bae7340 [tests] Don't stop-start unnecessarily in rpc_fundrawtransaction.py (John Newbery)
9a8505299b [tests] Use -whitelist in rpc_fundrawtransaction.py (John Newbery)
646b593bbd [tests] Speed up rpc_fundrawtransaction.py (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Speed up rpc_fundrawtransaction.py
Most of the time in rpc_fundrawtransaction.py is spent waiting for
unconfirmed transactions to propagate. Net processing adds a poisson
random delay to the time it will INV transactions with a mean interval
of 5 seconds. Calls like the following:
```
self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction(signedTx['hex'])
self.sync_all()
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
````
will therefore introduce a delay waiting for the mempools to sync.
Instead just generate the block on the node that sent the transaction:
```
self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction(signedTx['hex'])
self.nodes[2].generate(1)
```
rpc_fundrawtransaction.py is not intended to be a test for transaction
relay, so it's ok to do this.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK af7bae7340🛴
Tree-SHA512: db3407d871bfdc99a02e7304b07239dd3585ac47f27f020f1a70608b7f6386b134343c01f3e4d1c246ce734676755897671999695068d6388602fb042d178780
This was only added in c1dde3a949 to match
behaviour when `encryptwallet` would restart the node. It's not required
for the test (and slows things down).
When constructing an import from the solving data of an address,
make sure that the original address is the same type as the one that
will be imported.
92b2f5306b test: add dumptxoutset RPC test (James O'Beirne)
c1ccbc3dde devtools: add utxo_snapshot.sh (James O'Beirne)
57cf74c991 rpc: add dumptxoutset (James O'Beirne)
92fafb3a7d coinstats: add coins_count (James O'Beirne)
707fde7b9b add unused SnapshotMetadata class (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11):
Parent PR: #15606
Issue: #15605
Specification: https://github.com/jamesob/assumeutxo-docs/tree/master/proposal
---
This changeset defines the serialization format for UTXO snapshots and adds an RPC command for creating them, `dumptxoutset`. It also adds a convenience script for generating and verifying snapshots at a certain height, since that requires doing a hacky rewind of the chain via `invalidateblock`.
All of this is unused at the moment.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 92b2f5306b
Tree-SHA512: 200dff87767f157d627e99506ec543465d9329860a6cd49363081619c437163a640a46d008faa92b1f44fd403bfc7a7c9e851c658b5a4849efa9a34ca976bf31
