* build: Brand codebase as Dogecoin via automake/autoconf files.
* build: Update internal resource files for windows builds.
* build: Update internal application names and data directories.
* build: Update immediately visible remaining bitcoin name references from cli binaries and qt.
* build: Update immediately visible bitcoin references in the main gui itself.
* Update functional tests to match Dogecoin
* wallet: Add missing check for -descriptors wallet tool option
* correct output for functional tests (errorlevels?)
Co-authored-by: Ross Nicoll <ross.nicoll@r3.com>
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
0e2a5e448f tests: dumping and minimizing of script assets data (Pieter Wuille)
4567ba034c tests: add generic qa-asset-based script verification unit test (Pieter Wuille)
f06e6d0345 tests: functional tests for Schnorr/Taproot/Tapscript (Pieter Wuille)
3c226639eb tests: add BIP340 Schnorr signature support to test framework (Pieter Wuille)
206fb180ec --- [TAPROOT] Tests --- (Pieter Wuille)
d7ff237f29 Activate Taproot/Tapscript on regtest (BIP 341, BIP 342) (Pieter Wuille)
e9a021d7e6 Make Taproot spends standard + policy limits (Pieter Wuille)
865d2c37e2 --- [TAPROOT] Regtest activation and policy --- (Pieter Wuille)
72422ce396 Implement Tapscript script validation rules (BIP 342) (Johnson Lau)
330de894a9 Use ScriptExecutionData to pass through annex hash (Pieter Wuille)
8bbed4b7ac Implement Taproot validation (BIP 341) (Pieter Wuille)
0664f5fe1f Support for Schnorr signatures and integration in SignatureCheckers (BIP 340) (Pieter Wuille)
5de246ca81 Implement Taproot signature hashing (BIP 341) (Johnson Lau)
9eb590894f Add TaggedHash function (BIP 340) (Pieter Wuille)
450d2b2371 --- [TAPROOT] BIP340/341/342 consensus rules --- (Pieter Wuille)
5d62e3a68b refactor: keep spent outputs in PrecomputedTransactionData (Pieter Wuille)
8bd2b4e784 refactor: rename scriptPubKey in VerifyWitnessProgram to exec_script (Pieter Wuille)
107b57df9f scripted-diff: put ECDSA in name of signature functions (Pieter Wuille)
f8c099e220 --- [TAPROOT] Refactors --- (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This is an implementation of the Schnorr/taproot consensus rules proposed by BIPs [340](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0340.mediawiki), [341](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0340.mediawiki), and [342](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0340.mediawiki).
See the list of commits [below](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19953#issuecomment-691815830). No signing or wallet support of any kind is included, as testing is done entirely through the Python test framework.
This is a successor to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17977 (see discussion following [this comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17977#issuecomment-682285983)), and will have further changes squashed/rebased. The history of this PR can be found in #19997.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK 0e2a5e448f
benthecarman:
reACK 0e2a5e4
kallewoof:
reACK 0e2a5e448f
jonasnick:
ACK 0e2a5e448f almost only looked at bip340/libsecp related code
jonatack:
ACK 0e2a5e448f modulo the last four commits (tests) that I plan to finish reviewing tomorrow
fjahr:
reACK 0e2a5e448f
achow101:
ACK 0e2a5e448f
Tree-SHA512: 1b00314450a2938a22bccbb4e177230cf08bd365d72055f9d526891f334b364c997e260c10bc19ca78440b6767712c9feea7faad9a1045dd51a5b96f7ca8146e
c4a29d0a90 Update wallet_multiwallet.py for descriptor and sqlite wallets (Russell Yanofsky)
310b0fde04 Run dumpwallet for legacy wallets only in wallet_backup.py (Andrew Chow)
6c6639ac9f Include sqlite3 in documentation (Andrew Chow)
f023b7cac0 wallet: Enforce sqlite serialized threading mode (Andrew Chow)
6173269866 Set and check the sqlite user version (Andrew Chow)
9d3d2d263c Use network magic as sqlite wallet application ID (Andrew Chow)
9af5de3798 Use SQLite for descriptor wallets (Andrew Chow)
9b78f3ce8e walletutil: Wallets can also be sqlite (Andrew Chow)
ac38a87225 Determine wallet file type based on file magic (Andrew Chow)
6045f77003 Implement SQLiteDatabase::MakeBatch (Andrew Chow)
727e6b2a4e Implement SQLiteDatabase::Verify (Andrew Chow)
b4df8fdb19 Implement SQLiteDatabase::Rewrite (Andrew Chow)
010e365906 Implement SQLiteDatabase::TxnBegin, TxnCommit, and TxnAbort (Andrew Chow)
ac5c1617e7 Implement SQLiteDatabase::Backup (Andrew Chow)
f6f9cd6a64 Implement SQLiteBatch::StartCursor, ReadAtCursor, and CloseCursor (Andrew Chow)
bf90e033f4 Implement SQLiteBatch::ReadKey, WriteKey, EraseKey, and HasKey (Andrew Chow)
7aa45620e2 Add SetupSQLStatements (Andrew Chow)
6636a2608a Implement SQLiteBatch::Close (Andrew Chow)
93825352a3 Implement SQLiteDatabase::Close (Andrew Chow)
a0de83372b Implement SQLiteDatabase::Open (Andrew Chow)
3bfa0fe125 Initialize and Shutdown sqlite3 globals (Andrew Chow)
5a488b3d77 Constructors, destructors, and relevant private fields for SQLiteDatabase/Batch (Andrew Chow)
ca8b7e04ab Implement SQLiteDatabaseVersion (Andrew Chow)
7577b6e1c8 Add SQLiteDatabase and SQLiteBatch dummy classes (Andrew Chow)
e87df82580 Add sqlite to travis and depends (Andrew Chow)
54729f3f4e Add libsqlite3 (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a new class `SQLiteDatabase` which is a subclass of `WalletDatabase`. This provides access to a SQLite database that is used to store the wallet records. To keep compatibility with BDB and to complexity of the change down, we don't make use of many SQLite's features. We use it strictly as a key-value store. We create a table `main` which has two columns, `key` and `value` both with the type `blob`.
For new descriptor wallets, we will create a `SQLiteDatabase` instead of a `BerkeleyDatabase`. There is no requirement that all SQLite wallets are descriptor wallets, nor is there a requirement that all descriptor wallets be SQLite wallets. This allows for existing descriptor wallets to work as well as keeping open the option to migrate existing wallets to SQLite.
We keep the name `wallet.dat` for SQLite wallets. We are able to determine which database type to use by searching for specific magic bytes in the `wallet.dat` file. SQLite begins it's files with a null terminated string `SQLite format 3`. BDB has `0x00053162` at byte 12 (note that the byte order of this integer depends on the system endianness). So when we see that there is a `wallet.dat` file that we want to open, we check for the magic bytes to determine which database system to use.
I decided to keep the `wallet.dat` naming to keep things like backup script to continue to function as they won't need to be modified to look for a different file name. It also simplifies a couple of things in the implementation and the tests as `wallet.dat` is something that is specifically being looked for. If we don't want this behavior, then I do have another branch which creates `wallet.sqlite` files instead, but I find that this direction is easier.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK c4a29d0a90
promag:
Tested ACK c4a29d0a90.
fjahr:
reACK c4a29d0a90
S3RK:
Re-review ACK c4a29d0a90
meshcollider:
re-utACK c4a29d0a90
hebasto:
re-ACK c4a29d0a90, only rebased since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19077#pullrequestreview-507743699) review, verified with `git range-diff master d18892dcc c4a29d0a9`.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK c4a29d0a90. I am honestly confused about reasons for locking into `wallet.dat` again when it's so easy now to use a clean format. I assume I'm just very dense, or there's some unstated reason, because the only thing that's been brought up are unrealistic compatibility scenarios (all require actively creating a wallet with non-default descriptor+sqlite option, then trying to using the descriptor+sqlite wallets with old software or scripts and ignoring the results) that we didn't pay attention to with previous PRs like #11687, which did not require any active interfaction.
jonatack:
ACK c4a29d0a90, debug builds and test runs after rebase to latest master @ c2c4dbaebd, some manual testing creating, using, unloading and reloading a few different new sqlite descriptor wallets over several node restarts/shutdowns.
Tree-SHA512: 19145732e5001484947352d3175a660b5102bc6e833f227a55bd41b9b2f4d92737bbed7cead64b75b509decf9e1408cd81c185ab1fb4b90561aee427c4f9751c
This adds a --dumptests flag to the feature_taproot.py test, to dump all its
generated test cases to files, in a format compatible with the
script_assets_test unit test. A fuzzer for said format is added as well, whose
primary purpose is coverage-based minimization of those dumps.
This adds a fuzz test that reimplements a naive reimplementation of
TxRequestTracker (with up to 16 fixed peers and 16 fixed txhashes),
and compares the real implementation against it.
Note that with this change we are no-longer including PTHREAD_* flags
when building libbitcoinconsensus.
Also note that we are including PTHREAD_LIBS in AM_PTHREAD_FLAGS
46fcac1e4b tests: Add fuzzing harness for ec_seckey_import_der(...) and ec_seckey_export_der(...) (practicalswift)
b667a90389 tests: Add fuzzing harness for SigHasLowR(...) and ecdsa_signature_parse_der_lax(...) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add fuzzing harness for `SigHasLowR(...)` and `ecdsa_signature_parse_der_lax(...)`.
See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets).
Happy fuzzing :)
ACKs for top commit:
Crypt-iQ:
ACK 46fcac1e4b
Tree-SHA512: 11a4856a1efd9a04030a8c8aee2413fd5be1ea248147e649a48a55bacdf732bb48a19ee1ce2761d47d4dd61c9598aec53061b961b319ad824d539dda11a8ccf4
With this commit, make clean now removes coverage files from the
fuzzing directory. Without this, subsequent fuzzing runs would have
garbled coverage signals for files in the fuzz directory as
they were never deleted with make clean.
78c312c983 Replace current benchmarking framework with nanobench (Martin Ankerl)
Pull request description:
Replace current benchmarking framework with nanobench
This replaces the current benchmarking framework with nanobench [1], an
MIT licensed single-header benchmarking library, of which I am the
autor. This has in my opinion several advantages, especially on Linux:
* fast: Running all benchmarks takes ~6 seconds instead of 4m13s on
an Intel i7-8700 CPU @ 3.20GHz.
* accurate: I ran e.g. the benchmark for SipHash_32b 10 times and
calculate standard deviation / mean = coefficient of variation:
* 0.57% CV for old benchmarking framework
* 0.20% CV for nanobench
So the benchmark results with nanobench seem to vary less than with
the old framework.
* It automatically determines runtime based on clock precision, no need
to specify number of evaluations.
* measure instructions, cycles, branches, instructions per cycle,
branch misses (only Linux, when performance counters are available)
* output in markdown table format.
* Warn about unstable environment (frequency scaling, turbo, ...)
* For better profiling, it is possible to set the environment variable
NANOBENCH_ENDLESS to force endless running of a particular benchmark
without the need to recompile. This makes it to e.g. run "perf top"
and look at hotspots.
Here is an example copy & pasted from the terminal output:
| ns/byte | byte/s | err% | ins/byte | cyc/byte | IPC | bra/byte | miss% | total | benchmark
|--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------------:|----------------:|-------:|---------------:|--------:|----------:|:----------
| 2.52 | 396,529,415.94 | 0.6% | 25.42 | 8.02 | 3.169 | 0.06 | 0.0% | 0.03 | `bench/crypto_hash.cpp RIPEMD160`
| 1.87 | 535,161,444.83 | 0.3% | 21.36 | 5.95 | 3.589 | 0.06 | 0.0% | 0.02 | `bench/crypto_hash.cpp SHA1`
| 3.22 | 310,344,174.79 | 1.1% | 36.80 | 10.22 | 3.601 | 0.09 | 0.0% | 0.04 | `bench/crypto_hash.cpp SHA256`
| 2.01 | 496,375,796.23 | 0.0% | 18.72 | 6.43 | 2.911 | 0.01 | 1.0% | 0.00 | `bench/crypto_hash.cpp SHA256D64_1024`
| 7.23 | 138,263,519.35 | 0.1% | 82.66 | 23.11 | 3.577 | 1.63 | 0.1% | 0.00 | `bench/crypto_hash.cpp SHA256_32b`
| 3.04 | 328,780,166.40 | 0.3% | 35.82 | 9.69 | 3.696 | 0.03 | 0.0% | 0.03 | `bench/crypto_hash.cpp SHA512`
[1] https://github.com/martinus/nanobench
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 78c312c983
Tree-SHA512: 9e18770b18b6f95a7d0105a4a5497d31cf4eb5efe6574f4482f6f1b4c88d7e0946b9a4a1e9e8e6ecbf41a3f2d7571240677dcb45af29a6f0584e89b25f32e49e
f19fdd47a6 test: add test for CChainState::ResizeCoinsCaches() (James O'Beirne)
8ac3ef4699 add ChainstateManager::MaybeRebalanceCaches() (James O'Beirne)
f36aaa6392 Add CChainState::ResizeCoinsCaches (James O'Beirne)
b223111da2 txdb: add CCoinsViewDB::ChangeCacheSize (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11):
Parent PR: #15606
Issue: #15605
Specification: https://github.com/jamesob/assumeutxo-docs/tree/master/proposal
---
In the assumeutxo implementation draft (#15056), once a UTXO snapshot is loaded, a new chainstate object is created after initialization. This means that we have to reclaim some of the cache that we've allocated to the original chainstate (per `dbcache=`) to repurpose for the snapshot chainstate.
Furthermore, it makes sense to have different cache allocations depending on which chainstate is more active. While the snapshot chainstate is working to get to the network tip (and the background validation chainstate is idle), it makes sense that the snapshot chainstate should have the majority of cache allocation. And contrariwise once the snapshot has reached network tip, most of the cache should be given to the background validation chainstate.
This set of changes (detailed in the commit messages) allows us to dynamically resize the various coins caches. None of the functionality introduced here is used at the moment, but will be in the next AU PR (which introduces `ActivateSnapshot`).
`ChainstateManager::MaybeRebalanceCaches()` defines the (somewhat normative) cache allocations between the snapshot and background validation chainstates. I'd be interested in feedback if anyone has thoughts on the proportions I've set there.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
weak utACK f19fdd47a6 -- didn't find any major problems, but not super confident that I didn't miss anything
fjahr:
Code review ACK f19fdd4
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK f19fdd47a6. Only change since last review is constructor cleanup (no change in behavior). I think the suggestions here from ajtowns and others are good, but shouldn't delay merging the PR (and hold up assumeutxo)
Tree-SHA512: fffb7847fb6993dd4a1a41cf11179b211b0b20b7eb5f7cf6266442136bfe9d43b830bbefcafd475bfd4af273f5573500594aa41fff03e0ed5c2a1e8562ff9269
ad6c34881d tests: Add fuzzing harness for CBlockPolicyEstimator::{Read,Write} (policy/fees.h) (practicalswift)
614e0807a8 tests: Add fuzzing harness for CBufferedFile::{SetPos,GetPos,GetType,GetVersion} (stream.h) (practicalswift)
7bcc71e5f8 tests: Add fuzzing harness for LoadExternalBlockFile(...) (validation.h) (practicalswift)
9823376030 tests: Add fuzzing harness for CBufferedFile (streams.h) (practicalswift)
f3aa659be6 tests: Add fuzzing harness for CAutoFile (streams.h) (practicalswift)
e507c0799d tests: Add serialization/deserialization fuzzing helpers WriteToStream(…)/ReadFromStream(…) (practicalswift)
e48094a506 tests: Add FuzzedAutoFileProvider which provides a CAutoFile interface to FuzzedDataProvider (practicalswift)
9dbcd6854c tests: Add FuzzedFileProvider which provides a FILE* interface to FuzzedDataProvider using fopencookie (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add fuzzing harnesses for `CAutoFile`, `CBufferedFile`, `LoadExternalBlockFile` and other `FILE*` consumers:
* Add `FuzzedFileProvider` which provides a `FILE*` interface to `FuzzedDataProvider` using `fopencookie`
* Add `FuzzedAutoFileProvider` which provides a `CAutoFile` interface to `FuzzedDataProvider`
* Add serialization/deserialization fuzzing helpers `WriteToStream(…)`/`ReadFromStream(…)`
* Add fuzzing harness for `CAutoFile` (`streams.h`)
* Add fuzzing harness for `CBufferedFile` (`streams.h`)
* Add fuzzing harness for `LoadExternalBlockFile(...)` (`validation.h`)
* Add fuzzing harness for `CBlockPolicyEstimator::Read` and `CBlockPolicyEstimator::Write` (`policy/fees.h`)
See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets).
Happy fuzzing :)
ACKs for top commit:
Crypt-iQ:
Tested ACK ad6c348
Tree-SHA512: a38e142608218496796a527d7e59b74e30279a2815450408b7c27a76ed600cebc6b88491e831665a0639671e2d212453fcdca558500bbadbeb32b267751f8f72
cca7c577d5 tests: Add fuzzing harness for ChaCha20Poly1305AEAD (practicalswift)
2fc4e5916c tests: Add fuzzing harness for ChaCha20 (practicalswift)
e9e8aac029 tests: Add fuzzing harness for CHKDF_HMAC_SHA256_L32 (practicalswift)
ec86ca1aaa tests: Add fuzzing harness for poly1305_auth(...) (practicalswift)
4cee53bba7 tests: Add fuzzing harness for AES256CBCEncrypt/AES256CBCDecrypt (practicalswift)
9352c32325 tests: Add fuzzing harness for AES256Encrypt/AES256Decrypt (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add fuzzing harness for `AES{CBC,}256{Encrypt,Decrypt}`, `poly1305_auth`, `CHKDF_HMAC_SHA256_L32`, `ChaCha20` and `ChaCha20Poly1305AEAD`.
See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets).
Happy fuzzing :)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK cca7c577d5
Tree-SHA512: cff9acefe370c12a3663aa55145371df835479c6ab8f6d81bbf84e0f81a9d6b0d94e45ec545f9dd5e1702744eaa7947a1f4ffed0171f446fc080369161afd740
fa525e4d1c net: Avoid wasting inv traffic during IBD (MarcoFalke)
fa06d7e934 refactor: block import implies IsInitialBlockDownload (MarcoFalke)
faba65e696 Add ChainstateManager::ActiveChainstate (MarcoFalke)
fabf3d64ff test: Add FeeFilterRounder test (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Tx-inv messages are ignored during IBD, so it would be nice if we told peers to not send them in the first place. Do that by sending two `feefilter` messages: One when the connection is made (and the node is in IBD), and another one when the node leaves IBD.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
ACK fa525e4d1c ([`jamesob/ackr/19204.1.MarcoFalke.p2p_reduce_inv_traffic_d`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/19204.1.MarcoFalke.p2p_reduce_inv_traffic_d))
naumenkogs:
utACK fa525e4
gzhao408:
ACK fa525e4d1c
jonatack:
re-ACK fa525e4 checked diff `git range-diff 19612ca fa8a66c fa525e4`, re-reviewed, ran tests, ran a custom p2p IBD behavior test at 9321e0f223.
hebasto:
re-ACK fa525e4d1c, only rebased since the [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19204#pullrequestreview-429519667) review (verified with `git range-diff`).
Tree-SHA512: 2c22a5def9822396fca45d808b165b636f1143c4bdb2eaa5c7e977f1f18e8b10c86d4c180da488def38416cf3076a26de15014dfd4d86b2a7e5af88c74afb8eb
This replaces the current benchmarking framework with nanobench [1], an
MIT licensed single-header benchmarking library, of which I am the
autor. This has in my opinion several advantages, especially on Linux:
* fast: Running all benchmarks takes ~6 seconds instead of 4m13s on
an Intel i7-8700 CPU @ 3.20GHz.
* accurate: I ran e.g. the benchmark for SipHash_32b 10 times and
calculate standard deviation / mean = coefficient of variation:
* 0.57% CV for old benchmarking framework
* 0.20% CV for nanobench
So the benchmark results with nanobench seem to vary less than with
the old framework.
* It automatically determines runtime based on clock precision, no need
to specify number of evaluations.
* measure instructions, cycles, branches, instructions per cycle,
branch misses (only Linux, when performance counters are available)
* output in markdown table format.
* Warn about unstable environment (frequency scaling, turbo, ...)
* For better profiling, it is possible to set the environment variable
NANOBENCH_ENDLESS to force endless running of a particular benchmark
without the need to recompile. This makes it to e.g. run "perf top"
and look at hotspots.
Here is an example copy & pasted from the terminal output:
| ns/byte | byte/s | err% | ins/byte | cyc/byte | IPC | bra/byte | miss% | total | benchmark
|--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------------:|----------------:|-------:|---------------:|--------:|----------:|:----------
| 2.52 | 396,529,415.94 | 0.6% | 25.42 | 8.02 | 3.169 | 0.06 | 0.0% | 0.03 | `bench/crypto_hash.cpp RIPEMD160`
| 1.87 | 535,161,444.83 | 0.3% | 21.36 | 5.95 | 3.589 | 0.06 | 0.0% | 0.02 | `bench/crypto_hash.cpp SHA1`
| 3.22 | 310,344,174.79 | 1.1% | 36.80 | 10.22 | 3.601 | 0.09 | 0.0% | 0.04 | `bench/crypto_hash.cpp SHA256`
| 2.01 | 496,375,796.23 | 0.0% | 18.72 | 6.43 | 2.911 | 0.01 | 1.0% | 0.00 | `bench/crypto_hash.cpp SHA256D64_1024`
| 7.23 | 138,263,519.35 | 0.1% | 82.66 | 23.11 | 3.577 | 1.63 | 0.1% | 0.00 | `bench/crypto_hash.cpp SHA256_32b`
| 3.04 | 328,780,166.40 | 0.3% | 35.82 | 9.69 | 3.696 | 0.03 | 0.0% | 0.03 | `bench/crypto_hash.cpp SHA512`
[1] https://github.com/martinus/nanobench
* Adds support for asymptotes
This adds support to calculate asymptotic complexity of a benchmark.
This is similar to #17375, but currently only one asymptote is
supported, and I have added support in the benchmark `ComplexMemPool`
as an example.
Usage is e.g. like this:
```
./bench_bitcoin -filter=ComplexMemPool -asymptote=25,50,100,200,400,600,800
```
This runs the benchmark `ComplexMemPool` several times but with
different complexityN settings. The benchmark can extract that number
and use it accordingly. Here, it's used for `childTxs`. The output is
this:
| complexityN | ns/op | op/s | err% | ins/op | cyc/op | IPC | total | benchmark
|------------:|--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------------:|----------------:|-------:|----------:|:----------
| 25 | 1,064,241.00 | 939.64 | 1.4% | 3,960,279.00 | 2,829,708.00 | 1.400 | 0.01 | `ComplexMemPool`
| 50 | 1,579,530.00 | 633.10 | 1.0% | 6,231,810.00 | 4,412,674.00 | 1.412 | 0.02 | `ComplexMemPool`
| 100 | 4,022,774.00 | 248.58 | 0.6% | 16,544,406.00 | 11,889,535.00 | 1.392 | 0.04 | `ComplexMemPool`
| 200 | 15,390,986.00 | 64.97 | 0.2% | 63,904,254.00 | 47,731,705.00 | 1.339 | 0.17 | `ComplexMemPool`
| 400 | 69,394,711.00 | 14.41 | 0.1% | 272,602,461.00 | 219,014,691.00 | 1.245 | 0.76 | `ComplexMemPool`
| 600 | 168,977,165.00 | 5.92 | 0.1% | 639,108,082.00 | 535,316,887.00 | 1.194 | 1.86 | `ComplexMemPool`
| 800 | 310,109,077.00 | 3.22 | 0.1% |1,149,134,246.00 | 984,620,812.00 | 1.167 | 3.41 | `ComplexMemPool`
| coefficient | err% | complexity
|--------------:|-------:|------------
| 4.78486e-07 | 4.5% | O(n^2)
| 6.38557e-10 | 21.7% | O(n^3)
| 3.42338e-05 | 38.0% | O(n log n)
| 0.000313914 | 46.9% | O(n)
| 0.0129823 | 114.4% | O(log n)
| 0.0815055 | 133.8% | O(1)
The best fitting curve is O(n^2), so the algorithm seems to scale
quadratic with `childTxs` in the range 25 to 800.
