bc01f7ae05 doc: release note for rpc getaddressinfo removals (Jon Atack)
90e989390e rpc: getaddressinfo RPCResult fixup (Jon Atack)
a8507c99da rpc: remove deprecated getaddressinfo `labels: purpose` (Jon Atack)
645a8653c8 rpc: remove deprecated getaddressinfo `label` field (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
These were deprecated in #17578 and #17585, with expected 0.21 removal notified in the 0.20 release notes.
```
- The `getaddressinfo` RPC has had its `label` field deprecated
(re-enable for this release using the configuration parameter
`-deprecatedrpc=label`). The `labels` field is altered from returning
JSON objects to returning a JSON array of label names (re-enable
previous behavior for this release using the configuration parameter
`-deprecatedrpc=labelspurpose`). Backwards compatibility using the
deprecated configuration parameters is expected to be dropped in the
0.21 release. (#17585, #17578)
```
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK bc01f7a
adamjonas:
utACK bc01f7a
meshcollider:
utACK bc01f7ae05
Tree-SHA512: ae1af381e32c4c3bde8b061a56382838513a9a82c88767843cdeae3a2ab8aa7d8c2e66e106d2b31ea07d74bb80c191a2f842c9aaecc7c5438ad9a9bc66d1b251
e5327f947c [rpc] fundrawtransaction: add_inputs option to control automatic input adding (Sjors Provoost)
79804fe24b [rpc] walletcreatefundedpsbt: don't automatically append inputs (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
When the user doesn't specificy inputs, it makes sense to automatically select them. But when the user does specify inputs, `walletcreatefundedpsbt` now fails if the amount is insufficient, unless `addInputs` is set to `true`.
Similarly for `fundrawtransaction` if the original transaction already specified inputs, we only add more if `addInputs` is set to `true`.
This protects against fat finger mistakes in the amount or fee rate (see also #16257). The behavior is also more similar to GUI coin selection.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e5327f947c
meshcollider:
utACK e5327f947c
Tree-SHA512: d8653b820914396c7c25b0d0a2b7e92de214aa023bc1aa085feb37d3b20fab361ebea90416a7db989f19bdc37e26cf0adfbcb712c80985c87afa67a9bd44fecb
951bca61d7 tests: feature_backwards_compatibility.py test 0.16 up/downgrade (Andrew Chow)
3a03a11e8c Skip hdKeypath of 'm' (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Previously the seed was stored with keypath 'm' so we need to skip this as well when determining inactive seeds.
Fixes#19051
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK 951bca61d7
instagibbs:
re-utACK 951bca61d7
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 951bca61d7. No significant changes since last review, just updated comment and some test tweaks
Tree-SHA512: 930f77e7097c9cf4f1012e540bd2b1a72fd279262517f10c1531b2ad48c632ef95e0dd4edea81bcc3b3db306479d34e5e79e5d6c4ed31dfa4b77a4231436436e
80d4423f99 Test buffered valid message (Troy Giorshev)
Pull request description:
This PR is a tweak of #19302. This sends a valid message.
Additionally, this test includes logging in the same vein as #19272.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
tested ACK 80d4423f99 (added an assert(false) to observe deterministic coverage) 🌦
gzhao408:
ACK 80d4423f99👊
Tree-SHA512: 3b1aa5ec480a1661917354788923d64595e2886448c9697ec0606a81293e8b4a4642b2b3cc9afb2206ce6f74e5c6d687308c5ad19cb73c5b354d3071ad8496f8
A message can be broken across two buffers, with the split inside its
header. Usually this will occur when sending many messages, such that
the first buffer fills.
This test uses the RPC to verify that the message is actually being
received in two pieces.
There is a very rare chance of a race condition where the test framework
sends a message in between the two halves of the message under test. In
this case the peer will almost certainly disconnect and the test will
fail. An assert has been added to help debugging that rare case.
fa195d4eba test: Add missing sync_blocks (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Bitcoin Core does not sort block and tx announcements for other peers, so generating 100 blocks and then sending out a transaction might reject it if it arrives too early. (non-final)
Fix that by syncing the blocks first.
Fix#19265Fix#19311
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK fa195d4eba: sounds plausible
Tree-SHA512: fdc46aed59595e4189509e71bd4a3607a93893933cc01d806cec2ee7701d54d7422c5f22dd83b81ddb021f9113b3119a688fdd8cf8a6474fc12fea422aedd064
9a40cfc558 [refactor] use waiting inside disconnect_p2ps (gzhao408)
aeb9fb414e [test] wait for disconnect_p2ps to be reflected in getpeerinfo (gzhao408)
e81942d2e1 [test] logging and style followups for bloomfilter tests (gzhao408)
Pull request description:
Followup to #19083 which adds bloomfilter-related tests.
1. Make test_node `disconnect_p2ps` wait until disconnection is complete to avoid race conditions (and not place the burden on tests) from MarcoFalke's [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19083#discussion_r437383989). And clean up any redundant `wait_until`s in the functional tests.
2. Clean up style + logging in p2p_filter.py and p2p_nobloomfilter_messages.py and jonatack's other [comments](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19083#pullrequestreview-428955784)
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Code review ACK 9a40cfc from re-reviewing the diff and `git range-diff 5cafb46 8386ad5 9a40cfc`
MarcoFalke:
ACK 9a40cfc558🐂
Tree-SHA512: 2e14b1c12fc08a355bd5ccad7a2a734a4ccda4bc7dc7bac171cb57359819fc1599d764290729af74832fac3e2be258c5d406c701e78ab6d7262835859b9a7d87
-Waiting is important to avoid race conditions,
especially if testing peer info through rpc later.
-Wait for mininodes to be disconnected only, even
though it's more complex, because we may still want
to be connected to test nodes.
-Use peer to refer to mininodes instead of node
because they are not bitcoind nodes.
-Use log.debug for logs that give helpful but
not super necessary information.
-Adhere to style guidelines (newlines, capitalization).
16d4b3fd6d test: mempool.dat compatibility between versions (Ivan Metlushko)
Pull request description:
Rationale: Verify mempool.dat compatibility between versions
The format of mempool.dat has been changed in #18038
The tests verifies the fix made in #18807 and ensures that the file format is compatible between current version and v0.19.1
The test verifies both backward and forward compatibility.
This PR also adds a log when we fail to add a tx loaded from mempool.dat.
It was useful when debugging this test and could be potentially useful to debug other scenarios as well.
Closes#19037
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK 16d4b3fd6d
Tree-SHA512: 00a38bf528c6478cb0da467af216488f83c1e3ca4d9166c109202ea8284023e99d87a3d6e252c4d88d08d9b5ed1a730b3e1970d6e5c0aef526fa7ced40de7490
62068381a3 [tests] Make mininode_lock non-reentrant (John Newbery)
c67c1f2c03 [tests] Don't call super twice in P2PTxInvStore.on_inv() (John Newbery)
9d80762fa0 [tests] Don't acquire mininode_lock twice in wait_for_broadcast() (John Newbery)
edae6075aa [tests] Only acquire lock once in p2p_compactblocks.py (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
There's no need for mininode_lock to be reentrant.
Use a simpler non-recursive lock.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 62068381a3😃
jonatack:
ACK 62068381a3
Tree-SHA512: dcbc19e6c986970051705789be0ff7bec70c69cf76d5b468c2ba4cb732883ad512b1de5c3206c2eca41fa3f1c4806999df4cabbf67fc3c463bb817458e59a19c
3a10d935ac [p2p/refactor] move disconnect logic and remove misbehaving (gzhao408)
ff8c430c65 [test] test disconnect for filterclear (gzhao408)
1c6b787e03 [netprocessing] disconnect node that sends filterclear (gzhao408)
Pull request description:
Nodes that don't have bloomfilters turned on (i.e. no `NODE_BLOOM` service) should disconnect peers that send them `filterclear` P2P messages.
Non-bloomfilter nodes already disconnect peers for [`filteradd` and `filterload`](19e919217e/src/net_processing.cpp (L2218)), but #8709 removed `filterclear` so it could be used to reset tx relay. This isn't needed now because using `feefilter` message is much better for this purpose (See #19204).
Also refactors existing disconnect logic for `filteradd` and `filterload` into respective message handlers and removes banning for them.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 3a10d935ac
naumenkogs:
utACK 3a10d93
gillichu:
tested ACK: quick test_runner on macOS [`3a10d93`](3a10d935ac)
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 3a10d935ac only change is replacing false with true 🚝
Tree-SHA512: 7aad8b3c0b0e776a47ad52544f0c1250feb242320f9a2962542f5905042f77e297a1486f8cdc3bf0fb93cd00c1ab66a67b2ec426eb6da3fe4cda56b5e623620f
af2a145e57 Refactor resource exhaustion test (Troy Giorshev)
5c4648d17b Fix "invalid message size" test (Troy Giorshev)
ff1e7b8844 Move size limits to module-global (Troy Giorshev)
57890abf2c Remove two unneeded tests (Troy Giorshev)
Pull request description:
This PR touches only the p2p_invalid_messages.py functional test module. There are two main goals accomplished here. First, it fixes the "invalid message size" test, which previously made a message that was invalid for multiple reasons. Second, it refactors the file into a single consistent style. This file appears to have originally had two authors, with different styles and some test duplication.
It should now be easier and quicker to understand this module, anticipating the upcoming [BIP324](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18242) and [AltNet](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18989) changes.
This should probably go in ahead of #19107, but the two are not strictly related.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK af2a145e57
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK af2a145e57🍦
Tree-SHA512: 9b57561e142c5eaefac5665f7355c8651670400b4db1a89525d2dfdd20e872d6873c4f6175c4222b6f5a8e5210cf5d6a52da69b925b673a2e2ac30a15d670d1c
45eff751c6 Add functional test for P2P eviction logic of inbound peers (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
This adds a functional test for the eviction logic for inbound peers, which is triggered when the number of maximum connections is exceeded.
The functional test covers eviction protection for peers that have sent us blocks or txns recently, or that have faster pings. I couldn't find a way to test the logic of `CConnman::AttemptToEvictConnection` that is based on netgroup (see #14210 for related discussion)
Fixes#16660 (at least partially).
[Edit: Earlier, this PR also contained a unit test, which was removed after the discussion]
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 45eff751c6
naumenkogs:
Tested ACK 45eff75
fjahr:
re-ACK 45eff751c6
andrewtoth:
re-ACK 45eff751c6
Tree-SHA512: 177208ab6f30dc62da1cc5f51e654f7c9770d8c6b42aca6ae7ecb30e29d3096e04d75739578e7d149a0f29dd92652b4a707e93c0f1be8aa7ed315e6ec3ab07a4
fadf6bd04f refactor: Remove unused request.fHelp (MarcoFalke)
fad889cbf0 wallet: Make RPC help compile-time static (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently calling `help` on a wallet RPC method will either return `help: unknown command: getnewaddress` or the actual help. This runtime dependency of the help is a bug that complicates any tool that relies on documentation. Also, the code that enables the bug is overly complicated and confusing.
The fix is split into two commits:
* First, a commit that can be reviewed with the `--color-moved=dimmed-zebra` option and tested with the included test.
* Second, a commit that removes the complicated and confusing code.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK fadf6bd04f
promag:
Tested ACK fadf6bd04f.
Tree-SHA512: 65d4ff400467f57cb8415c30ce30f814dc76c5c157308b7a7409c59ac9db629e65dfba31cd9c389cfe60a008d3d87787ea0a0e0f2671fd65fd190543c915493d
dca73941eb scripted-diff: rename node to peer for mininodes (gzhao408)
0474ea25af [test] fix race conditions and test in p2p_filter (gzhao408)
4ef80f0827 [test] sending invalid msgs to node with bloomfilters=0 causes disconnect (gzhao408)
497a619386 [test] add BIP 37 test for node with fRelay=false (gzhao408)
e8acc60156 [test] add mempool msg test for node with bloomfilter enabled (gzhao408)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a few tests that are bloomfilter-related, including behavior for when bloomfilters are turned _off_:
1. Tests p2p message `msg_mempool`: a node that has `peerbloomfilters` enabled should send its mempool (disabled behavior already tested [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/p2p_mempool.py)).
2. Tests that bloomfilter peers with [`fRelay=False`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0037.mediawiki#extensions-to-existing-messages) in the `version` message should not receive any invs until they set the filter. The rest is the same as what’s already tested in `p2p_filter.py`.
3. Tests that peers get disconnected if they send `filterload` or `filteradd` p2p messages to a node with bloom filters disabled.
4. Refactor: renames p2p_mempool.py to p2p_nobloomfilter_messages.py.
5. Fixes race conditions in p2p_filter.py
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK dca73941eb only changes is restoring accidentally deleted test 🍮
jonatack:
ACK dca73941eb modulo a few nits if you retouch, happy to re-ACK if you take any of them but don't feel obliged to.
Tree-SHA512: 442aeab0755cb8b830251ea170d1d5e6da8ac9029b3276d407a20ee3d588cc61b77b8842368de18c244056316b8c63b911776d6e106bc7c023439ab915b27ad3
3a83a01694 [tests] move generate_wif_key to wallet_util.py (John Newbery)
b216b0b71f [tests] sort imports in rpc_createmultisig.py (John Newbery)
e38081846d Revert "[TESTS] Move base58 to own module to break circular dependency" (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
generate_wif_key is a wallet utility function. Move it from the EC key module to the wallet util module.
This fixes the circular dependency issue in #17977
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 3a83a01694🍪
Tree-SHA512: 24985dffb75202721ccc0c6c5b52f1fa5d1ce7963bccde24389feb913cab4dad0c265274ca67892c46c8b64e6a065a0f23263a89be4fb9134dfefbdbe5c7238a
fa98e10d5e test: Remove leftover comment in mining_basic (MarcoFalke)
faedb50d89 test: pep-8 mining_basic (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Remove an accidental leftover comment from #19082, which no longer applies and thus might be confusing
ACKs for top commit:
adamjonas:
code review ACK fa98e10
Tree-SHA512: c7f7f8f579b3c6e92f45769be0a7af1a421438a3f5524db5278b2269511a9e0e08f44e3836afb26727644035897ee51ff8296d13ce23030549e7403f57b40e40
-A node with bloomfilters disabled should disconnect peers that send
msg_mempool, msg_filterload, or msg_filteradd.
-Renamed the test because it now has a wider scope and msg_mempool's
actual functionality makes more sense for p2p_filter.py.
-msg_mempool is currently only tested with bloomfilter disabled
(node is disconnected) in p2p_mempool.py
-msg_mempool should get mempool txns in response when bloomfilter
is enabled
-edit test that doesn't test msg_mempool as intended
c75de5da5f [TESTS] Move base58 to own module to break circular dependency (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
I encountered difficulties with the test framework in #17977. This fixes them, and I think the change is generally useful.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK c75de5da5f
MarcoFalke:
ACK c75de5da5f according to --color-moved=dimmed-zebra this is a move-only apart from the imports 👒
Tree-SHA512: 9e0493de3e279074f0c70e92c959b73ae30479ad6f2083a3c6bbf4b0191d65ef94854559a5b7c904f5dadc5e93129ed00f6dc0a8ccce6ba7921cd45f7119f74b
34645c4dd0 Test txinwitness is accessible on coinbase vin (Rod Vagg)
3e4421070a Expose txinwitness for coinbase in JSON form (Rod Vagg)
Pull request description:
## Rationale
The CLI can provide you with everything about transactions and blocks that you need to reconstruct the block structure and raw block itself **except** for the witness commitment nonce which is stored in the `scriptWitness` of the coinbase and is not printed. You could manually parse the raw `"hex"` fields for transactions if you really wanted to, but this seems to defeat the point of having a JSONification of the raw block/transaction data.
Without the nonce you can't:
1. calculate and validate the witness commitment yourself, you can generate the witness tx merkle root but you don't have the nonce to combine it with
2. reconstruct the raw block form because you don't have `scriptWitness` stack associated with the coinbase (although you know how big it will be and can guess the common case of `[0x000...000]`)
I'm building some archiving tooling for block data and being able to do a validated two-way conversion is very helpful.
## What
This PR simply makes the `txinwitness` field not dependent on whether we are working with the coinbase or not. So you get it for the coinbase as well as the rest.
## Examples
Common case of a `[0x000...000]` nonce: 00000000000000000000140a7289f3aada855dfd23b0bb13bb5502b0ca60cdd7
```json
"vin": [
{
"coinbase": "0368890904c1fe8d5e2f706f6f6c696e2e636f6d2ffabe6d6d5565843a681160cf7b08b1b74ac90a719e6d6ab28c16d336b924f0dc2fcabdc6010000000000000051bf2ad74af345dbe642154b2658931612a70d195e007add0100ffffffff",
"txinwitness": [
"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"
],
"sequence": 4294967295
}
],
...
```
Novel nonce value: 000000000000000000008c31945b2012258366cc600a3e9a3ee0598e8f797731
```json
"vin": [
{
"coinbase": "031862082cfabe6d6d80c099b5e21f4c186d54eb292e17026932e52b1b807fa1380574c5adc1c843450200000000000000",
"txinwitness": [
"5b5032506f6f6c5d5b5032506f6f6c5d5b5032506f6f6c5d5b5032506f6f6c5d"
],
"sequence": 4294967295
}
],
...
```
## Alternatives
This field could be renamed for the coinbase, `"witnessnonce"` perhaps. It could also be omitted when null/zero (`0x000...000`).
## Tests
This didn't break any tests and I couldn't find an obvious way to include a test for this. If this is desired I'd apreicate some pointers.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 34645c4dd0
Tree-SHA512: b192facc1dfd210a5ec3f0d5d1ac6d0cae81eb35be15eaa71f60009a538dd6a79ab396f218434e7e998563f7f0df2c396cc925cb91619f6841c5a67806148c85
34e641a564 test: Remove unnecessary disconnect_nodes call in rpc_psbt.py (Danny Lee)
e6e7abd51a test: remove redundant two-way disconnect_nodes calls (Danny Lee)
a9bd1f9adf test: warn if nodes not connected before disconnect_nodes (Danny Lee)
Pull request description:
There's no harm in calling `disconnect_nodes` for nodes that weren't connected (in this case it's a no-op). However, detecting this case and logging a warning can help ensure that tests are behaving as expected.
In addition, since `disconnect_nodes` works bidirectionally, I removed all instances of this pattern:
```
disconnect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 1)
disconnect_nodes(self.nodes[1], 0)
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 34e641a564👔
amitiuttarwar:
ACK 34e641a564. Thanks for this test improvement!
Tree-SHA512: 344855ceb46c012d43c13d7c09f44d32dcb7645706d10ae1e4645d9edca54c6c6c13fee26b79480755cdfcdf39b4b5770b36bb03ce71ba002d5be8a27fe008af
This is a simple refactor of the specified test. It is now brought in
line with the rest of the tests in the module. This should make things
easier to debug, as all of the tests are now grouped together at the
top.
This test originally made a message with an invalid stated length, and
an invalid checksum. This was because only the header was changed, but
the checksum stayed the same. This was fine for now because we check
the header first to see if it has a valid stated size, and we disconnect
if it does not, so we never end up checking for the checksum. If this
behavior was to change, this test would become a problem. (Indeed I
discovered this when playing around with this behavior). By instead
creating a message with an oversized payload from the start, we create a
message with an invalid stated length but a valid checksum, as intended.
Additionally, this takes advantage to the newly module-global
VALID_DATA_LIMIT as opposed to the magic 0x02000000. Yes, 4MB < 32MiB,
but at the moment when receiving a message we check both, so this makes
the test tighter.
As well, this renames those variables to match PEP8 and this clears up
the comment relating to VALID_DATA_LIMIT.
Admittedly, this commit is mainly to make the following ones cleaner.
Test 1 is a duplicate of test_size() later in the file. Inexplicably,
this test does not work on macOS, whereas test_size() does.
Test 2 is problematic for two reasons. First, it always fails with an
invalid checksum, which is probably not what was intended. Second, it's
not defined at this layer what the behavior should be. Hypothetically,
if this test was fixed so that it gave messages with valid checksums,
then the message would pass successfully thought the network layer and
fail only in the processing layer. A priori the network layer has no
idea what the size of a message "actually" is.
The "Why does behavior change at 78 bytes" is because of the following:
print(len(node.p2p.build_message(msg))) # 125
=> Payload size = 125 - 24 = 101
If we take 77 bytes, then there are 101 - 77 = 24 left
That's exactly the size of a header
So, bitcoind deserializes the header and rejects it for some other reason
(Almost always an invalid size (too large))
But, if we take 78 bytes, then there are 101 - 78 = 23 left
That's not enough to fill a header, so the socket stays open waiting for
more data. That's why we sometimes have to push additional data in
order for the peer to disconnect.
Additionally, both of these tests use the "conn" variable. For fun, go
look at where it's declared. (Hint: test_large_inv(). Don't we all
love python's idea of scope?)
