84a46a9b93 doc: mention MAKE=gmake workaround when building on a BSD (emu)
Pull request description:
Fixes: #14404.
Replaces: #18129.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK 84a46a9b93
laanwj:
ACK 84a46a9b93
Tree-SHA512: 7a28c17c5d8a5d98aaedfb849d10a3a809f0d6d4b8f03add2cd6927e9d9689613b8b5c53e62d8e0fce8f4732efcee9ed3a83b0ed325b38934ceff6057a6db163
fa3fa27c45 fuzz: Remove option --export_coverage from test_runner (MarcoFalke)
aaaa055ff7 fuzz: Add option to merge input dir to test runner (MarcoFalke)
fa4fa88d76 doc: Remove --disable-ccache from docs (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is mainly useful for myself to merge pull requests like https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets/pull/4
I thought it wouldn't hurt to share the code.
Also remove the `--disable-ccache` from the docs to speed up builds when developing fuzzers.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 818d85a90db86a7f4e8b001cc88342e5b28b02029d2bd4174440b28a8c4cc29b5406bd6348f72ddf909bb3d0f9bf7b1011976f6480e4418c8b7da5ecccae93e8
3e32499909 Change example addresses to bech32 (Yusuf Sahin HAMZA)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up PR to #18197 that fixes RPCExamples.
Fixes#18185.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 3e32499909
jonatack:
ACK 3e32499
Tree-SHA512: c7a6410ef8b6e169016c2c5eac3e6b9501caabd0e8a0871ec31e56bfc44589f056d3f5cb55b5a13bba36f6c15136c2352f883e30e4dcc0997ffd36b27f9173b9
c1e0742308 doc: Warn about wallet.dat re-use and backups (Albert)
Pull request description:
Following discussion in #18205, this PR adds a warning against re-use of the same wallet file on two different nodes, as that can cause problems due to race conditions between nodes (eg: both nodes using the same addresses at the same time for different things because they are not aware of the other node).
I've also included the rationale behind the warning but I've kept it short to make it clearer to users, not sure if I should have written a longer explanation instead.
Also, while this PR may help some users avoid problems, the changes are largely inconsequential, so feel free to close it if it's not worth the effort.
On an unrelated note, I've also set up [this site](https://corollari.github.io/bitcoin-core-docs/), which periodically pulls bitcoin core and turns its docs into a webpage. Browsing the docs can also be done locally or on github, so this doesn't add much value, but I personally find that more comfortable and it makes them more searchable.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 5ce06026176917304932714470be8c3410d35698f925875b0955ecd3b1756ef52793feb469dd4bdac4921f1a24daf59001e9911f1f096f559fb28c250baae378
155a11f897 doc: Added running functional tests in valgrind (Elichai Turkel)
Pull request description:
Technically the notes only show an "example" of how to run valgrind with the suppression file,
but now that https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17633 is merged then maybe this can encourage more people to run also the functional tests in valgrind
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: b8417249b720d0ed5e10b732648f2e07e8889bfc7aa7e94192d1c049b4b7837971678d30c535f273c227848f1290cf11e14369fd6c1924b734f2e47e2af41401
5bad7921d0 [test] PSBT RPC: check that bip32_derivs are present by default (Sjors Provoost)
29a21c9061 [rpc] set default bip32derivs to true for psbt methods (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
In https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13557#pullrequestreview-135905054 I recommended not including bip32 deriviation by default in PSBTs:
> _Bit of a privacy issue_: let's say person A and B are about to spend from a multisig address, sending everything to person A. Person A gives their address to person B, their wallet wallet creates a PSBT, but doesn't sign it. Wallet A then calls `walletprocesspsbt` which signs it and _spontaneously adds the master_fingerprint and bip32 path_. Same issue with `walletcreatefundedpsbt`.
>
> Adding `bip32_derivs` should probably be opt-in.
In practice I find this default quite annoying because I forget it and end up with a confused hardware wallet.
More importantly, in the multisig example I provided, it's actually essential for the other side to know the derivation details (in addition to an xpub). This allows them to check that change is going to an address you can still co-sign for (because the spending policy is unchanged except for an index).
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK 5bad7921d0
jonatack:
ACK 5bad7921d0 code review, built, ran tests, inspected/messed around with/pprinted values from the new tests. Thanks for adding the tests.
meshcollider:
utACK 5bad7921d0
Tree-SHA512: 22ad71dda96856060a96758c4ae7aafa22d5e9efba30e0c8287c711e7579849bd72593cbc0f41a2e9e8821315d78bda04e848dbb006283b841b2795e2faebcfd
63ce882760 doc: link to homebrew's troubleshooting page (Gastón I. Silva)
Pull request description:
A trivial documentation update.
When I was following the build steps for mac, I had some errors installing the dependencies. After searching on the Internet, and correcting the errors, I found that `brew doctor` had all the answers I needed. Could have skipped the Internet searches all together.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 63ce882760 - a link to the troubleshooting page seems fine. I wouldn't really want our README to have anything more specific than that.
Tree-SHA512: 12c96cd9c9bd39ada21f3f27cbec3ed4bef4b8e74dec7872c892fc6a92a70418a5cc0882ff449883e91d96c01e1ca7104b076590917f397334c82931ec7fda1c
7f1475c711 rpc: update validateaddress RPCExamples to bech32 (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Another small step to get rid of legacy addresses in the RPC help texts and by that encourage the use of bech32 addresses by default. The (invalid) address is the same as in the `getaddressinfo` RPC (see 2ee0cb3330, kudos to jonatack!), I don't think it adds any value to have a different example address per RPC.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 7f1475c711
MarcoFalke:
ACK 7f1475c711
Tree-SHA512: 2350f61fa942a9053f9f5c860ea446965dc7209c71c81bdb98a859d03ca23b225ad72c9c506e4a55c8d8988823d9cfbe808c1a452a1eeadb70ab186b146dd4ca
also contains the following changes:
- rpc: factor out example bech32 address for RPCExamples
- doc: update developer notes wrt RPCExamples addresses
(mention the EXAMPLE_ADDRESS constant as an example for an invalid bech32
address suitable for RPCExamples help documentation)
fae9084ac5 build: Skip i686 build by default in guix and gitian (MarcoFalke)
fa55a2554c depends: Remove reference to win32 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Closes#17504
Now that we no longer provide downloads for i686 on our website (https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/), there is no need to build them by default.
i686 can still be built in depends (tested by ci/travis) and in guix/gitian by setting the appropriate `HOSTS`.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fae9084ac5 -- patch looks correct
dongcarl:
ACK fae9084ac5 patch looks correct
laanwj:
Code review ACK fae9084ac5
hebasto:
ACK fae9084ac5, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: b000c19a2cd2a596a52028fa298c4022c24cfdfc1bdb3795a90916d0a00a32e4dd22278db93790b6a11724e08ea8451f4f05c77bc40d1664518e11a8c82d6e29
677fb8e923 test: Add ubsan surpression for crc32c (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
8e68bb1dde build: Disable msvc warning 4722 for leveldb build (Aaron Clauson)
be23949765 build: MSVC changes for leveldb update (Aaron Clauson)
9ebdf04757 build: CRC32C build system integration (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
402252a808 build: Add LCOV exception for crc32c (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
3a037d0067 test: Add crc32c exception to various linters and generation scripts (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
84ff1b2076 test: Add crc32c to subtree check linter (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
7cf13a5134 doc: Add crc32c subtree to developer notes (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
24d02a9ac0 build: Update build system for new leveldb (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
2e1819311a Squashed 'src/crc32c/' content from commit 224988680f7673cd7c769963d4035cb315aa3388 (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
66480821b3 Squashed 'src/leveldb/' changes from f545dfabff4c2e9836efed094dba99a34fbc6b88..f8ae182c1e5176d12e816fb2217ae33a5472fdd7 (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
This updates leveldb to currently newest upstream commit 0c40829872:
- CRC32C hardware acceleration is now an external library [crc32c](https://github.com/google/crc32c). This adds acceleration on ARM, and should be faster on x86 because of using prefetch. It also makes it easy to support similar instruction sets on other platforms in the future.
- Thread handling uses C++11, instead of platform specific code.
- Native windows environment was added. No need to maintain our own hacky one, anymore.
- Upstream now builds using CMake. This doesn't mean we need to use that (phew), but internal configuration changed to a a series of checks, instead of OS profiles. This means the blanket error "Cannot build leveldb for $host. Please file a bug report' is removed.
All changes: a53934a3ae...0c40829872
Pretty much all our changes have been subsumed by upstream, so we figured it was cleaner to start over with a new branch from upstream with the still-relevant patches applied: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/leveldb/tree/bitcoin-fork-new
There's quite some testing to be done (see below). See https://github.com/bitcoin-core/leveldb/issues/25 and https://github.com/bitcoin-core/leveldb/pull/26 for more history and context.
TODO:
- [x] Subtree `crc32c`
- [x] Make linters happy about crc32 subtree
- [x] Integrate `crc32c` library into build system
- [x] MSVC build system
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK 677fb8e923
Tree-SHA512: 37ee92a750e053e924bc4626b12bb3fd81faa9f8c5ebaa343931fee810c45ba05aa6051fdea82535fa351bf2be7297801b98af9469865fc5ead771650a5d6240
19a354b11f Output a descriptor in createmultisig and addmultisigaddress (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Give a descriptor from `createmultisig` and `addmultisigaddress`.
Extracted from #16528 with `addmultisgaddress` and tests added.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK 19a354b11f
MarcoFalke:
ACK 19a354b11f
promag:
Code review ACK 19a354b11f.
meshcollider:
utACK 19a354b11f
Tree-SHA512: e813125fbbc358ea8d45b1748de16a29a94efd83175b748fb8fa3b0bfc8e783ed36b6c554d84f5d4ead1ba252a83a3e937b6c3f75da7b8d3b4e55f94d6013771
900d8f6f70 util: Disallow network-qualified command line options (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Previously these were allowed but ignored.
This change implements one of the settings simplifications listed in #17508. Change includes release notes.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 900d8f6f70
Tree-SHA512: ab020a16a86c1e8ec709fbf798d533879d32c565eceeb7eb785c33042c49c6b4d1108c5453d8166e4a2abffc2c8802fbb6d3b895e0ddeefa8f274fd647e3c8ad
d3bc184081 doc: update release notes with getaddressinfo label deprecation (Jon Atack)
72af93f364 test: getaddressinfo label deprecation test (Jon Atack)
d48875fa20 rpc: deprecate getaddressinfo label field (Jon Atack)
dc0cabeda4 test: remove getaddressinfo label tests (Jon Atack)
c7654af6f8 doc: address pr17578 review feedback (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This PR builds on #17578 (now merged) and deprecates the rpc getaddressinfo `label` field. The deprecated behavior can be re-enabled by starting bitcoind with `-deprecatedrpc=label`.
See http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-11-22.html#l-622 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17283#issuecomment-554458001 for more context.
Reviewers: This PR may be tested manually by building, then running bitcoind with and without the `-deprecatedrpc=label` flag while verifying the rpc getaddressinfo output and help text.
Next step: add support for multiple labels.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK d3bc184081
laanwj:
ACK d3bc184081
meshcollider:
utACK d3bc184081
Tree-SHA512: f954402884ec54977def332c8160fd892f289b0d2aee1e91fed9ac3220f7e5b1f7fc6421b84cc7a5c824a0582eca4e6fc194e4e33ddd378c733c8941ac45f56d
b6c3e84e87 doc: Improve fuzzing docs for macOS users (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Adds several helpful hints for macOS users trying to get fuzzers to run locally using AFL or libFuzzer. These are partly based on this comment https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17657#issuecomment-562869600 and discussions in the review club for #17860. See: https://bitcoincore.reviews/17860.html
Based on the doc in the current state I could not compile fuzzers for AFL or libFuzzer. Using these hints, I can
- compile and run fuzzers with AFL
- compile but **not** run fuzzers with libFuzzer
Fuzzers compiled with libFuzzers may be running but don't produce any output. Looking for others to test this to see if it is an issue with my local system. Especially interesting if you have been running libFuzzer fuzzers successfully on macOS before.
Edit: Closes#17914
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK b6c3e84e87
Sjors:
ACK b6c3e84
fanquake:
ACK b6c3e84e87 - I think this has been nitpicked enough, and importantly the commands look better now.
Tree-SHA512: fdbacbcf10e9353a4ac3d22edf88663e33185ad2f244b986ff74c513de05f9fa62c4d8b17985d2f9288834c124b352cf52280627b5ff095735b411b12482e2ec
42ec499489 doc: developer notes guideline on RPCExamples addresses (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
to make explicit the use of invalid addresses for user safety and to encourage
the use of bech32 addresses by default. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17578#discussion_r361752570 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17578#discussion_r362564492.
Fix a typo to appease the linter.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK 42ec499489, no strong opinion as whether this belongs to developer notes or not but why not.
fjahr:
ACK 42ec499
michaelfolkson:
ACK 42ec499489
Tree-SHA512: 64f90e227d256aa194c4fd48435440bdc233a51213dd4a6ac5b05d04263f729c6b4bb5f3afd3b87719b20cb1b159d5a9673d58a11b72823a4a6a16e8a26ae10e
8925df86c4 doc: update release notes (Jon Atack)
8bb405bbad test: getaddressinfo labels purpose deprecation test (Jon Atack)
60aba1f2f1 rpc: simplify getaddressinfo labels, deprecate previous behavior (Jon Atack)
7851f14ccf rpc: incorporate review feedback from PR 17283 (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This PR builds on #17283 (now merged) and is followed by #17585.
It modifies the value returned by rpc getaddressinfo `labels` to an array of label name strings and deprecates the previous behavior of returning an array of JSON hash structures containing label `name` and address `purpose` key/value pairs.
before
```
"labels": [
{
"name": "DOUBLE SPEND",
"purpose": "receive"
}
```
after
```
"labels": [
"DOUBLE SPEND"
]
```
The deprecated behavior can be re-enabled by starting bitcoind with `-deprecatedrpc=labelspurpose`.
For context, see:
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17283#issuecomment-554458001
- http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-12-13.html#l-425 (lines 425-427)
- http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-11-22.html#l-622
Reviewers: This PR may be tested manually by building, then running bitcoind with and without the `-deprecatedrpc=labelspurpose` flag while verifying the rpc getaddressinfo help text and `labels` output.
Next steps: deprecate the rpc getaddressinfo `label` field (EDIT: done in #17585) and add support for multiple labels per address. This PR will unblock those.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
reACK 8925df8
promag:
Code review ACK 8925df86c4.
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 8925df86c4
Tree-SHA512: c2b717209996da32b6484de7bb8800e7048410f9ce6afdb3e02a6866bd4a8f2c730f905fca27b10b877b91cf407f546e69e8c4feb9cd934325a6c71c166bd438
to make explicit the use of invalid addresses for user safety and to encourage
the use of bech32 addresses by default.
Fix a typo to appease the linter.
6094222de7 use preferred shebang approach for documentation (hackerrdave)
Pull request description:
Documentation update to use recommended shebang approach mentioned in the [developer notes](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/developer-notes.md#shebang)
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 6094222de7, I have reviewed the code, and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: fc58632f0a6fa82c7abdddfac4897f082110d647426d2b468cba6fabf6b34a015fcad47e5b26be98e629b8b0417b8781e8d89da67189e20da228b97b17f1a532
a5089f62bd fix directory path for secp256k1 subtree in developer-notes (hackerrdave)
Pull request description:
Documentation update to fix the directory path of the `secp256k1` subtree in the developer notes
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK a5089f62bd
Tree-SHA512: d0986721d7091af26edaee769db78c9aabac25bbaddb2a1bfa96c7208187226e280e9c38897b5227ee6c9e40d5a1af86bb7c58e72c6a30a94a478c4bf54c086e
fab2f351f2 doc: Update release process with latest changes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Mainly adding the reminder to bump the flatpak
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fab2f351f2
fanquake:
ACK fab2f351f2
Tree-SHA512: fe279a6cdee881e8dd608cb7d09d992c4b668b01b9d0d2dbfaf92f12f3032b8fcb2c256b20fcee861397451add1338f162b6e5fa7b3c21e76c247cc419315284
5ad4dd1ea1 doc: Changed MiniUPnPc link to https in dependencies.md (Marius Kjærstad)
Pull request description:
doc: Changed MiniUPnPc link to https in dependencies.md
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 228ee98c877612468a34d09610999a47257ab1e060f3004a530639f0c29fb473b48e59588ff70297c53a3abeb2bb32bfedbb61e102a7fc10df4bb1b5d0d5893b
27d82b63fb gui: remove macOS start on login code (fanquake)
Pull request description:
The macOS startup item code was disabled for builds targeting macOS >
`10.11` in #15208. Now that we require macOS `10.12` as a minimum (#17550),
we can remove the startup item code entirely. The API we were using, `LSSharedFileListItemCopyResolvedURL`, `LSSharedFileListCopySnapshot` etc,
was removed in macOS `10.12` SDK.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK 27d82b63fb
jonasschnelli:
Tested ACK 27d82b63fb - successfully compiled on 10.15.1
Tree-SHA512: 7420757b91c7820e6a63280887155394547134a9cebcf3721af0284da23292627f94cd431241e033075b3fd86d79ace3ebf1b25d17763acbf71e07a742395409
8f15a31760 doc: add glibc 2.17 requirement to release-notes (fanquake)
16a7be1663 build: Bump minimum versions in symbol checker (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
b77d5ad59f build: Disallow dynamic linking against c++ library (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Closes: #17525. Taken over from #17531.
Debian 8 (Jessie) has:
- g++ version 4.9.2
- libc version 2.19
CentOS 7 has:
- g++ version 4.8.5
- libc version 2.17
Ubuntu 16.04.4 (Xenial, oldest supported Ubuntu) has:
- g++ version 5.3.1
- libc version 2.23.0
Taking the minimum of these as our target. According to [GNU ABI document](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/abi.html) this corresponds to:
- GCC 4.8.5: GCC_4.8.0
- (glibc) GLIBC_2_17
This also contains a (long needed) commit to disallow dynamic linking to stdc++, as our releases statically link against that.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
re-ACK 8f15a31760
Tree-SHA512: a3cc92aa1c5de253b1531f4b854d6f5f4a15d614ba6290d9db293542a96994b55c4a8e33e03b601bae16eb65529630b4f94b48b010e0b66b7dc9ff0acf945107
794fe91395 doc: Update and improve Developer Notes (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR:
- removes outdated things, e.g., global pointer `pwalletMain` etc
- adds "Sanitizers" to the TOC
- makes filenames, `peer.dat` and `debug.log`, monospaced
- specifies that _compile-time_ constant names are all uppercase
- rewords using `explicit` with constructors
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
lazy ACK 794fe91395
practicalswift:
ACK 794fe91395 -- nice improvements!
Tree-SHA512: 2c5f035b1627f5fac8dc2453199d9e46bd101f86771de567cd95698de3c61cc459444ec1a68710e1d280195e1e40b42d9f40906297d12f12bf37749eca58297d
The macOS startup item code was disabled for builds targeting macOS >
10.11 in #15208. Now that we require macOS 10.12 as a minimum, #17550,
we can remove the startup item code entirely, as the API we were using
was removed in macOS 10.12.
02ac445b2f bump libevent to 2.1.11 in depends (stefanwouldgo)
Pull request description:
this doesn't need patches on Android anymore like 2.1.8 did.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 02ac445b2f
Tree-SHA512: 1fbfe342ee15fa4c5cb417979bd6c443f7c7aa40a489accf8ccd7c919e5b08e859b3da6edeee3de484f6f156b35dd4e97c7e2c7971b59fc31029865585ccb296
ea3c7e585c test: Remove libssl-dev packages from CI scripts (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
7ea55264b9 test: remove lsan suppression for libcrypto (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
2d7066527a build: remove libcrypto as internal dependency in libbitcoinconsensus.pc (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
278751ea11 doc: Remove ssl as a required dependency from build-unix (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Some doc and build cleanups following #17265.
I intentionally left the libssl-dev install in `gitian-win-signer.yml`, as it's necessary for the ossl signer.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK ea3c7e585c 🗯
jamesob:
ACK ea3c7e585c
practicalswift:
ACK ea3c7e585c - nice!
fanquake:
ACK ea3c7e585c - thanks.
Tree-SHA512: 67ea35bdd6d6e512d69e6734713534c88cae033a2ed695677ea15c3e3d5ff570374e342775c88e60877fa43a19047853e7b2a433e2c9a4349a5c423726a7457e
adbe155047 doc: Add some better examples for scripted diff (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
The current example isn't too great, for example it uses `find` instead of `git ls-files`. Add a subsection with suggestions and examples.
Feel free to propose some other great examples to add.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK adbe155047
Tree-SHA512: 38f03716a122a1791c93abc052ea7572a3d2108b3d0d93dc95d3c4a7eb190c6b639d1cc66e4f74d378c4b11d6951dbd901d0973792f8f13cbeb9d9dcf4f8e037
feb5075777 build: use osslsigncode 2.0 in gitian (fanquake)
Pull request description:
The original osslsigncode project, https://sourceforge.net/projects/osslsigncode, has been marked as abandonware:
> This is now - and has been for a long while - abandonware. Feel free to create your own forks etc.".
However, a fork has emerged, https://github.com/mtrojnar/osslsigncode, that has incorporated
theuni's patches ([add the -pem option in extract-signature mode ](36715c1183) & [add the attach-signature command](3be7eb1676)) as well as updated the tool to work with OpenSSL 1.1 and other improvements.
This commit switches the windows signer descriptor to use this new version of `osslsigncode`.
I've tested using this new version of `osslsigncode` while doing a 0.18.1 gitian build, and it "seems" to work. However this needs a look over from Cory, to check if the tool is still compatible with his usage in the [`detached-sig-create.sh`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/windeploy/detached-sig-create.sh) script, as well as some review of the changes to `osslsigncode` itself. Hence WIP and chasing Concept ACKs / NACKs.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
Concept ACK feb5075777 given that this upstream is now used in Ubuntu and Debian
laanwj:
ACK feb5075777
Tree-SHA512: c48de6dc32751d96dd04b920bfacca40af47a2883330ba0700371d56c580a7e45cedd8d8a913709d56be036762b63cb1825a98cff7aa77b6d7804fab11220850
e2c03c1156 doc: Add relase note for db→walletdb rename (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
4c1d263d93 scripted-diff: Change `BCLog::DB` to `BCLog::WALLETDB` (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
6b42b3ba90 Rename `db` log category to `walletdb` (like `coindb`) (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Rename the `db` log category to `walletdb` (in the style of, and to distinguish from `coindb`). Deprecate (but still accept) '-debug=db'.
Second commit is a scripted commit that changes the enum item name.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK e2c03c1156, tested on Linux Mint 19.2:
Tree-SHA512: a044de6f9a70e735cbb1caa4ed6bf75bc2269b2d5bc3241a25b6a6d69c1fc1d83456e252b431388ae61f4821e4fc06ecc1b634816ceadbe9a3c0e494bee6c11e
fa7f5a4d2a doc: Update doc/bips.md with recent changes in master (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #17165
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK fa7f5a4d2a. Verified markdown view at https://github.com/MarcoFalke/bitcoin-core/blob/1911-docBips/doc/bips.md and the urls in the links. Some of the PRs are indicated with # and some without, but this is the case over the whole document.
laanwj:
ACK fa7f5a4d2a
fanquake:
ACK fa7f5a4d2a
Tree-SHA512: 31782b5f1f2f10b1189f05f010f908c183dbe723477ca1c46ad1d3bee5ea483335847008a7fe48d72373ccd39b84e0b950d0d1b23e457cb70f34210c5f2dc6aa
104f7de593 remove old bootstrap relevant code (tryphe)
Pull request description:
This picks up #15954
I fixed the code and added at a functional test utilizing the scripts in `contrib/linearize` as suggested by @MarcoFalke .
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 104f7de593
Tree-SHA512: acac9f285f9785fcbc3afc78118461e45bec2962f90ab90e9f82f3ad28adc90a44f0443b712458ccf486e46d891eb8a67f53e7bee5fa6d89e4387814fe03f117
4671fc3d9e Expand on wallet_balance.py comment from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16766\#issuecomment-527563982 (Jeremy Rubin)
91f3073f08 Update release notes to mention changes to IsTrusted and impact on wallet (Jeremy Rubin)
8f174ef112 Systematize style of IsTrusted single line if (Jeremy Rubin)
b49dcbedf7 update variable naming conventions for IsTrusted (Jeremy Rubin)
5ffe0d1449 Update comment in test/functional/wallet_balance.py (Jeremy Rubin)
a550c58267 Update wallet_balance.py test to reflect new behavior (Jeremy Rubin)
5dd7da4ccd Reuse trustedParents in looped calls to IsTrusted (Jeremy Rubin)
595f09d6de Cache tx Trust per-call to avoid DoS (Jeremy Rubin)
dce032ce29 Make IsTrusted scan parents recursively (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
This slightly modifies the behavior of IsTrusted to recursively check the parents of a transaction. Otherwise, it's possible that a parent is not IsTrusted but a child is. If a parent is not trusted, then a child should not be either.
This recursive scan can be a little expensive, so ~it might be beneficial to have a way of caching IsTrusted state, but this is a little complex because various conditions can change between calls to IsTrusted (e.g., re-org).~ I added a cache which works per call/across calls, but does not store the results semi-permanently. Which reduces DoS risk of this change. There is no risk of untrusted parents causing a resource exploitation, as we immediately return once that is detected.
This is a change that came up as a bug-fix esque change while working on OP_SECURETHEBAG. You can see the branch where this change is important here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/master...JeremyRubin:stb-with-rpc?expand=1. Essentially, without this change, we can be tricked into accepting an OP_SECURETHEBAG output because we don't properly check the parents. As this was a change which, on its own, was not dependent on OP_SECURETHEBAG, I broke it out as I felt the change stands on its own by fixing a long standing wallet bug.
The test wallet_balance.py has been corrected to meet the new behavior. The below comment, reproduced, explains what the issue is and the edge cases that can arise before this change.
# Before `test_balance()`, we have had two nodes with a balance of 50
# each and then we:
#
# 1) Sent 40 from node A to node B with fee 0.01
# 2) Sent 60 from node B to node A with fee 0.01
#
# Then we check the balances:
#
# 1) As is
# 2) With transaction 2 from above with 2x the fee
#
# Prior to #16766, in this situation, the node would immediately report
# a balance of 30 on node B as unconfirmed and trusted.
#
# After #16766, we show that balance as unconfirmed.
#
# The balance is indeed "trusted" and "confirmed" insofar as removing
# the mempool transactions would return at least that much money. But
# the algorithm after #16766 marks it as unconfirmed because the 'taint'
# tracking of transaction trust for summing balances doesn't consider
# which inputs belong to a user. In this case, the change output in
# question could be "destroyed" by replace the 1st transaction above.
#
# The post #16766 behavior is correct; we shouldn't be treating those
# funds as confirmed. If you want to rely on that specific UTXO existing
# which has given you that balance, you cannot, as a third party
# spending the other input would destroy that unconfirmed.
#
# For example, if the test transactions were:
#
# 1) Sent 40 from node A to node B with fee 0.01
# 2) Sent 10 from node B to node A with fee 0.01
#
# Then our node would report a confirmed balance of 40 + 50 - 10 = 80
# BTC, which is more than would be available if transaction 1 were
# replaced.
The release notes have been updated to note the new behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
ariard:
Code Review ACK 4671fc3, maybe extend DoS protection in a follow-up PR.
fjahr:
Code review ACK 4671fc3d9e
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 4671fc3d9e. Changes since last review: 2 new commits adding suggested release note and python test comment, also a clean rebase with no changes to the earlier commits. The PR description is more comprehensive now, too. Looks good!
promag:
Code review ACK 4671fc3d9e.
Tree-SHA512: 6b183ff425304fef49724290053514cb2770f4a2350dcb83660ef24af5c54f7c4c2c345b0f62bba60eb2d2f70625ee61a7fab76a7f491bb5a84be5c4cc86b92f
3ed8e3d079 doc: Remove explicit network name references (Fabian Jahr)
d6e493f0c2 wallet: Remove left-over BIP70 comment (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
A small follow-up to #17165 which removed BIP70 support.
1. Removes one leftover mention of BIP70 in a comment.
2. Removes BIP70 reference in comments on network/chain name strings. These can be removed as they are not really helpful and also incorrect: BIP70 only defines "main" and "test" but not "regtest". If/When signet gets merged we will add another name to the list that is not defined in BIP70. Mostly there is also an exhaustive list of the options included in the comment anyway.
If we would like to keep an identifier for this naming scheme, I would suggest switching to something more generic, like 'short chain name'. Happy to implement that if that is preferred. Alternatively, we could add a reference to `CBaseChainParams`. That would also mean we don't have to change these lines again for signet.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 3ed8e3d079
Tree-SHA512: 9a7c0b9cacbb67bd31a089ffdc6f1ebc7f336493e2c8266eb697da34dce2b505a431d5639a3e4fc34f9287361343e861b55dc2662e0a1d2095cc1046db77d6ee
1cf9b35c0d doc: Add developer note on c_str() (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Add a note when to use and when not to use `c_str()`.
ACKs for top commit:
elichai:
ACK 1cf9b35c0d
MarcoFalke:
Looking nice ACK 1cf9b35c0d
Tree-SHA512: 38cb5e54695782c23a82d03db214a8999b5bb52553f4fbe5322281686f42616981a217ba987feb6d87f3e6b95919cadd8484efe69ecc364ba1731aaf173626c9
9075d13153 [docs] Add release notes for removal of REJECT reasons (John Newbery)
04a2f326ec [validation] Fix REJECT message comments (John Newbery)
e9d5a59e34 [validation] Remove REJECT code from CValidationState (John Newbery)
0053e16714 [logging] Don't log REJECT code when transaction is rejected (John Newbery)
a1a07cfe99 [validation] Fix peer punishment for bad blocks (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
We no longer send BIP 61 REJECT messages, so there's no need to set
a REJECT code in the CValidationState object.
Note that there is a minor bug fix in p2p behaviour here. Because the
call to `MaybePunishNode()` in `PeerLogicValidation::BlockChecked()` only
previously happened if the REJECT code was > 0 and < `REJECT_INTERNAL`,
then there are cases were `MaybePunishNode()` can get called where it
wasn't previously:
- when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `CACHED_INVALID`.
- when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `BLOCK_MISSING_PREV`.
Note that `BlockChecked()` cannot fail with an 'internal' reject code. The
only internal reject code was `REJECT_HIGHFEE`, which was only set in
ATMP.
This reverts a minor bug introduced in 5d08c9c579.
ACKs for top commit:
ariard:
ACK 9075d13, changes since last reviewed are splitting them in separate commits to ease understanding and fix nits
fjahr:
ACK 9075d13153, confirmed diff to last review was fixing nits in docs/comments.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9075d13153. Only changes since last review are splitting the main commit and updating comments
Tree-SHA512: 58e8a1a4d4e6f156da5d29fb6ad6a62fc9c594bbfc6432b3252e962d0e9e10149bf3035185dc5320c46c09f3e49662bc2973ec759679c0f3412232087cb8a3a7
