From b9d18c49300947dd3f176d1ec6d5d381db527037 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matthias Wilhelm <matthias.wilhelm@elastic.co>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 18:53:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Skip 'context view for date_nanos with custom timestamp'
 functional test (#56178)

---
 test/functional/apps/context/_date_nanos_custom_timestamp.js | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/functional/apps/context/_date_nanos_custom_timestamp.js b/test/functional/apps/context/_date_nanos_custom_timestamp.js
index 3901fa936e71..046cca0aba8c 100644
--- a/test/functional/apps/context/_date_nanos_custom_timestamp.js
+++ b/test/functional/apps/context/_date_nanos_custom_timestamp.js
@@ -28,8 +28,9 @@ export default function({ getService, getPageObjects }) {
   const docTable = getService('docTable');
   const PageObjects = getPageObjects(['common', 'context', 'timePicker', 'discover']);
   const esArchiver = getService('esArchiver');
-
-  describe('context view for date_nanos with custom timestamp', () => {
+  // skipped due to a recent change in ES that caused search_after queries with data containing
+  // custom timestamp formats like in the testdata to fail
+  describe.skip('context view for date_nanos with custom timestamp', () => {
     before(async function() {
       await esArchiver.loadIfNeeded('date_nanos_custom');
       await kibanaServer.uiSettings.replace({ defaultIndex: TEST_INDEX_PATTERN });