* chore(NA): add fsevents resolution to 2.x * chore(NA): add fsevents as an optionalDepedency to allow resolutions to be set for it * chore(NA): remove fsevents resolution from package.json * chore(NA): remove optionalDependencies from being declared * chore(NA): update kbn pm dist Co-authored-by: Kibana Machine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Kibana Machine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
dist | ||
src | ||
.babelrc | ||
cli.js | ||
index.d.ts | ||
jest.config.js | ||
package.json | ||
README.md | ||
tsconfig.json | ||
webpack.config.js |
@kbn/pm
— The Kibana project management tool
@kbn/pm
is a project management tool inspired by Lerna, which enables sharing
code between Kibana and Kibana plugins.
To run @kbn/pm
, go to Kibana root and run yarn kbn
.
Why @kbn/pm
?
Long-term we want to get rid of Webpack from production (basically, it's causing
a lot of problems, using a lot of memory and adding a lot of complexity).
Ideally we want each plugin to build its own separate production bundles for
both server and UI. To get there all Kibana plugins (including x-pack) need to
be able to build their production bundles separately from Kibana, which means
they need to be able to depend on code from Kibana without import
-ing random
files directly from the Kibana source code.
From a plugin perspective there are two different types of Kibana dependencies:
runtime and static dependencies. Runtime dependencies are things that are
instantiated at runtime and that are injected into the plugin, for example
config and elasticsearch clients. Static dependencies are those dependencies
that we want to import
. elastic-eslint-config-kibana
is one example of this, and
it's actually needed because eslint requires it to be a separate package. But we
also have dependencies like datemath
, flot
, eui
and others that we
control, but where we want to import
them in plugins instead of injecting them
(because injecting them would be painful to work with). (Btw, these examples
aren't necessarily a part of the Kibana repo today, they are just meant as
examples of code that we might at some point want to include in the repo while
having them be import
able in Kibana plugins like any other npm package)
Another reason we need static dependencies is that we're starting to introduce TypeScript into Kibana, and to work nicely with TypeScript across plugins we need to be able to statically import dependencies. We have for example built an observable library for Kibana in TypeScript and we need to expose both the functionality and the TypeScript types to plugins (so other plugins built with TypeScript can depend on the types for the lib).
However, even though we have multiple packages we don't necessarily want to
npm publish
them. The ideal solution for us is being able to work on code
locally in the Kibana repo and have a nice workflow that doesn't require
publishing, but where we still get the value of having "packages" that are
available to plugins, without these plugins having to import files directly from
the Kibana folder.
Basically, we just want to be able to share "static code" (aka being able to
import
) between Kibana and Kibana plugins. To get there we need tooling.
@kbn/pm
is a tool that helps us manage these static dependencies, and it
enables us to share these packages between Kibana and Kibana plugins. It also
enables these packages to have their own dependencies and their own build
scripts, while still having a nice developer experience.
How it works
Internal usage
For packages that are referenced within the Kibana repo itself (for example,
using the @kbn/i18n
package from an x-pack
plugin), we are leveraging
Yarn's workspaces feature. This allows yarn to optimize node_modules within
the entire repo to avoid duplicate modules by hoisting common packages as high
in the dependency tree as possible.
To reference a package from within the Kibana repo, simply use the current
version number from that package's package.json file. Then, running yarn kbn bootstrap
will symlink that package into your dependency tree. That means
you can make changes to @kbn/i18n
and immediately have them available
in Kibana itself. No npm publish
needed anymore — Kibana will always rely
directly on the code that's in the local packages.
External Plugins
For external plugins, referencing packages in Kibana relies on
link:
style dependencies in Yarn. With link:
dependencies you specify the
relative location to a package instead of a version when adding it to
package.json
. For example:
"@kbn/i18n": "link:packages/kbn-i18n"
Now when you run yarn
it will set up a symlink to this folder instead of
downloading code from the npm registry. This allows external plugins to always
use the versions of the package that is bundled with the Kibana version they
are running inside of.
"@kbn/i18n": "link:../../kibana/packages/kbn-date-math"
This works because we moved to a strict location of Kibana plugins,
./plugins/{pluginName}
inside of Kibana, or ../kibana-extra/{pluginName}
relative to Kibana. This is one of the reasons we wanted to move towards a setup
that looks like this:
elastic
└── kibana
└── plugins
├── kibana-canvas
└── x-pack-kibana
Relying on link:
style dependencies means we no longer need to npm publish
our Kibana specific packages. It also means that plugin authors no longer need
to worry about the versions of the Kibana packages, as they will always use the
packages from their local Kibana.
The kbn
use-cases
Bootstrapping
Now, instead of installing all the dependencies with just running yarn
you use
the @kbn/pm
tool, which can install dependencies (and set up symlinks) in
all the packages using one command (aka "bootstrap" the setup).
To bootstrap Kibana:
yarn kbn bootstrap
By default, @kbn/pm
will bootstrap all packages within Kibana, plus all
Kibana plugins located in ./plugins
or ../kibana-extra
. There are several
options for skipping parts of this, e.g. to skip bootstrapping of Kibana
plugins:
yarn kbn bootstrap --skip-kibana-plugins
Or just skip few selected packages:
yarn kbn bootstrap --exclude @kbn/pm --exclude @kbn/i18n
For more details, run:
yarn kbn
Bootstrapping also calls the kbn:bootstrap
script for every included project.
This is intended for packages that need to be built/transpiled to be usable.
Running scripts
Some times you want to run the same script across multiple packages and plugins,
e.g. build
or test
. Instead of jumping into each package and running
yarn build
you can run:
yarn kbn run build
And if needed, you can skip packages in the same way as for bootstrapping, e.g.
with --exclude
and --skip-kibana-plugins
:
yarn kbn run build --exclude kibana
Watching
During development you can also use kbn
to watch for changes. For this to work
package should define kbn:watch
script in the package.json
:
yarn kbn watch
By default kbn watch
will sort all packages within Kibana into batches based on
their mutual dependencies and run watch script for all packages in the correct order.
As with any other kbn
command, you can use --include
and --exclude
filters to watch
only for a selected packages:
yarn kbn watch --include @kbn/pm --include kibana
Building packages for production
The production build process relies on both the Grunt setup at the root of the
Kibana project and code in @kbn/pm
. The full process is described in
tasks/build/packages.js
.
Development
This package is run from Kibana root, using yarn kbn
. This will run the
"pre-built" (aka built and committed to git) version of this tool, which is
located in the dist/
folder. This will also use the included version of Yarn
instead of using your local install of Yarn.
If you need to build a new version of this package, run yarn build
in this
folder.
Even though this file is generated we commit it to Kibana, because it's used before dependencies are fetched (as this is the tool actually responsible for fetching dependencies).
Technical decisions
Why our own tool?
While exploring the approach to static dependencies we built PoCs using npm 5
(which symlinks packages using file:
dependencies), Yarn
workspaces, Yarn (using link:
dependencies), and
Lerna.
In the end we decided to build our own tool, based on Yarn, and link:
dependencies, and workspaces. This gave us the control we wanted, and it fits
nicely into our context (e.g. where publishing to npm isn't necessarily
something we want to do).
Some notes from this exploration
file:
dependencies in npm<5 and in yarn
When you add a dependency like "foo": "file:../../kibana/packages/foo"
, both
npm<5 and yarn copies the files into the node_modules
folder. This means you
can't easily make changes to the plugin while developing. Therefore this is a
no-go.
file:
dependencies in npm5
In npm5 file:
dependencies changed to symlink instead of copy the files. This
means you can have a nicer workflow while developing packages locally. However,
we hit several bugs when using this feature, and we often had to re-run
npm install
in packages. This is likely because we used an early version of
the new file:
dependencies in npm5.
link:
dependencies in Yarn
This is the same feature as file:
dependencies in npm5. However, we did not
hit any problems with them during our exploration.
Yarn workspaces
Enables specifying multiple "workspaces" (aka packages/projects) in
package.json
. When running yarn
from the root, Yarn will install all the
dependencies for these workspaces and hoist the dependencies to the root (to
"deduplicate" packages). However:
Workspaces must be children of the workspace root in term of folder hierarchy. You cannot and must not reference a workspace that is located outside of this filesystem hierarchy.
So Yarn workspaces requires a shared root, which (at least currently) doesn't fit Kibana, and it's therefore a no-go for now.
Lerna
Lerna is based on symlinking packages (similarly to the link
feature which exists in both npm and Yarn, but it's not directly using that
feature). It's a tool built specifically for managing JavaScript projects with
multiple packages. However, it's primarily built (i.e. optimized) for monorepo
libraries, so it's focused on publishing packages and other use-cases that are
not necessarily optimized for our use-cases. It's also not ideal for the setup
we currently have, with one app that "owns everything" and the rest being
packages for that app.
Why a local version of Yarn?
See the vendor readme.