pulumi/pkg/engine/plan.go

340 lines
11 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

2018-05-22 21:43:36 +02:00
// Copyright 2016-2018, Pulumi Corporation.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
package engine
import (
"bytes"
"context"
"fmt"
"os"
"sync"
"github.com/golang/glog"
"github.com/opentracing/opentracing-go"
"github.com/pkg/errors"
"github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/diag"
"github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/diag/colors"
"github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/resource"
"github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/resource/deploy"
"github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/resource/plugin"
"github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/tokens"
"github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/util/contract"
"github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/workspace"
)
// ProjectInfoContext returns information about the current project, including its pwd, main, and plugin context.
Implement first-class providers. (#1695) ### First-Class Providers These changes implement support for first-class providers. First-class providers are provider plugins that are exposed as resources via the Pulumi programming model so that they may be explicitly and multiply instantiated. Each instance of a provider resource may be configured differently, and configuration parameters may be source from the outputs of other resources. ### Provider Plugin Changes In order to accommodate the need to verify and diff provider configuration and configure providers without complete configuration information, these changes adjust the high-level provider plugin interface. Two new methods for validating a provider's configuration and diffing changes to the same have been added (`CheckConfig` and `DiffConfig`, respectively), and the type of the configuration bag accepted by `Configure` has been changed to a `PropertyMap`. These changes have not yet been reflected in the provider plugin gRPC interface. We will do this in a set of follow-up changes. Until then, these methods are implemented by adapters: - `CheckConfig` validates that all configuration parameters are string or unknown properties. This is necessary because existing plugins only accept string-typed configuration values. - `DiffConfig` either returns "never replace" if all configuration values are known or "must replace" if any configuration value is unknown. The justification for this behavior is given [here](https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pull/1695/files#diff-a6cd5c7f337665f5bb22e92ca5f07537R106) - `Configure` converts the config bag to a legacy config map and configures the provider plugin if all config values are known. If any config value is unknown, the underlying plugin is not configured and the provider may only perform `Check`, `Read`, and `Invoke`, all of which return empty results. We justify this behavior becuase it is only possible during a preview and provides the best experience we can manage with the existing gRPC interface. ### Resource Model Changes Providers are now exposed as resources that participate in a stack's dependency graph. Like other resources, they are explicitly created, may have multiple instances, and may have dependencies on other resources. Providers are referred to using provider references, which are a combination of the provider's URN and its ID. This design addresses the need during a preview to refer to providers that have not yet been physically created and therefore have no ID. All custom resources that are not themselves providers must specify a single provider via a provider reference. The named provider will be used to manage that resource's CRUD operations. If a resource's provider reference changes, the resource must be replaced. Though its URN is not present in the resource's dependency list, the provider should be treated as a dependency of the resource when topologically sorting the dependency graph. Finally, `Invoke` operations must now specify a provider to use for the invocation via a provider reference. ### Engine Changes First-class providers support requires a few changes to the engine: - The engine must have some way to map from provider references to provider plugins. It must be possible to add providers from a stack's checkpoint to this map and to register new/updated providers during the execution of a plan in response to CRUD operations on provider resources. - In order to support updating existing stacks using existing Pulumi programs that may not explicitly instantiate providers, the engine must be able to manage the "default" providers for each package referenced by a checkpoint or Pulumi program. The configuration for a "default" provider is taken from the stack's configuration data. The former need is addressed by adding a provider registry type that is responsible for managing all of the plugins required by a plan. In addition to loading plugins froma checkpoint and providing the ability to map from a provider reference to a provider plugin, this type serves as the provider plugin for providers themselves (i.e. it is the "provider provider"). The latter need is solved via two relatively self-contained changes to plan setup and the eval source. During plan setup, the old checkpoint is scanned for custom resources that do not have a provider reference in order to compute the set of packages that require a default provider. Once this set has been computed, the required default provider definitions are conjured and prepended to the checkpoint's resource list. Each resource that requires a default provider is then updated to refer to the default provider for its package. While an eval source is running, each custom resource registration, resource read, and invoke that does not name a provider is trapped before being returned by the source iterator. If no default provider for the appropriate package has been registered, the eval source synthesizes an appropriate registration, waits for it to complete, and records the registered provider's reference. This reference is injected into the original request, which is then processed as usual. If a default provider was already registered, the recorded reference is used and no new registration occurs. ### SDK Changes These changes only expose first-class providers from the Node.JS SDK. - A new abstract class, `ProviderResource`, can be subclassed and used to instantiate first-class providers. - A new field in `ResourceOptions`, `provider`, can be used to supply a particular provider instance to manage a `CustomResource`'s CRUD operations. - A new type, `InvokeOptions`, can be used to specify options that control the behavior of a call to `pulumi.runtime.invoke`. This type includes a `provider` field that is analogous to `ResourceOptions.provider`.
2018-08-07 02:50:29 +02:00
func ProjectInfoContext(projinfo *Projinfo, host plugin.Host, config plugin.ConfigSource, pluginEvents plugin.Events,
diag diag.Sink, tracingSpan opentracing.Span) (string, string, *plugin.Context, error) {
contract.Require(projinfo != nil, "projinfo")
// If the package contains an override for the main entrypoint, use it.
pwd, main, err := projinfo.GetPwdMain()
if err != nil {
return "", "", nil, err
}
// Create a context for plugins.
Implement first-class providers. (#1695) ### First-Class Providers These changes implement support for first-class providers. First-class providers are provider plugins that are exposed as resources via the Pulumi programming model so that they may be explicitly and multiply instantiated. Each instance of a provider resource may be configured differently, and configuration parameters may be source from the outputs of other resources. ### Provider Plugin Changes In order to accommodate the need to verify and diff provider configuration and configure providers without complete configuration information, these changes adjust the high-level provider plugin interface. Two new methods for validating a provider's configuration and diffing changes to the same have been added (`CheckConfig` and `DiffConfig`, respectively), and the type of the configuration bag accepted by `Configure` has been changed to a `PropertyMap`. These changes have not yet been reflected in the provider plugin gRPC interface. We will do this in a set of follow-up changes. Until then, these methods are implemented by adapters: - `CheckConfig` validates that all configuration parameters are string or unknown properties. This is necessary because existing plugins only accept string-typed configuration values. - `DiffConfig` either returns "never replace" if all configuration values are known or "must replace" if any configuration value is unknown. The justification for this behavior is given [here](https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pull/1695/files#diff-a6cd5c7f337665f5bb22e92ca5f07537R106) - `Configure` converts the config bag to a legacy config map and configures the provider plugin if all config values are known. If any config value is unknown, the underlying plugin is not configured and the provider may only perform `Check`, `Read`, and `Invoke`, all of which return empty results. We justify this behavior becuase it is only possible during a preview and provides the best experience we can manage with the existing gRPC interface. ### Resource Model Changes Providers are now exposed as resources that participate in a stack's dependency graph. Like other resources, they are explicitly created, may have multiple instances, and may have dependencies on other resources. Providers are referred to using provider references, which are a combination of the provider's URN and its ID. This design addresses the need during a preview to refer to providers that have not yet been physically created and therefore have no ID. All custom resources that are not themselves providers must specify a single provider via a provider reference. The named provider will be used to manage that resource's CRUD operations. If a resource's provider reference changes, the resource must be replaced. Though its URN is not present in the resource's dependency list, the provider should be treated as a dependency of the resource when topologically sorting the dependency graph. Finally, `Invoke` operations must now specify a provider to use for the invocation via a provider reference. ### Engine Changes First-class providers support requires a few changes to the engine: - The engine must have some way to map from provider references to provider plugins. It must be possible to add providers from a stack's checkpoint to this map and to register new/updated providers during the execution of a plan in response to CRUD operations on provider resources. - In order to support updating existing stacks using existing Pulumi programs that may not explicitly instantiate providers, the engine must be able to manage the "default" providers for each package referenced by a checkpoint or Pulumi program. The configuration for a "default" provider is taken from the stack's configuration data. The former need is addressed by adding a provider registry type that is responsible for managing all of the plugins required by a plan. In addition to loading plugins froma checkpoint and providing the ability to map from a provider reference to a provider plugin, this type serves as the provider plugin for providers themselves (i.e. it is the "provider provider"). The latter need is solved via two relatively self-contained changes to plan setup and the eval source. During plan setup, the old checkpoint is scanned for custom resources that do not have a provider reference in order to compute the set of packages that require a default provider. Once this set has been computed, the required default provider definitions are conjured and prepended to the checkpoint's resource list. Each resource that requires a default provider is then updated to refer to the default provider for its package. While an eval source is running, each custom resource registration, resource read, and invoke that does not name a provider is trapped before being returned by the source iterator. If no default provider for the appropriate package has been registered, the eval source synthesizes an appropriate registration, waits for it to complete, and records the registered provider's reference. This reference is injected into the original request, which is then processed as usual. If a default provider was already registered, the recorded reference is used and no new registration occurs. ### SDK Changes These changes only expose first-class providers from the Node.JS SDK. - A new abstract class, `ProviderResource`, can be subclassed and used to instantiate first-class providers. - A new field in `ResourceOptions`, `provider`, can be used to supply a particular provider instance to manage a `CustomResource`'s CRUD operations. - A new type, `InvokeOptions`, can be used to specify options that control the behavior of a call to `pulumi.runtime.invoke`. This type includes a `provider` field that is analogous to `ResourceOptions.provider`.
2018-08-07 02:50:29 +02:00
ctx, err := plugin.NewContext(diag, host, config, pluginEvents, pwd, projinfo.Proj.RuntimeInfo.Options(),
tracingSpan)
if err != nil {
return "", "", nil, err
}
return pwd, main, ctx, nil
}
General prep work for refresh This change includes a bunch of refactorings I made in prep for doing refresh (first, the command, see pulumi/pulumi#1081): * The primary change is to change the way the engine's core update functionality works with respect to deploy.Source. This is the way we can plug in new sources of resource information during planning (and, soon, diffing). The way I intend to model refresh is by having a new kind of source, deploy.RefreshSource, which will let us do virtually everything about an update/diff the same way with refreshes, which avoid otherwise duplicative effort. This includes changing the planOptions (nee deployOptions) to take a new SourceFunc callback, which is responsible for creating a source specific to the kind of plan being requested. Preview, Update, and Destroy now are primarily differentiated by the kind of deploy.Source that they return, rather than sprinkling things like `if Destroying` throughout. This tidies up some logic and, more importantly, gives us precisely the refresh hook we need. * Originally, we used the deploy.NullSource for Destroy operations. This simply returns nothing, which is how Destroy works. For some reason, we were no longer doing this, and instead had some `if Destroying` cases sprinkled throughout the deploy.EvalSource. I think this is a vestige of some old way we did configuration, at least judging by a comment, which is apparently no longer relevant. * Move diff and diff-printing logic within the engine into its own pkg/engine/diff.go file, to prepare for upcoming work. * I keep noticing benign diffs anytime I regenerate protobufs. I suspect this is because we're also on different versions. I changed generate.sh to also dump the version into grpc_version.txt. At least we can understand where the diffs are coming from, decide whether to take them (i.e., a newer version), and ensure that as a team we are monotonically increasing, and not going backwards. * I also tidied up some tiny things I noticed while in there, like comments, incorrect types, lint suppressions, and so on.
2018-03-28 16:45:23 +02:00
// newPlanContext creates a context for a subsequent planning operation. Callers must call Close on the
// resulting context object once they have completed the associated planning operation.
func newPlanContext(u UpdateInfo, opName string, parentSpan opentracing.SpanContext) (*planContext, error) {
General prep work for refresh This change includes a bunch of refactorings I made in prep for doing refresh (first, the command, see pulumi/pulumi#1081): * The primary change is to change the way the engine's core update functionality works with respect to deploy.Source. This is the way we can plug in new sources of resource information during planning (and, soon, diffing). The way I intend to model refresh is by having a new kind of source, deploy.RefreshSource, which will let us do virtually everything about an update/diff the same way with refreshes, which avoid otherwise duplicative effort. This includes changing the planOptions (nee deployOptions) to take a new SourceFunc callback, which is responsible for creating a source specific to the kind of plan being requested. Preview, Update, and Destroy now are primarily differentiated by the kind of deploy.Source that they return, rather than sprinkling things like `if Destroying` throughout. This tidies up some logic and, more importantly, gives us precisely the refresh hook we need. * Originally, we used the deploy.NullSource for Destroy operations. This simply returns nothing, which is how Destroy works. For some reason, we were no longer doing this, and instead had some `if Destroying` cases sprinkled throughout the deploy.EvalSource. I think this is a vestige of some old way we did configuration, at least judging by a comment, which is apparently no longer relevant. * Move diff and diff-printing logic within the engine into its own pkg/engine/diff.go file, to prepare for upcoming work. * I keep noticing benign diffs anytime I regenerate protobufs. I suspect this is because we're also on different versions. I changed generate.sh to also dump the version into grpc_version.txt. At least we can understand where the diffs are coming from, decide whether to take them (i.e., a newer version), and ensure that as a team we are monotonically increasing, and not going backwards. * I also tidied up some tiny things I noticed while in there, like comments, incorrect types, lint suppressions, and so on.
2018-03-28 16:45:23 +02:00
contract.Require(u != nil, "u")
// Create a root span for the operation
opts := []opentracing.StartSpanOption{}
if opName != "" {
opts = append(opts, opentracing.Tag{Key: "operation", Value: opName})
}
if parentSpan != nil {
opts = append(opts, opentracing.ChildOf(parentSpan))
}
tracingSpan := opentracing.StartSpan("pulumi-plan", opts...)
General prep work for refresh This change includes a bunch of refactorings I made in prep for doing refresh (first, the command, see pulumi/pulumi#1081): * The primary change is to change the way the engine's core update functionality works with respect to deploy.Source. This is the way we can plug in new sources of resource information during planning (and, soon, diffing). The way I intend to model refresh is by having a new kind of source, deploy.RefreshSource, which will let us do virtually everything about an update/diff the same way with refreshes, which avoid otherwise duplicative effort. This includes changing the planOptions (nee deployOptions) to take a new SourceFunc callback, which is responsible for creating a source specific to the kind of plan being requested. Preview, Update, and Destroy now are primarily differentiated by the kind of deploy.Source that they return, rather than sprinkling things like `if Destroying` throughout. This tidies up some logic and, more importantly, gives us precisely the refresh hook we need. * Originally, we used the deploy.NullSource for Destroy operations. This simply returns nothing, which is how Destroy works. For some reason, we were no longer doing this, and instead had some `if Destroying` cases sprinkled throughout the deploy.EvalSource. I think this is a vestige of some old way we did configuration, at least judging by a comment, which is apparently no longer relevant. * Move diff and diff-printing logic within the engine into its own pkg/engine/diff.go file, to prepare for upcoming work. * I keep noticing benign diffs anytime I regenerate protobufs. I suspect this is because we're also on different versions. I changed generate.sh to also dump the version into grpc_version.txt. At least we can understand where the diffs are coming from, decide whether to take them (i.e., a newer version), and ensure that as a team we are monotonically increasing, and not going backwards. * I also tidied up some tiny things I noticed while in there, like comments, incorrect types, lint suppressions, and so on.
2018-03-28 16:45:23 +02:00
return &planContext{
Update: u,
TracingSpan: tracingSpan,
General prep work for refresh This change includes a bunch of refactorings I made in prep for doing refresh (first, the command, see pulumi/pulumi#1081): * The primary change is to change the way the engine's core update functionality works with respect to deploy.Source. This is the way we can plug in new sources of resource information during planning (and, soon, diffing). The way I intend to model refresh is by having a new kind of source, deploy.RefreshSource, which will let us do virtually everything about an update/diff the same way with refreshes, which avoid otherwise duplicative effort. This includes changing the planOptions (nee deployOptions) to take a new SourceFunc callback, which is responsible for creating a source specific to the kind of plan being requested. Preview, Update, and Destroy now are primarily differentiated by the kind of deploy.Source that they return, rather than sprinkling things like `if Destroying` throughout. This tidies up some logic and, more importantly, gives us precisely the refresh hook we need. * Originally, we used the deploy.NullSource for Destroy operations. This simply returns nothing, which is how Destroy works. For some reason, we were no longer doing this, and instead had some `if Destroying` cases sprinkled throughout the deploy.EvalSource. I think this is a vestige of some old way we did configuration, at least judging by a comment, which is apparently no longer relevant. * Move diff and diff-printing logic within the engine into its own pkg/engine/diff.go file, to prepare for upcoming work. * I keep noticing benign diffs anytime I regenerate protobufs. I suspect this is because we're also on different versions. I changed generate.sh to also dump the version into grpc_version.txt. At least we can understand where the diffs are coming from, decide whether to take them (i.e., a newer version), and ensure that as a team we are monotonically increasing, and not going backwards. * I also tidied up some tiny things I noticed while in there, like comments, incorrect types, lint suppressions, and so on.
2018-03-28 16:45:23 +02:00
}, nil
}
type planContext struct {
Update UpdateInfo // The update being processed.
TracingSpan opentracing.Span // An OpenTracing span to parent plan operations within.
General prep work for refresh This change includes a bunch of refactorings I made in prep for doing refresh (first, the command, see pulumi/pulumi#1081): * The primary change is to change the way the engine's core update functionality works with respect to deploy.Source. This is the way we can plug in new sources of resource information during planning (and, soon, diffing). The way I intend to model refresh is by having a new kind of source, deploy.RefreshSource, which will let us do virtually everything about an update/diff the same way with refreshes, which avoid otherwise duplicative effort. This includes changing the planOptions (nee deployOptions) to take a new SourceFunc callback, which is responsible for creating a source specific to the kind of plan being requested. Preview, Update, and Destroy now are primarily differentiated by the kind of deploy.Source that they return, rather than sprinkling things like `if Destroying` throughout. This tidies up some logic and, more importantly, gives us precisely the refresh hook we need. * Originally, we used the deploy.NullSource for Destroy operations. This simply returns nothing, which is how Destroy works. For some reason, we were no longer doing this, and instead had some `if Destroying` cases sprinkled throughout the deploy.EvalSource. I think this is a vestige of some old way we did configuration, at least judging by a comment, which is apparently no longer relevant. * Move diff and diff-printing logic within the engine into its own pkg/engine/diff.go file, to prepare for upcoming work. * I keep noticing benign diffs anytime I regenerate protobufs. I suspect this is because we're also on different versions. I changed generate.sh to also dump the version into grpc_version.txt. At least we can understand where the diffs are coming from, decide whether to take them (i.e., a newer version), and ensure that as a team we are monotonically increasing, and not going backwards. * I also tidied up some tiny things I noticed while in there, like comments, incorrect types, lint suppressions, and so on.
2018-03-28 16:45:23 +02:00
}
func (ctx *planContext) Close() {
ctx.TracingSpan.Finish()
}
// planOptions includes a full suite of options for performing a plan and/or deploy operation.
type planOptions struct {
UpdateOptions
// SourceFunc is a factory that returns an EvalSource to use during planning. This is the thing that
// creates resources to compare against the current checkpoint state (e.g., by evaluating a program, etc).
SourceFunc planSourceFunc
SkipOutputs bool // true if we we should skip printing outputs separately.
DOT bool // true if we should print the DOT file for this plan.
Events eventEmitter // the channel to write events from the engine to.
Diag diag.Sink // the sink to use for diag'ing.
General prep work for refresh This change includes a bunch of refactorings I made in prep for doing refresh (first, the command, see pulumi/pulumi#1081): * The primary change is to change the way the engine's core update functionality works with respect to deploy.Source. This is the way we can plug in new sources of resource information during planning (and, soon, diffing). The way I intend to model refresh is by having a new kind of source, deploy.RefreshSource, which will let us do virtually everything about an update/diff the same way with refreshes, which avoid otherwise duplicative effort. This includes changing the planOptions (nee deployOptions) to take a new SourceFunc callback, which is responsible for creating a source specific to the kind of plan being requested. Preview, Update, and Destroy now are primarily differentiated by the kind of deploy.Source that they return, rather than sprinkling things like `if Destroying` throughout. This tidies up some logic and, more importantly, gives us precisely the refresh hook we need. * Originally, we used the deploy.NullSource for Destroy operations. This simply returns nothing, which is how Destroy works. For some reason, we were no longer doing this, and instead had some `if Destroying` cases sprinkled throughout the deploy.EvalSource. I think this is a vestige of some old way we did configuration, at least judging by a comment, which is apparently no longer relevant. * Move diff and diff-printing logic within the engine into its own pkg/engine/diff.go file, to prepare for upcoming work. * I keep noticing benign diffs anytime I regenerate protobufs. I suspect this is because we're also on different versions. I changed generate.sh to also dump the version into grpc_version.txt. At least we can understand where the diffs are coming from, decide whether to take them (i.e., a newer version), and ensure that as a team we are monotonically increasing, and not going backwards. * I also tidied up some tiny things I noticed while in there, like comments, incorrect types, lint suppressions, and so on.
2018-03-28 16:45:23 +02:00
}
// planSourceFunc is a callback that will be used to prepare for, and evaluate, the "new" state for a stack.
type planSourceFunc func(
opts planOptions, proj *workspace.Project, pwd, main string,
target *deploy.Target, plugctx *plugin.Context, dryRun bool) (deploy.Source, error)
General prep work for refresh This change includes a bunch of refactorings I made in prep for doing refresh (first, the command, see pulumi/pulumi#1081): * The primary change is to change the way the engine's core update functionality works with respect to deploy.Source. This is the way we can plug in new sources of resource information during planning (and, soon, diffing). The way I intend to model refresh is by having a new kind of source, deploy.RefreshSource, which will let us do virtually everything about an update/diff the same way with refreshes, which avoid otherwise duplicative effort. This includes changing the planOptions (nee deployOptions) to take a new SourceFunc callback, which is responsible for creating a source specific to the kind of plan being requested. Preview, Update, and Destroy now are primarily differentiated by the kind of deploy.Source that they return, rather than sprinkling things like `if Destroying` throughout. This tidies up some logic and, more importantly, gives us precisely the refresh hook we need. * Originally, we used the deploy.NullSource for Destroy operations. This simply returns nothing, which is how Destroy works. For some reason, we were no longer doing this, and instead had some `if Destroying` cases sprinkled throughout the deploy.EvalSource. I think this is a vestige of some old way we did configuration, at least judging by a comment, which is apparently no longer relevant. * Move diff and diff-printing logic within the engine into its own pkg/engine/diff.go file, to prepare for upcoming work. * I keep noticing benign diffs anytime I regenerate protobufs. I suspect this is because we're also on different versions. I changed generate.sh to also dump the version into grpc_version.txt. At least we can understand where the diffs are coming from, decide whether to take them (i.e., a newer version), and ensure that as a team we are monotonically increasing, and not going backwards. * I also tidied up some tiny things I noticed while in there, like comments, incorrect types, lint suppressions, and so on.
2018-03-28 16:45:23 +02:00
// plan just uses the standard logic to parse arguments, options, and to create a snapshot and plan.
func plan(ctx *Context, info *planContext, opts planOptions, dryRun bool) (*planResult, error) {
contract.Assert(info != nil)
contract.Assert(info.Update != nil)
General prep work for refresh This change includes a bunch of refactorings I made in prep for doing refresh (first, the command, see pulumi/pulumi#1081): * The primary change is to change the way the engine's core update functionality works with respect to deploy.Source. This is the way we can plug in new sources of resource information during planning (and, soon, diffing). The way I intend to model refresh is by having a new kind of source, deploy.RefreshSource, which will let us do virtually everything about an update/diff the same way with refreshes, which avoid otherwise duplicative effort. This includes changing the planOptions (nee deployOptions) to take a new SourceFunc callback, which is responsible for creating a source specific to the kind of plan being requested. Preview, Update, and Destroy now are primarily differentiated by the kind of deploy.Source that they return, rather than sprinkling things like `if Destroying` throughout. This tidies up some logic and, more importantly, gives us precisely the refresh hook we need. * Originally, we used the deploy.NullSource for Destroy operations. This simply returns nothing, which is how Destroy works. For some reason, we were no longer doing this, and instead had some `if Destroying` cases sprinkled throughout the deploy.EvalSource. I think this is a vestige of some old way we did configuration, at least judging by a comment, which is apparently no longer relevant. * Move diff and diff-printing logic within the engine into its own pkg/engine/diff.go file, to prepare for upcoming work. * I keep noticing benign diffs anytime I regenerate protobufs. I suspect this is because we're also on different versions. I changed generate.sh to also dump the version into grpc_version.txt. At least we can understand where the diffs are coming from, decide whether to take them (i.e., a newer version), and ensure that as a team we are monotonically increasing, and not going backwards. * I also tidied up some tiny things I noticed while in there, like comments, incorrect types, lint suppressions, and so on.
2018-03-28 16:45:23 +02:00
contract.Assert(opts.SourceFunc != nil)
// If this isn't a dry run, we will need to record plugin events, so that we persist them in the checkpoint. If
// we're just doing a dry run, we don't actually need to persist anything (and indeed trying to do so would fail).
var pluginEvents plugin.Events
if !dryRun {
pluginEvents = &pluginActions{ctx}
}
// First, load the package metadata and the deployment target in preparation for executing the package's program
// and creating resources. This includes fetching its pwd and main overrides.
proj, target := info.Update.GetProject(), info.Update.GetTarget()
contract.Assert(proj != nil)
contract.Assert(target != nil)
projinfo := &Projinfo{Proj: proj, Root: info.Update.GetRoot()}
Implement first-class providers. (#1695) ### First-Class Providers These changes implement support for first-class providers. First-class providers are provider plugins that are exposed as resources via the Pulumi programming model so that they may be explicitly and multiply instantiated. Each instance of a provider resource may be configured differently, and configuration parameters may be source from the outputs of other resources. ### Provider Plugin Changes In order to accommodate the need to verify and diff provider configuration and configure providers without complete configuration information, these changes adjust the high-level provider plugin interface. Two new methods for validating a provider's configuration and diffing changes to the same have been added (`CheckConfig` and `DiffConfig`, respectively), and the type of the configuration bag accepted by `Configure` has been changed to a `PropertyMap`. These changes have not yet been reflected in the provider plugin gRPC interface. We will do this in a set of follow-up changes. Until then, these methods are implemented by adapters: - `CheckConfig` validates that all configuration parameters are string or unknown properties. This is necessary because existing plugins only accept string-typed configuration values. - `DiffConfig` either returns "never replace" if all configuration values are known or "must replace" if any configuration value is unknown. The justification for this behavior is given [here](https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pull/1695/files#diff-a6cd5c7f337665f5bb22e92ca5f07537R106) - `Configure` converts the config bag to a legacy config map and configures the provider plugin if all config values are known. If any config value is unknown, the underlying plugin is not configured and the provider may only perform `Check`, `Read`, and `Invoke`, all of which return empty results. We justify this behavior becuase it is only possible during a preview and provides the best experience we can manage with the existing gRPC interface. ### Resource Model Changes Providers are now exposed as resources that participate in a stack's dependency graph. Like other resources, they are explicitly created, may have multiple instances, and may have dependencies on other resources. Providers are referred to using provider references, which are a combination of the provider's URN and its ID. This design addresses the need during a preview to refer to providers that have not yet been physically created and therefore have no ID. All custom resources that are not themselves providers must specify a single provider via a provider reference. The named provider will be used to manage that resource's CRUD operations. If a resource's provider reference changes, the resource must be replaced. Though its URN is not present in the resource's dependency list, the provider should be treated as a dependency of the resource when topologically sorting the dependency graph. Finally, `Invoke` operations must now specify a provider to use for the invocation via a provider reference. ### Engine Changes First-class providers support requires a few changes to the engine: - The engine must have some way to map from provider references to provider plugins. It must be possible to add providers from a stack's checkpoint to this map and to register new/updated providers during the execution of a plan in response to CRUD operations on provider resources. - In order to support updating existing stacks using existing Pulumi programs that may not explicitly instantiate providers, the engine must be able to manage the "default" providers for each package referenced by a checkpoint or Pulumi program. The configuration for a "default" provider is taken from the stack's configuration data. The former need is addressed by adding a provider registry type that is responsible for managing all of the plugins required by a plan. In addition to loading plugins froma checkpoint and providing the ability to map from a provider reference to a provider plugin, this type serves as the provider plugin for providers themselves (i.e. it is the "provider provider"). The latter need is solved via two relatively self-contained changes to plan setup and the eval source. During plan setup, the old checkpoint is scanned for custom resources that do not have a provider reference in order to compute the set of packages that require a default provider. Once this set has been computed, the required default provider definitions are conjured and prepended to the checkpoint's resource list. Each resource that requires a default provider is then updated to refer to the default provider for its package. While an eval source is running, each custom resource registration, resource read, and invoke that does not name a provider is trapped before being returned by the source iterator. If no default provider for the appropriate package has been registered, the eval source synthesizes an appropriate registration, waits for it to complete, and records the registered provider's reference. This reference is injected into the original request, which is then processed as usual. If a default provider was already registered, the recorded reference is used and no new registration occurs. ### SDK Changes These changes only expose first-class providers from the Node.JS SDK. - A new abstract class, `ProviderResource`, can be subclassed and used to instantiate first-class providers. - A new field in `ResourceOptions`, `provider`, can be used to supply a particular provider instance to manage a `CustomResource`'s CRUD operations. - A new type, `InvokeOptions`, can be used to specify options that control the behavior of a call to `pulumi.runtime.invoke`. This type includes a `provider` field that is analogous to `ResourceOptions.provider`.
2018-08-07 02:50:29 +02:00
pwd, main, plugctx, err := ProjectInfoContext(projinfo, opts.host, target, pluginEvents, opts.Diag, info.TracingSpan)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
General prep work for refresh This change includes a bunch of refactorings I made in prep for doing refresh (first, the command, see pulumi/pulumi#1081): * The primary change is to change the way the engine's core update functionality works with respect to deploy.Source. This is the way we can plug in new sources of resource information during planning (and, soon, diffing). The way I intend to model refresh is by having a new kind of source, deploy.RefreshSource, which will let us do virtually everything about an update/diff the same way with refreshes, which avoid otherwise duplicative effort. This includes changing the planOptions (nee deployOptions) to take a new SourceFunc callback, which is responsible for creating a source specific to the kind of plan being requested. Preview, Update, and Destroy now are primarily differentiated by the kind of deploy.Source that they return, rather than sprinkling things like `if Destroying` throughout. This tidies up some logic and, more importantly, gives us precisely the refresh hook we need. * Originally, we used the deploy.NullSource for Destroy operations. This simply returns nothing, which is how Destroy works. For some reason, we were no longer doing this, and instead had some `if Destroying` cases sprinkled throughout the deploy.EvalSource. I think this is a vestige of some old way we did configuration, at least judging by a comment, which is apparently no longer relevant. * Move diff and diff-printing logic within the engine into its own pkg/engine/diff.go file, to prepare for upcoming work. * I keep noticing benign diffs anytime I regenerate protobufs. I suspect this is because we're also on different versions. I changed generate.sh to also dump the version into grpc_version.txt. At least we can understand where the diffs are coming from, decide whether to take them (i.e., a newer version), and ensure that as a team we are monotonically increasing, and not going backwards. * I also tidied up some tiny things I noticed while in there, like comments, incorrect types, lint suppressions, and so on.
2018-03-28 16:45:23 +02:00
// Now create the state source. This may issue an error if it can't create the source. This entails,
// for example, loading any plugins which will be required to execute a program, among other things.
source, err := opts.SourceFunc(opts, proj, pwd, main, target, plugctx, dryRun)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
// If there are any analyzers in the project file, add them.
var analyzers []tokens.QName
if as := projinfo.Proj.Analyzers; as != nil {
for _, a := range *as {
analyzers = append(analyzers, a)
}
}
// Append any analyzers from the command line.
for _, a := range opts.Analyzers {
analyzers = append(analyzers, tokens.QName(a))
}
// Generate a plan; this API handles all interesting cases (create, update, delete).
Implement first-class providers. (#1695) ### First-Class Providers These changes implement support for first-class providers. First-class providers are provider plugins that are exposed as resources via the Pulumi programming model so that they may be explicitly and multiply instantiated. Each instance of a provider resource may be configured differently, and configuration parameters may be source from the outputs of other resources. ### Provider Plugin Changes In order to accommodate the need to verify and diff provider configuration and configure providers without complete configuration information, these changes adjust the high-level provider plugin interface. Two new methods for validating a provider's configuration and diffing changes to the same have been added (`CheckConfig` and `DiffConfig`, respectively), and the type of the configuration bag accepted by `Configure` has been changed to a `PropertyMap`. These changes have not yet been reflected in the provider plugin gRPC interface. We will do this in a set of follow-up changes. Until then, these methods are implemented by adapters: - `CheckConfig` validates that all configuration parameters are string or unknown properties. This is necessary because existing plugins only accept string-typed configuration values. - `DiffConfig` either returns "never replace" if all configuration values are known or "must replace" if any configuration value is unknown. The justification for this behavior is given [here](https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pull/1695/files#diff-a6cd5c7f337665f5bb22e92ca5f07537R106) - `Configure` converts the config bag to a legacy config map and configures the provider plugin if all config values are known. If any config value is unknown, the underlying plugin is not configured and the provider may only perform `Check`, `Read`, and `Invoke`, all of which return empty results. We justify this behavior becuase it is only possible during a preview and provides the best experience we can manage with the existing gRPC interface. ### Resource Model Changes Providers are now exposed as resources that participate in a stack's dependency graph. Like other resources, they are explicitly created, may have multiple instances, and may have dependencies on other resources. Providers are referred to using provider references, which are a combination of the provider's URN and its ID. This design addresses the need during a preview to refer to providers that have not yet been physically created and therefore have no ID. All custom resources that are not themselves providers must specify a single provider via a provider reference. The named provider will be used to manage that resource's CRUD operations. If a resource's provider reference changes, the resource must be replaced. Though its URN is not present in the resource's dependency list, the provider should be treated as a dependency of the resource when topologically sorting the dependency graph. Finally, `Invoke` operations must now specify a provider to use for the invocation via a provider reference. ### Engine Changes First-class providers support requires a few changes to the engine: - The engine must have some way to map from provider references to provider plugins. It must be possible to add providers from a stack's checkpoint to this map and to register new/updated providers during the execution of a plan in response to CRUD operations on provider resources. - In order to support updating existing stacks using existing Pulumi programs that may not explicitly instantiate providers, the engine must be able to manage the "default" providers for each package referenced by a checkpoint or Pulumi program. The configuration for a "default" provider is taken from the stack's configuration data. The former need is addressed by adding a provider registry type that is responsible for managing all of the plugins required by a plan. In addition to loading plugins froma checkpoint and providing the ability to map from a provider reference to a provider plugin, this type serves as the provider plugin for providers themselves (i.e. it is the "provider provider"). The latter need is solved via two relatively self-contained changes to plan setup and the eval source. During plan setup, the old checkpoint is scanned for custom resources that do not have a provider reference in order to compute the set of packages that require a default provider. Once this set has been computed, the required default provider definitions are conjured and prepended to the checkpoint's resource list. Each resource that requires a default provider is then updated to refer to the default provider for its package. While an eval source is running, each custom resource registration, resource read, and invoke that does not name a provider is trapped before being returned by the source iterator. If no default provider for the appropriate package has been registered, the eval source synthesizes an appropriate registration, waits for it to complete, and records the registered provider's reference. This reference is injected into the original request, which is then processed as usual. If a default provider was already registered, the recorded reference is used and no new registration occurs. ### SDK Changes These changes only expose first-class providers from the Node.JS SDK. - A new abstract class, `ProviderResource`, can be subclassed and used to instantiate first-class providers. - A new field in `ResourceOptions`, `provider`, can be used to supply a particular provider instance to manage a `CustomResource`'s CRUD operations. - A new type, `InvokeOptions`, can be used to specify options that control the behavior of a call to `pulumi.runtime.invoke`. This type includes a `provider` field that is analogous to `ResourceOptions.provider`.
2018-08-07 02:50:29 +02:00
plan, err := deploy.NewPlan(plugctx, target, target.Snapshot, source, analyzers, dryRun)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return &planResult{
Ctx: info,
General prep work for refresh This change includes a bunch of refactorings I made in prep for doing refresh (first, the command, see pulumi/pulumi#1081): * The primary change is to change the way the engine's core update functionality works with respect to deploy.Source. This is the way we can plug in new sources of resource information during planning (and, soon, diffing). The way I intend to model refresh is by having a new kind of source, deploy.RefreshSource, which will let us do virtually everything about an update/diff the same way with refreshes, which avoid otherwise duplicative effort. This includes changing the planOptions (nee deployOptions) to take a new SourceFunc callback, which is responsible for creating a source specific to the kind of plan being requested. Preview, Update, and Destroy now are primarily differentiated by the kind of deploy.Source that they return, rather than sprinkling things like `if Destroying` throughout. This tidies up some logic and, more importantly, gives us precisely the refresh hook we need. * Originally, we used the deploy.NullSource for Destroy operations. This simply returns nothing, which is how Destroy works. For some reason, we were no longer doing this, and instead had some `if Destroying` cases sprinkled throughout the deploy.EvalSource. I think this is a vestige of some old way we did configuration, at least judging by a comment, which is apparently no longer relevant. * Move diff and diff-printing logic within the engine into its own pkg/engine/diff.go file, to prepare for upcoming work. * I keep noticing benign diffs anytime I regenerate protobufs. I suspect this is because we're also on different versions. I changed generate.sh to also dump the version into grpc_version.txt. At least we can understand where the diffs are coming from, decide whether to take them (i.e., a newer version), and ensure that as a team we are monotonically increasing, and not going backwards. * I also tidied up some tiny things I noticed while in there, like comments, incorrect types, lint suppressions, and so on.
2018-03-28 16:45:23 +02:00
Plugctx: plugctx,
Plan: plan,
Options: opts,
}, nil
}
type planResult struct {
General prep work for refresh This change includes a bunch of refactorings I made in prep for doing refresh (first, the command, see pulumi/pulumi#1081): * The primary change is to change the way the engine's core update functionality works with respect to deploy.Source. This is the way we can plug in new sources of resource information during planning (and, soon, diffing). The way I intend to model refresh is by having a new kind of source, deploy.RefreshSource, which will let us do virtually everything about an update/diff the same way with refreshes, which avoid otherwise duplicative effort. This includes changing the planOptions (nee deployOptions) to take a new SourceFunc callback, which is responsible for creating a source specific to the kind of plan being requested. Preview, Update, and Destroy now are primarily differentiated by the kind of deploy.Source that they return, rather than sprinkling things like `if Destroying` throughout. This tidies up some logic and, more importantly, gives us precisely the refresh hook we need. * Originally, we used the deploy.NullSource for Destroy operations. This simply returns nothing, which is how Destroy works. For some reason, we were no longer doing this, and instead had some `if Destroying` cases sprinkled throughout the deploy.EvalSource. I think this is a vestige of some old way we did configuration, at least judging by a comment, which is apparently no longer relevant. * Move diff and diff-printing logic within the engine into its own pkg/engine/diff.go file, to prepare for upcoming work. * I keep noticing benign diffs anytime I regenerate protobufs. I suspect this is because we're also on different versions. I changed generate.sh to also dump the version into grpc_version.txt. At least we can understand where the diffs are coming from, decide whether to take them (i.e., a newer version), and ensure that as a team we are monotonically increasing, and not going backwards. * I also tidied up some tiny things I noticed while in there, like comments, incorrect types, lint suppressions, and so on.
2018-03-28 16:45:23 +02:00
Ctx *planContext // plan context information.
Plugctx *plugin.Context // the context containing plugins and their state.
Plan *deploy.Plan // the plan created by this command.
General prep work for refresh This change includes a bunch of refactorings I made in prep for doing refresh (first, the command, see pulumi/pulumi#1081): * The primary change is to change the way the engine's core update functionality works with respect to deploy.Source. This is the way we can plug in new sources of resource information during planning (and, soon, diffing). The way I intend to model refresh is by having a new kind of source, deploy.RefreshSource, which will let us do virtually everything about an update/diff the same way with refreshes, which avoid otherwise duplicative effort. This includes changing the planOptions (nee deployOptions) to take a new SourceFunc callback, which is responsible for creating a source specific to the kind of plan being requested. Preview, Update, and Destroy now are primarily differentiated by the kind of deploy.Source that they return, rather than sprinkling things like `if Destroying` throughout. This tidies up some logic and, more importantly, gives us precisely the refresh hook we need. * Originally, we used the deploy.NullSource for Destroy operations. This simply returns nothing, which is how Destroy works. For some reason, we were no longer doing this, and instead had some `if Destroying` cases sprinkled throughout the deploy.EvalSource. I think this is a vestige of some old way we did configuration, at least judging by a comment, which is apparently no longer relevant. * Move diff and diff-printing logic within the engine into its own pkg/engine/diff.go file, to prepare for upcoming work. * I keep noticing benign diffs anytime I regenerate protobufs. I suspect this is because we're also on different versions. I changed generate.sh to also dump the version into grpc_version.txt. At least we can understand where the diffs are coming from, decide whether to take them (i.e., a newer version), and ensure that as a team we are monotonically increasing, and not going backwards. * I also tidied up some tiny things I noticed while in there, like comments, incorrect types, lint suppressions, and so on.
2018-03-28 16:45:23 +02:00
Options planOptions // the options used during planning.
}
// Chdir changes the directory so that all operations from now on are relative to the project we are working with.
// It returns a function that, when run, restores the old working directory.
func (res *planResult) Chdir() (func(), error) {
General prep work for refresh This change includes a bunch of refactorings I made in prep for doing refresh (first, the command, see pulumi/pulumi#1081): * The primary change is to change the way the engine's core update functionality works with respect to deploy.Source. This is the way we can plug in new sources of resource information during planning (and, soon, diffing). The way I intend to model refresh is by having a new kind of source, deploy.RefreshSource, which will let us do virtually everything about an update/diff the same way with refreshes, which avoid otherwise duplicative effort. This includes changing the planOptions (nee deployOptions) to take a new SourceFunc callback, which is responsible for creating a source specific to the kind of plan being requested. Preview, Update, and Destroy now are primarily differentiated by the kind of deploy.Source that they return, rather than sprinkling things like `if Destroying` throughout. This tidies up some logic and, more importantly, gives us precisely the refresh hook we need. * Originally, we used the deploy.NullSource for Destroy operations. This simply returns nothing, which is how Destroy works. For some reason, we were no longer doing this, and instead had some `if Destroying` cases sprinkled throughout the deploy.EvalSource. I think this is a vestige of some old way we did configuration, at least judging by a comment, which is apparently no longer relevant. * Move diff and diff-printing logic within the engine into its own pkg/engine/diff.go file, to prepare for upcoming work. * I keep noticing benign diffs anytime I regenerate protobufs. I suspect this is because we're also on different versions. I changed generate.sh to also dump the version into grpc_version.txt. At least we can understand where the diffs are coming from, decide whether to take them (i.e., a newer version), and ensure that as a team we are monotonically increasing, and not going backwards. * I also tidied up some tiny things I noticed while in there, like comments, incorrect types, lint suppressions, and so on.
2018-03-28 16:45:23 +02:00
pwd := res.Plugctx.Pwd
if pwd == "" {
return func() {}, nil
}
oldpwd, err := os.Getwd()
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
General prep work for refresh This change includes a bunch of refactorings I made in prep for doing refresh (first, the command, see pulumi/pulumi#1081): * The primary change is to change the way the engine's core update functionality works with respect to deploy.Source. This is the way we can plug in new sources of resource information during planning (and, soon, diffing). The way I intend to model refresh is by having a new kind of source, deploy.RefreshSource, which will let us do virtually everything about an update/diff the same way with refreshes, which avoid otherwise duplicative effort. This includes changing the planOptions (nee deployOptions) to take a new SourceFunc callback, which is responsible for creating a source specific to the kind of plan being requested. Preview, Update, and Destroy now are primarily differentiated by the kind of deploy.Source that they return, rather than sprinkling things like `if Destroying` throughout. This tidies up some logic and, more importantly, gives us precisely the refresh hook we need. * Originally, we used the deploy.NullSource for Destroy operations. This simply returns nothing, which is how Destroy works. For some reason, we were no longer doing this, and instead had some `if Destroying` cases sprinkled throughout the deploy.EvalSource. I think this is a vestige of some old way we did configuration, at least judging by a comment, which is apparently no longer relevant. * Move diff and diff-printing logic within the engine into its own pkg/engine/diff.go file, to prepare for upcoming work. * I keep noticing benign diffs anytime I regenerate protobufs. I suspect this is because we're also on different versions. I changed generate.sh to also dump the version into grpc_version.txt. At least we can understand where the diffs are coming from, decide whether to take them (i.e., a newer version), and ensure that as a team we are monotonically increasing, and not going backwards. * I also tidied up some tiny things I noticed while in there, like comments, incorrect types, lint suppressions, and so on.
2018-03-28 16:45:23 +02:00
if err = os.Chdir(pwd); err != nil {
return nil, errors.Wrapf(err, "could not change to the project working directory")
}
return func() {
// Restore the working directory after planning completes.
cderr := os.Chdir(oldpwd)
contract.IgnoreError(cderr)
}, nil
}
// Walk enumerates all steps in the plan, calling out to the provided action at each step. It returns four things: the
// resulting Snapshot, no matter whether an error occurs or not; an error, if something went wrong; the step that
// failed, if the error is non-nil; and finally the state of the resource modified in the failing step.
func (res *planResult) Walk(cancelCtx *Context, events deploy.Events, preview bool) (deploy.PlanSummary, error) {
opts := deploy.Options{
Events: events,
Parallel: res.Options.Parallel,
}
Implement first-class providers. (#1695) ### First-Class Providers These changes implement support for first-class providers. First-class providers are provider plugins that are exposed as resources via the Pulumi programming model so that they may be explicitly and multiply instantiated. Each instance of a provider resource may be configured differently, and configuration parameters may be source from the outputs of other resources. ### Provider Plugin Changes In order to accommodate the need to verify and diff provider configuration and configure providers without complete configuration information, these changes adjust the high-level provider plugin interface. Two new methods for validating a provider's configuration and diffing changes to the same have been added (`CheckConfig` and `DiffConfig`, respectively), and the type of the configuration bag accepted by `Configure` has been changed to a `PropertyMap`. These changes have not yet been reflected in the provider plugin gRPC interface. We will do this in a set of follow-up changes. Until then, these methods are implemented by adapters: - `CheckConfig` validates that all configuration parameters are string or unknown properties. This is necessary because existing plugins only accept string-typed configuration values. - `DiffConfig` either returns "never replace" if all configuration values are known or "must replace" if any configuration value is unknown. The justification for this behavior is given [here](https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pull/1695/files#diff-a6cd5c7f337665f5bb22e92ca5f07537R106) - `Configure` converts the config bag to a legacy config map and configures the provider plugin if all config values are known. If any config value is unknown, the underlying plugin is not configured and the provider may only perform `Check`, `Read`, and `Invoke`, all of which return empty results. We justify this behavior becuase it is only possible during a preview and provides the best experience we can manage with the existing gRPC interface. ### Resource Model Changes Providers are now exposed as resources that participate in a stack's dependency graph. Like other resources, they are explicitly created, may have multiple instances, and may have dependencies on other resources. Providers are referred to using provider references, which are a combination of the provider's URN and its ID. This design addresses the need during a preview to refer to providers that have not yet been physically created and therefore have no ID. All custom resources that are not themselves providers must specify a single provider via a provider reference. The named provider will be used to manage that resource's CRUD operations. If a resource's provider reference changes, the resource must be replaced. Though its URN is not present in the resource's dependency list, the provider should be treated as a dependency of the resource when topologically sorting the dependency graph. Finally, `Invoke` operations must now specify a provider to use for the invocation via a provider reference. ### Engine Changes First-class providers support requires a few changes to the engine: - The engine must have some way to map from provider references to provider plugins. It must be possible to add providers from a stack's checkpoint to this map and to register new/updated providers during the execution of a plan in response to CRUD operations on provider resources. - In order to support updating existing stacks using existing Pulumi programs that may not explicitly instantiate providers, the engine must be able to manage the "default" providers for each package referenced by a checkpoint or Pulumi program. The configuration for a "default" provider is taken from the stack's configuration data. The former need is addressed by adding a provider registry type that is responsible for managing all of the plugins required by a plan. In addition to loading plugins froma checkpoint and providing the ability to map from a provider reference to a provider plugin, this type serves as the provider plugin for providers themselves (i.e. it is the "provider provider"). The latter need is solved via two relatively self-contained changes to plan setup and the eval source. During plan setup, the old checkpoint is scanned for custom resources that do not have a provider reference in order to compute the set of packages that require a default provider. Once this set has been computed, the required default provider definitions are conjured and prepended to the checkpoint's resource list. Each resource that requires a default provider is then updated to refer to the default provider for its package. While an eval source is running, each custom resource registration, resource read, and invoke that does not name a provider is trapped before being returned by the source iterator. If no default provider for the appropriate package has been registered, the eval source synthesizes an appropriate registration, waits for it to complete, and records the registered provider's reference. This reference is injected into the original request, which is then processed as usual. If a default provider was already registered, the recorded reference is used and no new registration occurs. ### SDK Changes These changes only expose first-class providers from the Node.JS SDK. - A new abstract class, `ProviderResource`, can be subclassed and used to instantiate first-class providers. - A new field in `ResourceOptions`, `provider`, can be used to supply a particular provider instance to manage a `CustomResource`'s CRUD operations. - A new type, `InvokeOptions`, can be used to specify options that control the behavior of a call to `pulumi.runtime.invoke`. This type includes a `provider` field that is analogous to `ResourceOptions.provider`.
2018-08-07 02:50:29 +02:00
src, err := res.Plan.Source().Iterate(opts, res.Plan)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
ctx, cancelFunc := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
done := make(chan bool)
var summary deploy.PlanSummary
go func() {
planExec := deploy.NewPlanExecutor(ctx, res.Plan, opts, preview, src)
err = planExec.Execute()
summary = planExec.Summary()
close(done)
}()
// Asynchronously listen for cancellation, and deliver that signal to plan.
go func() {
select {
case <-cancelCtx.Cancel.Canceled():
// Cancel the plan executor's context, so it begins to shut down.
cancelFunc()
cancelErr := res.Plan.SignalCancellation()
if cancelErr != nil {
glog.V(3).Infof("Attempted to signal cancellation to resource providers, but failed: %s",
cancelErr.Error())
}
case <-done:
return
}
}()
select {
case <-cancelCtx.Cancel.Terminated():
return summary, cancelCtx.Cancel.TerminateErr()
case <-done:
return summary, err
}
}
func (res *planResult) Close() error {
General prep work for refresh This change includes a bunch of refactorings I made in prep for doing refresh (first, the command, see pulumi/pulumi#1081): * The primary change is to change the way the engine's core update functionality works with respect to deploy.Source. This is the way we can plug in new sources of resource information during planning (and, soon, diffing). The way I intend to model refresh is by having a new kind of source, deploy.RefreshSource, which will let us do virtually everything about an update/diff the same way with refreshes, which avoid otherwise duplicative effort. This includes changing the planOptions (nee deployOptions) to take a new SourceFunc callback, which is responsible for creating a source specific to the kind of plan being requested. Preview, Update, and Destroy now are primarily differentiated by the kind of deploy.Source that they return, rather than sprinkling things like `if Destroying` throughout. This tidies up some logic and, more importantly, gives us precisely the refresh hook we need. * Originally, we used the deploy.NullSource for Destroy operations. This simply returns nothing, which is how Destroy works. For some reason, we were no longer doing this, and instead had some `if Destroying` cases sprinkled throughout the deploy.EvalSource. I think this is a vestige of some old way we did configuration, at least judging by a comment, which is apparently no longer relevant. * Move diff and diff-printing logic within the engine into its own pkg/engine/diff.go file, to prepare for upcoming work. * I keep noticing benign diffs anytime I regenerate protobufs. I suspect this is because we're also on different versions. I changed generate.sh to also dump the version into grpc_version.txt. At least we can understand where the diffs are coming from, decide whether to take them (i.e., a newer version), and ensure that as a team we are monotonically increasing, and not going backwards. * I also tidied up some tiny things I noticed while in there, like comments, incorrect types, lint suppressions, and so on.
2018-03-28 16:45:23 +02:00
return res.Plugctx.Close()
}
2018-01-20 21:15:28 +01:00
// printPlan prints the plan's result to the plan's Options.Events stream.
func printPlan(ctx *Context, result *planResult, dryRun bool) (ResourceChanges, error) {
result.Options.Events.preludeEvent(dryRun, result.Ctx.Update.GetTarget().Config)
// Walk the plan's steps and and pretty-print them out.
actions := newPlanActions(result.Options)
_, err := result.Walk(ctx, actions, true)
if err != nil {
return nil, errors.New("an error occurred while advancing the preview")
}
// Emit an event with a summary of operation counts.
changes := ResourceChanges(actions.Ops)
result.Options.Events.previewSummaryEvent(changes)
return changes, nil
}
type planActions struct {
Refresh bool
Ops map[deploy.StepOp]int
Opts planOptions
Seen map[resource.URN]deploy.Step
MapLock sync.Mutex
}
func newPlanActions(opts planOptions) *planActions {
return &planActions{
Ops: make(map[deploy.StepOp]int),
Opts: opts,
Seen: make(map[resource.URN]deploy.Step),
}
}
func (acts *planActions) OnResourceStepPre(step deploy.Step) (interface{}, error) {
acts.MapLock.Lock()
acts.Seen[step.URN()] = step
acts.MapLock.Unlock()
acts.Opts.Events.resourcePreEvent(step, true /*planning*/, acts.Opts.Debug)
// Warn the user if they're not updating a resource whose initialization failed.
if step.Op() == deploy.OpSame && len(step.Old().InitErrors) > 0 {
indent := " "
// TODO: Move indentation to the display logic, instead of doing it ourselves.
var warning bytes.Buffer
warning.WriteString("This resource failed to initialize in a previous deployment. It is recommended\n")
warning.WriteString(indent + "to update it to fix these issues:\n")
for i, err := range step.Old().InitErrors {
warning.WriteString(colors.SpecImportant + indent + fmt.Sprintf(" - Problem #%d", i+1) +
colors.Reset + " " + err + "\n")
}
acts.Opts.Diag.Warningf(diag.RawMessage(step.URN(), warning.String()))
}
return nil, nil
}
func (acts *planActions) OnResourceStepPost(ctx interface{},
step deploy.Step, status resource.Status, err error) error {
acts.MapLock.Lock()
assertSeen(acts.Seen, step)
acts.MapLock.Unlock()
if err != nil {
acts.Opts.Diag.Errorf(diag.GetPreviewFailedError(step.URN()), err)
} else {
// Track the operation if shown and/or if it is a logically meaningful operation.
if step.Logical() {
acts.MapLock.Lock()
acts.Ops[step.Op()]++
acts.MapLock.Unlock()
}
_ = acts.OnResourceOutputs(step)
}
return nil
}
func (acts *planActions) OnResourceOutputs(step deploy.Step) error {
acts.MapLock.Lock()
assertSeen(acts.Seen, step)
acts.MapLock.Unlock()
// Print the resource outputs separately, unless this is a refresh in which case they are already printed.
if !acts.Opts.SkipOutputs {
acts.Opts.Events.resourceOutputsEvent(step, true /*planning*/, acts.Opts.Debug)
}
return nil
}
func assertSeen(seen map[resource.URN]deploy.Step, step deploy.Step) {
_, has := seen[step.URN()]
contract.Assertf(has, "URN '%v' had not been marked as seen", step.URN())
}