2018-03-21 20:43:21 +01:00
|
|
|
// Copyright 2016-2018, Pulumi Corporation. All rights reserved.
|
Begin resource modeling and planning
This change introduces a new package, pkg/resource, that will form
the foundation for actually performing deployment plans and applications.
It contains the following key abstractions:
* resource.Provider is a wrapper around the CRUD operations exposed by
underlying resource plugins. It will eventually defer to resource.Plugin,
which itself defers -- over an RPC interface -- to the actual plugin, one
per package exposing resources. The provider will also understand how to
load, cache, and overall manage the lifetime of each plugin.
* resource.Resource is the actual resource object. This is created from
the overall evaluation object graph, but is simplified. It contains only
serializable properties, for example. Inter-resource references are
translated into serializable monikers as part of creating the resource.
* resource.Moniker is a serializable string that uniquely identifies
a resource in the Mu system. This is in contrast to resource IDs, which
are generated by resource providers and generally opaque to the Mu
system. See marapongo/mu#69 for more information about monikers and some
of their challenges (namely, designing a stable algorithm).
* resource.Snapshot is a "snapshot" taken from a graph of resources. This
is a transitive closure of state representing one possible configuration
of a given environment. This is what plans are created from. Eventually,
two snapshots will be diffable, in order to perform incremental updates.
One way of thinking about this is that a snapshot of the old world's state
is advanced, one step at a time, until it reaches a desired snapshot of
the new world's state.
* resource.Plan is a plan for carrying out desired CRUD operations on a target
environment. Each plan consists of zero-to-many Steps, each of which has
a CRUD operation type, a resource target, and a next step. This is an
enumerator because it is possible the plan will evolve -- and introduce new
steps -- as it is carried out (hence, the Next() method). At the moment, this
is linearized; eventually, we want to make this more "graph-like" so that we
can exploit available parallelism within the dependencies.
There are tons of TODOs remaining. However, the `mu plan` command is functioning
with these new changes -- including colorization FTW -- so I'm landing it now.
This is part of marapongo/mu#38 and marapongo/mu#41.
2017-02-17 21:31:48 +01:00
|
|
|
|
Overhaul resources, planning, and environments
This change, part of pulumi/lumi#90, overhauls quite a bit of the
core resource, planning, environments, and related areas.
The biggest amount of movement comes from the splitting of pkg/resource
into multiple sub-packages. This results in:
- pkg/resource: just the core resource data structures.
- pkg/resource/deployment: all planning and deployment logic.
- pkg/resource/environment: all environment, configuration, and
serialized checkpoint structures and logic.
- pkg/resource/plugin: all dynamically loaded analyzer and
provider logic, including the actual loading and RPC mechanisms.
This also splits the resource abstraction up. We now have:
- resource.Resource: a shared interface.
- resource.Object: a resource that is connected to a live object
that will periodically observe mutations due to ongoing
evaluation of computations. Snapshots of its state may be
taken; however, this is purely a "pre-planning" abstraction.
- resource.State: a snapshot of a resource's state that is frozen.
In other words, it is no longer connected to a live object.
This is what will store provider outputs (ID and properties),
and is what may be serialized into a deployment record.
The branch is in a half-baked state as of this change; more changes
are to come...
2017-06-09 01:37:40 +02:00
|
|
|
package plugin
|
Begin resource modeling and planning
This change introduces a new package, pkg/resource, that will form
the foundation for actually performing deployment plans and applications.
It contains the following key abstractions:
* resource.Provider is a wrapper around the CRUD operations exposed by
underlying resource plugins. It will eventually defer to resource.Plugin,
which itself defers -- over an RPC interface -- to the actual plugin, one
per package exposing resources. The provider will also understand how to
load, cache, and overall manage the lifetime of each plugin.
* resource.Resource is the actual resource object. This is created from
the overall evaluation object graph, but is simplified. It contains only
serializable properties, for example. Inter-resource references are
translated into serializable monikers as part of creating the resource.
* resource.Moniker is a serializable string that uniquely identifies
a resource in the Mu system. This is in contrast to resource IDs, which
are generated by resource providers and generally opaque to the Mu
system. See marapongo/mu#69 for more information about monikers and some
of their challenges (namely, designing a stable algorithm).
* resource.Snapshot is a "snapshot" taken from a graph of resources. This
is a transitive closure of state representing one possible configuration
of a given environment. This is what plans are created from. Eventually,
two snapshots will be diffable, in order to perform incremental updates.
One way of thinking about this is that a snapshot of the old world's state
is advanced, one step at a time, until it reaches a desired snapshot of
the new world's state.
* resource.Plan is a plan for carrying out desired CRUD operations on a target
environment. Each plan consists of zero-to-many Steps, each of which has
a CRUD operation type, a resource target, and a next step. This is an
enumerator because it is possible the plan will evolve -- and introduce new
steps -- as it is carried out (hence, the Next() method). At the moment, this
is linearized; eventually, we want to make this more "graph-like" so that we
can exploit available parallelism within the dependencies.
There are tons of TODOs remaining. However, the `mu plan` command is functioning
with these new changes -- including colorization FTW -- so I'm landing it now.
This is part of marapongo/mu#38 and marapongo/mu#41.
2017-02-17 21:31:48 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2017-02-18 20:54:24 +01:00
|
|
|
import (
|
Implement resource provider plugins
This change adds basic support for discovering, loading, binding to,
and invoking RPC methods on, resource provider plugins.
In a nutshell, we add a new context object that will share cached
state such as loaded plugins and connections to them. It will be
a policy decision in server scenarios how much state to share and
between whom. This context also controls per-resource context
allocation, which in the future will allow us to perform structured
cancellation and teardown amongst entire groups of requests.
Plugins are loaded based on their name, and can be found in one of
two ways: either simply by having them on your path (with a name of
"mu-ressrv-<pkg>", where "<pkg>" is the resource package name with
any "/"s replaced with "_"s); or by placing them in the standard
library installation location, which need not be on the path for this
to work (since we know precisely where to look).
If we find a protocol, we will load it as a child process.
The protocol for plugins is that they will choose a port on their
own -- to eliminate races that'd be involved should Mu attempt to
pre-pick one for them -- and then write that out as the first line
to STDOUT (terminated by a "\n"). This is the only STDERR/STDOUT
that Mu cares about; from there, the plugin is free to write all it
pleases (e.g., for logging, debugging purposes, etc).
Afterwards, we then bind our gRPC connection to that port, and create
a typed resource provider client. The CRUD operations that get driven
by plan application are then simple wrappers atop the underlying gRPC
calls. For now, we interpret all errors as catastrophic; in the near
future, we will probably want to introduce a "structured error"
mechanism in the gRPC interface for "transactional errors"; that is,
errors for which the server was able to recover to a safe checkpoint,
which can be interpreted as ResourceOK rather than ResourceUnknown.
2017-02-19 20:08:06 +01:00
|
|
|
"io"
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-22 04:18:21 +02:00
|
|
|
"github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/resource"
|
2018-03-03 00:23:59 +01:00
|
|
|
"github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/resource/config"
|
2017-09-22 04:18:21 +02:00
|
|
|
"github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/tokens"
|
2018-02-06 18:57:32 +01:00
|
|
|
"github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/workspace"
|
2017-02-18 20:54:24 +01:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Begin resource modeling and planning
This change introduces a new package, pkg/resource, that will form
the foundation for actually performing deployment plans and applications.
It contains the following key abstractions:
* resource.Provider is a wrapper around the CRUD operations exposed by
underlying resource plugins. It will eventually defer to resource.Plugin,
which itself defers -- over an RPC interface -- to the actual plugin, one
per package exposing resources. The provider will also understand how to
load, cache, and overall manage the lifetime of each plugin.
* resource.Resource is the actual resource object. This is created from
the overall evaluation object graph, but is simplified. It contains only
serializable properties, for example. Inter-resource references are
translated into serializable monikers as part of creating the resource.
* resource.Moniker is a serializable string that uniquely identifies
a resource in the Mu system. This is in contrast to resource IDs, which
are generated by resource providers and generally opaque to the Mu
system. See marapongo/mu#69 for more information about monikers and some
of their challenges (namely, designing a stable algorithm).
* resource.Snapshot is a "snapshot" taken from a graph of resources. This
is a transitive closure of state representing one possible configuration
of a given environment. This is what plans are created from. Eventually,
two snapshots will be diffable, in order to perform incremental updates.
One way of thinking about this is that a snapshot of the old world's state
is advanced, one step at a time, until it reaches a desired snapshot of
the new world's state.
* resource.Plan is a plan for carrying out desired CRUD operations on a target
environment. Each plan consists of zero-to-many Steps, each of which has
a CRUD operation type, a resource target, and a next step. This is an
enumerator because it is possible the plan will evolve -- and introduce new
steps -- as it is carried out (hence, the Next() method). At the moment, this
is linearized; eventually, we want to make this more "graph-like" so that we
can exploit available parallelism within the dependencies.
There are tons of TODOs remaining. However, the `mu plan` command is functioning
with these new changes -- including colorization FTW -- so I'm landing it now.
This is part of marapongo/mu#38 and marapongo/mu#41.
2017-02-17 21:31:48 +01:00
|
|
|
// Provider presents a simple interface for orchestrating resource create, reead, update, and delete operations. Each
|
|
|
|
|
// provider understands how to handle all of the resource types within a single package.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// This interface hides some of the messiness of the underlying machinery, since providers are behind an RPC boundary.
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// It is important to note that provider operations are not transactional. (Some providers might decide to offer
|
|
|
|
|
// transactional semantics, but such a provider is a rare treat.) As a result, failures in the operations below can
|
|
|
|
|
// range from benign to catastrophic (possibly leaving behind a corrupt resource). It is up to the provider to make a
|
Tidy up more lint
This change fixes a few things:
* Most importantly, we need to place a leading "." in the paths
to Gometalinter, otherwise some sub-linters just silently skip
the directory altogether. errcheck is one such linter, which
is a very important one!
* Use an explicit Gometalinter.json file to configure the various
settings. This flips on a few additional linters that aren't
on by default (line line length checking). Sadly, a few that
I'd like to enable take waaaay too much time, so in the future
we may consider a nightly job (this includes code similarity,
unused parameters, unused functions, and others that generally
require global analysis).
* Now that we're running more, however, linting takes a while!
The core Lumi project now takes 26 seconds to lint on my laptop.
That's not terrible, but it's long enough that we don't want to
do the silly "run them twice" thing our Makefiles were previously
doing. Instead, we shall deploy some $$($${PIPESTATUS[1]}-1))-fu
to rely on the fact that grep returns 1 on "zero lines".
* Finally, fix the many issues that this turned up.
I think(?) we are done, except, of course, for needing to drive
down some of the cyclomatic complexity issues (which I'm possibly
going to punt on; see pulumi/lumi#259 for more details).
2017-06-22 21:09:46 +02:00
|
|
|
// best effort to ensure catastrophes do not occur. The errors returned from mutating operations indicate both the
|
Begin resource modeling and planning
This change introduces a new package, pkg/resource, that will form
the foundation for actually performing deployment plans and applications.
It contains the following key abstractions:
* resource.Provider is a wrapper around the CRUD operations exposed by
underlying resource plugins. It will eventually defer to resource.Plugin,
which itself defers -- over an RPC interface -- to the actual plugin, one
per package exposing resources. The provider will also understand how to
load, cache, and overall manage the lifetime of each plugin.
* resource.Resource is the actual resource object. This is created from
the overall evaluation object graph, but is simplified. It contains only
serializable properties, for example. Inter-resource references are
translated into serializable monikers as part of creating the resource.
* resource.Moniker is a serializable string that uniquely identifies
a resource in the Mu system. This is in contrast to resource IDs, which
are generated by resource providers and generally opaque to the Mu
system. See marapongo/mu#69 for more information about monikers and some
of their challenges (namely, designing a stable algorithm).
* resource.Snapshot is a "snapshot" taken from a graph of resources. This
is a transitive closure of state representing one possible configuration
of a given environment. This is what plans are created from. Eventually,
two snapshots will be diffable, in order to perform incremental updates.
One way of thinking about this is that a snapshot of the old world's state
is advanced, one step at a time, until it reaches a desired snapshot of
the new world's state.
* resource.Plan is a plan for carrying out desired CRUD operations on a target
environment. Each plan consists of zero-to-many Steps, each of which has
a CRUD operation type, a resource target, and a next step. This is an
enumerator because it is possible the plan will evolve -- and introduce new
steps -- as it is carried out (hence, the Next() method). At the moment, this
is linearized; eventually, we want to make this more "graph-like" so that we
can exploit available parallelism within the dependencies.
There are tons of TODOs remaining. However, the `mu plan` command is functioning
with these new changes -- including colorization FTW -- so I'm landing it now.
This is part of marapongo/mu#38 and marapongo/mu#41.
2017-02-17 21:31:48 +01:00
|
|
|
// underlying error condition in addition to a bit indicating whether the operation was successfully rolled back.
|
|
|
|
|
type Provider interface {
|
Implement resource provider plugins
This change adds basic support for discovering, loading, binding to,
and invoking RPC methods on, resource provider plugins.
In a nutshell, we add a new context object that will share cached
state such as loaded plugins and connections to them. It will be
a policy decision in server scenarios how much state to share and
between whom. This context also controls per-resource context
allocation, which in the future will allow us to perform structured
cancellation and teardown amongst entire groups of requests.
Plugins are loaded based on their name, and can be found in one of
two ways: either simply by having them on your path (with a name of
"mu-ressrv-<pkg>", where "<pkg>" is the resource package name with
any "/"s replaced with "_"s); or by placing them in the standard
library installation location, which need not be on the path for this
to work (since we know precisely where to look).
If we find a protocol, we will load it as a child process.
The protocol for plugins is that they will choose a port on their
own -- to eliminate races that'd be involved should Mu attempt to
pre-pick one for them -- and then write that out as the first line
to STDOUT (terminated by a "\n"). This is the only STDERR/STDOUT
that Mu cares about; from there, the plugin is free to write all it
pleases (e.g., for logging, debugging purposes, etc).
Afterwards, we then bind our gRPC connection to that port, and create
a typed resource provider client. The CRUD operations that get driven
by plan application are then simple wrappers atop the underlying gRPC
calls. For now, we interpret all errors as catastrophic; in the near
future, we will probably want to introduce a "structured error"
mechanism in the gRPC interface for "transactional errors"; that is,
errors for which the server was able to recover to a safe checkpoint,
which can be interpreted as ResourceOK rather than ResourceUnknown.
2017-02-19 20:08:06 +01:00
|
|
|
// Closer closes any underlying OS resources associated with this provider (like processes, RPC channels, etc).
|
|
|
|
|
io.Closer
|
Add basic analyzer support
This change introduces the basic requirements for analyzers, as per
pulumi/coconut#119. In particular, an analyzer can implement either,
or both, of the RPC methods, Analyze and AnalyzeResource. The former
is meant to check an overall deployment (e.g., to ensure it has been
signed off on) and the latter is to check individual resources (e.g.,
to ensure properties of them are correct, such as checking style,
security, etc. rules). These run simultaneous to overall checking.
Analyzers are loaded as plugins just like providers are. The difference
is mainly in their naming ("analyzer-" prefix, rather than "resource-"),
and the RPC methods that they support.
This isn't 100% functional since we need a way to specify at the CLI
that a particular analyzer should be run, in addition to a way of
recording which analyzers certain projects should use in their manifests.
2017-03-11 08:49:17 +01:00
|
|
|
// Pkg fetches this provider's package.
|
|
|
|
|
Pkg() tokens.Package
|
2017-08-31 23:31:33 +02:00
|
|
|
// Configure configures the resource provider with "globals" that control its behavior.
|
2018-03-03 00:23:59 +01:00
|
|
|
Configure(vars map[config.Key]string) error
|
2017-12-03 01:34:16 +01:00
|
|
|
// Check validates that the given property bag is valid for a resource of the given type and returns the inputs
|
|
|
|
|
// that should be passed to successive calls to Diff, Create, or Update for this resource.
|
2018-01-10 03:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
Check(urn resource.URN, olds, news resource.PropertyMap,
|
|
|
|
|
allowUnknowns bool) (resource.PropertyMap, []CheckFailure, error)
|
2017-08-01 03:26:15 +02:00
|
|
|
// Diff checks what impacts a hypothetical update will have on the resource's properties.
|
2018-01-10 03:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
Diff(urn resource.URN, id resource.ID, olds resource.PropertyMap, news resource.PropertyMap,
|
|
|
|
|
allowUnknowns bool) (DiffResult, error)
|
Overhaul resources, planning, and environments
This change, part of pulumi/lumi#90, overhauls quite a bit of the
core resource, planning, environments, and related areas.
The biggest amount of movement comes from the splitting of pkg/resource
into multiple sub-packages. This results in:
- pkg/resource: just the core resource data structures.
- pkg/resource/deployment: all planning and deployment logic.
- pkg/resource/environment: all environment, configuration, and
serialized checkpoint structures and logic.
- pkg/resource/plugin: all dynamically loaded analyzer and
provider logic, including the actual loading and RPC mechanisms.
This also splits the resource abstraction up. We now have:
- resource.Resource: a shared interface.
- resource.Object: a resource that is connected to a live object
that will periodically observe mutations due to ongoing
evaluation of computations. Snapshots of its state may be
taken; however, this is purely a "pre-planning" abstraction.
- resource.State: a snapshot of a resource's state that is frozen.
In other words, it is no longer connected to a live object.
This is what will store provider outputs (ID and properties),
and is what may be serialized into a deployment record.
The branch is in a half-baked state as of this change; more changes
are to come...
2017-06-09 01:37:40 +02:00
|
|
|
// Create allocates a new instance of the provided resource and returns its unique resource.ID.
|
2017-12-03 01:34:16 +01:00
|
|
|
Create(urn resource.URN, news resource.PropertyMap) (resource.ID, resource.PropertyMap, resource.Status, error)
|
2018-04-05 16:00:16 +02:00
|
|
|
// read the current live state associated with a resource. enough state must be include in the inputs to uniquely
|
|
|
|
|
// identify the resource; this is typically just the resource id, but may also include some properties.
|
|
|
|
|
Read(urn resource.URN, id resource.ID, props resource.PropertyMap) (resource.PropertyMap, error)
|
2017-03-02 18:52:08 +01:00
|
|
|
// Update updates an existing resource with new values.
|
2017-08-31 22:10:55 +02:00
|
|
|
Update(urn resource.URN, id resource.ID,
|
2017-07-18 03:44:45 +02:00
|
|
|
olds resource.PropertyMap, news resource.PropertyMap) (resource.PropertyMap, resource.Status, error)
|
Implement resource provider plugins
This change adds basic support for discovering, loading, binding to,
and invoking RPC methods on, resource provider plugins.
In a nutshell, we add a new context object that will share cached
state such as loaded plugins and connections to them. It will be
a policy decision in server scenarios how much state to share and
between whom. This context also controls per-resource context
allocation, which in the future will allow us to perform structured
cancellation and teardown amongst entire groups of requests.
Plugins are loaded based on their name, and can be found in one of
two ways: either simply by having them on your path (with a name of
"mu-ressrv-<pkg>", where "<pkg>" is the resource package name with
any "/"s replaced with "_"s); or by placing them in the standard
library installation location, which need not be on the path for this
to work (since we know precisely where to look).
If we find a protocol, we will load it as a child process.
The protocol for plugins is that they will choose a port on their
own -- to eliminate races that'd be involved should Mu attempt to
pre-pick one for them -- and then write that out as the first line
to STDOUT (terminated by a "\n"). This is the only STDERR/STDOUT
that Mu cares about; from there, the plugin is free to write all it
pleases (e.g., for logging, debugging purposes, etc).
Afterwards, we then bind our gRPC connection to that port, and create
a typed resource provider client. The CRUD operations that get driven
by plan application are then simple wrappers atop the underlying gRPC
calls. For now, we interpret all errors as catastrophic; in the near
future, we will probably want to introduce a "structured error"
mechanism in the gRPC interface for "transactional errors"; that is,
errors for which the server was able to recover to a safe checkpoint,
which can be interpreted as ResourceOK rather than ResourceUnknown.
2017-02-19 20:08:06 +01:00
|
|
|
// Delete tears down an existing resource.
|
2017-08-31 22:10:55 +02:00
|
|
|
Delete(urn resource.URN, id resource.ID, props resource.PropertyMap) (resource.Status, error)
|
2017-09-20 02:23:10 +02:00
|
|
|
// Invoke dynamically executes a built-in function in the provider.
|
|
|
|
|
Invoke(tok tokens.ModuleMember, args resource.PropertyMap) (resource.PropertyMap, []CheckFailure, error)
|
2017-12-01 22:50:32 +01:00
|
|
|
// GetPluginInfo returns this plugin's information.
|
2018-02-06 18:57:32 +01:00
|
|
|
GetPluginInfo() (workspace.PluginInfo, error)
|
Begin resource modeling and planning
This change introduces a new package, pkg/resource, that will form
the foundation for actually performing deployment plans and applications.
It contains the following key abstractions:
* resource.Provider is a wrapper around the CRUD operations exposed by
underlying resource plugins. It will eventually defer to resource.Plugin,
which itself defers -- over an RPC interface -- to the actual plugin, one
per package exposing resources. The provider will also understand how to
load, cache, and overall manage the lifetime of each plugin.
* resource.Resource is the actual resource object. This is created from
the overall evaluation object graph, but is simplified. It contains only
serializable properties, for example. Inter-resource references are
translated into serializable monikers as part of creating the resource.
* resource.Moniker is a serializable string that uniquely identifies
a resource in the Mu system. This is in contrast to resource IDs, which
are generated by resource providers and generally opaque to the Mu
system. See marapongo/mu#69 for more information about monikers and some
of their challenges (namely, designing a stable algorithm).
* resource.Snapshot is a "snapshot" taken from a graph of resources. This
is a transitive closure of state representing one possible configuration
of a given environment. This is what plans are created from. Eventually,
two snapshots will be diffable, in order to perform incremental updates.
One way of thinking about this is that a snapshot of the old world's state
is advanced, one step at a time, until it reaches a desired snapshot of
the new world's state.
* resource.Plan is a plan for carrying out desired CRUD operations on a target
environment. Each plan consists of zero-to-many Steps, each of which has
a CRUD operation type, a resource target, and a next step. This is an
enumerator because it is possible the plan will evolve -- and introduce new
steps -- as it is carried out (hence, the Next() method). At the moment, this
is linearized; eventually, we want to make this more "graph-like" so that we
can exploit available parallelism within the dependencies.
There are tons of TODOs remaining. However, the `mu plan` command is functioning
with these new changes -- including colorization FTW -- so I'm landing it now.
This is part of marapongo/mu#38 and marapongo/mu#41.
2017-02-17 21:31:48 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
2017-03-03 03:15:38 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// CheckFailure indicates that a call to check failed; it contains the property and reason for the failure.
|
|
|
|
|
type CheckFailure struct {
|
Overhaul resources, planning, and environments
This change, part of pulumi/lumi#90, overhauls quite a bit of the
core resource, planning, environments, and related areas.
The biggest amount of movement comes from the splitting of pkg/resource
into multiple sub-packages. This results in:
- pkg/resource: just the core resource data structures.
- pkg/resource/deployment: all planning and deployment logic.
- pkg/resource/environment: all environment, configuration, and
serialized checkpoint structures and logic.
- pkg/resource/plugin: all dynamically loaded analyzer and
provider logic, including the actual loading and RPC mechanisms.
This also splits the resource abstraction up. We now have:
- resource.Resource: a shared interface.
- resource.Object: a resource that is connected to a live object
that will periodically observe mutations due to ongoing
evaluation of computations. Snapshots of its state may be
taken; however, this is purely a "pre-planning" abstraction.
- resource.State: a snapshot of a resource's state that is frozen.
In other words, it is no longer connected to a live object.
This is what will store provider outputs (ID and properties),
and is what may be serialized into a deployment record.
The branch is in a half-baked state as of this change; more changes
are to come...
2017-06-09 01:37:40 +02:00
|
|
|
Property resource.PropertyKey // the property that failed checking.
|
|
|
|
|
Reason string // the reason the property failed to check.
|
2017-03-03 03:15:38 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
2017-08-01 03:26:15 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2018-04-05 16:00:16 +02:00
|
|
|
// DiffChanges represents the kind of changes detected by a diff operation.
|
|
|
|
|
type DiffChanges int
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const (
|
|
|
|
|
// DiffUnknown indicates the provider didn't offer information about the changes (legacy behavior).
|
|
|
|
|
DiffUnknown DiffChanges = 0
|
|
|
|
|
// DiffNone indicates the provider performed a diff and concluded that no update is needed.
|
|
|
|
|
DiffNone DiffChanges = 1
|
|
|
|
|
// DiffSome indicates the provider performed a diff and concluded that an update or replacement is needed.
|
|
|
|
|
DiffSome DiffChanges = 2
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-01 03:26:15 +02:00
|
|
|
// DiffResult indicates whether an operation should replace or update an existing resource.
|
|
|
|
|
type DiffResult struct {
|
2018-04-05 16:00:16 +02:00
|
|
|
Changes DiffChanges // true if this diff represents a changed resource.
|
2017-12-10 17:37:22 +01:00
|
|
|
ReplaceKeys []resource.PropertyKey // an optional list of replacement keys.
|
|
|
|
|
StableKeys []resource.PropertyKey // an optional list of property keys that are stable.
|
|
|
|
|
DeleteBeforeReplace bool // if true, this resource must be deleted before recreating it.
|
2017-08-01 03:26:15 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Replace returns true if this diff represents a replacement.
|
|
|
|
|
func (r DiffResult) Replace() bool {
|
|
|
|
|
return len(r.ReplaceKeys) > 0
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
