pulumi/cmd/preview.go

100 lines
3.3 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

2017-06-26 23:46:34 +02:00
// Copyright 2016-2017, Pulumi Corporation. All rights reserved.
package cmd
import (
"github.com/spf13/cobra"
"github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/backend"
"github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/engine"
Improve the overall cloud CLI experience This improves the overall cloud CLI experience workflow. Now whether a stack is local or cloud is inherent to the stack itself. If you interact with a cloud stack, we transparently talk to the cloud; if you interact with a local stack, we just do the right thing, and perform all operations locally. Aside from sometimes seeing a cloud emoji pop-up ☁️, the experience is quite similar. For example, to initialize a new cloud stack, simply: $ pulumi login Logging into Pulumi Cloud: https://pulumi.com/ Enter Pulumi access token: <enter your token> $ pulumi stack init my-cloud-stack Note that you may log into a specific cloud if you'd like. For now, this is just for our own testing purposes, but someday when we support custom clouds (e.g., Enterprise), you can just say: $ pulumi login --cloud-url https://corp.acme.my-ppc.net:9873 The cloud is now the default. If you instead prefer a "fire and forget" style of stack, you can skip the login and pass `--local`: $ pulumi stack init my-faf-stack --local If you are logged in and run `pulumi`, we tell you as much: $ pulumi Usage: pulumi [command] // as before... Currently logged into the Pulumi Cloud ☁️ https://pulumi.com/ And if you list your stacks, we tell you which one is local or not: $ pulumi stack ls NAME LAST UPDATE RESOURCE COUNT CLOUD URL my-cloud-stack 2017-12-01 ... 3 https://pulumi.com/ my-faf-stack n/a 0 n/a And `pulumi stack` by itself prints information like your cloud org, PPC name, and so on, in addition to the usuals. I shall write up more details and make sure to document these changes. This change also fairly significantly refactors the layout of cloud versus local logic, so that the cmd/ package is resonsible for CLI things, and the new pkg/backend/ package is responsible for the backends. The following is the overall resulting package architecture: * The backend.Backend interface can be implemented to substitute a new backend. This has operations to get and list stacks, perform updates, and so on. * The backend.Stack struct is a wrapper around a stack that has or is being manipulated by a Backend. It resembles our existing Stack notions in the engine, but carries additional metadata about its source. Notably, it offers functions that allow operations like updating and deleting on the Backend from which it came. * There is very little else in the pkg/backend/ package. * A new package, pkg/backend/local/, encapsulates all local state management for "fire and forget" scenarios. It simply implements the above logic and contains anything specific to the local experience. * A peer package, pkg/backend/cloud/, encapsulates all logic required for the cloud experience. This includes its subpackage apitype/ which contains JSON schema descriptions required for REST calls against the cloud backend. It also contains handy functions to list which clouds we have authenticated with. * A subpackage here, pkg/backend/state/, is not a provider at all. Instead, it contains all of the state management functions that are currently shared between local and cloud backends. This includes configuration logic -- including encryption -- as well as logic pertaining to which stacks are known to the workspace. This addresses pulumi/pulumi#629 and pulumi/pulumi#494.
2017-12-02 16:29:46 +01:00
"github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/tokens"
"github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pkg/util/cmdutil"
)
func newPreviewCmd() *cobra.Command {
var debug bool
var stack string
// Flags for engine.UpdateOptions.
var analyzers []string
var color colorFlag
var parallel int
var showConfig bool
var showReplacementSteps bool
var showSames bool
var summary bool
var cmd = &cobra.Command{
Use: "preview",
Aliases: []string{"pre"},
SuggestFor: []string{"build", "plan"},
Short: "Show a preview of updates to an stack's resources",
Long: "Show a preview of updates an stack's resources\n" +
"\n" +
"This command displays a preview of the updates to an existing stack whose state is\n" +
"represented by an existing snapshot file. The new desired state is computed by running\n" +
"a Pulumi program, and extracting all resource allocations from its resulting object graph.\n" +
"These allocations are then compared against the existing state to determine what\n" +
"operations must take place to achieve the desired state. No changes to the stack will\n" +
"actually take place.\n" +
"\n" +
"The program to run is loaded from the project in the current directory. Use the `-C` or\n" +
"`--cwd` flag to use a different directory.",
Args: cmdutil.NoArgs,
Run: cmdutil.RunFunc(func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) error {
Make some stack-related CLI improvements (#947) This change includes a handful of stack-related CLI formatting improvements that I've been noodling on in the background for a while, based on things that tend to trip up demos and the inner loop workflow. This includes: * If `pulumi stack select` is run by itself, use an interactive CLI menu to let the user select an existing stack, or choose to create a new one. This looks as follows $ pulumi stack select Please choose a stack, or choose to create a new one: abcdef babblabblabble > currentlyselected defcon <create a new stack> and is navigated in the usual way (key up, down, enter). * If a stack name is passed that does not exist, prompt the user to ask whether s/he wants to create one on-demand. This hooks interesting moments in time, like `pulumi stack select foo`, and cuts down on the need to run additional commands. * If a current stack is required, but none is currently selected, then pop the same interactive menu shown above to select one. Depending on the command being run, we may or may not show the option to create a new stack (e.g., that doesn't make much sense when you're running `pulumi destroy`, but might when you're running `pulumi stack`). This again lets you do with a single command what would have otherwise entailed an error with multiple commands to recover from it. * If you run `pulumi stack init` without any additional arguments, we interactively prompt for the stack name. Before, we would error and you'd then need to run `pulumi stack init <name>`. * Colorize some things nicely; for example, now all prompts will by default become bright white.
2018-02-17 00:03:54 +01:00
proj, root, err := readProject()
if err != nil {
return err
}
Make some stack-related CLI improvements (#947) This change includes a handful of stack-related CLI formatting improvements that I've been noodling on in the background for a while, based on things that tend to trip up demos and the inner loop workflow. This includes: * If `pulumi stack select` is run by itself, use an interactive CLI menu to let the user select an existing stack, or choose to create a new one. This looks as follows $ pulumi stack select Please choose a stack, or choose to create a new one: abcdef babblabblabble > currentlyselected defcon <create a new stack> and is navigated in the usual way (key up, down, enter). * If a stack name is passed that does not exist, prompt the user to ask whether s/he wants to create one on-demand. This hooks interesting moments in time, like `pulumi stack select foo`, and cuts down on the need to run additional commands. * If a current stack is required, but none is currently selected, then pop the same interactive menu shown above to select one. Depending on the command being run, we may or may not show the option to create a new stack (e.g., that doesn't make much sense when you're running `pulumi destroy`, but might when you're running `pulumi stack`). This again lets you do with a single command what would have otherwise entailed an error with multiple commands to recover from it. * If you run `pulumi stack init` without any additional arguments, we interactively prompt for the stack name. Before, we would error and you'd then need to run `pulumi stack init <name>`. * Colorize some things nicely; for example, now all prompts will by default become bright white.
2018-02-17 00:03:54 +01:00
s, err := requireStack(tokens.QName(stack), true)
if err != nil {
return err
}
return s.Preview(proj, root, debug, engine.UpdateOptions{
Analyzers: analyzers,
DryRun: true,
Parallel: parallel,
ShowConfig: showConfig,
ShowReplacementSteps: showReplacementSteps,
ShowSames: showSames,
Summary: summary,
}, backend.DisplayOptions{
Color: color.Colorization(),
})
}),
}
cmd.PersistentFlags().BoolVarP(
&debug, "debug", "d", false,
"Print detailed debugging output during resource operations")
cmd.PersistentFlags().StringVarP(
&stack, "stack", "s", "",
"Choose an stack other than the currently selected one")
// Flags for engine.UpdateOptions.
cmd.PersistentFlags().VarP(
&color, "color", "c", "Colorize output. Choices are: always, never, raw, auto")
cmd.PersistentFlags().StringSliceVar(
&analyzers, "analyzer", []string{},
"Run one or more analyzers as part of this update")
cmd.PersistentFlags().IntVarP(
&parallel, "parallel", "p", 0,
"Allow P resource operations to run in parallel at once (<=1 for no parallelism)")
cmd.PersistentFlags().BoolVar(
&showConfig, "show-config", false,
"Show configuration keys and variables")
Implement `get` functions on all resources This change implements the `get` function for resources. Per pulumi/lumi#83, this allows Lumi scripts to actually read from the target environment. For example, we can now look up a SecurityGroup from its ARN: let group = aws.ec2.SecurityGroup.get( "arn:aws:ec2:us-west-2:153052954103:security-group:sg-02150d79"); The returned object is a fully functional resource object. So, we can then link it up with an EC2 instance, for example, in the usual ways: let instance = new aws.ec2.Instance(..., { securityGroups: [ group ], }); This didn't require any changes to the RPC or provider model, since we already implement the Get function. There are a few loose ends; two are short term: 1) URNs are not rehydrated. 2) Query is not yet implemented. One is mid-term: 3) We probably want a URN-based lookup function. But we will likely wait until we tackle pulumi/lumi#109 before adding this. And one is long term (and subtle): 4) These amount to I/O and are not repeatable! A change in the target environment may cause a script to generate a different plan intermittently. Most likely we want to apply a different kind of deployment "policy" for such scripts. These are inching towards the scripting model of pulumi/lumi#121, which is an entirely different beast than the repeatable immutable infrastructure deployments. Finally, it is worth noting that with this, we have some of the fundamental underpinnings required to finally tackle "inference" (pulumi/lumi#142).
2017-06-20 02:24:00 +02:00
cmd.PersistentFlags().BoolVar(
&showReplacementSteps, "show-replacement-steps", false,
"Show detailed resource replacement creates and deletes instead of a single step")
cmd.PersistentFlags().BoolVar(
&showSames, "show-sames", false,
"Show resources that needn't be updated because they haven't changed, alongside those that do")
cmd.PersistentFlags().BoolVar(
&summary, "summary", false,
"Only display summarization of resources and operations")
return cmd
}