- [sdk/nodejs] - Allow returning failures from Call in the provider without setting result outputs.
- [sdk/go] - Allow specifying Call failures from the provider.
- Add tests that return failures from Call.
* Implement the --exclude-protected feature
This piggybacks on the same machinery used by the --target flag. By
examining the stack, we find a list of all resources managed by
Pulumi (in that stack). We then form them into a DAG, and mark all
resources as either protected or unprotected.
A resource is protected it has the `Protect` flag set or is has a child
with the `protect` flag set. It is unprotected otherwise.
We then pass the urns of unprotected resources to the update options
passed to the destroy operation in the same way that `--target` does.
* Update changelog
* Handle providers correctly
* Add integration test
* Protect dependencies of protected resources
* Handle --exclude-protected in separate function
* Simplify implementation via DependencyGraph
* Add TransitiveDependenciesOf
* Cleanup unused functions
* Gate printed message behind !jsonDisplay
* Ensure provider is not `""`
* Clean up documentation (and some code)
* Fix issue with --target deletion dependant calculation
The code that computed --target deletion dependants was not correct.
It used parent/child component relationships, but did not respect actual
DAG dependencies. As a result, it could erroneously leave hanging
references to resources that no longer exist after performing a
`pulumi destroy --target X` operation. This manifested in bugs like
https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/issues/6283, which is fixed by this
change. The solution is to compute the (transitive!) dependency graph
correctly, factoring in both parent/child, as well as explicit and
implicit, dependencies. The existing logic does the correct thing once
we do this. I've also added tests for this area, including regression
tests that cover transitive dependency relationships, as well as ones
that would cause an infinite loop given a naive implementation.
* Add a changelog entry
* Fix failing test to include all destroyed targets
Unless I'm missing something, the entire tree should be deleted
in this test case because A is the ancestor for the entire tree.
* Use DependencyGraph to compute dependents
Per code review feedback from @pgavlin.
Co-authored-by: Anton Tayanovskyy <anton@pulumi.com>
Fixes two bugs in how padding was calculated in PrintTable.
Firstly we remove all ANSI escape codes from the string before measuring
how wide it is. Secondly we measure glyph count (using rivo/uniseg) not
byte or rune count of the string.
Together these fix the padding/alignment issues I saw when using
PrintTable with plan output. They also slightly change the layout of
"pulumi stack", for example the below is printed with current master and
has 6 characters of space for padding between SecurityGroup and
web-secgrp:
```
Current stack resources (4):
TYPE NAME
pulumi:pulumi:Stack aws-cs-webserver-test
├─ aws:ec2/securityGroup:SecurityGroup web-secgrp
├─ aws:ec2/instance:Instance web-server-www
└─ pulumi:providers:aws default_4_25_0
```
While printed with this commit you only get 2 characters of space for
padding (which is correct, the column gap is set to " "):
```
Current stack resources (4):
TYPE NAME
pulumi:pulumi:Stack aws-cs-webserver-test
├─ aws:ec2/securityGroup:SecurityGroup web-secgrp
├─ aws:ec2/instance:Instance web-server-www
└─ pulumi:providers:aws default_4_25_0
```
Picked these duplicates up when running gopls across the whole repo.
Module names should reflect the folder path they are in, but these two
looked like copy-paste bugs.
The Pulumi Package metaschema is a JSON schema definition that describes
the format of a Pulumi Package schema. The metaschema can be used to
validate certain basic properties of a Pulumi Package schema, including
(but not limited to):
- data types (e.g. is this property a string?)
- data formats (e.g. is this string property a valid regex?)
- object shapes (e.g. is this object missing required properties?)
The schema binder has been updated to use the metaschema as its first
validation pass.
In addition to its use in the binder, the metaschema has its own page in
the developer documentation. This page is generated using a small tool,
jsonschema2md.go.
This change expands the definition of `resource.Output` in the Go SDK with additional information about the output, i.e. dependencies and secretness, and adds support in the core Go RPC code for (un)marshaling output values.
Output values are marshaled as special objects ala archives, assets, and resource refs and are unmarshaled as `resource.Output` values.
Subsequent PRs will add:
- A monitor feature for output values, which will initially be disabled by default but available to turn on via an envvar
- Support for (un)marshaling output values in each language SDKs
- A way for providers to indicate support for receiving output values
- E2E tests
- Turn the monitor feature on by default (w/ env var to disable) (Note: the current plan is to initially scope this to only be used when marshaling inputs to a multi-language component)
This reverts commit ebb0e6aaed.
The changes in #7755 introduced a regression tracked in #7795. It is not yet clear how to retain the desired behaviour introduced in #7755 while avoiding this regression, so for now we will revert those changes, and re-open #7453 to track a deeper fix. That fix may require making changes to upstream `dill` to properly support these serialization requirements.
Fixes#7795.
