There are a few operations we do (stack rename, importing and edits)
where we will materialize a `deploy.Snapshot` from an existing
deployment, mutate it in somewhay, and then store it.
In these cases, we will just re-use the secrets manager that was used
to build the snapshot when we re-serialize it. This is less than ideal
in some cases, because many of these operations could run on an
"encrypted" copy of the Snapshot, where Inputs and Outputs have not
been decrypted.
Unfortunately, our system now is not set up in a great way to support
this and adding something like a `deploy.EncryptedSnapshot` would
require large scale code duplications.
So, for now, we'll take the hit of decrypting and re-encrypting, but
long term introducing a `deploy.EncryptedSnapshot` may be nice as it
would let us elide the encryption/decryption steps in some places and
would also make it clear what parts of our system have access to the
plaintext values of secrets.
When constructing a Deployment (which is a plaintext representation of
a Snapshot), ensure that we encrypt secret values. To do so, we
introduce a new type `secrets.Manager` which is able to encrypt and
decrypt values. In addition, it is able to reflect information about
itself that can be stored in the deployment such that we can
deserialize the deployment into a snapshot (decrypting the values in
the process) without external knowledge about how it was encrypted.
The ability to do this is import for allowing stack references to
work, since two stacks may not use the same manager (or they will use
the same type of manager, but have different state).
The state value is stored in plaintext in the deployment, so it **must
not** contain sensitive data.
A sample manager, which just base64 encodes and decodes strings is
provided, as it useful for testing. We will allow it to be varried
soon.
This change implements the same preview behavior we have for
cloud stacks, in pkg/backend/httpbe, for local stacks, in
pkg/backend/filebe. This mostly required just refactoring bits
and pieces so that we can share more of the code, although it
does still entail quite a bit of redundancy. In particular, the
apply functions for both backends are now so close to being
unified, but still require enough custom logic that it warrants
keeping them separate (for now...)
This simply refactors all the display logic out of the
pkg/backend/filestate package. This helps to gear us up to better unify
this logic between the filestate and httpstate backends.
Furthermore, this really ought to be in its own non-backend,
CLI-specific package, but I'm taking one step at a time here.
* Add a list of in-flight operations to the deployment
This commit augments 'DeploymentV2' with a list of operations that are
currently in flight. This information is used by the engine to keep
track of whether or not a particular deployment is in a valid state.
The SnapshotManager is responsible for inserting and removing operations
from the in-flight operation list. When the engine registers an intent
to perform an operation, SnapshotManager inserts an Operation into this
list and saves it to the snapshot. When an operation completes, the
SnapshotManager removes it from the snapshot. From this, the engine can
infer that if it ever sees a deployment with pending operations, the
Pulumi CLI must have crashed or otherwise abnormally terminated before
seeing whether or not an operation completed successfully.
To remedy this state, this commit also adds code to 'pulumi stack
import' that clears all pending operations from a deployment, as well as
code to plan generation that will reject any deployments that have
pending operations present.
At the CLI level, if we see that we are in a state where pending
operations were in-flight when the engine died, we'll issue a
human-friendly error message that indicates which resources are in a bad
state and how to recover their stack.
* CR: Multi-line string literals, renaming in-flight -> pending
* CR: Add enum to apitype for operation type, also name status -> type for clarity
* Fix the yaml type
* Fix missed renames
* Add implementation for lifecycle_test.go
* Rebase against master
* Initial support for passing URLs to `new` and `up`
This PR adds initial support for `pulumi new` using Git under the covers
to manage Pulumi templates, providing the same experience as before.
You can now also optionally pass a URL to a Git repository, e.g.
`pulumi new [<url>]`, including subdirectories within the repository,
and arbitrary branches, tags, or commits.
The following commands result in the same behavior from the user's
perspective:
- `pulumi new javascript`
- `pulumi new https://github.com/pulumi/templates/templates/javascript`
- `pulumi new https://github.com/pulumi/templates/tree/master/templates/javascript`
- `pulumi new https://github.com/pulumi/templates/tree/HEAD/templates/javascript`
To specify an arbitrary branch, tag, or commit:
- `pulumi new https://github.com/pulumi/templates/tree/<branch>/templates/javascript`
- `pulumi new https://github.com/pulumi/templates/tree/<tag>/templates/javascript`
- `pulumi new https://github.com/pulumi/templates/tree/<commit>/templates/javascript`
Branches and tags can include '/' separators, and `pulumi` will still
find the right subdirectory.
URLs to Gists are also supported, e.g.:
`pulumi new https://gist.github.com/justinvp/6673959ceb9d2ac5a14c6d536cb871a6`
If the specified subdirectory in the repository does not contain a
`Pulumi.yaml`, it will look for subdirectories within containing
`Pulumi.yaml` files, and prompt the user to choose a template, along the
lines of how `pulumi new` behaves when no template is specified.
The following commands result in the CLI prompting to choose a template:
- `pulumi new`
- `pulumi new https://github.com/pulumi/templates/templates`
- `pulumi new https://github.com/pulumi/templates/tree/master/templates`
- `pulumi new https://github.com/pulumi/templates/tree/HEAD/templates`
Of course, arbitrary branches, tags, or commits can be specified as well:
- `pulumi new https://github.com/pulumi/templates/tree/<branch>/templates`
- `pulumi new https://github.com/pulumi/templates/tree/<tag>/templates`
- `pulumi new https://github.com/pulumi/templates/tree/<commit>/templates`
This PR also includes initial support for passing URLs to `pulumi up`,
providing a streamlined way to deploy installable cloud applications
with Pulumi, without having to manage source code locally before doing
a deployment.
For example, `pulumi up https://github.com/justinvp/aws` can be used to
deploy a sample AWS app. The stack can be updated with different
versions, e.g.
`pulumi up https://github.com/justinvp/aws/tree/v2 -s <stack-to-update>`
Config values can optionally be passed via command line flags, e.g.
`pulumi up https://github.com/justinvp/aws -c aws:region=us-west-2 -c foo:bar=blah`
Gists can also be used, e.g.
`pulumi up https://gist.github.com/justinvp/62fde0463f243fcb49f5a7222e51bc76`
* Fix panic when hitting ^C from "choose template" prompt
* Add description to templates
When running `pulumi new` without specifying a template, include the template description along with the name in the "choose template" display.
```
$ pulumi new
Please choose a template:
aws-go A minimal AWS Go program
aws-javascript A minimal AWS JavaScript program
aws-python A minimal AWS Python program
aws-typescript A minimal AWS TypeScript program
> go A minimal Go program
hello-aws-javascript A simple AWS serverless JavaScript program
javascript A minimal JavaScript program
python A minimal Python program
typescript A minimal TypeScript program
```
* React to changes to the pulumi/templates repo.
We restructured the `pulumi/templates` repo to have all the templates in the root instead of in a `templates` subdirectory, so make the change here to no longer look for templates in `templates`.
This also fixes an issue around using `Depth: 1` that I found while testing this. When a named template is used, we attempt to clone or pull from the `pulumi/templates` repo to `~/.pulumi/templates`. Having it go in this well-known directory allows us to maintain previous behavior around allowing offline use of templates. If we use `Depth: 1` for the initial clone, it will fail when attempting to pull when there are updates to the remote repository. Unfortunately, there's no built-in `--unshallow` support in `go-git` and setting a larger `Depth` doesn't appear to help. There may be a workaround, but for now, if we're cloning the pulumi templates directory to `~/.pulumi/templates`, we won't use `Depth: 1`. For template URLs, we will continue to use `Depth: 1` as we clone those to a temp directory (which gets deleted) that we'll never try to update.
* List available templates in help text
* Address PR Feedback
* Don't show "Installing dependencies" message for `up`
* Fix secrets handling
When prompting for config, if the existing stack value is a secret, keep it a secret and mask the prompt. If the template says it should be secret, make it a secret.
* Fix ${PROJECT} and ${DESCRIPTION} handling for `up`
Templates used with `up` should already have a filled-in project name and description, but if it's a `new`-style template, that has `${PROJECT}` and/or `${DESCRIPTION}`, be helpful and just replace these with better values.
* Fix stack handling
Add a bool `setCurrent` param to `requireStack` to control whether the current stack should be saved in workspace settings. For the `up <url>` case, we don't want to save. Also, split the `up` code into two separate functions: one for the `up <url>` case and another for the normal `up` case where you have workspace in your current directory. While we may be able to combine them back into a single function, right now it's a bit cleaner being separate, even with some small amount of duplication.
* Fix panic due to nil crypter
Lazily get the crypter only if needed inside `promptForConfig`.
* Embellish comment
* Harden isPreconfiguredEmptyStack check
Fix the code to check to make sure the URL specified on the command line matches the URL stored in the `pulumi:template` config value, and that the rest of the config from the stack satisfies the config requirements of the template.
* Protobuf changes to record dependencies for read resources
* Add a number of tests for read resources, especially around replacement
* Place read resources in the snapshot with "external" bit set
Fixespulumi/pulumi#1521. This commit introduces two new step ops: Read
and ReadReplacement. The engine generates Read and ReadReplacement steps
when servicing ReadResource RPC calls from the language host.
* Fix an omission of OpReadReplace from the step list
* Rebase against master
* Transition to use V2 Resources by default
* Add a semantic "relinquish" operation to the engine
If the engine observes that a resource is read and also that the
resource exists in the snapshot as a non-external resource, it will not
delete the resource if the IDs of the old and new resources match.
* Typo fix
* CR: add missing comments, DeserializeDeployment -> DeserializeDeploymentV2, ID check
Instead of needing you to first select the current stack to use any of
these commands, allow passing `-s <stack-name>` or `--stack
<stack-name>` to say what stack you want to operate on.
These commands still require a `Pulumi.yaml` file to be present, which
is not ideal, but would require a larger refactoring to fix. That
refactoring will happen as part of #1556.
Fixes#1370
* Error when loading a deployment that is not a version that the CLI understands
* Add a test for 'pulumi stack import' on a badly-versioned deployment
* Move current deployment version to 'apitype'
* Rebase against master
* CR: emit CLI-friendly error message at the two points outside of the engine calling 'DeserializeDeployment'
These changes enable tracing of Pulumi API calls.
The span with which to associate an API call is passed via a
`context.Context` parameter. This required plumbing a
`context.Context` parameter through a rather large number of APIs,
especially in the backend.
In general, all API calls are associated with a new root span that
exists for essentially the entire lifetime of an invocation of the
Pulumi CLI. There were a few places where the plumbing got a bit hairier
than I was willing to address with these changes; I've used
`context.Background()` in these instances. API calls that receive this
context will create new root spans, but will still be traced.
Long term, a stack name alone will not be sufficent to address a
stack. Introduce a new `backend.StackReference` interface that allows
each backend to give an opaque stack reference that can be used across
operations.
This field indicates the schema of the serialized deployment. This field
behaves identically to the `Version` field of
`PatchUpdateCheckpointRequest`.
This is part of pulumi/pulumi-service#1046
Tests now target managed stacks instead of local stacks.
The existing logged in user and target backend API are used unless PULUMI_ACCES_TOKEN is defined, in which case tests are run under that access token and against the PULUMI_API backend.
For developer machines, we will now need to be logged in to Pulumi to run tests, and whichever default API backend is logged in (the one listed as current in ~/.pulumi/credentials.json) will be used. If you need to override these, provide PULUMI_ACCESS_TOKEN and possibly PULUMI_API.
For Travis, we currently target the staging service using the Pulumi Bot user.
We have decided to run tests in the pulumi organization. This can be overridden for local testing (or in Travis in the future) by defining PULUMI_API_OWNER_ORGANIZATION and using an access token with access to that organization.
Part of pulumi/home#195.
By using untyped deployment structures via `json.RawMessage`, we can
support round-tripping between old CLI clients and newer servers, without
dropping possibly-important information on the floor. I hadn't realized
this design goal with the original system, and after talking to @pgavlin,
I better realized the intent and that we want to preserve this.
Per pulumi/pulumi#984, we will now issue an error if it appears you're
importing a checkpoint from a different stack. This can be overridden
if you know what you're doing (with --force), but in general this is a
sign that you're doing something very wrong that will be hard to undo.
Despite our good progress moving towards having an apitype package,
where our exchange types live and can be shared among the engine and
our services, there were a few major types that were still duplciated.
Resource was the biggest example -- and indeed, the apitype varirant
was missing the new Dependencies property -- but there were others,
like Manfiest, PluginInfo, etc. These too had semi-random omissions.
This change merges all of these types into the apitype package. This
not only cleans up the redundancy and missing properties, but will
"force the issue" with respect to keeping them in sync and properly
versioning the information in a backwards compatible way.
The resource/stack package still exists as a simple marshaling layer
to and from the engine's core data types.
Finally, I've made the controversial change to share the actual
Deployment data structure at the apitype layer also. This will force
us to confront differences in that data structure similarly, and will
allow us to leverage the strong typing throughout to catch issues.
This change includes a handful of stack-related CLI formatting
improvements that I've been noodling on in the background for a while,
based on things that tend to trip up demos and the inner loop workflow.
This includes:
* If `pulumi stack select` is run by itself, use an interactive
CLI menu to let the user select an existing stack, or choose to
create a new one. This looks as follows
$ pulumi stack select
Please choose a stack, or choose to create a new one:
abcdef
babblabblabble
> currentlyselected
defcon
<create a new stack>
and is navigated in the usual way (key up, down, enter).
* If a stack name is passed that does not exist, prompt the user
to ask whether s/he wants to create one on-demand. This hooks
interesting moments in time, like `pulumi stack select foo`,
and cuts down on the need to run additional commands.
* If a current stack is required, but none is currently selected,
then pop the same interactive menu shown above to select one.
Depending on the command being run, we may or may not show the
option to create a new stack (e.g., that doesn't make much sense
when you're running `pulumi destroy`, but might when you're
running `pulumi stack`). This again lets you do with a single
command what would have otherwise entailed an error with multiple
commands to recover from it.
* If you run `pulumi stack init` without any additional arguments,
we interactively prompt for the stack name. Before, we would
error and you'd then need to run `pulumi stack init <name>`.
* Colorize some things nicely; for example, now all prompts will
by default become bright white.
These changes add the ability to export a stack's latest deployment or
import a new deployment to a stack via the Pulumi CLI. These
capabilities are exposed by two new verbs under `stack`:
- export, which writes the current stack's latest deployment to stdout
- import, which reads a new deployment from stdin and applies it to the
current stack.
In the local case, this simply involves reading/writing the stack's
latest checkpoint file. In the cloud case, this involves hitting two new
endpoints on the service to perform the export or import.
