After the move to stop including packages in the SDK, we no longer
published an SDK per build. This corrects this. Since the only things
in the SDK today are the language plugins and the CLI itself, we can
publish an SDK per build from pulumi/pulumi.
This change re-uses the existing infrastructure we have in
pulumi/sdk.
Fixes#1076
Tests now target managed stacks instead of local stacks.
The existing logged in user and target backend API are used unless PULUMI_ACCES_TOKEN is defined, in which case tests are run under that access token and against the PULUMI_API backend.
For developer machines, we will now need to be logged in to Pulumi to run tests, and whichever default API backend is logged in (the one listed as current in ~/.pulumi/credentials.json) will be used. If you need to override these, provide PULUMI_ACCESS_TOKEN and possibly PULUMI_API.
For Travis, we currently target the staging service using the Pulumi Bot user.
We have decided to run tests in the pulumi organization. This can be overridden for local testing (or in Travis in the future) by defining PULUMI_API_OWNER_ORGANIZATION and using an access token with access to that organization.
Part of pulumi/home#195.
We need to support the current version of the nodejs language host
running programs that use older version of @pulumi/pulumi where the
runtime expected config keys to look like
`<package>:config:<name>`. In the language host we actually did the
transformation from the new format to the old one, for compatability
reasons but we then droped the transfomed value on the floor.
The windows build was still on the old plan from way back when where
we had binaries littered in the build tree and you had to add parts of
your build-tree to the `%PATH%` for the integration tests to work.
This cleans that up and moves all of our scripts that invoke
javascript to be on the same plan. They invoke our specially named
node with a relative path to the JS code we want to run.
We only have one AppVeyor worker and building topic branches causes us
to build large backups in our queues. This is made worse when folks
are iterating on a PR because each push queues not only a PR
build (which we want) but also the topic branch build (which we don't
care about so much).