Rather than placing these combinators directly on the Output class,
which feels odd because they are special purpose to iterables, and deal
with not only Outputs but also Inputs, we will place them on a
separate and dedicated iterable module for these utility helpers.
This change adds some new constructors for output properties:
1) We alias `Output.create` to `output`, more like Promise's various
construction methods. This reads better and is more discoverable.
2) A new `Output.createMap` function will accept an array of inputs,
along with a selector function for key/value pairs, and produces
an output map with said keys and values inside of it.
3) A new `Output.createGroupByMap` functon will similarly accept an
array of inputs and a key/value selector, however it creates an
output map with said keys, but where values are arrays of values,
and all duplicate keys will lead to appending to said arrays.
Tests to come in a subsequent checkin.
Suppose you have `pulumi.output(o).apply(foo)`, with `o` being type `O`
and `foo` taking type `O` as an argument. If `O` is a type with methods,
this will fail to type check.
The reason is that `UnwrappedObject<T>` (as well as the other
`Unwrapped*` types) will recursively wrap the types of field values
whose type was `Function`. Since `UnwrappedObject<Function>` is not the
same as `Function`, we fail to type check. Note that this does not
result in an actual "boxed" object -- this is purely at the type level.
This commit resolves this by considering `Function` a primitive type,
which will cause us to not wrap the types of field values, instead
leaving them as `Function`.
* Revert RunError behavior. Introduce new ResourceError for errors associated with a resource.
* Fix docs.
* Use resource error.
* Use ResourceError in more places.
* Use ResourceError in a few more places.
* Throw a resource error.
* Make required.
* Revert this.
* Lint.
* Only report errors once.
* Better comment.
* Protobuf changes
* Move management of root resource state to engine
This commit fixes a persistent side-by-side issue in the NodeJS SDK by
moving the management of root resource state to the engine. Doing so
adds two new endpoints to the Engine gRPC service: 1) GetRootResource
and 2) SetRootResource, which get and set the root resource
respectively.
* Rebase against master, regenerate proto
`opts.providers` is currently only read by the `Resource` constructor if
either `opts.parent` or `getRootResource` is not `undefined`. In
scnearios where exactly one copy of `@pulumi/pulumi` is loaded, one of
these conditions will always be true. In SxS scenarios, however, it is
possible for neither of these conditions to be true, and the created
resource will end up without a `providers` map. These changes fix that
by always copying the contents of `opts.providers` if it is defined.
* Use Promise.resolve.
* Use `Inputs | Promise<Inputs> | Output<Inputs>` rather than
`Input<Inputs>`, which looks supremely bizarre.
* Update ComponentResource.registerOutputs also.
If a resource's options bag does not specify `protect` or `provider`,
pull a default value from the resource's parent.
In order to allow a parent resource to specify providers for multiple
resource types, component resources now accept an optional map from
package name to provider instance. When a custom resource needs a
default provider from its parent, it checks its parent provider bag for
an entry under its package. If a component resource does not have a
provider bag, its pulls a default from its parent.
These changes also add a `parent` field to `InvokeOptions` s.t. calls to
invoke can use the same behavior as resource creation w.r.t. providers.
Fixes#1735, #1736.
### First-Class Providers
These changes implement support for first-class providers. First-class
providers are provider plugins that are exposed as resources via the
Pulumi programming model so that they may be explicitly and multiply
instantiated. Each instance of a provider resource may be configured
differently, and configuration parameters may be source from the
outputs of other resources.
### Provider Plugin Changes
In order to accommodate the need to verify and diff provider
configuration and configure providers without complete configuration
information, these changes adjust the high-level provider plugin
interface. Two new methods for validating a provider's configuration
and diffing changes to the same have been added (`CheckConfig` and
`DiffConfig`, respectively), and the type of the configuration bag
accepted by `Configure` has been changed to a `PropertyMap`.
These changes have not yet been reflected in the provider plugin gRPC
interface. We will do this in a set of follow-up changes. Until then,
these methods are implemented by adapters:
- `CheckConfig` validates that all configuration parameters are string
or unknown properties. This is necessary because existing plugins
only accept string-typed configuration values.
- `DiffConfig` either returns "never replace" if all configuration
values are known or "must replace" if any configuration value is
unknown. The justification for this behavior is given
[here](https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pull/1695/files#diff-a6cd5c7f337665f5bb22e92ca5f07537R106)
- `Configure` converts the config bag to a legacy config map and
configures the provider plugin if all config values are known. If any
config value is unknown, the underlying plugin is not configured and
the provider may only perform `Check`, `Read`, and `Invoke`, all of
which return empty results. We justify this behavior becuase it is
only possible during a preview and provides the best experience we
can manage with the existing gRPC interface.
### Resource Model Changes
Providers are now exposed as resources that participate in a stack's
dependency graph. Like other resources, they are explicitly created,
may have multiple instances, and may have dependencies on other
resources. Providers are referred to using provider references, which
are a combination of the provider's URN and its ID. This design
addresses the need during a preview to refer to providers that have not
yet been physically created and therefore have no ID.
All custom resources that are not themselves providers must specify a
single provider via a provider reference. The named provider will be
used to manage that resource's CRUD operations. If a resource's
provider reference changes, the resource must be replaced. Though its
URN is not present in the resource's dependency list, the provider
should be treated as a dependency of the resource when topologically
sorting the dependency graph.
Finally, `Invoke` operations must now specify a provider to use for the
invocation via a provider reference.
### Engine Changes
First-class providers support requires a few changes to the engine:
- The engine must have some way to map from provider references to
provider plugins. It must be possible to add providers from a stack's
checkpoint to this map and to register new/updated providers during
the execution of a plan in response to CRUD operations on provider
resources.
- In order to support updating existing stacks using existing Pulumi
programs that may not explicitly instantiate providers, the engine
must be able to manage the "default" providers for each package
referenced by a checkpoint or Pulumi program. The configuration for
a "default" provider is taken from the stack's configuration data.
The former need is addressed by adding a provider registry type that is
responsible for managing all of the plugins required by a plan. In
addition to loading plugins froma checkpoint and providing the ability
to map from a provider reference to a provider plugin, this type serves
as the provider plugin for providers themselves (i.e. it is the
"provider provider").
The latter need is solved via two relatively self-contained changes to
plan setup and the eval source.
During plan setup, the old checkpoint is scanned for custom resources
that do not have a provider reference in order to compute the set of
packages that require a default provider. Once this set has been
computed, the required default provider definitions are conjured and
prepended to the checkpoint's resource list. Each resource that
requires a default provider is then updated to refer to the default
provider for its package.
While an eval source is running, each custom resource registration,
resource read, and invoke that does not name a provider is trapped
before being returned by the source iterator. If no default provider
for the appropriate package has been registered, the eval source
synthesizes an appropriate registration, waits for it to complete, and
records the registered provider's reference. This reference is injected
into the original request, which is then processed as usual. If a
default provider was already registered, the recorded reference is
used and no new registration occurs.
### SDK Changes
These changes only expose first-class providers from the Node.JS SDK.
- A new abstract class, `ProviderResource`, can be subclassed and used
to instantiate first-class providers.
- A new field in `ResourceOptions`, `provider`, can be used to supply
a particular provider instance to manage a `CustomResource`'s CRUD
operations.
- A new type, `InvokeOptions`, can be used to specify options that
control the behavior of a call to `pulumi.runtime.invoke`. This type
includes a `provider` field that is analogous to
`ResourceOptions.provider`.
These changes add support for distinguishing an output property with
an unknown value from an output property with a known value that is
undefined.
In a broad sense, the Pulumi property type system is just JSON with the
addition of unknown values. Notably absent, however, are undefined
values. As it stands, our marshalers between JavaScript and Pulumi
property values treat all undefined JavaScript values as unknown Pulumi
values. Unfortunately, this conflates two very different concepts:
unknown Pulumi values are intended to represent values of output
properties that are unknown at time of preview, _not_ values that are
known but undefined. This results in difficulty reasoning about when
transforms are run on output properties as well as confusing output in
the `diff` view of Pulumi preview (user-specifed undefined values are
rendered as unknown values).
As it turns out, we already have a way to decide whether or not an
Output value is known or not: Output.performApply. These changes rename
this property to `isKnown`, clarify its meaning, and take advantage of
the result to decide whether or not an Output value should marshal as
an unknown Pulumi value.
This also allowed these changes to improve the serialization of
undefined object keys and array elements s.t. we better match JavaScript
to JSON serialization behavior (undefined object keys are omitted;
undefined array elements are marshaled as `null`).
Fixes https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-cloud/issues/483.
This change adopts `x is T` style of RTTI inquiry, which fits much
more nicely with TypeScript's typechecking flow.
Thanks to @lukehoban for teaching me a new trick today! :-)
This change moves us away from using JavaScript RTTI, by way of
`instanceof`, for built-in Pulumi types. If we use `instanceof`,
then the same logical type loaded from separate copies of the
SDK package -- as will happen in SxS scenarios -- are considered
different. This isn't actually what we want. The solution is
simple: implement our own quasi-RTTI solution, using __pulumi*
properties and manual as* and is* functions. Note that we could
have skipped the as* and is* functions, but I found that they led
to slightly easier to read code.
There is one strange thing in here, which I spoke to
@CyrusNajmabadi about: SerializedOutput<T>, because it implements
Output<T> as an _interface_, did not previously masquerade as an
actual Output<T>. In other words, `instanceof` would have returned
false, and indeed a few important properties (like promise) are
missing. This change preserves that behavior, although I'll admit
that this is slightly odd. I suspect we'll want to revisit this as
part of https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/issues/1074.
Fixes https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/issues/1203.
As I began to write code using the ability to perform resource
lookups, especially in the code-generators, I realized the way it
was surfaced as an argument to the Resource base constructor would
lead to overload explosion. Instead of doing that, let's pass it
in the ResourceOptions bag.
Prior to this change, if you ended up with multiple Pulumi SDK
packages loaded side-by-side, we would fail in obscure ways. The
reason for this was that we initialize and store important state
in static variables. In the case that you load the same library
twice, however, you end up with separate copies of said statics,
which means we would be missing engine RPC addresses and so on.
This change adds the ability to recover from this situation by
mirroring the initialized state in process-wide environment
variables. By doing this, we can safely recover simply by reading
them back when we detect that they are missing. I think we can
eventually go even further here, and eliminate the entry point
launcher shim altogether by simply having the engine launch the
Node program with the right environment variables. This would
be a nice simplification to the system (fewer moving pieces).
There is still a risk that the separate copy is incompatible.
Presumably the reason for loading multiple copies is that the
NPM/Yarn version solver couldn't resolve to a shared version.
This may yield obscure failure modes should RPC interfaces change.
Figuring out what to do here is part of pulumi/pulumi#957.
This fixespulumi/pulumi#777 and pulumi/pulumi#1017.
This change wires up the new Read RPC method in such a manner that
Pulumi programs can invoke it. This is technically not required for
refreshing state programmatically (as in pulumi/pulumi#1081), however
it's a feature we had eons ago and have wanted since (see
pulumi/pulumi#83), and will allow us to write code like
let vm = aws.ec2.Instance.get("my-vm", "i-07043cd97bd2c9cfc");
// use any property from here on out ...
The way this works is simply by bridging the Pulumi program via its
existing RPC connection to the engine, much like Invoke and
RegisterResource RPC requests already do, and then invoking the proper
resource provider in order to read the state. Note that some resources
cannot be uniquely identified by their ID alone, and so an extra
resource state bag may be provided with just those properties required.
This came almost for free (okay, not exactly) and will come in handy as
we start gaining experience with reading live state from resources.
This change implements resource protection, as per pulumi/pulumi#689.
The overall idea is that a resource can be marked as "protect: true",
which will prevent deletion of that resource for any reason whatsoever
(straight deletion, replacement, etc). This is expressed in the
program. To "unprotect" a resource, one must perform an update setting
"protect: false", and then afterwards, they can delete the resource.
For example:
let res = new MyResource("precious", { .. }, { protect: true });
Afterwards, the resource will display in the CLI with a lock icon, and
any attempts to remove it will fail in the usual ways (in planning or,
worst case, during an actual update).
This was done by adding a new ResourceOptions bag parameter to the
base Resource types. This is unfortunately a breaking change, but now
is the right time to take this one. We had been adding new settings
one by one -- like parent and dependsOn -- and this new approach will
set us up to add any number of additional settings down the road,
without needing to worry about breaking anything ever again.
This is related to protected stacks, as described in
pulumi/pulumi-service#399. Most likely this will serve as a foundational
building block that enables the coarser grained policy management.
This change simplifies the necessary RPC changes for components.
Instead of a Begin/End pair, which complicates the whole system
because now we have the opportunity of a missing End call, we will
simply let RPCs come in that append outputs to existing states.
This change brings back component outputs to the overall system again.
In doing so, it generally overhauls the way we do resource RPCs a bit:
* Instead of RegisterResource and CompleteResource, we call these
BeginRegisterResource and EndRegisterResource, which begins to model
these as effectively "asynchronous" resource requests. This should also
help with parallelism (https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/issues/106).
* Flip the CLI/engine a little on its head. Rather than it driving the
planning and deployment process, we move more to a model where it
simply observes it. This is done by implementing an event handler
interface with three events: OnResourceStepPre, OnResourceStepPost,
and OnResourceComplete. The first two are invoked immediately before
and after any step operation, and the latter is invoked whenever a
EndRegisterResource comes in. The reason for the asymmetry here is
that the checkpointing logic in the deployment engine is largely
untouched (intentionally, as this is a sensitive part of the system),
and so the "begin"/"end" nature doesn't flow through faithfully.
* Also make the engine more event-oriented in its terminology and the
way it handles the incoming BeginRegisterResource and
EndRegisterResource events from the language host. This is the first
step down a long road of incrementally refactoring the engine to work
this way, a necessary prerequisite for parallelism.
This change simply prints a stack's output properties at the end of
running the program, since we now no longer actual record the outputs
as part of component registration. Bringing that back is part of
pulumi/pulumi#340, however it is too risky to add hastily. So, for
now, we will simply special case Stacks.
This change switches from child lists to parent pointers, in the
way resource ancestries are represented. This cleans up a fair bit
of the old parenting logic, including all notion of ambient parent
scopes (and will notably address pulumi/pulumi#435).
This lets us show a more parent/child display in the output when
doing planning and updating. For instance, here is an update of
a lambda's text, which is logically part of a cloud timer:
* cloud:timer:Timer: (same)
[urn=urn:pulumi:malta::lm-cloud:☁️timer:Timer::lm-cts-malta-job-CleanSnapshots]
* cloud:function:Function: (same)
[urn=urn:pulumi:malta::lm-cloud:☁️function:Function::lm-cts-malta-job-CleanSnapshots]
* aws:serverless:Function: (same)
[urn=urn:pulumi:malta::lm-cloud::aws:serverless:Function::lm-cts-malta-job-CleanSnapshots]
~ aws:lambda/function:Function: (modify)
[id=lm-cts-malta-job-CleanSnapshots-fee4f3bf41280741]
[urn=urn:pulumi:malta::lm-cloud::aws:lambda/function:Function::lm-cts-malta-job-CleanSnapshots]
- code : archive(assets:2092f44) {
// etc etc etc
Note that we still get walls of text, but this will be actually
quite nice when combined with pulumi/pulumi#454.
I've also suppressed printing properties that didn't change during
updates when --detailed was not passed, and also suppressed empty
strings and zero-length arrays (since TF uses these as defaults in
many places and it just makes creation and deletion quite verbose).
Note that this is a far cry from everything we can possibly do
here as part of pulumi/pulumi#340 (and even pulumi/pulumi#417).
But it's a good start towards taming some of our output spew.
This change adds back component output properties. Doing so
requires splitting the RPC interface for creating resources in
half, with an initial RegisterResource which contains all of the
input properties, and a final CompleteResource which optionally
contains any output properties synthesized by the component.
This change switches from child lists to parent pointers, in the
way resource ancestries are represented. This cleans up a fair bit
of the old parenting logic, including all notion of ambient parent
scopes (and will notably address pulumi/pulumi#435).
This lets us show a more parent/child display in the output when
doing planning and updating. For instance, here is an update of
a lambda's text, which is logically part of a cloud timer:
* cloud:timer:Timer: (same)
[urn=urn:pulumi:malta::lm-cloud:☁️timer:Timer::lm-cts-malta-job-CleanSnapshots]
* cloud:function:Function: (same)
[urn=urn:pulumi:malta::lm-cloud:☁️function:Function::lm-cts-malta-job-CleanSnapshots]
* aws:serverless:Function: (same)
[urn=urn:pulumi:malta::lm-cloud::aws:serverless:Function::lm-cts-malta-job-CleanSnapshots]
~ aws:lambda/function:Function: (modify)
[id=lm-cts-malta-job-CleanSnapshots-fee4f3bf41280741]
[urn=urn:pulumi:malta::lm-cloud::aws:lambda/function:Function::lm-cts-malta-job-CleanSnapshots]
- code : archive(assets:2092f44) {
// etc etc etc
Note that we still get walls of text, but this will be actually
quite nice when combined with pulumi/pulumi#454.
I've also suppressed printing properties that didn't change during
updates when --detailed was not passed, and also suppressed empty
strings and zero-length arrays (since TF uses these as defaults in
many places and it just makes creation and deletion quite verbose).
Note that this is a far cry from everything we can possibly do
here as part of pulumi/pulumi#340 (and even pulumi/pulumi#417).
But it's a good start towards taming some of our output spew.
Adds support for top-level exports in the main script of a Pulumi Program to be captured as stack-level output properties.
This create a new `pulumi:pulumi:Stack` component as the root of the resource tree in all Pulumi programs. That resources has properties for each top-level export in the Node.js script.
Running `pulumi stack` will display the current value of these outputs.
As part of adding components, we sometimes want to allocate things
that are guaranteed not to get attributed to the calling component's
initialization code. This includes lazily allocated pooled resources.
In those cases, we can invoke Resource.runInParentlessScope to
temporarily squelch the parent. Also renames withParent to
runInParentScope to be more symmetric and explicit about what it does.
This changes a few things about "components":
* Rename what was previously ExternalResource to CustomResource,
and all of the related fields and parameters that this implies.
This just seems like a much nicer and expected name for what
these represent. I realize I am stealing a name we had thought
about using elsewhere, but this seems like an appropriate use.
* Introduce ComponentResource, to make initializing resources
that merely aggregate other resources easier to do correctly.
* Add a withParent and parentScope concept to Resource, to make
allocating children less error-prone. Now there's no need to
explicitly adopt children as they are allocated; instead, any
children allocated as part of the withParent callback will
auto-parent to the resource provided. This is used by
ComponentResource's initialization function to make initialization
easier, including the distinction between inputs and outputs.
