This change eliminates the special type mu/extension in favor of extensible
intrinsic types. This subsumes the previous functionality while also fixing
a number of warts with the old model.
In particular, the old mu/extension approach deferred property binding until
very late in the compiler. In fact, too late. The backend provider for an
extension simply received an untyped bag of stuff, which it then had to
deal with. Unfortunately, some operations in the binder are inaccessible
at this point because doing so would cause a cycle. Furthermore, some
pertinent information is gone at this point, like the scopes and symtables.
The canonical example where we need this is binding services names to the
services themselves; e.g., the AWS CloudFormation "DependsOn" property should
resolve to the actual service names, not the string values. In the limit,
this requires full binding information.
There were a few solutions I considered, including ones that've required
less code motion, however this one feels the most elegant.
Now we permit types to be marked as "intrinsic." Binding to these names
is done exactly as ordinary name binding, unlike the special mu/extension
provider name. In fact, just about everything except code-generation for
these types is the same as ordinary types. This is perfect for the use case
at hand, which is binding properties.
After this change, for example, "DependsOn" is expanded to real service
names precisely as we need.
As part of this change, I added support for three new basic schema types:
* ast.StringList ("string[]"): a list of strings.
* ast.StringMap ("map[string]any"): a map of strings to anys.
* ast.ServiceList ("service[]"): a list of service references.
Obviously we need to revisit this and add a more complete set. This work
is already tracked by marapongo/mu#9.
At the end of the day, it's likely I will replace all hard-coded predefined
types with intrinsic types, for similar reasons to the above.
This is an initial pass at property binding. For all stack instantiations,
we must verify that the set of properties supplied are correct. We also must
remember the bound property information so that code-generation has all of
the information it needs to generate correct code (including capability refs).
This entails:
* Ensuring required properties are provided.
* Expanding missing properties that have Default values.
* Type-checking that supplied properties are of the right type.
* Expanding property values into AST literal nodes.
To do this requires a third AST pass in the semantic analysis part of the
compiler. In the 1st pass, dependencies aren't even known yet; in the 2nd
pass, dependencies have not yet been bound; therefore, we need a 3rd pass,
which can depend on the full binding information for the transitive closure
of AST nodes and dependencies to have been populated with types.
There are a few loose ends in here:
* We don't yet validate top-level stack properties.
* We don't yet validate top-level stack base type properties.
* We don't yet support complex schema property types.
* We don't yet support even "simple" complex property types, like `[ string ]`.
* We don't yet support strongly typed capability property types (just `service`).
That said, I am going to turn to writing a few tests for the basic cases, and then
resume to finishing this afterwards (tracked by marapongo/mu#25).
This change implements the aws/cf extension provider, so that AWS resources
may be described and encapsulated inside of other stacks. Each aws/cf instantiation
requires just two fields -- type and properties -- corresponding to the equivalent
AWS resource object. The result is simply plugged in as an AWS resource, after
Mu templates have been expanded, permitting stack properties, etc. to be used.
