* Make `async:true` the default for `invoke` calls (#3750)
* Switch away from native grpc impl. (#3728)
* Remove usage of the 'deasync' library from @pulumi/pulumi. (#3752)
* Only retry as long as we get unavailable back. Anything else continues. (#3769)
* Handle all errors for now. (#3781)
* Do not assume --yes was present when using pulumi in non-interactive mode (#3793)
* Upgrade all paths for sdk and pkg to v2
* Backport C# invoke classes and other recent gen changes (#4288)
Adjust C# generation
* Replace IDeployment with a sealed class (#4318)
Replace IDeployment with a sealed class
* .NET: default to args subtype rather than Args.Empty (#4320)
* Adding system namespace for Dotnet code gen
This is required for using Obsolute attributes for deprecations
```
Iam/InstanceProfile.cs(142,10): error CS0246: The type or namespace name 'ObsoleteAttribute' could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) [/Users/stack72/code/go/src/github.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws/sdk/dotnet/Pulumi.Aws.csproj]
Iam/InstanceProfile.cs(142,10): error CS0246: The type or namespace name 'Obsolete' could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) [/Users/stack72/code/go/src/github.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws/sdk/dotnet/Pulumi.Aws.csproj]
```
* Fix the nullability of config type properties in C# codegen (#4379)
This implements the new algorithm for deciding which resources must be
deleted due to a delete-before-replace operation.
We need to compute the set of resources that may be replaced by a
change to the resource under consideration. We do this by taking the
complete set of transitive dependents on the resource under
consideration and removing any resources that would not be replaced by
changes to their dependencies. We determine whether or not a resource
may be replaced by substituting unknowns for input properties that may
change due to deletion of the resources their value depends on and
calling the resource provider's Diff method.
This is perhaps clearer when described by example. Consider the
following dependency graph:
A
__|__
B C
| _|_
D E F
In this graph, all of B, C, D, E, and F transitively depend on A. It may
be the case, however, that changes to the specific properties of any of
those resources R that would occur if a resource on the path to A were
deleted and recreated may not cause R to be replaced. For example, the
edge from B to A may be a simple dependsOn edge such that a change to
B does not actually influence any of B's input properties. In that case,
neither B nor D would need to be deleted before A could be deleted.
In order to make the above algorithm a reality, the resource monitor
interface has been updated to include a map that associates an input
property key with the list of resources that input property depends on.
Older clients of the resource monitor will leave this map empty, in
which case all input properties will be treated as depending on all
dependencies of the resource. This is probably overly conservative, but
it is less conservative than what we currently implement, and is
certainly correct.
### First-Class Providers
These changes implement support for first-class providers. First-class
providers are provider plugins that are exposed as resources via the
Pulumi programming model so that they may be explicitly and multiply
instantiated. Each instance of a provider resource may be configured
differently, and configuration parameters may be source from the
outputs of other resources.
### Provider Plugin Changes
In order to accommodate the need to verify and diff provider
configuration and configure providers without complete configuration
information, these changes adjust the high-level provider plugin
interface. Two new methods for validating a provider's configuration
and diffing changes to the same have been added (`CheckConfig` and
`DiffConfig`, respectively), and the type of the configuration bag
accepted by `Configure` has been changed to a `PropertyMap`.
These changes have not yet been reflected in the provider plugin gRPC
interface. We will do this in a set of follow-up changes. Until then,
these methods are implemented by adapters:
- `CheckConfig` validates that all configuration parameters are string
or unknown properties. This is necessary because existing plugins
only accept string-typed configuration values.
- `DiffConfig` either returns "never replace" if all configuration
values are known or "must replace" if any configuration value is
unknown. The justification for this behavior is given
[here](https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pull/1695/files#diff-a6cd5c7f337665f5bb22e92ca5f07537R106)
- `Configure` converts the config bag to a legacy config map and
configures the provider plugin if all config values are known. If any
config value is unknown, the underlying plugin is not configured and
the provider may only perform `Check`, `Read`, and `Invoke`, all of
which return empty results. We justify this behavior becuase it is
only possible during a preview and provides the best experience we
can manage with the existing gRPC interface.
### Resource Model Changes
Providers are now exposed as resources that participate in a stack's
dependency graph. Like other resources, they are explicitly created,
may have multiple instances, and may have dependencies on other
resources. Providers are referred to using provider references, which
are a combination of the provider's URN and its ID. This design
addresses the need during a preview to refer to providers that have not
yet been physically created and therefore have no ID.
All custom resources that are not themselves providers must specify a
single provider via a provider reference. The named provider will be
used to manage that resource's CRUD operations. If a resource's
provider reference changes, the resource must be replaced. Though its
URN is not present in the resource's dependency list, the provider
should be treated as a dependency of the resource when topologically
sorting the dependency graph.
Finally, `Invoke` operations must now specify a provider to use for the
invocation via a provider reference.
### Engine Changes
First-class providers support requires a few changes to the engine:
- The engine must have some way to map from provider references to
provider plugins. It must be possible to add providers from a stack's
checkpoint to this map and to register new/updated providers during
the execution of a plan in response to CRUD operations on provider
resources.
- In order to support updating existing stacks using existing Pulumi
programs that may not explicitly instantiate providers, the engine
must be able to manage the "default" providers for each package
referenced by a checkpoint or Pulumi program. The configuration for
a "default" provider is taken from the stack's configuration data.
The former need is addressed by adding a provider registry type that is
responsible for managing all of the plugins required by a plan. In
addition to loading plugins froma checkpoint and providing the ability
to map from a provider reference to a provider plugin, this type serves
as the provider plugin for providers themselves (i.e. it is the
"provider provider").
The latter need is solved via two relatively self-contained changes to
plan setup and the eval source.
During plan setup, the old checkpoint is scanned for custom resources
that do not have a provider reference in order to compute the set of
packages that require a default provider. Once this set has been
computed, the required default provider definitions are conjured and
prepended to the checkpoint's resource list. Each resource that
requires a default provider is then updated to refer to the default
provider for its package.
While an eval source is running, each custom resource registration,
resource read, and invoke that does not name a provider is trapped
before being returned by the source iterator. If no default provider
for the appropriate package has been registered, the eval source
synthesizes an appropriate registration, waits for it to complete, and
records the registered provider's reference. This reference is injected
into the original request, which is then processed as usual. If a
default provider was already registered, the recorded reference is
used and no new registration occurs.
### SDK Changes
These changes only expose first-class providers from the Node.JS SDK.
- A new abstract class, `ProviderResource`, can be subclassed and used
to instantiate first-class providers.
- A new field in `ResourceOptions`, `provider`, can be used to supply
a particular provider instance to manage a `CustomResource`'s CRUD
operations.
- A new type, `InvokeOptions`, can be used to specify options that
control the behavior of a call to `pulumi.runtime.invoke`. This type
includes a `provider` field that is analogous to
`ResourceOptions.provider`.
Set the following compiler defaults:
```
"target": "es6",
"module": "commonjs",
"moduleResolution": "node",
"sourceMap": true,
```
Which allows us to not even include a tsconfig.json file. If one is
present, `ts-node` will use its options, but the above settings will
override any settings in a local tsconfig.json file. This means if you
want full control over the target, you'll need to go back to the raw
tsc workflow where you explicitly build ahead of time.
We retain a few tests on the RunBuild plan, with `typescript` set to
false in the runtime options, but for the general case, we remove the
build steps and custom entry points for our programs.
Tests now target managed stacks instead of local stacks.
The existing logged in user and target backend API are used unless PULUMI_ACCES_TOKEN is defined, in which case tests are run under that access token and against the PULUMI_API backend.
For developer machines, we will now need to be logged in to Pulumi to run tests, and whichever default API backend is logged in (the one listed as current in ~/.pulumi/credentials.json) will be used. If you need to override these, provide PULUMI_ACCESS_TOKEN and possibly PULUMI_API.
For Travis, we currently target the staging service using the Pulumi Bot user.
We have decided to run tests in the pulumi organization. This can be overridden for local testing (or in Travis in the future) by defining PULUMI_API_OWNER_ORGANIZATION and using an access token with access to that organization.
Part of pulumi/home#195.
Despite our good progress moving towards having an apitype package,
where our exchange types live and can be shared among the engine and
our services, there were a few major types that were still duplciated.
Resource was the biggest example -- and indeed, the apitype varirant
was missing the new Dependencies property -- but there were others,
like Manfiest, PluginInfo, etc. These too had semi-random omissions.
This change merges all of these types into the apitype package. This
not only cleans up the redundancy and missing properties, but will
"force the issue" with respect to keeping them in sync and properly
versioning the information in a backwards compatible way.
The resource/stack package still exists as a simple marshaling layer
to and from the engine's core data types.
Finally, I've made the controversial change to share the actual
Deployment data structure at the apitype layer also. This will force
us to confront differences in that data structure similarly, and will
allow us to leverage the strong typing throughout to catch issues.
In order to begin publishing our core SDK package to NPM, we will
need it to be underneath the @pulumi scope so that it may remain
private. Eventually, we can alias pulumi back to it.
This is part of pulumi/pulumi#915.
As it stands, we serialize more than is correct when registering
resources: in addition to serializing the RegisterResource RPC, we also
wait for input properties to resolve in the same context. Unfortunately,
this means that we can create cycles in the promise graph when a
resource A is constructed in an earlier turn than some resource B and
one of B's output properties is an input to resource A. These changes
fix this issue by allowing input properties to resolve *before*
serializing the RegisterResource RPC.
Some integration tests had taken a dependency on the ordering of resources in
either the output of the `pulumi` command or the checkpoint file. The
only test that took a dependency on command output was updated s.t. its
resources have exactly one legal topographical sort (and therefore their
ordering is deterministic). The other tests were updated s.t. their
validation did not depend on resource ordering.
This change implements resource protection, as per pulumi/pulumi#689.
The overall idea is that a resource can be marked as "protect: true",
which will prevent deletion of that resource for any reason whatsoever
(straight deletion, replacement, etc). This is expressed in the
program. To "unprotect" a resource, one must perform an update setting
"protect: false", and then afterwards, they can delete the resource.
For example:
let res = new MyResource("precious", { .. }, { protect: true });
Afterwards, the resource will display in the CLI with a lock icon, and
any attempts to remove it will fail in the usual ways (in planning or,
worst case, during an actual update).
This was done by adding a new ResourceOptions bag parameter to the
base Resource types. This is unfortunately a breaking change, but now
is the right time to take this one. We had been adding new settings
one by one -- like parent and dependsOn -- and this new approach will
set us up to add any number of additional settings down the road,
without needing to worry about breaking anything ever again.
This is related to protected stacks, as described in
pulumi/pulumi-service#399. Most likely this will serve as a foundational
building block that enables the coarser grained policy management.
This will allow us to remove a lot of current boilerplate in individual tests, and move it into the test harness.
Note that this will require updating users of the integration test framework. By moving to a property bag of inputs, we should avoid needing future breaking changes to this API though.
* Take an options pointer so values can change as a test runs.
* Don't pass redundant information.
* Extract initialization routine.
* Fix caller.
* Check return value.
* Extract destruction logic.
* Move preview and update into their own function.
* Inline null check.
* Revert "Make sure we properly update dir so that pulumi-destroy works."
This reverts commit 56bfc57998.
* Revert "Edits needs to continuously pass along the new directory. (#668)"
This reverts commit 8bd1822722.
* Revert "Refactor test code to make it simpler to validate code in the middle. (#662)"
This reverts commit ed65360157.
This fixes two closure bugs.
First, we had special cased `__awaiter` from days of yore, when we had
special cased its capture. I also think we were confused at some point
and instead of fixing the fact that we captured `this` for non-arrow
functions, which `__awaiter` would trigger, we doubled down on this
incorrect hack. This means we missed a real bonafide `this` capture.
Second, we had a global cache of captured variable objects. So, if a
free variable resolved to the same JavaScript object, it always resolved
to the first serialization of that object. This is clearly wrong if
the object had been mutated in the meantime. The cache is required to
reach a fixed point during mutually recursive captures, but we should
only be using it for the duration of a single closure serialization
call. That's precisely what this commit does.
Also add a fix for this case.
This fixespulumi/pulumi#663.
The two-phase output properties change broke the ability to recover
from a failed replacement that yields pending deletes in the checkpoint.
The issue here is simply that we should remember pending registrations
only for logical operations that *also* have a "new" state (create or
update). This commit fixes this, and also adds a new step test with
fault injection to probe many interesting combinations of steps.
