Fix two references to the now-unnamed `dir` that should have been to
other variables.
Check a real condition before the deferred call to RemoveAll instead of
checking the error return.
My previous change to stop supplying unknown properties to providers
broke `pulumi preview` in the case of unknown inputs. This change
restores the previous behavior for previews only; the new unknown-free
behavior remains for applies.
Fixes#790.
Before these changes, we were inconsistent in our treatment of unknown
property values across the resource provider RPC interface. `Check` and
`Diff` were retaining unknown properties in inputs and outputs;
`Create`, `Update`, and `Delete` were not. This interacted badly with
recent changes to `Check` to return all provider inputs--i.e. not just
defaults--from that method: if an unknown input was provided, it would
be present in the returned inputs, which would eventually confuse the
differ by giving the appearance of changes where none were present.
These changes remove unknowns from the provider interface entirely:
unknown property values are never passed to a provider, and a provider
must never return an unknown property value.
This is the primary piece of the fix for pulumi/pulumi-terraform#93.
These changes refactor the engine's entrypoints--Deploy, Destroy, and
Preview--to be update-centric rather than stack-centric. Each of these
methods now takes a value of a new type, Update, that abstracts away the
vagaries of fetching and maintaining the update's state. This
refactoring also reinforces Pulumi.yaml as a CLI concept rather than an
engine concept; the CLI is now the only reader/writer of this format.
These changes will smooth the way for a few refactorings on the service
side that will aid in update isolation.
These changes add the ability to export a stack's latest deployment or
import a new deployment to a stack via the Pulumi CLI. These
capabilities are exposed by two new verbs under `stack`:
- export, which writes the current stack's latest deployment to stdout
- import, which reads a new deployment from stdin and applies it to the
current stack.
In the local case, this simply involves reading/writing the stack's
latest checkpoint file. In the cloud case, this involves hitting two new
endpoints on the service to perform the export or import.
This PR updates the `pkg/testing/integration` package to support running integration tests against the Pulumi Service if desired. This is done through adding new options to `ProgramTestOptions`. (Generally adding support for providing values to flags that were previously inaccessible.)
I added an integration test to confirm that it all works if the PULUMI_API environment variable is set. These tests aren't run in Travis, only manually. Since we cannot reliably run tests from `master` against the service because of the delay in rolling out updates to the Pulumi SDK, etc.
This change incorporates feedback on https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/pull/764,
in addition to refactoring the retry logic to use our retry framework rather
than hand-rolling it in the REST API code. It's a minor improvement, but at
least lets us consolidate some of this logic which we'll undoubtedly use more
of over time.
We saw an issue where a user was mid-update, and got a networking
error stating `read: operation timed out`. We believe this was simply
a local client error, due to a flaky network. We should be resilient
to such things during updates, particularly when there's no way to
"reattach" to an in-progress udpate (see pulumi/pulumi#762).
This change accomplishes this by changing our retry logic in the
cloud backend's waitForUpdates function. Namely:
* We recognize three types of failure, and react differently:
- Expected HTTP errors. For instance, the 504 Gateway Timeouts
that we already retried in the face of. In these cases, we will
silently retry up to 10 times. After 10 times, we begin warning
the user just in case this is a persistent condition.
- Unexpected HTTP errors. The CLI will quit immediately and issue
an error to the user, in the usual ways. This covers
Unauthorized among other things. Over time, we may find that we
want to intentionally move some HTTP errors into the above.
- Anything else. This covers the transient networking errors case
that we have just seen. I'll admit, it's a wide net, but any
instance of this error issues a warning and it's up to the user
to ^C out of it. We also log the error so that we'll see it if
the user shares their logs with us.
* We implement backoff logic so that we retry very quickly (100ms)
on the first failure, and more slowly thereafter (1.5x, up to a max
of 5 seconds). This helps to avoid accidentally DoSing our service.
This merging causes similar issues to those it did in `Check`, and
differs from the approach we take to `Diff`. This can causes problems
such as an inability to remove properties.
Use the new {en,de}crypt endpoints in the Pulumi.com API to secure
secret config values. The ciphertext for a secret config value is bound
to the stack to which it applies and cannot be shared with other stacks
(e.g. by copy/pasting it around in Pulumi.yaml). All secrets will need
to be encrypted once per target stack.
This fixes a few more edit directory issues, where we didn't
correctly propagate the changes in edit directory required during
subsequent destroy/stack activities. It also fixes a few error
paths so that we preserve the right directory to be removed.
This change implements resource protection, as per pulumi/pulumi#689.
The overall idea is that a resource can be marked as "protect: true",
which will prevent deletion of that resource for any reason whatsoever
(straight deletion, replacement, etc). This is expressed in the
program. To "unprotect" a resource, one must perform an update setting
"protect: false", and then afterwards, they can delete the resource.
For example:
let res = new MyResource("precious", { .. }, { protect: true });
Afterwards, the resource will display in the CLI with a lock icon, and
any attempts to remove it will fail in the usual ways (in planning or,
worst case, during an actual update).
This was done by adding a new ResourceOptions bag parameter to the
base Resource types. This is unfortunately a breaking change, but now
is the right time to take this one. We had been adding new settings
one by one -- like parent and dependsOn -- and this new approach will
set us up to add any number of additional settings down the road,
without needing to worry about breaking anything ever again.
This is related to protected stacks, as described in
pulumi/pulumi-service#399. Most likely this will serve as a foundational
building block that enables the coarser grained policy management.
This change adds the ability to do very coarse-grained negative
tests in our integration test framework. Either a test itself,
or one of its edits, may be marked ExpectFailure == true, at which
point either the preview or update MUST fail (and, if one fails
without this being set, we still treat it as an error).
