This change just moves the assertion/failure functions from the pkg/util
package to pkg/util/contract, so things read a bit nicer (i.e.,
`contract.Assert(x)` versus `util.Assert(x)`).
In some cases, we want to specialize template generation based on
the options passed to the compiler. This change flows them through
so that they can be accessed as
{{if .Options.SomeSetting}}
...
{{end}}
This change adds a handful of property binding tests.
It also fixes:
* AsName should assert IsName.
* Enumerate properties stably, so that it is deterministic.
* Do not issue errors about unrecognized properties for the special
`mu/extension` type. It's entire purpose in life is to offer an
entirely custom set of properties, which the provider is meant to
validate.
* Default to an empty map if properties are missing.
* Add a "/" to the end of the namespace from the workspace, if present.
And rearranges some code:
* Rename the LiteralX types to XLiteral; e.g., StringLiteral instead of
LiteralString. I kept typing XLiteral erroneously.
* Eliminate the Mu prefix on all of the predefined type and service
functions and types. It's superfluous and reads nicer this way.
* Swap the order of "expected" vs. "got" in the error message about
incorrect property types. It used to say "got %v, expected %v"; I
personally find that it is more helpful if it says "expected %v,
got %v". YMMV.
This change detects the target cloud earlier on in the compilation process.
Prior to this change, we didn't know this information until the backend code-generation.
Clearly we need to know this at least by then, however, templates can specialize on this
information, so we actually need it sooner. This change moves it into the frontend part.
Note that to support this we now eliminate the ability to specify target clusters in
the Mufile alone. That "feels" right to me anyway, since Mufiles are supposed to be
agnostic to their deployment environment, other than template specialization. Instead,
this information can come from the CLI and/or the workspace settings file.
This change adds a super simple initial whack at a basic cluster topology
comprised of VPC, subnet, internet gateway, attachments, and route tables.
This is actually written in Mu itself, and I am committing this early, since
there are quite a few features required before we can actually make progress
getting this up and running.
This change implements most of the cloud target and architecture detection
logic, along with associated verification and a bunch of new error messages.
There are two settings for picking a cloud destination:
* Architecture: this specifies the combination of cloud (e.g., AWS, GCP, etc)
plus scheduler (e.g., none, Swarm, ECS, etc).
* Target: a named, preconfigured entity that includes both an Architecture and
an assortment of extra default configuration options.
The general idea here is that you can preconfigure a set of Targets for
named environments like "prod", "stage", etc. Those can either exist in a
single Mufile, or the Mucluster file if they are shared amongst multiple
Mufiles. This can be specified at the command line as such:
$ mu build --target=stage
Furthermore, a given environment may be annointed the default, so that
$ mu build
selects that environment without needing to say so explicitly.
It is also possible to specify an architecture at the command line for
scenarios where you aren't intending to target an existing named environment.
This is good for "anonymous" testing scenarios or even just running locally:
$ mu build --arch=aws
$ mu build --arch=aws:ecs
$ mu build --arch=local:kubernetes
$ .. and so on ..
This change does little more than plumb these settings around, verify them,
etc., however it sets us up to actually start dispating to the right backend.
This change begins to lay the groundwork for doing semantic analysis and
lowering to the cloud target's representation. In particular:
* Split the mu/schema package. There is now mu/ast which contains the
core types and mu/encoding which concerns itself with JSON and YAML
serialization.
* Notably I am *not* yet introducing a second AST form. Instead, we will
keep the parse tree and AST unified for the time being. I envision very
little difference between them -- at least for now -- and so this keeps
things simpler, at the expense of two downsides: 1) the trees will be
mutable (which turns out to be a good thing for performance), and 2) some
fields will need to be ignored during de/serialization. We can always
revisit this later when and if the need to split them arises.
* Add a binder phase. It is currently a no-op.
This change includes some progress on actual compilation (albeit with several
TODOs remaining before we can actually spit out a useful artifact). There are
also some general cleanups sprinkled throughout. In a nutshell:
* Add a compiler.Context object that will be available during template expansion.
* Introduce a diag.Document abstraction. This is better than passing raw filenames
around, and lets us embellish diagnostics as we go. In particular, we will be
in a better position to provide line/column error information.
* Move IO out of the Parser and into the Compiler, where it can cache and reuse
Documents. This will become important as we start to load up dependencies.
* Rename PosRange to Location. This reads nicer with the new Document terminology.
* Rename the mu/api package to mu/schema. It's likely we will need to introduce a
true AST that is decoupled from the serialization format and contains bound nodes.
As a result, treating the existing types as "schema" is more honest.
* Add in a big section of TODOs at the end of the compiler.Compiler.Build function.
