The wording for refresh doesn't accurately convey that the operations
aren't actually mutating your resources, but instead are simply changing
your checkpoint state. This change (hopefully) helps in two ways:
First, put text just before the prompt:
Do you want to perform this refresh?
No resources will be modified as part of this refresh; just your stack's state will be.
Second, alter the summary ever-so-slightly, from:
info: 2 changes performed:
~ 2 resources updated
3 resources unchanged
to:
info: 2 changes refreshed:
~ 2 resources updated
3 resources unchanged
This reads just slightly better, and removes any sense of panic I might
have otherwise had that my refresh just did something wrong.
As I was in here, since I had to pass UpdateKind information to new
places, I cleaned up the situation where we had three mostly-similar
enums (but which actually diverged) and several areas where we were
using untyped strings for this same information. Now there's just one.
This fixespulumi/pulumi#1551.
* Add a list of in-flight operations to the deployment
This commit augments 'DeploymentV2' with a list of operations that are
currently in flight. This information is used by the engine to keep
track of whether or not a particular deployment is in a valid state.
The SnapshotManager is responsible for inserting and removing operations
from the in-flight operation list. When the engine registers an intent
to perform an operation, SnapshotManager inserts an Operation into this
list and saves it to the snapshot. When an operation completes, the
SnapshotManager removes it from the snapshot. From this, the engine can
infer that if it ever sees a deployment with pending operations, the
Pulumi CLI must have crashed or otherwise abnormally terminated before
seeing whether or not an operation completed successfully.
To remedy this state, this commit also adds code to 'pulumi stack
import' that clears all pending operations from a deployment, as well as
code to plan generation that will reject any deployments that have
pending operations present.
At the CLI level, if we see that we are in a state where pending
operations were in-flight when the engine died, we'll issue a
human-friendly error message that indicates which resources are in a bad
state and how to recover their stack.
* CR: Multi-line string literals, renaming in-flight -> pending
* CR: Add enum to apitype for operation type, also name status -> type for clarity
* Fix the yaml type
* Fix missed renames
* Add implementation for lifecycle_test.go
* Rebase against master
* Protobuf changes to record dependencies for read resources
* Add a number of tests for read resources, especially around replacement
* Place read resources in the snapshot with "external" bit set
Fixespulumi/pulumi#1521. This commit introduces two new step ops: Read
and ReadReplacement. The engine generates Read and ReadReplacement steps
when servicing ReadResource RPC calls from the language host.
* Fix an omission of OpReadReplace from the step list
* Rebase against master
* Transition to use V2 Resources by default
* Add a semantic "relinquish" operation to the engine
If the engine observes that a resource is read and also that the
resource exists in the snapshot as a non-external resource, it will not
delete the resource if the IDs of the old and new resources match.
* Typo fix
* CR: add missing comments, DeserializeDeployment -> DeserializeDeploymentV2, ID check
When a resource fails to initialize (i.e., it is successfully created,
but fails to transition to a fully-initialized state), and a user
subsequently runs `pulumi update` without changing that resource, our
CLI will fail to warn the user that this resource is not initialized.
This commit begins the process of allowing our CLI to report this by
storing a list of initialization errors in the checkpoint.
* Error when loading a deployment that is not a version that the CLI understands
* Add a test for 'pulumi stack import' on a badly-versioned deployment
* Move current deployment version to 'apitype'
* Rebase against master
* CR: emit CLI-friendly error message at the two points outside of the engine calling 'DeserializeDeployment'
This field indicates the schema of the serialized deployment. This field
behaves identically to the `Version` field of
`PatchUpdateCheckpointRequest`.
This is part of pulumi/pulumi-service#1046
And make the deployment an opaque JSON message. The verison field
indicates the schema of the deployment. A missing version field will
behave as if the version was set to `1`. A version of `1` indicates that
the serialized deployment has the `DeploymentV1` schema.
This is part of pulumi/pulumi-service#1046.
This covers most of the transitive closure of the types that appear in a
checkpoint. A breaking change to any of these types implies a bump in
the checkpoint version number.
This is part of pulumi/pulumi-service#1046.
* Lift snapshot management out of the engine
This PR is a prerequisite for parallelism by addressing a major problem
that the engine has to deal with when performing parallel resource
construction: parallel mutation of the global snapshot. This PR adds
a `SnapshotManager` type that is responsible for maintaining and
persisting the current resource snapshot. It serializes all reads and
writes to the global snapshot and persists the snapshot to persistent
storage upon every write.
As a side-effect of this, the core engine no longer needs to know about
snapshot management at all; all snapshot operations can be handled as
callbacks on deployment events. This will greatly simplify the
parallelization of the core engine.
Worth noting is that the core engine will still need to be able to read
the current snapshot, since it is interested in the dependency graphs
contained within. The full implications of that are out of scope of this
PR.
Remove dead code, Steps no longer need a reference to the plan iterator that created them
Fixing various issues that arise when bringing up pulumi-aws
Line length broke the build
Code review: remove dead field, fix yaml name error
Rebase against master, provide implementation of StackPersister for cloud backend
Code review feedback: comments on MutationStatus, style in snapshot.go
Code review feedback: move SnapshotManager to pkg/backend, change engine to use an interface SnapshotManager
Code review feedback: use a channel for synchronization
Add a comment and a new test
* Maintain two checkpoints, an immutable base and a mutable delta, and
periodically merge the two to produce snapshots
* Add a lot of tests - covers all of the non-error paths of BeginMutation and End
* Fix a test resource provider
* Add a few tests, fix a few issues
* Rebase against master, fixed merge
As part of the new identity model, we're going to use tagging on
stacks to record metadata, let's create a bag for that, as well as a
few well known tag names that map to metadata we know we'll want to set.
These changes add the API types and cloud backend code necessary to
interact with service-managed stacks (i.e. stacks that do not have
PPC-managed deployments). The bulk of these changes are unremarkable:
the API types are straightforward, as are most of the interactions with
the new APIs. The trickiest bits are token and log management.
During an update to a managed stack, the CLI must continually renew the
token used to authorize the operations on that stack that comprise the
update. Once a token has been renewed, the old token should be
discarded. The CLI supports this by running a goroutine that is
responsible for both periodically renewing the token for an update and
servicing requests for the token itself from the rest of the backend.
In addition to token renewal, log output must be captured and uploaded
to the service during an update to a managed stack. Implementing this in
a reasonable fashion required a bit of refactoring in order to reuse
what already exists for the local backend. Each event-specific `Display`
function was replaced with an equivalent `Render` function that returns
a string rather than writing to a stream. This approach was chosen
primarily to avoid dealing with sheared colorization tags, which would
otherwise require clients to fuse log lines before colorizing. We could
take that approach in the future.
We needed to have two types of `UpdateProgramRequest` to serve both newer shapes of Pulumi configuration values as well as the older, untyped version. (The original change was supporting the `ConfigValue` type, which had a flag to indiciate if the configuration value was encrypted or not.)
Now that LM has been migrated to the M10 bits https://github.com/pulumi/home/issues/168 , we can remove this type. (The PR to remove existing references in the `pulumi-service` repo is https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-service/pull/957.)
This takes the existing `apitype.Checkpoint` type and renames it to
`apitype.CheckpointV1` locking in the shape. In addition, we introduce
a `apitype.VersionedCheckpoint` type, which holds a version number and
a json document representing a checkpoint at that version. Now, when
reading a checkpoint, the CLI can determine if it's in a format it
understands, and fail gracefully if it is not.
While the CLI understands the older checkpoint version, it always
writes the newest version format, meaning that if you manage a
fire-and-forget stack with this version of the CLI, it will be
un-readable by previous versions.
Stacks managed by Pulumi.com are not impacted by this change.
Fixes: #887
By using untyped deployment structures via `json.RawMessage`, we can
support round-tripping between old CLI clients and newer servers, without
dropping possibly-important information on the floor. I hadn't realized
this design goal with the original system, and after talking to @pgavlin,
I better realized the intent and that we want to preserve this.
Despite our good progress moving towards having an apitype package,
where our exchange types live and can be shared among the engine and
our services, there were a few major types that were still duplciated.
Resource was the biggest example -- and indeed, the apitype varirant
was missing the new Dependencies property -- but there were others,
like Manfiest, PluginInfo, etc. These too had semi-random omissions.
This change merges all of these types into the apitype package. This
not only cleans up the redundancy and missing properties, but will
"force the issue" with respect to keeping them in sync and properly
versioning the information in a backwards compatible way.
The resource/stack package still exists as a simple marshaling layer
to and from the engine's core data types.
Finally, I've made the controversial change to share the actual
Deployment data structure at the apitype layer also. This will force
us to confront differences in that data structure similarly, and will
allow us to leverage the strong typing throughout to catch issues.
This PR adds a new `pulumi history` command, which prints the update history for a stack.
The local backend stores the update history in a JSON file on disk, next to the checkpoint file. The cloud backend simply provides the update metadata, and expects to receive all the data from a (NYI) `/history` REST endpoint.
`pkg/backend/updates.go` defines the data that is being persisted. The way the data is wired through the system is adding a new `backend.UpdateMetadata` parameter to a Stack/Backend's `Update` and `Destroy` methods.
I use `tests/integration/stack_outputs/` as the simple app for the related tests, hence the addition to the `.gitignore` and fixing the name in the `Pulumi.yaml`.
Fixes#636.
Previously, the `pulumi` tool did not show any indication of progress
when doing a deployment. Combined with the fact that we do not create
resources in parallel it meant that sometime `pulumi` would appear to
hang, when really it was just waiting on some resource to be created
in AWS. In addition, some AWS resources take a long time to create and
CI systems like travis will kill the job if there is no output. This
causes us (and our customers) to have to do crazy dances where we
launch shell scripts that write a dot to the console every once in a
while so we don't get killed. While we plan to overhaul the output
logic (see #617), we take a first step towards interactivity by simply
having a nice little spinner (in the interactive case) and when run
non interactive have `pulumi` print a message that it is still
working.
Fixes#794
This PR surfaces the configuration options available to updates, previews, and destroys to the Pulumi Service. As part of this I refactored the options to unify them into a single `engine.UpdateOptions`, since they were all overlapping to various degrees.
With this PR we are adding several new flags to commands, e.g. `--summary` was not available on `pulumi destroy`.
There are also a few minor breaking changes.
- `pulumi destroy --preview` is now `pulumi destroy --dry-run` (to match the actual name of the field).
- The default behavior for "--color" is now `Always`. Previously it was `Always` or `Never` based on the value of a `--debug` flag. (You can specify `--color always` or `--color never` to get the exact behavior.)
Fixes#515, and cleans up the code making some other features slightly easier to add.
This improves the overall cloud CLI experience workflow.
Now whether a stack is local or cloud is inherent to the stack
itself. If you interact with a cloud stack, we transparently talk
to the cloud; if you interact with a local stack, we just do the
right thing, and perform all operations locally. Aside from sometimes
seeing a cloud emoji pop-up ☁️, the experience is quite similar.
For example, to initialize a new cloud stack, simply:
$ pulumi login
Logging into Pulumi Cloud: https://pulumi.com/
Enter Pulumi access token: <enter your token>
$ pulumi stack init my-cloud-stack
Note that you may log into a specific cloud if you'd like. For
now, this is just for our own testing purposes, but someday when we
support custom clouds (e.g., Enterprise), you can just say:
$ pulumi login --cloud-url https://corp.acme.my-ppc.net:9873
The cloud is now the default. If you instead prefer a "fire and
forget" style of stack, you can skip the login and pass `--local`:
$ pulumi stack init my-faf-stack --local
If you are logged in and run `pulumi`, we tell you as much:
$ pulumi
Usage:
pulumi [command]
// as before...
Currently logged into the Pulumi Cloud ☁️https://pulumi.com/
And if you list your stacks, we tell you which one is local or not:
$ pulumi stack ls
NAME LAST UPDATE RESOURCE COUNT CLOUD URL
my-cloud-stack 2017-12-01 ... 3 https://pulumi.com/
my-faf-stack n/a 0 n/a
And `pulumi stack` by itself prints information like your cloud org,
PPC name, and so on, in addition to the usuals.
I shall write up more details and make sure to document these changes.
This change also fairly significantly refactors the layout of cloud
versus local logic, so that the cmd/ package is resonsible for CLI
things, and the new pkg/backend/ package is responsible for the
backends. The following is the overall resulting package architecture:
* The backend.Backend interface can be implemented to substitute
a new backend. This has operations to get and list stacks,
perform updates, and so on.
* The backend.Stack struct is a wrapper around a stack that has
or is being manipulated by a Backend. It resembles our existing
Stack notions in the engine, but carries additional metadata
about its source. Notably, it offers functions that allow
operations like updating and deleting on the Backend from which
it came.
* There is very little else in the pkg/backend/ package.
* A new package, pkg/backend/local/, encapsulates all local state
management for "fire and forget" scenarios. It simply implements
the above logic and contains anything specific to the local
experience.
* A peer package, pkg/backend/cloud/, encapsulates all logic
required for the cloud experience. This includes its subpackage
apitype/ which contains JSON schema descriptions required for
REST calls against the cloud backend. It also contains handy
functions to list which clouds we have authenticated with.
* A subpackage here, pkg/backend/state/, is not a provider at all.
Instead, it contains all of the state management functions that
are currently shared between local and cloud backends. This
includes configuration logic -- including encryption -- as well
as logic pertaining to which stacks are known to the workspace.
This addresses pulumi/pulumi#629 and pulumi/pulumi#494.
This PR just wires the `Package.Main` field to the Pulumi Service (and in subsequent PRs, the `pulumi-service` and `pulumi-ppc` repos).
@joeduffy , should we just upload the entire `package.Package` type with the `UpdateProgramRequest` type? I'm not sure we want to treat that type as part of part of our public API surface area. But on the other hand, we'll need to mirror relevant fields in N places if we don't.
In an effort to improve performance and overall reliability, this PR moves the responsibility of uploading the Pulumi program from the Pulumi Service to the CLI. (Part of fixing https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-service/issues/313.)
Previously the CLI would send (the dozens of MiB) program archive to the Service, which would then upload the data to S3. Now the CLI sends the data to S3 directly, avoiding the unnecessary copying of data around.
The Service-side API changes are in https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-service/pull/323. I tested previews, updates, and destroys running the service and PPC on localhost.
The PR refactors how we handle the three kinds of program updates, and just unifies them into a single method. This makes the diff look crazy, but the code should be much simpler. I'm not sure what to do about supporting all the engine options for the Cloud-variants of Pulumi commands; I suspect that's something that should be handled at a later time.
This is the smallest possible thing that could work for both the local
development case and the case where we are targeting the Pulumi
Service.
Pulling down the pulumiframework and component packages here is a bit
of a feel bad, but we plan to rework the model soon enough to a
provider model which will remove the need for us to hold on to this
code (and will bring back the factoring where the CLI does not have
baked in knowledge of the Pulumi Cloud Framework).
Fixes#527
Rework the polling code for `pulumi` when targeting hosted scenarios. (i.e. absorb https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-service/pull/282.) We now return an `updateID` for update, preview, and destroy. And use bake that into the URL.
This PR also silently ignores 504 errors which are now returned from the Pulumi Service if the PPC request times out.
Combined, this should ameliorate some of the symptoms we see from https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-ppc/issues/60. Though we'll continue to try to identify and fix the root cause.
